Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800258.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800258
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748665656639

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 206 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Transformed 288 places.
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 04:27:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 288 places and 239 transitions and 699 arcs in 453 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Support contains 121 out of 288 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 288/288 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 285 transition count 239
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 274 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 274 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 273 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 273 transition count 227
Applied a total of 27 rules in 150 ms. Remains 273 /288 variables (removed 15) and now considering 227/239 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 273 cols
[2025-05-31 04:27:40] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 37 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 719 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:27:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 659 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1465 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/288 places, 227/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 272 /272 variables (removed 0) and now considering 227/227 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1663 ms. Remains : 272/288 places, 227/239 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 272 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 70 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
Support contains 117 out of 272 places (down from 121) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 79 to 78
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (334 resets) in 2744 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 6/78 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (45 resets) in 266 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (58 resets) in 235 ms. (169 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (45 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 272 cols
[2025-05-31 04:27:43] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 94/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 95/196 variables, 21/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/247 variables, 25/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 6/253 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 211/464 variables, 253/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 21/485 variables, 12/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 4/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 16/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 0/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 6/491 variables, 3/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 0/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/495 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 4/499 variables, 2/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/499 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 499/499 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 3635 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/12 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 182/194 variables, 32/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 6/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/247 variables, 25/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 9/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 6/253 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 211/464 variables, 253/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 21/485 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 6/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 2/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 0/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 6/491 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 0/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 4/495 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 4/499 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/499 variables, 0/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 499/499 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 921 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4600ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 150 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 265 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 205
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 241 transition count 196
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 224 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 224 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 224 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 223 transition count 174
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 223 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 222 transition count 173
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 212 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 212 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 212 transition count 153
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 211 transition count 152
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 211 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 208 transition count 149
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 131 transition count 72
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 129 transition count 74
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 129 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 128 transition count 73
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 128 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 127 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 126 transition count 72
Applied a total of 294 rules in 167 ms. Remains 126 /272 variables (removed 146) and now considering 72/227 (removed 155) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 167 ms. Remains : 126/272 places, 72/227 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 36184 steps (1852 resets) in 833 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
Computed a total of 69 stabilizing places and 62 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.9 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 253 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 253 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 253 transition count 204
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 242 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 242 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 242 transition count 184
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 241 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 241 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 241 transition count 182
Applied a total of 76 rules in 37 ms. Remains 241 /272 variables (removed 31) and now considering 182/227 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 330 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 582 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 155 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 9/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 175 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 5/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 423/423 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 59/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 182/423 variables, 241/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 181/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 4/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/423 variables, and 550 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60091ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/272 places, 182/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60716 ms. Remains : 241/272 places, 182/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15633082262687386914.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10259524935157677315.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15633082262687386914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10259524935157677315.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13608238615803588295.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13608238615803588295.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13608238615803588295.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13608238615803588295.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13608238615803588295.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10455789717627072561.gal : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17012875089838996833.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10455789717627072561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17012875089838996833.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.045e+17,2.91464,66632,6657,90,177672,917,617,155805,87,2887,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX(((EG(((i10.u69.p255==1)&&(i12.u78.p284==1))) * AF((i9.i0.i1.u50.p187==1))) * !((((i3.u12.p52==1)&&(i7.u44.p170==1))&&(i9.i0.i1.u53...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,!((E((i8.u40.p156==1) U E(TRUE U ((i11.u73.p265==1)&&(i11.u75.p273==1)))) + ((i5.u23.p85==1)&&(i5...599
