Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800225.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-00b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800225
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 592K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 136K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748651688918

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-00b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 00:34:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 00:34:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 129 ms
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Transformed 271 places.
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Transformed 230 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 271 places and 230 transitions and 658 arcs in 299 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 24 ms.
Support contains 108 out of 271 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 271/271 places, 230/230 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 270 transition count 230
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 255 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 255 transition count 215
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 250 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 250 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 250 transition count 206
Applied a total of 45 rules in 111 ms. Remains 250 /271 variables (removed 21) and now considering 206/230 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 206 rows 250 cols
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 38 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 523 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:34:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:34:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 749 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1340 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 205 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:34:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/250 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 161 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 165 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 145 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 20/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 153 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 20/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 4/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 206/456 variables, 250/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved in 30041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/250 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 53/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 206/456 variables, 250/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 205/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 8/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/456 variables, and 577 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60230ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 250/271 places, 206/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61722 ms. Remains : 250/271 places, 206/230 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 250 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 00:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:53] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-31 00:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 250 places (down from 108) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (343 resets) in 1601 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/65 properties
[2025-05-31 00:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
Computed a total of 28 stabilizing places and 28 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 448 edges and 250 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 448 edges and 250 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 244 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 222 transition count 179
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 222 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 214 transition count 171
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 203 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 203 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 154
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 200 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 196 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 196 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 196 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 195 transition count 142
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 195 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 194 transition count 141
Performed 65 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 129 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 127 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 125 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 124 transition count 73
Applied a total of 247 rules in 86 ms. Remains 124 /250 variables (removed 126) and now considering 73/206 (removed 133) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 447 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:35:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 23/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/124 variables, 9/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/197 variables, 124/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 4150 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 23/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/124 variables, 9/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/197 variables, 124/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 71/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 12483 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16650ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16652ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/250 places, 73/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17196 ms. Remains : 124/250 places, 73/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17491871241336814173.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7809217083959415303.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17491871241336814173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7809217083959415303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17459414585792537794.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17459414585792537794.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17459414585792537794.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17459414585792537794.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17459414585792537794.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6643977327697940232.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6077479064151745895.ctl : 17 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6643977327697940232.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6077479064151745895.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18539e+11,0.375992,14244,836,53,24307,222,332,27572,65,550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((i6.i1.u17.p150==0)||(i7.u28.p181==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i6.i1.u17.p150==0)||(i7.u28.p181==1)))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.82285,137380,1,0,380387,439,1220,314636,240,1370,408344
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 448 edges and 250 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 244 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 226 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 224 transition count 181
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 224 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 215 transition count 172
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 205 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 205 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 205 transition count 156
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 205 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 154
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 199 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 199 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 199 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 198 transition count 145
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 198 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 197 transition count 144
Performed 66 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 131 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 129 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 128 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 127 transition count 75
