Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800260.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800260
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748669270405

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 200 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Transformed 288 places.
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 05:27:53] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 288 places and 239 transitions and 699 arcs in 468 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 58 out of 288 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 288/288 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 285 transition count 239
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 265 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 265 transition count 219
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 256 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 256 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 256 transition count 203
Applied a total of 68 rules in 141 ms. Remains 256 /288 variables (removed 32) and now considering 203/239 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 203 rows 256 cols
[2025-05-31 05:27:54] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 63 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 878 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 666 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1641 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 255/288 places, 203/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 255 /255 variables (removed 0) and now considering 203/203 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1824 ms. Remains : 255/288 places, 203/239 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 255 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 05:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 203 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (349 resets) in 2047 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 2/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (52 resets) in 311 ms. (128 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (63 resets) in 398 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 203 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-31 05:27:57] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/57 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 110/167 variables, 26/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/230 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/238 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 190/428 variables, 238/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 21/449 variables, 12/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 5/454 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/456 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/458 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/57 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 110/167 variables, 26/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/230 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/238 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 190/428 variables, 238/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 21/449 variables, 12/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 5/454 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/456 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/458 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 941 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1668ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 96 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 250 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 250 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 233 transition count 182
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 233 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 223 transition count 172
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 216 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 216 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 216 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 215 transition count 159
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 215 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 214 transition count 158
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 212 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 212 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 212 transition count 154
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 212 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 210 transition count 152
Performed 78 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 78 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 132 transition count 74
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 130 transition count 76
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 130 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 128 transition count 74
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 128 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 127 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 126 transition count 73
Applied a total of 256 rules in 208 ms. Remains 126 /255 variables (removed 129) and now considering 73/203 (removed 130) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 208 ms. Remains : 126/255 places, 73/203 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2084 resets) in 554 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (448 resets) in 166 ms. (239 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1107130 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=368 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1107130 steps, saw 167591 distinct states, run finished after 3013 ms. (steps per millisecond=367 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:02] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/11 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 36/47 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/77 variables, 21/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 28/105 variables, 17/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 7/112 variables, 7/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 67/179 variables, 112/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 13/192 variables, 8/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/194 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 4/198 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 1/199 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 277 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/11 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 36/47 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/77 variables, 21/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 28/105 variables, 17/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 7/112 variables, 7/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 67/179 variables, 112/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 13/192 variables, 8/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/194 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 4/198 variables, 3/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 1/199 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 238 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 536ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 2393 steps, including 96 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=239 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 15 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Computed a total of 66 stabilizing places and 59 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 247 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 232 transition count 182
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 232 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 222 transition count 172
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 215 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 215 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 215 transition count 161
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 215 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 214 transition count 160
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 212 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 212 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 212 transition count 156
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 212 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 210 transition count 154
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 133 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 132 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 130 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 129 transition count 75
Applied a total of 240 rules in 102 ms. Remains 129 /255 variables (removed 126) and now considering 75/203 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:03] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:28:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 337 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 593 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/203 variables, 128/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 6133 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/203 variables, 128/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 72/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 17327 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23511ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/255 places, 75/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24221 ms. Remains : 129/255 places, 75/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 268 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 13 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 24604 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 247 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 231 transition count 181
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 231 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 221 transition count 171
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 215 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 215 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 215 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 214 transition count 159
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 214 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 213 transition count 158
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 211 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 211 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 211 transition count 154
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 211 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 209 transition count 152
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 133 transition count 76
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 131 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 129 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 128 transition count 76
Applied a total of 243 rules in 80 ms. Remains 128 /255 variables (removed 127) and now considering 76/203 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 291 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 503 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/127 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 76/203 variables, 127/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 9293 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/127 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 76/203 variables, 127/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 72/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 18043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27381ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27383ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/255 places, 76/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27985 ms. Remains : 128/255 places, 76/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 28073 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 247 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 231 transition count 181
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 231 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 221 transition count 171
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 214 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 214 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 214 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 213 transition count 158