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t87, t134, t143, t144, t176, i0.u33.t79, i0.u34.t76, i1.u14.t112, i1.u16.t109, i2.t1...729
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 264 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 209
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 243 transition count 200
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 226 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 226 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 225 transition count 178
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 225 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 224 transition count 177
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 214 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 214 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 214 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 156
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 210 transition count 153
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 141 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 139 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 138 transition count 82
Applied a total of 264 rules in 81 ms. Remains 138 /272 variables (removed 134) and now considering 82/227 (removed 145) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 138 cols
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 363 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:29:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/137 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/219 variables, 137/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 5112 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/137 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/219 variables, 137/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 79/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 26972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 32109ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32113ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/272 places, 82/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32566 ms. Remains : 138/272 places, 82/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17585862731714194348.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5478112077628186385.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17585862731714194348.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5478112077628186385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.0475e+10,17.9179,351596,2,347101,5,1.81774e+06,6,0,631,1.65694e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17040243638606690280.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17040243638606690280.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17040243638606690280.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17040243638606690280.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17040243638606690280.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16117499061546483399.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16102790798454047043.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16117499061546483399.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16102790798454047043.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.0475e+10,0.209223,10232,1505,98,12305,275,315,30057,82,660,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((i13.u40.p218==1)||(i14.u46.p257==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i13.u40.p218==1)||(i14.u46.p257==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t70, t73, t74, t78, u0.t47, u1.t17, u51.t1, i1.u2.t14, i1.u2.t20, i3.t57, i3.u6.t12, i4.t55, ...307
(forward)formula 0,0,0.978902,36216,1,0,82409,788,1491,133382,445,2274,143625
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 254 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 254 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 254 transition count 205
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 243 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 243 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 243 transition count 185
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 242 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 242 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 242 transition count 183
Applied a total of 74 rules in 18 ms. Remains 242 /272 variables (removed 30) and now considering 183/227 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-31 04:30:53] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:30:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 439 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 633 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 146 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 13/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 164 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 217 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 19/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 354 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 51/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 182/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 166 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 5/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 553 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/272 places, 183/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60711 ms. Remains : 242/272 places, 183/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17846778028564885170.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6286638297095269802.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17846778028564885170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6286638297095269802.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5648728588633248333.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5648728588633248333.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5648728588633248333.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5648728588633248333.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5648728588633248333.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4908704295467885516.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7447253060220892964.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4908704295467885516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7447253060220892964.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08675e+17,0.835133,23704,2926,89,47530,682,686,62429,95,1926,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((i9.i1.u57.p210==1)&&(i9.i1.u57.p237==1)) + (!(EX(((i2.u10.p37!=1)||((((i8.u45.p167==1)&&(i8.u45.p169==1))&&((i7.u44.p171==1)&&(i7.u4...418
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U ((i9.i0.u66.p243==1)&&(i11.u72.p263==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U ((i9.i0.u66.p243==...607
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t55, t59, t88, t135, t145, t177, i0.i0.u74.t24, i0.i0.u74.t26, i0.i1.u32.t80, i0.i2.u34.t...753
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 259 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 259 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 259 transition count 211
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 252 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 252 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 252 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 251 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 251 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 251 transition count 197
Applied a total of 51 rules in 23 ms. Remains 251 /272 variables (removed 21) and now considering 197/227 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 251 cols
[2025-05-31 04:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 370 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 578 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 197/448 variables, 251/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 6/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/448 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 251/251 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 46/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 7/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 197/448 variables, 251/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 196/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 18/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60061ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 251/272 places, 197/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60664 ms. Remains : 251/272 places, 197/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8475157094374897130.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3653130345775337407.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8475157094374897130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3653130345775337407.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12652369812084461975.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12652369812084461975.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12652369812084461975.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12652369812084461975.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12652369812084461975.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 5 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16905760499082949629.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1728604289959208323.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16905760499082949629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1728604289959208323.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.25054e+17,3.06219,65612,4831,92,102513,1269,658,378055,97,4575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(E((((i4.u4.p16==1)&&(i4.u12.p38==1))||(i1.u18.p71==1)) U (((i10.u60.p210==1)&&(i10.u60.p237==1))&&((i9.i0.i1.u44.p174==1)&&(i9.i0.i...766
