Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800241.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800241
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 460K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748658383108

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 145 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Transformed 284 places.
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Transformed 235 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 02:26:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 284 places and 235 transitions and 683 arcs in 319 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 20 ms.
Support contains 71 out of 284 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 235/235 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 282 transition count 235
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 267 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 267 transition count 220
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 259 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 259 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 259 transition count 205
Applied a total of 55 rules in 123 ms. Remains 259 /284 variables (removed 25) and now considering 205/235 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 259 cols
[2025-05-31 02:26:26] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 53 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 736 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 788 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 257/284 places, 205/235 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 257 /257 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 944 ms. Remains : 257/284 places, 205/235 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 257 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 02:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 205 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 257 places (down from 71) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (397 resets) in 1586 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 1/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 28982 steps (43 resets) in 211 ms. (136 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 205 transitions.
Computed a total of 56 stabilizing places and 52 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 455 edges and 257 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 41 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 431 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 734 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 184 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 414/414 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 62/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 177/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 414/414 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60148ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60928 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1431783112116420060.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7319703066472613991.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1431783112116420060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7319703066472613991.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,29.8244,667588,2,415900,5,2.57807e+06,6,0,1123,2.72328e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4295984860214948913.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4295984860214948913.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4295984860214948913.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4295984860214948913.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4295984860214948913.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6111188613128689982.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 02:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17456429914614978107.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6111188613128689982.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17456429914614978107.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.451317,18072,2276,77,31232,711,681,51914,80,2296,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(AX((i10.u76.p266==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EX(!((i10.u76.p266==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t52, t58, t87, t131, t172, i0.i0.u32.t79, i1.t119, i1.u7.t124, i1.u7.t125, i1.u8.t12...731
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 455 edges and 257 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 248 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 184
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 223 transition count 174
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 214 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 214 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 214 transition count 164
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 209 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 209 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 209 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 207 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 206 transition count 150
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 206 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 205 transition count 149
Performed 67 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 138 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 136 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 135 transition count 80
Applied a total of 231 rules in 85 ms. Remains 135 /257 variables (removed 122) and now considering 80/205 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 135 cols
[2025-05-31 02:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 325 ms returned [42, 46, 51, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 107, 130]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 603 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/257 places, 80/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 239 edges and 114 vertex of which 112 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 101 transition count 68
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 14 places
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 75 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 73 transition count 55
Applied a total of 62 rules in 37 ms. Remains 73 /114 variables (removed 41) and now considering 55/80 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 73 cols
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [58, 61]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 71/257 places, 55/205 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 70 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 70 transition count 54
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 69 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 69 transition count 52
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 51
Applied a total of 6 rules in 9 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 51/55 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 68 cols
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 68/257 places, 51/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1115 ms. Remains : 68/257 places, 51/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2660772028058013759.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9457483591718919454.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2660772028058013759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9457483591718919454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45422e+06,0.094049,5280,2,2229,5,6926,6,0,316,5600,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p122==1) + (((p71==0)&&(p149==1)) * EF((p18==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p122==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p71==0)&&(p149==1))),TRUE) * (p18==1))] ...164
(forward)formula 0,1,0.096069,5536,1,0,7,6926,8,1,319,5600,1
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 246 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 246 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 246 transition count 194
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 240 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 240 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 240 transition count 184
Applied a total of 38 rules in 18 ms. Remains 240 /257 variables (removed 17) and now considering 184/205 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 240 cols