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 213 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 212 transition count 157
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 210 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 210 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 210 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 210 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 208 transition count 151
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 16 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 136 transition count 79
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 134 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 132 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 131 transition count 79
Applied a total of 237 rules in 105 ms. Remains 131 /255 variables (removed 124) and now considering 79/203 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 131 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 361 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 577 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 75 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 24/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/129 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/131 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/210 variables, 131/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 6699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 131/131 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 24/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 6/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/129 variables, 7/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/131 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/210 variables, 131/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 75/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 3/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 42 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 24298 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 131/131 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 31036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31040ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 131/255 places, 79/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31734 ms. Remains : 131/255 places, 79/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 14 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 31902 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U G(((p1 U p2)||X(X(X(p3)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 247 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 247 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 247 transition count 192
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 244 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 244 transition count 186
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 244 /255 variables (removed 11) and now considering 186/203 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-31 05:29:28] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 432 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 636 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 185 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 158 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 10/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 231 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 169 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 4/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 12/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 13/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 5/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 176 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 51/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 8/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 185/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 2/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 560 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60094ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/255 places, 186/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60742 ms. Remains : 244/255 places, 186/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 2333 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), true, (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), false]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 63135 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(((X(!p0)||G(p1))&&(!p2||G(!p3)))) U X(p3)))'
Support contains 7 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 245 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 245 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 189
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 242 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 242 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 242 transition count 184
Applied a total of 32 rules in 17 ms. Remains 242 /255 variables (removed 13) and now considering 184/203 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-31 05:30:31] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:30:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 482 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 744 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 11/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 184/426 variables, 242/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 181 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 209 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 9/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 13/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 116 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 3/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 58/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 184/426 variables, 242/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 183/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 173 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 8/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60062ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/255 places, 184/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60826 ms. Remains : 242/255 places, 184/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 503 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p3) p0), (NOT p3), false, (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0), true, (OR (AND p0 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p2) p3), (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p2 p3)), (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 30664 reset in 538 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 30705 reset in 418 ms.
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 434 edges and 242 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Detected a total of 64/242 stabilizing places and 57/184 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3)))), (X p1), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p3) p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p3)))), (X (X (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 383 ms. Reduced automaton from 12 states, 28 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 32 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 583 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) p2 (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (NOT p3), true, (OR (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))), (AND p3 (NOT p2)), (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p2 p3)), (NOT p1), false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (352 resets) in 755 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 2/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (66 resets) in 332 ms. (120 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (58 resets) in 387 ms. (103 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/50 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 123/173 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 50/223 variables, 26/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/226 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 171/397 variables, 226/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 19/416 variables, 11/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 6/422 variables, 3/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/424 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/426 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/426 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 270 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/50 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 123/173 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/223 variables, 26/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/226 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 3/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 171/397 variables, 226/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 19/416 variables, 11/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 6/422 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/424 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 2/426 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/426 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 426/426 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1059 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1342ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 17992 steps, including 339 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=227 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 80 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3)))), (X p1), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p3) p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p3)))), (X (X (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p3) p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p3 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p3) p1) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p3 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p3) p2))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p3 (NOT p2)) (OR p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) p1) (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p3 p1) (OR p0 p1 p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) p3 (NOT p1)) (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p3) p1 p2))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR p0 p3 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2)))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p3 p1)))
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 423 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 32 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 65626 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X((X(F(p2))||p1))))'
Support contains 5 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 246 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 246 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 246 transition count 191
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 242 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 242 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 242 transition count 184
Applied a total of 32 rules in 20 ms. Remains 242 /255 variables (removed 13) and now considering 184/203 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:31:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 414 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 651 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 11/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 184/426 variables, 242/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 218 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 219 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 9/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 13/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 58/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 184/426 variables, 242/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 183/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 8/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60057ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/255 places, 184/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60732 ms. Remains : 242/255 places, 184/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 248 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 163 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 155 ms.