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,((!(E((((i4.u4.p16==1)&&(i4.u12.p38==1))||(i1.u18.p71==1)) U (((i10.u60.p210==1)&&(i10.u60.p237==...2730
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t127, t144, t155, t156, i0.u79.t17, i1.u34.t79, i1.u18.t110, i1.u18.t111, i2.u8.t134...814
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 255 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 255 transition count 207
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 245 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 245 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 245 transition count 189
Applied a total of 65 rules in 14 ms. Remains 245 /272 variables (removed 27) and now considering 189/227 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-31 04:34:55] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:34:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 350 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 557 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 188 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:34:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 16/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 12/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 17/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 5/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 189/434 variables, 245/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 187 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 212 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 6/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 2/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 434/434 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 188/188 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 56/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 189/434 variables, 245/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 188/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 13/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60047ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/272 places, 189/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60622 ms. Remains : 245/272 places, 189/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4522946425309389198.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11975669306370699599.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4522946425309389198.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11975669306370699599.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5859633407476677720.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5859633407476677720.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5859633407476677720.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5859633407476677720.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5859633407476677720.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13789146559552052999.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5165431173236115186.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13789146559552052999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5165431173236115186.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64649e+17,0.95829,29952,2938,91,54009,594,709,102417,95,1663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(EX(((A((i6.i1.u26.p95==1) U ((i3.i0.u11.p40==1)&&(i5.u31.p130==1))) * AX((i10.i1.u49.p183==1))) * ((i3.i1.u12.p48==1)||(i5.u30.p125...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(EX(((!((E(!(((i3.i0.u11.p40==1)&&(i5.u31.p130==1))) U (!((i6.i1.u26.p95==1)) * !(((i3.i0.u11.p40...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t60, t62, t87, t139, t150, t151, t183, i0.u78.t17, i1.i1.u32.t79, i2.t124, i2.u...763
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 264 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 251 transition count 208
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 251 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 241 transition count 198
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 226 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 226 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 225 transition count 178
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 216 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 216 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 216 transition count 161
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 216 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 213 transition count 158
Performed 67 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 146 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 146 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 144 transition count 88
Applied a total of 252 rules in 56 ms. Remains 144 /272 variables (removed 128) and now considering 88/227 (removed 139) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 144 cols
[2025-05-31 04:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 263 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 04:36:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/140 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 14/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 88/231 variables, 143/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/232 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 7729 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/140 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 14/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 88/231 variables, 143/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 82/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 37751ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37752ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/272 places, 88/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38244 ms. Remains : 144/272 places, 88/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4993772662559721415.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14502951026532701356.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4993772662559721415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14502951026532701356.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49918e+11,14.6522,281800,2,317175,5,1.44006e+06,6,0,657,1.29213e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4214353092882727320.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4214353092882727320.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4214353092882727320.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4214353092882727320.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4214353092882727320.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16892377777810934425.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2752154611318581797.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16892377777810934425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2752154611318581797.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49918e+11,0.287473,10700,2008,98,18521,271,371,17612,90,601,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(!((((i8.i0.u21.p161!=1)&&(i2.i0.u8.p81==1)) + AF((i0.u4.p48==1)))) U AF(((u18.p140==1)&&(i4.i1.u48.p248==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((u18.p140==1)&&(i4.i1.u48.p248==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((u18.p140==1)&&(i...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t60, t76, t79, t80, t81, t84, u18.t63, u53.t0, i0.t52, i0.u3.t10, i0.u4.t13, i1.t62, i1....331
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 267 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 266 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 254 transition count 211
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 254 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 245 transition count 202
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 228 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 228 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 228 transition count 181
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 228 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 227 transition count 180
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 217 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 217 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 217 transition count 161
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 217 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 214 transition count 158
Performed 66 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 148 transition count 92
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 148 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 146 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 145 transition count 90