Applied a total of 242 rules in 65 ms. Remains 127 /250 variables (removed 123) and now considering 75/206 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-31 00:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:36:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:36:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 459 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:36:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:36:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 23/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/127 variables, 8/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/202 variables, 127/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 6258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 23/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/127 variables, 8/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/202 variables, 127/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 73/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 8260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14533ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14534ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/250 places, 75/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15066 ms. Remains : 127/250 places, 75/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15780133765197927509.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16215168340918902442.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15780133765197927509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16215168340918902442.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12630884748703442745.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12630884748703442745.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12630884748703442745.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12630884748703442745.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12630884748703442745.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6785850942294060225.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:37:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3606275133580976657.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6785850942294060225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3606275133580976657.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.60263e+10,1.01256,38024,1619,84,95749,369,299,73372,75,966,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((((u48.p267==0)||(i0.u5.p54==1)) + AG((i8.u36.p215==1))) U (AF((i5.u15.p136==1)) * (i4.i1.u43.p233==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(EG(!((i5.u15.p136==1)))) * (i4.i1.u43.p233==0)))) * !((((u48.p267==0)||(i0.u5...513
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t67, t73, u48.t3, i0.u1.t13, i0.u5.t33, i1.u0.t43, i1.u7.t9, i1.u8.t7, i2.u9.t5, i2.u10.t...310
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 233 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 233 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 233 transition count 184
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 227 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 227 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 227 transition count 175
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 226 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 226 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 226 transition count 173
Applied a total of 57 rules in 27 ms. Remains 226 /250 variables (removed 24) and now considering 173/206 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-31 00:38:02] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:38:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 339 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 515 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:38:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 19/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 173/399 variables, 226/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 7/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 399/399 variables, and 326 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 42/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 4/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 8/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 4/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 3/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 173/399 variables, 226/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 172/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 2/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60064ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/250 places, 173/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60614 ms. Remains : 226/250 places, 173/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11485495389220453166.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9356316017442813986.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11485495389220453166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9356316017442813986.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5989204941279169168.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5989204941279169168.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5989204941279169168.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5989204941279169168.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5989204941279169168.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8441966770456755713.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:39:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13267802249172292281.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8441966770456755713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13267802249172292281.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.22197e+17,3.5334,65332,3272,75,118965,507,669,166990,88,1664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EG(((i11.u73.p266!=1)||(i7.i0.u56.p209==0))) U EF(!(((i8.i1.u51.p190==0)||(i8.i0.u41.p161==0)))))) * EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(((i8.i1.u51.p190==0)||(i8.i0.u41.p161==0))))) U (!(EG(((i11.u73.p266!=1)||(i7.i...323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t48, t56, t85, t134, t135, t167, i0.i0.u27.t77, i0.i1.u10.t107, i1.t117, i1.u3.t122, i1.u3.t1...732
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 234 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 234 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 234 transition count 186
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 228 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 228 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 228 transition count 177
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 227 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 227 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 227 transition count 175
Applied a total of 54 rules in 16 ms. Remains 227 /250 variables (removed 23) and now considering 175/206 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 227 cols
[2025-05-31 00:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:40:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 424 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 635 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:40:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 134 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 5/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 50/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 174/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 8/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 523 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60710 ms. Remains : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14340507258511250668.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4442296245837724489.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14340507258511250668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4442296245837724489.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5131751170420564980.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5131751170420564980.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5131751170420564980.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5131751170420564980.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5131751170420564980.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10388871620414108542.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17215801759908601320.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10388871620414108542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17215801759908601320.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.55618e+17,2.06733,47536,2524,65,87916,703,627,150283,80,2225,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AX(AF((i4.u26.p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i4.u26.p103==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t54, t86, t135, t136, t168, i0.u19.t96, i0.u28.t77, i1.t118, i1.u3.t123, i1.u3.t124, i1....713
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 234 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 234 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 234 transition count 186
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 228 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 228 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 228 transition count 177
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 227 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 227 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 227 transition count 175
Applied a total of 54 rules in 20 ms. Remains 227 /250 variables (removed 23) and now considering 175/206 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 227 cols
[2025-05-31 00:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:42:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 447 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 685 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:42:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 13/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 3/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 45/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 4/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 174/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 3/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 512 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60754 ms. Remains : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5931558472072163767.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10066554235264576813.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5931558472072163767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10066554235264576813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10723571304480828802.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10723571304480828802.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10723571304480828802.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10723571304480828802.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10723571304480828802.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16865782251761137373.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9932136860344900299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16865782251761137373.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9932136860344900299.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.18409e+17,0.828198,26180,1900,75,45306,736,664,84559,87,2368,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EF(AX(((i9.i2.u55.p218==1)||(i11.i1.u57.p203==0)))) U ((i12.u67.p249==1) * (EF(((i9.i1.u35.p166==0)||(i12.u64.p242==1))) + EX((i2.i1...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((i12.u67.p249==1) * (E(TRUE U ((i9.i1.u35.p166==0)||(i12.u64.p242==1))) + EX((i2.i1.u10.p42!=...460