[2025-05-31 02:28:31] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 529 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 732 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 147 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 176 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 184/424 variables, 240/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 213 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 4/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 5/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 424/424 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 56/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 184/424 variables, 240/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 183/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 7/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 424/424 variables, and 550 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60082ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/257 places, 184/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60837 ms. Remains : 240/257 places, 184/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14721040051215024994.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6465230861545270479.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14721040051215024994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6465230861545270479.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10315139895416084989.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10315139895416084989.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10315139895416084989.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10315139895416084989.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10315139895416084989.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6497717893817077730.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17117359644322113415.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6497717893817077730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17117359644322113415.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.06995e+15,0.925823,27316,3048,76,49704,741,629,109942,86,2262,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EF(!(AF(AX((i7.u40.p271==1))))) U !(((i2.u10.p35==0)||(i4.u26.p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i7.u40.p271==1)))))))))) * !(((i2.u10.p35==0)||(i4.u26.p103==1))))] = FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t58, t87, t135, t156, t178, i0.u13.t112, i0.u15.t109, i1.t123, i1.u7.t128, i1.u7.t129, i1...732
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 245 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 245 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 239 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 239 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 239 transition count 183
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 238 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 238 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 238 transition count 181
Applied a total of 43 rules in 23 ms. Remains 238 /257 variables (removed 19) and now considering 181/205 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-31 02:30:32] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:30:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 420 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 636 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:30:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 16/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 151 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 10/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 2/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 419/419 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 16/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 59/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 180/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 7/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 419/419 variables, and 547 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60728 ms. Remains : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3853377928497162341.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:31:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6139056559019857768.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3853377928497162341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6139056559019857768.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11701057944233556522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11701057944233556522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11701057944233556522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11701057944233556522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11701057944233556522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5267583475329744163.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12531769557996610243.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5267583475329744163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12531769557996610243.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.57499e+15,0.364008,16296,1967,77,27600,684,723,44871,91,2114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(((i10.i1.u67.p253==0)||(i10.i0.u12.p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i10.i1.u67.p253==0)||(i10.i0.u12.p54==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t54, t56, t87, t133, i0.i0.u33.t76, i0.i1.u35.t74, i0.i2.u70.t25, i1.i1.u73.t17, i2....761
(forward)formula 0,0,13.0671,288808,1,0,519061,1332,3439,1.36239e+06,456,4413,639917
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 245 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 245 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 239 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 239 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 239 transition count 183
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 238 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 238 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 238 transition count 181
Applied a total of 43 rules in 23 ms. Remains 238 /257 variables (removed 19) and now considering 181/205 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-31 02:32:16] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:32:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 505 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 735 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:32:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 14/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 208 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 6/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 419/419 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 62/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 180/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 188 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 172 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 4/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 419/419 variables, and 546 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60803 ms. Remains : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13915496937156166980.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16289097820388070566.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13915496937156166980.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16289097820388070566.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6639243609996021312.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6639243609996021312.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6639243609996021312.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6639243609996021312.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6639243609996021312.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3432630140171365567.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 02:33:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5211062264831649840.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3432630140171365567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5211062264831649840.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.61862e+15,0.348131,14572,2007,66,24562,412,681,31243,79,1215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX((((i5.u29.p113==0)||(i2.i3.u78.p278==1))&&((i8.u39.p151==0)||(i4.u22.p81==0))))) * EX(EX((i9.i2.u61.p229==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * EG(EX((((i5.u29.p113==0)||(i2.i3.u78.p278==1))&&((i8.u39.p151==0)||(i4.u22.p81==0)))))))) * (i9....181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t52, t54, t62, t89, t101, t121, t133, t174, i0.u8.t117, i1.u7.t123, i1.u7.t124, i1.u...731
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 17 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 02:34:17] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:34:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 301 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 544 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:34:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 140 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 414/414 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 62/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 177/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 414/414 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60624 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9248013920984685900.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3730748286300438056.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9248013920984685900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3730748286300438056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,29.9088,668880,2,415900,5,2.57807e+06,6,0,1123,2.72328e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10421106454255972471.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10421106454255972471.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10421106454255972471.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10421106454255972471.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10421106454255972471.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7266719766722252112.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13326466428012987740.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7266719766722252112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13326466428012987740.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.787545,18804,2309,70,36890,662,604,48765,82,1729,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(EX(AG(((i1.u8.p33==0)||(i7.i0.i0.u39.p155==1))))) U !((((i8.u62.p217==0)||(i7.i1.i1.u59.p213==1))&&((i3.u18.p76==0)||(i7.i1.i0.u63.p...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u8.p33==0)||(i7.i0.i0.u39.p155==1)))))))))) * !((((i8.u62.p217==0)||(i7....230
