Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800257.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800257
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748665611838

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 04:26:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 04:26:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 198 ms
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Transformed 288 places.
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 288 places and 239 transitions and 699 arcs in 601 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 37 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 120 out of 288 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 288/288 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 285 transition count 239
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 276 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 276 transition count 230
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 274 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 274 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 274 transition count 227
Applied a total of 26 rules in 178 ms. Remains 274 /288 variables (removed 14) and now considering 227/239 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 274 cols
[2025-05-31 04:26:55] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 33 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:26:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 823 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:26:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:26:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 740 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1657 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 273/288 places, 227/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 273 /273 variables (removed 0) and now considering 227/227 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1885 ms. Remains : 273/288 places, 227/239 transitions.
Support contains 120 out of 273 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 04:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2025-05-31 04:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-31 04:26:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 273 places (down from 120) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (332 resets) in 3465 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 4/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (51 resets) in 425 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (47 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (58 resets) in 162 ms. (245 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (48 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 273 cols
[2025-05-31 04:26:59] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 73/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 115/200 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/248 variables, 23/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 7/255 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 212/467 variables, 255/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 19/486 variables, 11/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 6/492 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 4/496 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/496 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/500 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/500 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 500/500 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 883 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 273/273 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 73/83 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 115/198 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 50/248 variables, 23/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 271 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 7/255 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 212/467 variables, 255/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 19/486 variables, 11/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 3/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 6/492 variables, 3/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 4/496 variables, 2/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/496 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 4/500 variables, 2/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 0/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 0/500 variables, 0/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 500/500 variables, and 351 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 3103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 273/273 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/4 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4029ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 70 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 273 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 266 transition count 203
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 249 transition count 203
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 249 transition count 195
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 241 transition count 195
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 226 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 226 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 226 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 225 transition count 176
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 225 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 224 transition count 175
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 214 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 214 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 214 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 213 transition count 154
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 213 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 210 transition count 151
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 136 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 134 transition count 79
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 134 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 133 transition count 78
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 133 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 132 transition count 77
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 132 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 131 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 130 transition count 76
Applied a total of 287 rules in 125 ms. Remains 130 /273 variables (removed 143) and now considering 76/227 (removed 151) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 130/273 places, 76/227 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1390 resets) in 712 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (348 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1483851 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=494 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1483851 steps, saw 213112 distinct states, run finished after 3010 ms. (steps per millisecond=492 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-31 04:27:06] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 13/18 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/22 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 32/54 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 39/93 variables, 23/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 26/119 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/124 variables, 5/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 75/199 variables, 124/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 6/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 6/205 variables, 5/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/206 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 261 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 13/18 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/22 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 32/54 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 39/93 variables, 23/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 26/119 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/124 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 75/199 variables, 124/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 6/205 variables, 5/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 206/206 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 586 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 866ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 203 steps, including 3 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=101 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 8 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
Computed a total of 71 stabilizing places and 64 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.9 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 265 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 251 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 249 transition count 205
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 249 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 241 transition count 197
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 229 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 229 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 229 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 228 transition count 181
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 220 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 220 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 220 transition count 166
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 220 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 218 transition count 164
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 149 transition count 95
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 149 transition count 94
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 149 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 147 transition count 92
Applied a total of 247 rules in 109 ms. Remains 147 /273 variables (removed 126) and now considering 92/227 (removed 135) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 147 cols