Applied a total of 254 rules in 53 ms. Remains 145 /272 variables (removed 127) and now considering 90/227 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 145 cols
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 252 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 429 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:38:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 15/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/144 variables, 10/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 90/234 variables, 144/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 210 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 11507 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 15/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 4/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/144 variables, 10/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 90/234 variables, 144/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 84/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 26764 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 38293ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38295ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/272 places, 90/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38789 ms. Remains : 145/272 places, 90/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2327222335535451812.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13559710999594118010.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2327222335535451812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13559710999594118010.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.20317e+11,16.3454,327496,2,350192,5,1.65786e+06,6,0,666,1.50921e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3630247457640345281.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3630247457640345281.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3630247457640345281.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3630247457640345281.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3630247457640345281.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5453870881462336860.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13312748372223123854.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5453870881462336860.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13312748372223123854.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.20317e+11,0.309017,10200,1723,118,15386,372,379,18342,90,939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!((!(((!((i0.u3.p50==1)&&(i0.u4.p45==1)))&&(!((i1.i0.u9.p87==1)||(i5.i3.u26.p187==1))))) + AG((i5.i0.u20.p165==1)))) U A(EF((EF((i10....263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!((!(((!((i0.u3.p50==1)&&(i0.u4.p45==1)))&&(!((i1.i0.u9.p87==1)||(i5.i3.u26.p187==1))))) + !(E(TRUE...491
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t80, t81, t85, u50.t1, i1.t63, i1.i0.u9.t43, i2.u0.t53, i2.u1.t19, i2.u2.t22, i3.t61, i3...323
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 256 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 256 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 256 transition count 208
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 247 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 247 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 247 transition count 192
Applied a total of 60 rules in 14 ms. Remains 247 /272 variables (removed 25) and now considering 192/227 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 247 cols
[2025-05-31 04:40:14] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:40:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 447 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 659 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 10/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 192/439 variables, 247/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 215 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 202 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 10/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 (/ 15.0 16.0))
(s5 0.0)
(s6 (/ 1.0 16.0))
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 (/ 15.0 16.0))
(s102 (/ 1.0 16.0))
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 (/ 15.0 16.0))
(s112 (/ 1.0 16.0))
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 439/439 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 247/247 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 49/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 8/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 192/439 variables, 247/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 191/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 5/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60042ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 247/272 places, 192/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60718 ms. Remains : 247/272 places, 192/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4972180499629278077.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14198568367458884932.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4972180499629278077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14198568367458884932.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12688461308310175381.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12688461308310175381.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12688461308310175381.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12688461308310175381.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12688461308310175381.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10620522024569060736.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9825053277686430883.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10620522024569060736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9825053277686430883.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.01713e+17,0.976183,30724,3997,79,64760,686,717,78114,90,2069,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(!(E((i2.u11.p35==1) U ((i12.u76.p265==1)&&(i12.u78.p270==1))))) * !(A(!(((i10.i1.u47.p166==1)&&(i10.i1.u54.p191==1))) U !(AG(((i1...339
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX(!(E((i2.u11.p35==1) U ((i12.u76.p265==1)&&(i12.u78.p270==1))))) * !(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE...1278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t56, t87, t99, t122, t141, t153, t154, t186, i0.i1.u36.t79, i1.i0.t132, i1.i0.u9.t12...756
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 257 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 257 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 257 transition count 209
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 247 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 247 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 247 transition count 191
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 246 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 246 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 246 transition count 189
Applied a total of 64 rules in 27 ms. Remains 246 /272 variables (removed 26) and now considering 189/227 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 246 cols
[2025-05-31 04:42:15] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:42:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 311 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 544 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 188 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:42:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 32/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 15/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 147 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 13/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 159 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 6/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 153 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 189/435 variables, 246/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 213 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 223 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 3/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 3/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 435/435 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 246/246 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 188/188 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 32/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 15/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 46/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 7/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 189/435 variables, 246/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 188/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 15/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 435/435 variables, and 565 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 246/246 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 188/188 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60064ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60065ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 246/272 places, 189/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60638 ms. Remains : 246/272 places, 189/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17020953102882602098.