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t52, t54, t56, t85, t136, t137, t169, i0.t114, i0.u8.t126, i1.t118, i1.u4.t123, i1.u4.t1...728
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 234 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 234 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 234 transition count 185
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 230 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 230 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 230 transition count 178
Applied a total of 48 rules in 13 ms. Remains 230 /250 variables (removed 20) and now considering 178/206 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 230 cols
[2025-05-31 00:44:04] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:44:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 342 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 552 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 177 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:44:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/230 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 10/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 18/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 178/408 variables, 230/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 6/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 5/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 19/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 408/408 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 230/230 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/230 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 10/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 61/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 178/408 variables, 230/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 177/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 2/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 408/408 variables, and 528 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 230/230 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 177/177 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 177 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 230/250 places, 178/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60599 ms. Remains : 230/250 places, 178/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15367722216772375761.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7447921588944497846.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15367722216772375761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7447921588944497846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7120243921749101715.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7120243921749101715.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7120243921749101715.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7120243921749101715.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7120243921749101715.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3975555907571607585.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:45:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13489861468751428496.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3975555907571607585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13489861468751428496.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.3915e+17,0.945157,27240,1925,70,55128,598,647,61886,82,1535,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A((i5.i0.u31.p125==0) U (EX(TRUE) + EF((i4.u22.p95==0)))) U E((EG((i4.u23.p83==0)) + ((i0.u12.p53!=1) * !(E((i3.i0.u16.p64==1) U (i5.i2...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((EG((i4.u23.p83==0)) + ((i0.u12.p53!=1) * !(E((i3.i0.u16.p64==1) U (i5.i2.u36.p258==1))))) U ...689
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t54, t85, t137, t138, t149, i0.u9.t111, i0.u11.t108, i1.i0.t120, i1.i0.t128, i1.i0.u3.t1...746
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 235 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 235 transition count 192
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 235 transition count 186
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 230 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 230 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 230 transition count 179
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 229 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 229 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 229 transition count 177
Applied a total of 50 rules in 15 ms. Remains 229 /250 variables (removed 21) and now considering 177/206 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 229 cols
[2025-05-31 00:46:05] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:46:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 331 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 534 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 176 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:46:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 177/406 variables, 229/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 3/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 3/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved in 29842 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 49/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 177/406 variables, 229/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 176/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 3/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 1/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 522 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 59875ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59876ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/250 places, 177/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60426 ms. Remains : 229/250 places, 177/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 177 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9165922333384752480.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8737042527678173214.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9165922333384752480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8737042527678173214.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15823639265025125369.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15823639265025125369.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15823639265025125369.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15823639265025125369.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15823639265025125369.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9507024070861803932.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14033154250950285917.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9507024070861803932.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14033154250950285917.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.97038e+17,5.18612,109896,3781,86,253895,756,646,280028,90,2571,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EG((AF((i10.i3.u60.p205==1)) * AX(((i4.i1.u24.p87==0)||(i9.i3.u53.p192==1))))) * EX(A((i8.u36.p139==0) U AF((i8.u37.p163==1))))) * (...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG((!(EG(!((i10.i3.u60.p205==1)))) * !(EX(!(((i4.i1.u24.p87==0)||(i9.i3.u53.p192==1)))))))))] =...531
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t48, t56, t85, t118, t138, t139, t171, i0.u3.t125, i0.u3.t126, i0.u9.t111, i1.t123, i1.u4.t12...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 234 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 234 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 234 transition count 186
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 228 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 228 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 228 transition count 177
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 227 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 227 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 227 transition count 175
Applied a total of 54 rules in 14 ms. Remains 227 /250 variables (removed 23) and now considering 175/206 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 227 cols