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 472 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 92/238 variables, 146/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/239 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 239/239 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 14150 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 92/238 variables, 146/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 88/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/239 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 239/239 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 29852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 44054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44060ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/273 places, 92/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44662 ms. Remains : 147/273 places, 92/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4496700245940925034.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:27:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4909389451028854309.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4496700245940925034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4909389451028854309.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.68652e+11,24.0102,529668,2,552827,5,2.74938e+06,6,0,676,2.46582e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16769849069875627287.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16769849069875627287.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16769849069875627287.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16769849069875627287.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16769849069875627287.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10280888408362282369.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6888922500261716892.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10280888408362282369.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6888922500261716892.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.68652e+11,0.372006,10544,1231,97,14348,329,365,23838,81,773,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(E(((i4.u15.p121!=0)||(((i12.u50.p250==0)||(i3.u11.p102==1))&&((i0.u3.p42==0)||(u7.p73==1)))) U ((i12.u20.p155!=0) * AF(((i9.i2.u29....185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((i4.u15.p121!=0)||(((i12.u50.p250==0)||(i3.u11.p102==1))&&((i0.u3.p42==0)||(u7.p73==1)))) U...240
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t62, t63, t71, t80, t87, u7.t39, u54.t2, i0.t56, i0.u2.t11, i0.u4.t14, i2.t66, i2.u0.t51,...347
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 258 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 258 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 258 transition count 209
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 248 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 248 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 248 transition count 192
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 247 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 247 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 247 transition count 190
Applied a total of 63 rules in 24 ms. Remains 247 /273 variables (removed 26) and now considering 190/227 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 247 cols
[2025-05-31 04:28:53] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 495 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:28:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 441 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 941 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 189 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:28:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 183 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 242 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 190/437 variables, 247/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 159 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 13/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 14/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 1/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 3/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 437/437 variables, and 351 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 247/247 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/247 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 43/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 15/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 190/437 variables, 247/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 189/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 2/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 437/437 variables, and 558 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 247/247 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60097ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 247/273 places, 190/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61063 ms. Remains : 247/273 places, 190/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5621078176809242689.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:29:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13485164789898643369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5621078176809242689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13485164789898643369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18391497274280391292.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18391497274280391292.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18391497274280391292.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18391497274280391292.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18391497274280391292.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11626968887377215796.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16059529833890663906.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11626968887377215796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16059529833890663906.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46137e+17,1.51215,34764,3656,79,65200,502,742,106861,90,1182,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((AF((i12.i2.u81.p281==0)) * (i3.i0.u26.p93==1)) * ((i5.i1.u47.p174==1)&&(i2.i1.u27.p96==1))) * ((i1.i1.u14.p38==0)&&(i6.i0.u50.p169...409
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((!(EG(!((i12.i2.u81.p281==0)))) * (i3.i0.u26.p93==1)) * ((i5.i1.u47.p174==1)&&(i2.i1.u27.p96==1)...606
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t58, t123, t140, t151, t152, i0.t128, i0.u10.t126, i0.u11.t127, i1.i0.u9.t130, i1.i0...819
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 265 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 253 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 251 transition count 207
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 251 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 242 transition count 198
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 227 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 227 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 227 transition count 180
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 227 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 179
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 216 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 216 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 216 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 215 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 214 transition count 158
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 214 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 212 transition count 156
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 148 transition count 92
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 148 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 146 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 145 transition count 90
Applied a total of 252 rules in 111 ms. Remains 145 /273 variables (removed 128) and now considering 90/227 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 145 cols
[2025-05-31 04:30:54] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:30:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 322 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 558 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:30:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 11/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 23/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/144 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 90/234 variables, 144/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 17230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 11/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 23/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 9/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/144 variables, 7/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 90/234 variables, 144/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 86/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 47274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47276ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/273 places, 90/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47956 ms. Remains : 145/273 places, 90/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5426195567554274682.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality142441316317745686.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5426195567554274682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality142441316317745686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5840783367868028205.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5840783367868028205.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5840783367868028205.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5840783367868028205.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5840783367868028205.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16231416090658928488.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13719218150944626524.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16231416090658928488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13719218150944626524.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44499e+11,0.202563,10020,1735,128,15555,361,391,15861,93,837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((EF(((i2.u9.p108==0)||(i3.u16.p145==1))) + (i0.u3.p50==0)) + (i2.u11.p107==1))) + AG(((((i11.u35.p212==0)||(u52.p287==1))&&(i0.u1...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U ((i2.u9.p108==0)||(i3.u16.p145==1))) + (i0.u3.p50==0)) + (i2.u11...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t68, t77, t81, t84, u52.t40, i0.u2.t19, i1.t65, i1.u7.t12, i2.t63, i2.u9.t7, i2.u11.t...311