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4098825072818744938.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17020953102882602098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4098825072818744938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8052452940443941153.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8052452940443941153.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8052452940443941153.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8052452940443941153.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8052452940443941153.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16226618273673258265.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1292617699186601182.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16226618273673258265.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1292617699186601182.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.55695e+17,1.61993,45332,4589,95,82303,935,655,190915,94,3048,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((!(A(((i1.u1.p8==1)&&(i12.u76.p280==1)) U EG((i6.u23.p84==1)))) + AG((i4.u15.p58==1)))) * E(((i4.u18.p69==1)&&(i11.u73.p267==1)) U A(...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(!(!((E(!(EG((i6.u23.p84==1))) U (!(((i1.u1.p8==1)&&(i12.u76.p280==1))) * !(EG((i6.u23.p84=...436
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t52, t54, t87, t139, t150, t151, i0.u34.t76, i1.u33.t79, i2.t138, i2.u13.t119, i3.t1...754
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 264 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 209
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 242 transition count 199
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 225 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 225 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 225 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 224 transition count 177
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 224 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 223 transition count 176
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 213 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 213 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 212 transition count 155
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 212 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 209 transition count 152
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 138 transition count 81
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 138 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 136 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 135 transition count 79
Applied a total of 271 rules in 44 ms. Remains 135 /272 variables (removed 137) and now considering 79/227 (removed 148) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 135 cols
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 314 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 544 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:44:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/134 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/213 variables, 134/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4859 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/134 variables, 7/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/213 variables, 134/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 76/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 12432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17300ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17300ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/272 places, 79/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17895 ms. Remains : 135/272 places, 79/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 159 steps (3 resets) in 4 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7876865355444443414.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8962630182261469497.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7876865355444443414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8962630182261469497.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 264 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 251 transition count 208
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 251 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 241 transition count 198
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 224 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 224 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 224 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 223 transition count 176
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 223 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 222 transition count 175
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 213 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 213 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 213 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 212 transition count 156
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 212 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 209 transition count 153
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 140 transition count 84
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 140 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 138 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 137 transition count 82
Applied a total of 267 rules in 71 ms. Remains 137 /272 variables (removed 135) and now considering 82/227 (removed 145) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 137 cols
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 411 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:44:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/136 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/218 variables, 136/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/136 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 82/218 variables, 136/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 78/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 20122 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25419ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25420ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/272 places, 82/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25912 ms. Remains : 137/272 places, 82/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10920636016987025574.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12830971968032922162.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10920636016987025574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12830971968032922162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.33345e+10,21.3873,388140,2,406598,5,2.01123e+06,6,0,626,1.83351e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16962381382339733964.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16962381382339733964.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16962381382339733964.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16962381382339733964.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16962381382339733964.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15669628124138053344.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13856779915973053710.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15669628124138053344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13856779915973053710.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.33345e+10,0.221426,9216,1390,101,12384,282,315,16557,83,607,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((i1.u0.p29==1)&&(i1.u8.p83==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((i1.u0.p29==1)&&(i1.u8.p83==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t55, t68, t71, t72, t76, t81, u50.t0, i0.u1.t11, i1.u7.t6, i1.u8.t4, i2.t53, i2.t52, i2....313
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,19.1606,495644,1,0,1.28886e+06,980,1644,1.33839e+06,467,3235,1393549
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 254 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 254 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 254 transition count 205
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 244 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 244 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 244 transition count 187
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 243 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 243 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 243 transition count 185