[2025-05-31 00:48:06] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:48:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 307 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 490 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:48:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 402/402 variables, and 326 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 40/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 5/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 2/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 175/402 variables, 227/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 174/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 2/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/402 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 402/402 variables, and 526 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 227/227 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60543 ms. Remains : 227/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6546871922161650434.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8921437624793292591.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6546871922161650434.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8921437624793292591.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7046594715057295476.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7046594715057295476.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7046594715057295476.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7046594715057295476.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7046594715057295476.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1675810597512578715.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13450265608648939565.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1675810597512578715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13450265608648939565.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.02665e+17,2.90752,64508,4779,71,129063,473,671,132566,91,1337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(((i2.u3.p12==1)&&((i5.i1.u27.p114==0)||(i10.i1.u66.p241==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((i2.u3.p12==1)&&((i5.i1.u27.p114==0)||(i10.i1.u66.p241==1)))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 233 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 233 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 233 transition count 184
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 227 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 227 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 227 transition count 175
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 226 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 226 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 226 transition count 173
Applied a total of 57 rules in 15 ms. Remains 226 /250 variables (removed 24) and now considering 173/206 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-31 00:50:07] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:50:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 299 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 475 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:50:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 19/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 173/399 variables, 226/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 7/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 399/399 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 43/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 173/399 variables, 226/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 172/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 158 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 13/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 5/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 2/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 399/399 variables, and 525 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/250 places, 173/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60524 ms. Remains : 226/250 places, 173/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality84574216579459438.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8582962712589157585.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality84574216579459438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8582962712589157585.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8493292658547649350.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8493292658547649350.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8493292658547649350.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8493292658547649350.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8493292658547649350.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:51:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:51:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:51:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14698088450252961117.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:51:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7086491939265947421.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14698088450252961117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7086491939265947421.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.22197e+17,3.78511,79520,3733,92,164143,606,651,235495,92,1993,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((AX((EX(((i12.u70.p264==0)&&(i8.i0.u45.p175==1))) + ((i2.u7.p34==0)&&(i4.i0.u15.p62==1)))) + AG((i4.i0.u21.p93==0))) + EF(((((i8.i0....408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((!(EX(!((EX(((i12.u70.p264==0)&&(i8.i0.u45.p175==1))) + ((i2.u7.p34==0)&&(i4.i0.u15.p62==1)))))) ...513
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t56, t85, t134, t135, t167, i0.i0.u27.t77, i0.i1.u10.t107, i1.t117, i1.u3.t122, i1.u3.t1...740
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 236 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 236 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 236 transition count 187
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 232 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 232 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 232 transition count 181
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 231 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 231 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 231 transition count 179
Applied a total of 46 rules in 13 ms. Remains 231 /250 variables (removed 19) and now considering 179/206 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 231 cols
[2025-05-31 00:52:08] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:52:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 293 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 178 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:52:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 10/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 13/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 179/410 variables, 231/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 410/410 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 178/178 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 50/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 179/410 variables, 231/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 178/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 1/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 12/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 410/410 variables, and 535 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 178/178 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 178 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/250 places, 179/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60512 ms. Remains : 231/250 places, 179/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5694955218303985892.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality966447782405266227.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5694955218303985892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality966447782405266227.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16032425394262175612.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16032425394262175612.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16032425394262175612.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16032425394262175612.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16032425394262175612.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1259532921201627414.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2874106240204053581.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1259532921201627414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2874106240204053581.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.04376e+17,4.64493,103008,4289,71,231096,740,613,265424,82,2675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((((AX((i1.u5.p17==1)) * AG((i5.u32.p125==0))) * (A((i1.u4.p18==1) U (i11.u74.p255==0)) * AG(((i12.u77.p267==0)||(i11.u74.p253==1))))...386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((i11.u66.p230==0)&&(i9.i0.i3.u62.p215==1)))))) U (!((!(EG(!(((i7.u39.p139==0)|...1349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t54, t119, t139, i0.u11.t109, i0.u3.t126, i0.u3.t127, i0.u9.t112, i1.t124, i1.u4.t121, i...723
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 235 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 235 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 235 transition count 185
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 230 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 230 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 230 transition count 177
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 229 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 229 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 229 transition count 175
Applied a total of 52 rules in 13 ms. Remains 229 /250 variables (removed 21) and now considering 175/206 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 229 cols