(forward)formula 0,1,1.11782,40612,1,0,97944,1049,1872,107091,488,3130,166701
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 265 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 248 transition count 204
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 248 transition count 195
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 239 transition count 195
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 225 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 225 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 225 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 224 transition count 177
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 224 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 223 transition count 176
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 214 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 214 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 214 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 157
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 210 transition count 154
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 141 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 139 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 138 transition count 83
Applied a total of 264 rules in 58 ms. Remains 138 /273 variables (removed 135) and now considering 83/227 (removed 144) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 138 cols
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 481 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 18/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/138 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 83/221 variables, 138/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 7115 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 18/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 4/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/138 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 83/221 variables, 138/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 80/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 16480 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 23608ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23609ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/273 places, 83/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24155 ms. Remains : 138/273 places, 83/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8977629953737031002.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:32:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17201393770943857490.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8977629953737031002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17201393770943857490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.92653e+10,20.2579,403220,2,358014,5,2.02504e+06,6,0,631,1.99174e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16315432796918218026.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16315432796918218026.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16315432796918218026.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16315432796918218026.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16315432796918218026.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9054877364646622391.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2447123625593495933.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9054877364646622391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2447123625593495933.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.92653e+10,0.31594,10620,1160,102,15198,345,316,22014,87,824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i1.u1.p33==0)&&(i3.u5.p77==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i1.u1.p33==0)&&(i3.u5.p77==1))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,1.87316,58492,1,0,136298,842,1159,212187,338,2955,174195
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 255 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 255 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 255 transition count 206
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 243 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 243 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 243 transition count 185
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 242 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 242 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 242 transition count 183
Applied a total of 75 rules in 16 ms. Remains 242 /273 variables (removed 31) and now considering 183/227 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 434 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 669 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:33:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 223 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 234 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 20/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 20/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 8/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 9/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 2/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 362 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 59/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 182/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 134 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 551 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60065ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/273 places, 183/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60752 ms. Remains : 242/273 places, 183/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7553295729147826168.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15355672191670616946.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7553295729147826168.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15355672191670616946.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph841408366212774421.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph841408366212774421.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph841408366212774421.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph841408366212774421.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph841408366212774421.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4307811347113936613.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11116469626630067519.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4307811347113936613.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11116469626630067519.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06951e+17,1.24075,27544,2921,101,46436,949,672,98239,92,2513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(FALSE)) * E(AF((((((i10.i1.u62.p229==0)||(i0.u77.p282==1))&&(!((i4.u25.p94==0)||(i4.u22.p89==1)))) + AF(((i7.i1.u70.p255==0)||(i2....338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE))))),!(EG(!((((((i10.i1.u62.p229==0)||(i0.u77.p282==1))&&(!((i4.u25.p9...888
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t58, t135, t144, t145, t177, i0.u76.t17, i1.t120, i1.u9.t125, i1.u9.t126, i1.u10.t12...736
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 254 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 254 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 254 transition count 205
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 243 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 243 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 243 transition count 185
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 242 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 242 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 242 transition count 183
Applied a total of 75 rules in 15 ms. Remains 242 /273 variables (removed 31) and now considering 183/227 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-31 04:35:11] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:35:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 461 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 777 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 8/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 8/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 9/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 4/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 48/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 9/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 183/425 variables, 242/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 182/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 6/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60056ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/273 places, 183/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60851 ms. Remains : 242/273 places, 183/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18011923764817167957.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2270783446145203897.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18011923764817167957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2270783446145203897.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16399799548309131431.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16399799548309131431.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16399799548309131431.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16399799548309131431.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16399799548309131431.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4342019838086148046.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:36:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13638670567270032424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4342019838086148046.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13638670567270032424.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05128e+17,1.13652,29368,2805,91,55020,840,688,92972,89,2639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(EG(AX((i9.i0.u48.p176==0)))) * EX(AF((i6.i2.u39.p153==1)))) * (AX((((E((i6.i1.u35.p137==0) U (i8.i3.u65.p227==1)) + EF(((i6.i0.u37.p...293
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!((i9.i0.u48.p176==0)))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EX(!(EG(!((i6.i2.u39.p153==1)))))))] = ...431
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t87, t135, t144, t145, t177, i0.u79.t17, i1.t120, i1.u9.t125, i1.u9.t126, i1.u10.t12...752
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 257 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 257 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 257 transition count 210