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t87, t131, t172, i0.u32.t79, i0.u76.t17, i1.t119, i1.u7.t124, i1.u7.t125, i1.u8.t121...701
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 18 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:36:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:36:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 601 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 869 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:36:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 202 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 414/414 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 62/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 177/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 414/414 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60951 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1522470222956834032.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality273865453442610764.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1522470222956834032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality273865453442610764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14296660272333068512.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14296660272333068512.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14296660272333068512.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14296660272333068512.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14296660272333068512.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13256303347229864868.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15827358130671253874.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13256303347229864868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15827358130671253874.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.652983,17612,1998,69,35058,678,604,42876,80,1906,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(((i4.u78.p277==0)||(i0.u11.p48==1)) U !(((EX((i5.u32.p125==1)) + (i1.u36.p141==1)) + ((i1.u75.p263==0)||(i9.u50.p184==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(((EX((i5.u32.p125==1)) + (i1.u36.p141==1)) + ((i1.u75.p263==0)||(i9.u50.p184==1)))))))) *...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t87, t131, t172, i0.u12.t115, i1.u75.t25, i1.u35.t76, i2.t119, i2.u8.t124, i2.u...702
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 455 edges and 257 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 248 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 181
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 220 transition count 171
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 210 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 210 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 210 transition count 160
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 210 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 209 transition count 159
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 204 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 204 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 204 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 202 transition count 146
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 202 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 200 transition count 144
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 132 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 130 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 128 transition count 74
Applied a total of 244 rules in 82 ms. Remains 128 /257 variables (removed 129) and now considering 74/205 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-31 02:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 263 ms returned [9, 35, 39, 43, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 100, 123]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 452 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/257 places, 74/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 221 edges and 106 vertex of which 104 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 102 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 101 transition count 70
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 101 transition count 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 93 transition count 62
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 68 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 66 transition count 49
Applied a total of 59 rules in 24 ms. Remains 66 /106 variables (removed 40) and now considering 49/74 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [42, 51, 54]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 63/257 places, 49/205 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 62 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 62 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 61 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 61 transition count 46
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 60 transition count 45
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /63 variables (removed 3) and now considering 45/49 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 60/257 places, 45/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 878 ms. Remains : 60/257 places, 45/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16539962260840225976.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17909773202170465632.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16539962260840225976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17909773202170465632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.37876e+06,0.047162,5084,2,1835,5,6036,6,0,282,5119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p167==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p167==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t4, t6, t22, t24, t29, t30, t32, t38, t40, t41, t43, t44, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,1,0.666613,23216,1,0,105,131040,111,42,1707,89588,100
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 246 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 246 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 246 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 240 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 240 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 240 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 239 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 239 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 239 transition count 180
Applied a total of 43 rules in 31 ms. Remains 239 /257 variables (removed 18) and now considering 180/205 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 239 cols
[2025-05-31 02:38:21] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:38:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 516 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 745 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:38:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/239 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 4/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/419 variables, 239/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 205 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 224 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 19/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 1/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 419/419 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/239 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 65/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 180/419 variables, 239/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 179/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 5/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 419/419 variables, and 552 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/257 places, 180/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60818 ms. Remains : 239/257 places, 180/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11673105388043194912.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6878759921586007720.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11673105388043194912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6878759921586007720.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17482255680077603651.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17482255680077603651.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17482255680077603651.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17482255680077603651.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17482255680077603651.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13041895299394355414.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:39:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6503181471308069571.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13041895299394355414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6503181471308069571.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.74514e+15,0.640291,21624,3325,66,34834,429,604,86203,82,1047,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EG(EX(((i10.u71.p253==0)||(i2.u21.p82==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(EX(((i10.u71.p253==0)||(i2.u21.p82==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t87, t132, t173, i0.t120, i0.u8.t125, i0.u8.t126, i0.u9.t122, i0.u9.t123, i0.u13.t11...688