[2025-05-31 00:54:08] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:54:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 298 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:54:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/229 variables, 35/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 156 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 20/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 16/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 175/404 variables, 229/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 404/404 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/229 variables, 35/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 50/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 175/404 variables, 229/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 174/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 2/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 404/404 variables, and 516 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60525 ms. Remains : 229/250 places, 175/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15057649561606267427.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1189242039373975679.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15057649561606267427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1189242039373975679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6934551721495694541.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6934551721495694541.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6934551721495694541.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6934551721495694541.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6934551721495694541.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11448526371723269115.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2854578613439831861.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11448526371723269115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2854578613439831861.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.27337e+17,1.16034,28712,2272,77,55451,635,657,76523,89,1957,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i3.u17.p69==1) + EG(((i2.u2.p5==0)||((i11.u67.p244==0)&&(i2.u2.p4==1))))) + AX(!(A((i6.i0.u30.p122==1) U ((i9.i3.u57.p213==0)||(i11...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i3.u17.p69==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i2.u2.p5==0)||((i11.u67.p244==0)&&(i2...401
(forward)formula 0,1,1.16923,28968,1,0,55451,635,661,76523,92,1957,483
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 235 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 235 transition count 192
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 235 transition count 186
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 230 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 230 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 230 transition count 178
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 229 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 229 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 229 transition count 176
Applied a total of 51 rules in 12 ms. Remains 229 /250 variables (removed 21) and now considering 176/206 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 229 cols
[2025-05-31 00:55:40] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:55:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 461 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 672 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 175 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:55:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 11/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 176/405 variables, 229/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 13/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 405/405 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 45/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 176/405 variables, 229/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 175/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 11/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 13/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 405/405 variables, and 531 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/250 places, 176/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60725 ms. Remains : 229/250 places, 176/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11395369611678992876.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:56:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12241449238477755856.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11395369611678992876.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12241449238477755856.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4008785196794802327.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4008785196794802327.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4008785196794802327.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4008785196794802327.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4008785196794802327.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6592779974689575186.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1598836540407803387.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6592779974689575186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1598836540407803387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.34907e+17,1.04902,31164,1838,87,59743,898,668,86674,94,2795,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((((i7.i1.u39.p144==0)||(i10.u54.p222==1))||((!((i12.u73.p264==0)||(i3.i1.u26.p87==1)))||((i1.u4.p13!=1)&&(i7.i1.u51.p160==0)))) U EG(A...301
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY((Init * !(E((((i7.i1.u39.p144==0)||(i10.u54.p222==1))||((!((i12.u73.p264==0)||(i3.i1.u26.p87==1)))||((...581
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t56, t85, t137, t138, t170, i0.i0.u9.t113, i0.i0.u11.t110, i0.i1.t105, i0.i1.u14.t107, i...768
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 448 edges and 250 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 244 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 224 transition count 181
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 224 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 214 transition count 171
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 203 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 203 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 154
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 201 transition count 152
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 197 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 197 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 197 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 196 transition count 143
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 196 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 195 transition count 142
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 134 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 132 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 131 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 130 transition count 78
Applied a total of 236 rules in 62 ms. Remains 130 /250 variables (removed 120) and now considering 78/206 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-31 00:57:41] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:57:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 318 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 452 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:57:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 23/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/130 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 8/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 78/208 variables, 130/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 3/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/208 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 208/208 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 9384 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 23/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/130 variables, 13/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 5/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 78/208 variables, 130/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 76/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/208 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 208/208 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 17446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 26840ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26841ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/250 places, 78/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27364 ms. Remains : 130/250 places, 78/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14331381963272153647.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3664559700445209179.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14331381963272153647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3664559700445209179.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18026672685402239175.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18026672685402239175.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18026672685402239175.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18026672685402239175.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18026672685402239175.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15996193140965133940.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1279701220149910084.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15996193140965133940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1279701220149910084.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37042e+11,0.344797,10720,736,118,16808,321,320,17058,81,1136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AG(((i10.i1.u26.p175!=0)&&(i8.i0.u24.p167!=1))) * (((i0.u5.p57==0)||(i8.i0.u24.p168==1))||(i0.u5.p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(E(TRUE U !(((i10.i1.u26.p175!=0)&&(i8.i0.u24.p167!=1))))) * (((i0.u5.p57==0)||(i8.i0.u2...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t61, t69, t75, i0.u1.t15, i0.u5.t12, i1.u0.t46, i1.u7.t8, i1.u8.t10, i2.u9.t6, i2.u9....352
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.69564,158944,1,0,425725,1910,1697,351461,403,13294,425564
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 249 transition count 206
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 236 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 236 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 236 transition count 188
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 233 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 233 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 233 transition count 183