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 246 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 246 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 246 transition count 191
Applied a total of 63 rules in 10 ms. Remains 246 /273 variables (removed 27) and now considering 191/227 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 246 cols
[2025-05-31 04:37:12] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 312 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:37:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 531 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 845 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:37:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 191/437 variables, 246/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 218 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 199 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 188 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 145 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 7/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 3/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 8/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 1/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 437/437 variables, and 352 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 246/246 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 45/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 7/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/437 variables, 246/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 190/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 437/437 variables, and 561 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 246/246 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 246/273 places, 191/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60910 ms. Remains : 246/273 places, 191/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3412742973709332983.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9080131085807616455.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3412742973709332983.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9080131085807616455.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2574087896681218535.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2574087896681218535.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2574087896681218535.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2574087896681218535.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2574087896681218535.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10708353759238239252.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6212491034862053354.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10708353759238239252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6212491034862053354.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83801e+17,1.26565,34916,2953,86,67500,935,725,119850,91,3312,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(EX((((i11.u82.p286==0)||(i10.i2.u80.p278==1))||((i2.i1.u12.p47==1)||(((i4.i2.u26.p94==0)||(i10.i1.u71.p247==1))&&(i8.i0.u47.p163==1...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(((i9.i0.u65.p229==0)||(i7.i2.u59.p206==1))) U (!(EX((((i11.u82.p286==0)||(i10.i2.u80.p278==1)...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t57, t140, t151, t184, i0.u14.t114, i0.u16.t111, i1.t124, i1.i0.u8.t130, i1.i0.u8.t131, i...785
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 265 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 251 transition count 207
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 251 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 241 transition count 197
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 227 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 227 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 227 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 179
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 225 transition count 178
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 216 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 216 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 216 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 215 transition count 159
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 215 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 213 transition count 157
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 145 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 143 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 142 transition count 87
Applied a total of 256 rules in 40 ms. Remains 142 /273 variables (removed 131) and now considering 87/227 (removed 140) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 142 cols
[2025-05-31 04:39:13] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 238 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 87/228 variables, 141/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 229/229 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 8059 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 87/228 variables, 141/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 83/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 229/229 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 23396 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 31464ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31464ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/273 places, 87/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31883 ms. Remains : 142/273 places, 87/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7086036024351955371.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4876833935934642863.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7086036024351955371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4876833935934642863.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59938e+11,19.901,421908,2,403563,5,2.35201e+06,6,0,651,1.9432e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6759303478068706531.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6759303478068706531.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6759303478068706531.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6759303478068706531.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6759303478068706531.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15581937394793010341.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7854248782620445168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15581937394793010341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7854248782620445168.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59938e+11,0.196475,8180,1343,107,11050,296,354,10319,93,621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG((i4.u18.p151!=1)) * (u50.p286==1)) * ((i2.i1.u35.p215!=0)&&(i0.u4.p64!=0))) * (i2.i1.u7.p81!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i2.i1.u7.p81!=1)) * ((i2.i1.u35.p215!=0)&&(i0.u4.p64!=0))) * (u50.p286==1)),(i4.u18....174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,3.95511,123892,1,0,355046,830,1281,331124,363,2649,480845
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 265 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 250 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 249 transition count 205
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 249 transition count 195
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 239 transition count 195
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 224 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 224 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 224 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 223 transition count 176
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 223 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 222 transition count 175
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 212 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 212 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 212 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 211 transition count 154
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 211 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 208 transition count 151
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 138 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 136 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 135 transition count 79
Applied a total of 271 rules in 69 ms. Remains 135 /273 variables (removed 138) and now considering 79/227 (removed 148) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 135 cols
[2025-05-31 04:40:19] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 253 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 361 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 616 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:40:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 11/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 25/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/213 variables, 134/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 9789 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 11/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 25/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 13/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 79/213 variables, 134/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 76/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 39809ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39810ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/273 places, 79/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40507 ms. Remains : 135/273 places, 79/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 486 steps (15 resets) in 7 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3398950826709974783.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6948626305457886671.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3398950826709974783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6948626305457886671.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 273 vertex of which 266 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 265 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 254 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 253 transition count 209
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 253 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 245 transition count 201
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 232 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 232 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 232 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 231 transition count 184