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 16 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 02:40:22] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:40:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 504 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 731 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:40:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 414/414 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 64/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 177/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 179 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 414/414 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60065ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60814 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5916002103156241223.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12029449998422725108.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5916002103156241223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12029449998422725108.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2387469972913075520.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2387469972913075520.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2387469972913075520.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2387469972913075520.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2387469972913075520.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15471279593252844998.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2651088720971505301.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15471279593252844998.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2651088720971505301.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.619713,22180,2596,69,43098,447,667,63490,80,1232,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((!(AG(((i7.u43.p159==0)||(i12.i0.u65.p260==1)))) * AG((((i8.i1.u46.p181==0)||(i10.i0.u54.p203==1))||(i12.i1.u71.p261==1)))) U ((i0.i2...265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i7.u43.p159==0)||(i12.i0.u65.p260==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((i8.i1.u46.p181==0)||...504
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t87, t131, t172, i0.i0.u30.t79, i0.i2.u75.t17, i1.u14.t109, i2.t119, i2.u7.t124...749
(forward)formula 0,1,8.10764,163620,1,0,318878,766,3220,544902,406,2214,479898
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 31 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:42:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 320 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:42:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 575 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 903 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:42:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30048ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30999 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4778370963718973685.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2867905570173477682.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4778370963718973685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2867905570173477682.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6808835945639711139.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6808835945639711139.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6808835945639711139.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6808835945639711139.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6808835945639711139.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7944379218561678177.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7164866434924618831.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7944379218561678177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7164866434924618831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.578027,18716,3341,73,32622,499,612,50559,82,1385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t87, t99, t131, i0.u12.t112, i0.u14.t109, i1.t119, i1.u7.t124, i1.u7.t125, i1.u...702
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 455 edges and 257 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 248 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 181
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 219 transition count 170
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 209 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 209 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 209 transition count 159
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 209 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 208 transition count 158
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 203 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 203 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 203 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 201 transition count 145
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 201 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 199 transition count 143
Performed 67 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 132 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 130 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 128 transition count 74
Applied a total of 244 rules in 42 ms. Remains 128 /257 variables (removed 129) and now considering 74/205 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 236 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 316 ms returned [9, 35, 39, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 100, 123]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 557 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/257 places, 74/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 220 edges and 106 vertex of which 104 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 102 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 92 transition count 61
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 71 transition count 50
Applied a total of 53 rules in 8 ms. Remains 71 /106 variables (removed 35) and now considering 50/74 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 71 cols
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [40, 41, 45, 46, 49, 56, 59]
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [40, 45, 49, 56, 59]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 119 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/257 places, 50/205 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 65 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 65 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 64 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 64 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 63 transition count 46
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /66 variables (removed 3) and now considering 46/50 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [40, 44]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 61/257 places, 46/205 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 61 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 60 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 59 transition count 44
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 59 /61 variables (removed 2) and now considering 44/46 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 59 cols
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:43:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 4 : 59/257 places, 44/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 4 iterations and 1079 ms. Remains : 59/257 places, 44/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12060829428740455963.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3313213098179596438.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12060829428740455963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3313213098179596438.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 4591 steps (274 resets) in 146 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 244 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 244 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 244 transition count 192