Applied a total of 40 rules in 16 ms. Remains 233 /250 variables (removed 17) and now considering 183/206 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-31 00:58:44] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:58:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 406 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 607 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:58:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 10/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 183/416 variables, 233/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 4/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 4/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 8/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 416/416 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 10/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 49/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 183/416 variables, 233/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 182/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 3/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 416/416 variables, and 525 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60039ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/250 places, 183/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60666 ms. Remains : 233/250 places, 183/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1164533985303474950.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:59:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16066212215871306890.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1164533985303474950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16066212215871306890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17282248342948120411.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17282248342948120411.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17282248342948120411.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17282248342948120411.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17282248342948120411.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14451255617586580316.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4427778188101443357.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14451255617586580316.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4427778188101443357.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.08602e+17,2.52465,62960,3022,71,77361,772,584,432104,81,2751,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EX(((((i6.u34.p121==0)||(i4.u26.p84==1)) * E(((i3.u15.p59==0)||(i8.i1.i1.u51.p176==1)) U ((i1.u9.p29==0)||(i2.u11.p40==1)))) + !(((i0...453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!((E(!((!(!(E(TRUE U !((i11.u67.p248==0))))) * EX((i11.u74.p259==1)))) U (!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ...1804
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t54, t85, t142, t143, i0.u12.t108, i1.t131, i1.t123, i1.u4.t128, i1.u4.t129, i1.u5.t125,...713
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 448 edges and 250 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 244 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 223 transition count 180
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 223 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 214 transition count 171
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 203 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 203 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 154
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 203 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 200 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 196 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 196 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 196 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 195 transition count 142
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 195 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 194 transition count 141
Performed 66 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 128 transition count 75
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 128 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 126 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 124 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 123 transition count 72
Applied a total of 250 rules in 37 ms. Remains 123 /250 variables (removed 127) and now considering 72/206 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 123 cols
[2025-05-31 01:00:45] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 01:00:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 448 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:00:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 21/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/122 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 72/195 variables, 123/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 195/195 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 7803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 21/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/122 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 72/195 variables, 123/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 70/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 195/195 variables, and 252 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 12853 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20665ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20666ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/250 places, 72/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21158 ms. Remains : 123/250 places, 72/206 transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16597294988048025435.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4072801159943968083.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16597294988048025435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4072801159943968083.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
RANDOM walk for 4260 steps (166 resets) in 79 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4072801159943968083.prop.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13906631808672686678.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13906631808672686678.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13906631808672686678.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13906631808672686678.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13906631808672686678.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 01:01:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 01:01:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-31 01:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1969705629042637409.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 01:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4049983607602135354.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1969705629042637409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4049983607602135354.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.7651e+18,1.67594,34956,2217,90,65636,701,687,84073,101,2386,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((((i13.u79.p267==0)||(i4.i1.u13.p54==1)) + AG((i11.i2.u63.p215==1))) U (AF((i0.i1.u40.p136==1)) * (i12.u69.p233==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(EG(!((i0.i1.u40.p136==1)))) * (i12.u69.p233==0)))) * !((((i13.u79.p267==0)||(...541
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t59, t92, t135, t162, t196, i0.t171, i0.i0.u36.t77, i0.i0.u76.t22, i0.i0.u76.t24, i0.i1....787
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,402.246,2429244,1,0,4.99441e+06,1189,1520,5.60557e+06,211,4060,2282110
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (!(A(EG(((i13.u79.p266!=1)||(i9.i3.u65.p209==0))) U EF(!(((i10.i2.u58.p190==0)||(i10.i0.u44.p161==0)))))) * EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(((i10.i2.u58.p190==0)||(i10.i0.u44.p161==0))))) U (!(EG(((i13.u79.p266!=1)||(i9...329
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,855.702,2962072,1,0,5.65517e+06,1279,2153,7.07784e+06,284,4060,3206121
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(AX(AX(AF((i7.u31.p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i7.u31.p103==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,0,1371.17,4588804,1,0,8.0327e+06,1279,1326,8.73925e+06,202,4060,475524
FORMULA DES-PT-00b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(A(EF(AX(((i10.i2.u62.p218==1)||(i11.i2.u66.p203==0)))) U ((i12.u75.p249==1) * (EF(((i10.i1.u50.p166==0)||(i12.u70.p242==1))) + EX((i3....174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((i12.u75.p249==1) * (E(TRUE U ((i10.i1.u50.p166==0)||(i12.u70.p242==1))) + EX((i3.i0.u10.p42!...464
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 79 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8134249083540780090.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 01:29:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6672137179751926944.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8134249083540780090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6672137179751926944.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.7651e+18,34.6661,646684,11630,299,710050,2063,607,6.3442e+06,148,7285,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EF(AX(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i1.i0.u85.p218==1)||(i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u104.p203==0)))) U ((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u94.p249==...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.u94.p249==1) * (E(TRUE U ((i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.u140.p166==0)||(i1.i...670
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u12.t113, i0.i0.u12.t115, i0.i0.i0.u11.t119, i0.i0.i0.i0.u10.t124, i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u9.t1...1648

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-00b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-00b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800225"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-00b.tgz
mv DES-PT-00b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;