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 434 edges and 242 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 61347 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((p0&&(p1 U p2))) U X(p3)))'
Support contains 6 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 246 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 246 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 246 transition count 190
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 243 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 243 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 243 transition count 185
Applied a total of 30 rules in 11 ms. Remains 243 /255 variables (removed 12) and now considering 185/203 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-31 05:32:38] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:32:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 550 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 818 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:32:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 32/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 16/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 185/428 variables, 243/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 213 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 20/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 11/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 17/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30088ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30090ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/255 places, 185/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30921 ms. Remains : 243/255 places, 185/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 371 ms :[(NOT p3), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 5123 steps with 359 reset in 18 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 31345 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||X(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 245 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 245 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 189
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 241 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 241 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 241 transition count 182
Applied a total of 35 rules in 19 ms. Remains 241 /255 variables (removed 14) and now considering 182/203 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-31 05:33:09] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 309 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:33:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 564 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 877 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 160 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 9/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 225 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 217 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 5/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/423 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 44/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 16/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 181/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 1/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/423 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/255 places, 182/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60951 ms. Remains : 241/255 places, 182/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 158 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 207 ms.
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 431 edges and 241 vertex of which 236 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Computed a total of 64 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 14 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 61477 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((((F(p1) U p2)&&p0)||((F(p1) U p2)&&G(p3))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 248 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 235 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 183
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 224 transition count 174
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 217 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 217 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 217 transition count 162
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 216 transition count 161
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 216 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 215 transition count 160
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 213 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 213 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 213 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 212 transition count 155
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 212 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 211 transition count 154
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 134 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 133 transition count 77
Applied a total of 238 rules in 65 ms. Remains 133 /255 variables (removed 122) and now considering 77/203 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 133 cols
[2025-05-31 05:34:11] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 269 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/255 places, 77/203 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 340 ms. Remains : 132/255 places, 77/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 454 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 27 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 819 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((p0||G(p1)))||X(p2)||F((p0&&X(F(p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 245 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 245 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 189
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 241 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 241 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 241 transition count 182
Applied a total of 35 rules in 15 ms. Remains 241 /255 variables (removed 14) and now considering 182/203 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-31 05:34:11] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 316 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:34:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 569 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 888 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 179 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 153 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 9/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 223 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 219 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 5/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s10 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)timeout

( org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/423 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 44/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 16/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 181/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 1/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/423 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/255 places, 182/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60955 ms. Remains : 241/255 places, 182/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 294 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 85 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 61280 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&(p1||(G((p2||F(p3))) U p3))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 248 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 232 transition count 182
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 232 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 222 transition count 172
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 216 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 216 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 216 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 215 transition count 160
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 215 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 214 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 213 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 213 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 213 transition count 157
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 213 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 212 transition count 156
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 139 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 137 transition count 85
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 137 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 135 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 134 transition count 83
Applied a total of 233 rules in 49 ms. Remains 134 /255 variables (removed 121) and now considering 83/203 (removed 120) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 134 cols
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 250 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 05:35:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 7/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 83/216 variables, 133/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 10317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 5/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 83/216 variables, 133/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 80/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40338ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40339ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/255 places, 83/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40847 ms. Remains : 134/255 places, 83/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 254 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 24 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 41122 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||X(F((p0&&F(p1))))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 460 edges and 255 vertex of which 248 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 247 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 233 transition count 183
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 233 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 223 transition count 173
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 216 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 216 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 216 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 215 transition count 160
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 215 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 214 transition count 159
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 212 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 212 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 212 transition count 155
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 212 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 210 transition count 153
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 134 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 132 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 130 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 129 transition count 77
Applied a total of 241 rules in 55 ms. Remains 129 /255 variables (removed 126) and now considering 77/203 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 360 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 559 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:35:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/205 variables, 128/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/206 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 6961 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/205 variables, 128/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 74/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 206/206 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 16598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23579ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23580ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/255 places, 77/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24207 ms. Remains : 129/255 places, 77/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 10 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 24341 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(G((p0&&F(G(p1)))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 203/203 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 247 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 247 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 247 transition count 192
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 244 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 244 transition count 186
Applied a total of 28 rules in 12 ms. Remains 244 /255 variables (removed 11) and now considering 186/203 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-31 05:36:18] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:36:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 385 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 614 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 185 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:36:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 9/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 198 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 2/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 6/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 48/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 185/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 9/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/255 places, 186/203 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60671 ms. Remains : 244/255 places, 186/203 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 273 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DES-PT-02b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 60976 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 566508 ms.

BK_STOP 1748669839631

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800260"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-02b.tgz
mv DES-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;