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 237 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 237 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 237 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 236 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 236 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 29 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 178/205 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 558 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 856 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:43:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 148 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 7/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 3/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 414/414 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 60/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 178/414 variables, 236/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 177/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 5/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 414/414 variables, and 547 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60964 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 178/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17928470944951593758.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:44:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8018502382288878431.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17928470944951593758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8018502382288878431.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2664836695195982089.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2664836695195982089.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2664836695195982089.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2664836695195982089.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2664836695195982089.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10130229608418234363.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14687009973013616606.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10130229608418234363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14687009973013616606.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.628846,18512,2163,72,31350,509,694,65592,80,1469,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((i10.i1.u37.p151==1) U E(((i10.i1.u38.p178==0)||(i8.i1.u45.p156==1)) U ((i0.u9.p47==0)||(i9.i1.u52.p196==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(E(((i10.i1.u38.p178==0)||(i8.i1.u45.p156==1)) U ((i0.u9.p47==0)||(i9.i1.u52.p196==1)))) U (...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t54, t62, t87, t131, t172, i0.u9.t115, i1.i0.u33.t76, i1.i1.u72.t25, i2.i2.u31.t79, ...735
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 455 edges and 257 vertex of which 249 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 248 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 181
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 230 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 220 transition count 171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 211 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 211 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 211 transition count 161
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 211 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 210 transition count 160
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 206 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 206 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 206 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 204 transition count 149
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 204 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 203 transition count 148
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 135 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 133 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 131 transition count 78
Applied a total of 237 rules in 32 ms. Remains 131 /257 variables (removed 126) and now considering 78/205 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 131 cols
[2025-05-31 02:45:35] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:45:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 372 ms returned [9, 42, 46, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 103, 126]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 587 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/257 places, 78/205 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 232 edges and 110 vertex of which 108 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 106 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 105 transition count 74
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 105 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 98 transition count 67
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 55
Applied a total of 54 rules in 10 ms. Remains 73 /110 variables (removed 37) and now considering 55/78 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 73 cols
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [49, 58, 61]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 70/257 places, 55/205 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 69 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 69 transition count 54
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 68 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 52
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 67 transition count 51
Applied a total of 6 rules in 11 ms. Remains 67 /70 variables (removed 3) and now considering 51/55 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 67 cols
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 295 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 67/257 places, 51/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1072 ms. Remains : 67/257 places, 51/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5225335350465764295.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5386224541576841238.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5225335350465764295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5386224541576841238.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92536e+06,0.099621,5808,2,3201,5,9161,6,0,316,8496,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A(EG(AF((p113==1))) U (p167==0)) * (p171==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p167==0))) * !((p167==0))) * !(EG(!(EG(!((p113==1)))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(Init...231
(forward)formula 0,0,0.102256,6192,1,0,8,9161,9,2,321,8496,1
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 245 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 245 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 245 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 239 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 239 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 239 transition count 183
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 238 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 238 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 238 transition count 181
Applied a total of 43 rules in 27 ms. Remains 238 /257 variables (removed 19) and now considering 181/205 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 293 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:45:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 551 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 845 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 16/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 200 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 10/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 419/419 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 16/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 59/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 181/419 variables, 238/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 180/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/419 variables, 7/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 419/419 variables, and 551 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60923 ms. Remains : 238/257 places, 181/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10760456612899087284.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:46:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3487849857192560348.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10760456612899087284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3487849857192560348.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2851737596358772136.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2851737596358772136.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2851737596358772136.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2851737596358772136.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2851737596358772136.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11352186413681387428.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1137173480770121749.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11352186413681387428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1137173480770121749.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.57499e+15,0.692304,22244,3148,67,43105,572,621,66847,83,1727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((E((i2.u26.p104!=0) U (i10.u11.p52==1)) * E(((i0.u31.p128==0)||(i0.u31.p129==1)) U EG(((i3.u30.p123==0)||(i6.u37.p147==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * E((i2.u26.p104!=0) U (i10.u11.p52==1))),((i0.u31.p128==0)||(i0.u31.p129==1))),...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t56, t87, t133, t175, i0.u31.t79, i0.u76.t17, i1.u13.t109, i2.t173, i2.t99, i2.t95, ...708
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 205/205 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 256 transition count 205