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 231 transition count 183
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 230 transition count 183
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 223 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 223 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 223 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 222 transition count 168
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 222 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 221 transition count 167
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 159 transition count 105
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 159 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 157 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 156 transition count 103
Applied a total of 229 rules in 38 ms. Remains 156 /273 variables (removed 117) and now considering 103/227 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 156 cols
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 482 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 11/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 18/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 7/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/155 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 103/258 variables, 155/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 4/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/259 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 259/259 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 12191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 11/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 18/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 7/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/155 variables, 8/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 103/258 variables, 155/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 99/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 259/259 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 42212ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42213ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/273 places, 103/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42743 ms. Remains : 156/273 places, 103/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9753272744303982415.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6351031505074380918.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9753272744303982415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6351031505074380918.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5919823681194535424.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5919823681194535424.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5919823681194535424.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5919823681194535424.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5919823681194535424.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13371192714496444118.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7389700636572532700.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13371192714496444118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7389700636572532700.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.9328e+12,0.39924,13388,2389,137,22973,507,419,23486,97,1582,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AG((((i2.u0.p26==0)||(i12.u44.p253==1))||((i0.u2.p52==0)||(i12.u43.p243==1))))) * (AG((i3.u6.p108==1)) + EF((EG((i2.u7.p89==1)) * (...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u3.p58==0)||(i13.u46.p258==1))))) + EG(E((((i11.i0.u17.p157!=0)&&(i0.u11.p12...790
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t74, t82, t90, t93, t96, t100, i0.u2.t30, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t56, i1.u3.t24, i2.t77, i2.u0....386
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 255 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 255 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 255 transition count 206
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 245 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 245 transition count 196
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 245 transition count 188
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 244 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 244 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 244 transition count 186
Applied a total of 70 rules in 14 ms. Remains 244 /273 variables (removed 29) and now considering 186/227 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-31 04:42:43] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 317 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:42:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 497 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 818 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 185 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:42:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 212 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 20/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 20/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 4/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 49/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 186/430 variables, 244/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 185/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 9/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 553 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/273 places, 186/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60893 ms. Remains : 244/273 places, 186/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 186 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11611977489013798633.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:43:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7288311813584677261.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11611977489013798633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7288311813584677261.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6156594344468252989.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6156594344468252989.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6156594344468252989.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6156594344468252989.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6156594344468252989.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10577777875843771832.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15978216529839042362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10577777875843771832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15978216529839042362.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19989e+17,0.829022,24332,2686,90,45099,586,690,66998,94,1670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((AF(((i3.u24.p87!=0)&&(i11.i2.u57.p204!=1))) * EX(((i12.i0.u76.p270!=0)&&(i7.i0.u65.p222!=1)))) + (AX(AF(((i3.u9.p29==0)||(i7.i0.u46....196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY((EY(Init) * !((!(EG(!(((i3.u24.p87!=0)&&(i11.i2.u57.p204!=1))))) * EX(((i12.i0.u76.p270!=0)&&(i7.i0.u6...392
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t56, t58, t87, t120, t136, t146, t147, t179, i0.u34.t79, i1.i0.u16.t110, i1.i1.u10.t...732
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 255 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 255 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 255 transition count 206
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 244 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 244 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 244 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 243 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 243 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 243 transition count 184
Applied a total of 73 rules in 33 ms. Remains 243 /273 variables (removed 30) and now considering 184/227 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-31 04:44:44] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:44:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 536 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 858 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 188 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 184/427 variables, 243/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 197 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 150 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 148 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 18/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 8/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 57/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 7/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 184/427 variables, 243/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 183/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 5/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/273 places, 184/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60946 ms. Remains : 243/273 places, 184/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17323146617435273458.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1020094240108629284.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17323146617435273458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1020094240108629284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1561881804071075437.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1561881804071075437.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1561881804071075437.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1561881804071075437.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1561881804071075437.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15258420104881450778.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15493774101535876863.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15258420104881450778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15493774101535876863.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.2425e+17,1.43515,30220,2997,95,53577,625,699,117015,95,1804,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AX(AG(((i0.i1.u5.p17==0)&&(i13.i2.u74.p274==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i1.u5.p17==0)&&(i13.i2.u74.p274==1)))))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t53, t59, t88, t135, t144, t145, t156, t178, i0.i0.u32.t80, i1.u12.t116, i2.t120, i2.u8.t...772