Applied a total of 71 rules in 14 ms. Remains 243 /272 variables (removed 29) and now considering 185/227 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-31 04:45:49] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 495 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 709 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 6/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 8/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 185/428 variables, 243/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 137 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 11/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 6/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s10 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 428/428 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 44/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 5/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 185/428 variables, 243/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 184/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 195 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 12/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 428/428 variables, and 552 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/272 places, 185/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60773 ms. Remains : 243/272 places, 185/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14073794114846129344.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4435012699401061396.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14073794114846129344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4435012699401061396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16755591470405824396.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16755591470405824396.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16755591470405824396.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16755591470405824396.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16755591470405824396.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6979041173725140160.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17000549774621663266.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6979041173725140160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17000549774621663266.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29156e+17,1.84864,37252,4036,88,68986,682,689,140501,92,2257,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AG(EX(EX((i6.u30.p119==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(EX((i6.u30.p119==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t89, t101, t121, t136, t145, t146, t178, i0.i1.u33.t79, i1.u79.t17, i2.u10.t123...751
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 499 edges and 272 vertex of which 265 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 264 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 209
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 252 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 243 transition count 200
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 226 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 226 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 225 transition count 178
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 225 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 224 transition count 177
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 214 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 214 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 214 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 156
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 210 transition count 153
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 139 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 137 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 136 transition count 80
Applied a total of 268 rules in 40 ms. Remains 136 /272 variables (removed 136) and now considering 80/227 (removed 147) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 136 cols
[2025-05-31 04:47:50] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 245 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 470 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/135 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/215 variables, 135/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 7243 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/135 variables, 7/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/215 variables, 135/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 77/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 21140 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28396ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28396ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/272 places, 80/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28926 ms. Remains : 136/272 places, 80/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17988785537670052742.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13960030026867702833.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17988785537670052742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13960030026867702833.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.01898e+10,21.1813,390848,2,373606,5,2.05706e+06,6,0,621,1.8899e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11362862829917170769.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11362862829917170769.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11362862829917170769.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11362862829917170769.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11362862829917170769.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17536726797948560038.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5480001808375486958.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17536726797948560038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5480001808375486958.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.01898e+10,0.144947,7788,1112,97,8341,286,307,13157,82,615,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((i14.u46.p257==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(i14.u46.p257==0))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,1.04071,36844,1,0,85294,732,1176,115932,335,2232,122518
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 256 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 256 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 256 transition count 208
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 247 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 247 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 247 transition count 191
Applied a total of 61 rules in 20 ms. Remains 247 /272 variables (removed 25) and now considering 191/227 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 247 cols
[2025-05-31 04:48:50] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 278 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:48:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 455 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 736 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 12/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 4/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/438 variables, 247/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 209 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 208 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 7/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 438/438 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 247/247 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 51/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 191/438 variables, 247/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 190/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 5/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 438/438 variables, and 560 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 247/247 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 247/272 places, 191/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60819 ms. Remains : 247/272 places, 191/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13152791169820656124.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8141704183199567982.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13152791169820656124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8141704183199567982.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10532677939418541059.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10532677939418541059.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10532677939418541059.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10532677939418541059.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10532677939418541059.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16758092625622296898.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9008300969759080266.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16758092625622296898.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9008300969759080266.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08641e+17,2.37525,51820,5494,78,105646,552,714,185863,87,1758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((!(E(((i1.i2.u4.p7==1)&&(i1.i2.u39.p139==1)) U (i3.i1.u9.p37==1))) * AX(((i11.i0.u73.p260==1)&&(i11.i0.u74.p262==1)))) * ((i1.i0.u0....398
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(E(((i1.i2.u4.p7==1)&&(i1.i2.u39.p139==1)) U (i3.i1.u9.p37==1))) * !(EX(!(((i11.i0...667
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t55, t140, t151, t152, i0.t17, i1.i1.u36.t80, i1.i2.u38.t77, i2.u14.t114, i2.u17.t111, i3...816
(forward)formula 0,0,24.4506,354972,1,0,587968,982,4159,1.68185e+06,461,3713,906633
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 253 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 253 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 253 transition count 204
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 243 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 243 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 243 transition count 185