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 246 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 246 transition count 195
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 239 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 239 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 239 transition count 183
Applied a total of 40 rules in 21 ms. Remains 239 /257 variables (removed 18) and now considering 183/205 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 239 cols
[2025-05-31 02:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 02:47:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 467 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 693 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:47:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 151 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 7/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 183/422 variables, 239/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 203 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 217 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 11/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 422/422 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 14/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 49/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 14/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 183/422 variables, 239/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 182/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 2/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 422/422 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/257 places, 183/205 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60765 ms. Remains : 239/257 places, 183/205 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4669863667883982706.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 02:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality310220143676075400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4669863667883982706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality310220143676075400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6248597364581319387.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6248597364581319387.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6248597364581319387.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6248597364581319387.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6248597364581319387.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7713668064901067754.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1579866370586143876.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7713668064901067754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1579866370586143876.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.1994e+15,0.777838,21444,2707,80,40524,676,675,60954,84,2333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(A(((i12.u77.p278==0)||(i7.i0.u37.p144==1)) U EG(((i5.i0.u28.p124==0)||(i8.i1.u58.p237==1))))) + AG(AX(((i3.u10.p40==0)||(i6.u73.p264...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(((Init * !(EG((i10.i0.u41.p174==1)))) * !(EX(!((E(!(EG(((i5.i0.u28.p124==0)||(i8.i1.u58.p237==1)))) U ...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t53, t57, t88, t135, t177, i0.u32.t80, i1.u14.t110, i2.t123, i2.u6.t128, i2.u6.t129, i2.u...744
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8039510732013831111.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8039510732013831111.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8039510732013831111.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8039510732013831111.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8039510732013831111.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12776484808451005921.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 02:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4855324443825683245.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12776484808451005921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4855324443825683245.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.03484e+16,0.543333,19364,2492,67,34138,728,756,57097,88,2489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(AX((i11.u80.p266==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EX(!((i11.u80.p266==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t58, t91, t150, t175, i0.i1.u38.t78, i0.i2.u82.t17, i1.t138, i1.u8.t143, i1.u8.t144, i1.u...875
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,53.1684,776548,1,0,1.88823e+06,728,3377,1.70777e+06,402,2489,1754966
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: !(E(EF(!(AF(AX((i8.u44.p271==1))))) U !(((i7.i1.u13.p35==0)||(i6.i1.u28.p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i8.u44.p271==1)))))))))) * !(((i7.i1.u13.p35==0)||(i6.i1.u28.p103==1))))] ...162
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,288.812,2202004,1,0,4.47714e+06,1033,2324,5.89694e+06,213,3352,2303031
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(EX((((i5.i0.u33.p113==0)||(i0.i2.u83.p278==1))&&((i10.i0.u45.p151==0)||(i4.u24.p81==0))))) * EX(EX((i10.i4.u70.p229==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * EG(EX((((i5.i0.u33.p113==0)||(i0.i2.u83.p278==1))&&((i10.i0.u45.p151==0)||(i4.u24.p81==0))))))))...189
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,475.866,2431996,1,0,4.77064e+06,1089,1659,6.68783e+06,173,3376,2526291
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(AF(EX(AG(((i1.u9.p33==0)||(i10.i1.u46.p155==1))))) U !((((i9.i3.u68.p217==0)||(i10.i3.u65.p213==1))&&((i6.i1.u22.p76==0)||(i10.i4.u69.p...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u9.p33==0)||(i10.i1.u46.p155==1)))))))))) * !((((i9.i3.u68.p217==0)||(i1...230
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,0,638.953,2675212,1,0,4.98479e+06,1096,1483,7.40242e+06,169,3376,1769576
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(A(((i0.i2.u82.p277==0)||(i7.i0.u12.p48==1)) U !(((EX((i5.i1.u35.p125==1)) + (i0.i0.u40.p141==1)) + ((i8.u79.p263==0)||(i9.i1.u54.p184=...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(((EX((i5.i1.u35.p125==1)) + (i0.i0.u40.p141==1)) + ((i8.u79.p263==0)||(i9.i1.u54.p184==1)...428
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 4,0,909.585,2943372,1,0,5.38797e+06,1096,1858,8.57619e+06,197,3376,4146895
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AX(EG(EX(((i2.i1.u76.p253==0)||(i4.u25.p82==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(EX(((i2.i1.u76.p253==0)||(i4.u25.p82==1))))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 5,0,1057.18,3240332,1,0,5.86618e+06,1096,1672,8.57619e+06,173,3376,2099773
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 6,0,1073.14,3240332,1,0,5.86618e+06,1110,2310,8.57619e+06,211,3440,2875568
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(EX(A((i10.i0.u45.p151==1) U E(((i10.i2.u52.p178==0)||(i10.i1.u51.p156==1)) U ((i7.i0.u12.p47==0)||(i9.i2.u58.p196==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(E(((i10.i2.u52.p178==0)||(i10.i1.u51.p156==1)) U ((i7.i0.u12.p47==0)||(i9.i2.u58.p196==1)))...397
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 7,1,1122.29,3240332,1,0,5.86618e+06,1146,2556,8.57619e+06,241,3713,4692467
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(EF((E((i6.i0.u29.p104!=0) U (i2.i0.u14.p52==1)) * E(((i3.i3.u37.p128==0)||(i3.i3.u37.p129==1)) U EG(((i5.i1.u35.p123==0)||(i8.u43.p147...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * E((i6.i0.u29.p104!=0) U (i2.i0.u14.p52==1))),((i3.i3.u37.p128==0)||(i3.i3.u37....216
(forward)formula 8,1,1136.82,3240332,1,0,6.26394e+06,1548,3450,8.57619e+06,300,5526,5194026
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((EX(A(((i0.i2.u83.p278==0)||(i8.u42.p144==1)) U EG(((i5.i0.u33.p124==0)||(i10.i3.u63.p237==1))))) + AG(AX(((i7.i0.u10.p40==0)||(i8.u79.p...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(((Init * !(EG((i10.i1.u51.p174==1)))) * !(EX(!((E(!(EG(((i5.i0.u33.p124==0)||(i10.i3.u63.p237==1)))) U...377
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2500707811686991790.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 03:17:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9293259691866844319.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2500707811686991790.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9293259691866844319.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.03484e+16,19.8437,525640,34366,254,598148,1201,626,5.05653e+06,131,4094,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(A(((i1.i1.i1.u118.p278==0)||(i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.u140.p144==1)) U EG(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u33.p124==0)||(i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i1....297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(((Init * !(EG((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u63.p174==1)))) * !(EX(!((E(!(EG(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u...544
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t150, i0.t0, i1.i0.i0.u20.t112, i1.i0.i0.u20.t114, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t117, i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u18.t...1875

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800241"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-01b.tgz
mv DES-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;