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 256 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 256 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 256 transition count 208
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 245 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 245 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 245 transition count 189
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 244 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 244 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 244 transition count 187
Applied a total of 69 rules in 22 ms. Remains 244 /273 variables (removed 29) and now considering 187/227 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-31 04:46:45] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 475 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 710 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 186 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 32/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 15/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 9/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 187/431 variables, 244/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 17/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 5/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 431/431 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 32/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 15/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 51/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 187/431 variables, 244/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 186/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 4/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60055ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/273 places, 187/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60789 ms. Remains : 244/273 places, 187/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 187 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality673635534778625446.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2387571652352309637.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality673635534778625446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2387571652352309637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17796697418510054000.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17796697418510054000.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17796697418510054000.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17796697418510054000.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17796697418510054000.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4960452189323002315.gal : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12525353070832736066.ctl : 17 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4960452189323002315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12525353070832736066.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76913e+17,2.1609,54648,3568,90,120006,625,710,213547,89,1871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((A((((i6.i1.u78.p270==0)||(i8.i0.u51.p185==1))&&(i10.i2.u66.p223==0)) U (((i9.u44.p161==1)||(i5.u30.p111==0))||(i4.i0.u19.p76==1))) ...367
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!((E(!((((i9.u44.p161==1)||(i5.u30.p111==0))||(i4.i0.u19.p76==1))) U (!((((i6.i1.u78.p270==0)||(i8...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t56, t137, t147, t148, t180, i0.i1.t122, i0.i1.u9.t127, i0.i1.u9.t128, i0.i1.u10.t12...800
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 227/227 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 255 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 255 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 255 transition count 206
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 244 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 244 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 244 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 243 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 243 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 243 transition count 184
Applied a total of 73 rules in 13 ms. Remains 243 /273 variables (removed 30) and now considering 184/227 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-31 04:48:46] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:48:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 455 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 722 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 184/427 variables, 243/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 207 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 188 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 13/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 54/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 10/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 184/427 variables, 243/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 183/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 189 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 172 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 10/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 564 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/273 places, 184/227 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60787 ms. Remains : 243/273 places, 184/227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2642931672548935002.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7432328894343138193.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2642931672548935002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7432328894343138193.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12326630370726615232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12326630370726615232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12326630370726615232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12326630370726615232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12326630370726615232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9904255905701417693.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3640619388539751237.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9904255905701417693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3640619388539751237.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.045e+17,1.21511,33916,3592,93,68007,774,714,118501,87,2308,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AF(((i5.i0.u33.p133==0)&&(i5.i1.u22.p83==1))) * EF((((i6.u30.p130==0)||(i9.i2.u52.p193==1))||((i1.i1.u17.p72==0)||(i2.u13.p55==1))))...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(((i5.i0.u33.p133==0)&&(i5.i1.u22.p83==1))))) * E(TRUE U (((i6.u30.p130==0)||(i9.i2....312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t87, t99, t136, t145, t146, i0.u78.t17, i1.i0.u15.t111, i1.i1.t106, i1.i1.u17.t...773
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph109535353669512623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph109535353669512623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph109535353669512623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph109535353669512623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph109535353669512623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7991043832660066317.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14450027356046921397.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7991043832660066317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14450027356046921397.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.20204e+18,6.29544,165104,14924,91,413744,1006,675,391312,102,3279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(E(((i6.u38.p121!=0)||(((i7.u78.p250==0)||(i5.u34.p102==1))&&((i2.u15.p42==0)||(i3.u22.p73==1)))) U ((i9.i1.i0.u50.p155!=0) * AF(((i...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((i6.u38.p121!=0)||(((i7.u78.p250==0)||(i5.u34.p102==1))&&((i2.u15.p42==0)||(i3.u22.p73==1))...247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t59, t97, t146, t165, t182, i0.u44.t79, i0.u87.t17, i1.t151, i1.u11.t149, i1.u12.t150, i2...881
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 122 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18429034801604039068.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10889842835358047958.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18429034801604039068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10889842835358047958.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.20204e+18,45.0116,1102404,64542,354,1.35215e+06,1960,643,1.02991e+07,151,10586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(E(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u134.p121!=0)||(((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u119.p250==0)||(i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u133.p102==1))&&((i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0....338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u134.p121!=0)||(((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u119.p250==0)||(i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i0.i1...393
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t165, i0.t0, i1.i0.i0.u20.t119, i1.i0.i0.u20.t121, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t124, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t126...2022
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Transformed 273 places.
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Transformed 227 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality290391290694046480.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3806241400095709562.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality290391290694046480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3806241400095709562.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...327
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.20204e+18,11.6097,249100,2,135701,5,1.1166e+06,6,0,1319,1.00615e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(E(((p121!=0)||(((p250==0)||(p102==1))&&((p42==0)||(p73==1)))) U ((p155!=0) * AF(((p187==0)||(p41==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((p121!=0)||(((p250==0)||(p102==1))&&((p42==0)||(p73==1)))) U ((p155!=0) * !(EG(!(((p187==0)...185
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t17, t23, t26, t32, t35, t37, t40, t51, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62,...494

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-02b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800257"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-02b.tgz
mv DES-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;