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 242 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 242 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 242 transition count 183
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 242 /272 variables (removed 30) and now considering 183/227 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-31 04:50:46] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:50:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 493 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 725 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 148 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 161 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 20/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 5/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 148 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 15/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 55/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 182/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 200 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 3/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 551 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/272 places, 183/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60813 ms. Remains : 242/272 places, 183/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17524294389649360074.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3822550138129036749.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17524294389649360074.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3822550138129036749.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1274202241040398015.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1274202241040398015.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1274202241040398015.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1274202241040398015.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1274202241040398015.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12057666175034552646.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7232512156832893000.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12057666175034552646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7232512156832893000.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.20807e+17,1.46773,37724,3241,91,72416,936,621,138404,86,2449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((i7.u41.p152==1)&&(i7.u41.p275==1)) U !(E(EF((i12.u69.p244==1)) U (i5.u22.p81==1)))) + EX(EG((((i5.u32.p126==1)&&(i7.u35.p142==1))...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(E(E(TRUE U (i12.u69.p244==1)) U (i5.u22.p81==1)))) U (!(((i7.u41.p152==1)&&(i7.u41.p275==...361
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t87, t134, t143, t144, t155, t177, i0.u15.t112, i0.u17.t109, i1.u80.t17, i2.t11...732
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 255 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 255 transition count 206
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 247 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 247 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 247 transition count 192
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 246 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 246 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 246 transition count 190
Applied a total of 63 rules in 18 ms. Remains 246 /272 variables (removed 26) and now considering 190/227 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 246 cols
[2025-05-31 04:52:47] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 310 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:52:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 473 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 809 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 189 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 144 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 154 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 6/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 7/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 190/436 variables, 246/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 208 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30031ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 246/272 places, 190/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30862 ms. Remains : 246/272 places, 190/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16691863459125948129.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14433277691781578442.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16691863459125948129.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14433277691781578442.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9572540632747959212.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9572540632747959212.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9572540632747959212.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9572540632747959212.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9572540632747959212.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 25 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4535944338032189681.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18157810577989625241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4535944338032189681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18157810577989625241.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.2043e+17,1.12652,33016,4849,84,70676,645,728,87754,101,1639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((i3.i1.u15.p64==0)) * (AF(E(A((i6.u32.p125!=1) U EG((i12.i1.u38.p145==1))) U (((((i0.i0.u3.p11==1)&&(i0.i0.u34.p132==1))&&(i1.u7.p21=...405
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((i3.i1.u15.p64==0)))] = FALSE * [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(E(!((E(!(EG((i12.i1.u38.p145==1))) U (!((i6...657
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t56, t89, t93, t123, t139, t150, t151, t183, i0.i0.u34.t79, i1.u9.t125, i1.u9.t126, ...765
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph189895801911955907.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph189895801911955907.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph189895801911955907.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph189895801911955907.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph189895801911955907.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18217149016235804076.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10467622752225618111.ctl : 17 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18217149016235804076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10467622752225618111.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.73504e+18,1.34348,38308,4443,83,61039,736,641,194599,100,2369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX(((EG(((i11.u75.p255==1)&&(i0.u84.p284==1))) * AF((i8.u57.p187==1))) * !((((i4.u14.p52==1)&&(i8.u53.p170==1))&&(i8.u60.p197==1)))))...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,!((E((i9.u48.p156==1) U E(TRUE U ((i11.u77.p265==1)&&(i12.u81.p273==1)))) + ((i2.u24.p85==1)&&(i5...586
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t60, t96, t144, t164, t183, i0.u83.t17, i1.u20.t116, i1.u20.t117, i1.u16.t127, i1.u1...856
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 127 labels/synchronizations in 42 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9601656241872493151.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15609645167095848387.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9601656241872493151.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15609645167095848387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.73504e+18,56.0671,1223940,64593,358,1.51615e+06,1595,645,1.1359e+07,155,10923,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX(((EG(((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u119.p255==1)&&(i1.i1.i1.u105.p284==1))) * AF((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u108.p187==1)...510
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,!((E((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u144.p156==1) U E(TRUE U ((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u102.p265==1)&&(i1....996
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t163, i0.t0, i1.i0.i0.u20.t116, i1.i0.i0.u20.t117, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t122, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t124...2029
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:25:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 251 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:38] [INFO ] Transformed 272 places.
[2025-05-31 05:25:38] [INFO ] Transformed 227 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-31 05:25:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17961488568186870602.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8104971072034810138.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17961488568186870602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8104971072034810138.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.73504e+18,12.577,229456,2,124740,5,1.00575e+06,6,0,1315,950590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800258"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-02b.tgz
mv DES-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;