Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063700201.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Dekker-PT-100, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063700201
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 6.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9M May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748643050151

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-100
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 22:10:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 22:10:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 22:10:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 1000 ms
[2025-05-30 22:10:54] [INFO ] Transformed 500 places.
[2025-05-30 22:10:54] [INFO ] Transformed 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:10:54] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 22:10:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 500 places and 10200 transitions and 80200 arcs in 1314 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 37 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 100 out of 500 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 500/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 478 ms. Remains 500 /500 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:10:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 500 cols
[2025-05-30 22:10:55] [INFO ] Computed 300 invariants in 43 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 13656 ms returned [200, 203, 206, 209, 215, 218, 224, 227, 233, 236, 242, 248, 251, 257, 260, 263, 266, 269, 272, 275, 278, 284, 287, 296, 302, 305, 308, 314, 320, 323, 326, 329, 332, 338, 341, 344, 347, 350, 353, 356, 362, 365, 368, 374, 377, 380, 383, 386, 389, 395, 398, 404, 407, 410, 413, 425, 431, 434, 437, 440, 443, 449, 452, 455, 458, 464, 467, 470, 476, 482, 488, 491, 494, 497]
Discarding 74 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 13765 ms to find 74 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 426/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 213 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14500 ms. Remains : 426/500 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 426 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 22:11:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1131 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 585 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 426 places (down from 100) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 63 to 62
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 4529 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 9/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 238 ms. (167 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 281 ms. (141 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 308 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 286 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 316 ms. (126 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 313 ms. (127 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 335 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 300 ms. (132 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 243 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-05-30 22:11:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 426 cols
[2025-05-30 22:11:15] [INFO ] Computed 226 invariants in 14 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 33/47 variables, 19/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 33/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 9/56 variables, 9/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 9/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 7/63 variables, 7/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 56/119 variables, 63/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 172/291 variables, 100/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 449/740 variables, 277/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 277/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 67/882 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 0/882 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 86/826 variables, 105/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 86/1073 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 19/1092 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 86/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 0/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/826 variables, 0/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 826/826 variables, and 1178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 1865 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 426/426 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 426/426 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 33/47 variables, 19/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 33/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 246 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 163 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 129 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 127 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 20/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 142 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 16/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 9/56 variables, 9/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 9/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 7/63 variables, 7/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 56/119 variables, 63/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 291/826 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 5022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/426 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/26 constraints, State Equation: 63/426 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/8 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7109ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 14 out of 426 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1153 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1157 ms. Remains : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1398 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 180 ms. (221 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 192 ms. (207 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 227 ms. (175 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 250 ms. (159 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 99182 steps, run timeout after 3003 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties seen :0 out of 8
Probabilistic random walk after 99182 steps, saw 92032 distinct states, run finished after 3012 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties seen :0
[2025-05-30 22:11:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 22:11:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 33/47 variables, 19/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 33/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 9/56 variables, 9/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 9/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 7/63 variables, 7/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 56/119 variables, 63/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 172/291 variables, 100/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 449/740 variables, 277/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 277/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 67/882 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 0/882 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 86/826 variables, 105/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 86/1073 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 19/1092 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 86/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 0/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/826 variables, 0/1178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 826/826 variables, and 1178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 1496 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 426/426 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 426/426 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 33/47 variables, 19/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 33/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 174 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 156 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 151 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 131 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 123 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 20/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 8/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 9/56 variables, 9/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 9/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 8/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 7/63 variables, 7/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 56/119 variables, 63/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 172/291 variables, 100/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 449/740 variables, 277/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 277/851 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 67/918 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 8/926 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 536 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 546 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 478 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 3/929 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 327 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 431 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 455 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 447 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 464 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 418 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 382 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 329 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 425 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 447 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 431 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 424 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 478 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 456 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 429 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 414 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 420 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 321 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 312 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 304 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 20/949 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 271 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 341 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 363 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 373 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 311 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 5/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 344 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 1/955 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 324 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 307 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 369 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 3/958 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 309 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 299 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 279 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 3/961 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 281 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 263 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 248 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 236 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 272 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 5/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 153 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 1/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 189 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 154 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 172 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 154 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 146 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 136 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 185 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 167 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 210 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 205 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 239 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 243 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 227 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 206 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 183 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 156 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 20/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 136 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 2/989 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 245 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 322 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 3/992 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 199 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 249 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 286 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 276 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 6/998 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 205 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 197 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 184 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 169 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 155 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 192 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 183 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 151 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 138 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 199 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 223 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 204 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 15/1013 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 141 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 150 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 144 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 136 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 140 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 119 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 243 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 221 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 198 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 184 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 171 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 16/1029 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 148 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 5/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 146 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 124 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 5/1039 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 3/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 46569ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 14 out of 426 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 633 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 634 ms. Remains : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 437 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:12:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:12:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5205 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5226 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 402/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 506 ms. Remains 402 /402 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 6176 ms. Remains : 402/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1806 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 171 ms. (232 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 189 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-30 22:12:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 402 cols
[2025-05-30 22:12:21] [INFO ] Computed 202 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 100 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 19/28 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 20/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/36 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 8/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 7/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/73 variables, 37/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 182/255 variables, 100/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 456/711 variables, 274/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 274/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 90/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 0/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 91/802 variables, 92/951 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 91/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1043 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 91/1134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 0/1134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 802/802 variables, and 1134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 5816 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 402/402 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 402/402 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 19/28 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 21/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/36 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 8/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 7/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 36/73 variables, 37/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 182/255 variables, 100/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 456/711 variables, 274/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 274/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 90/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 7/866 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 447 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 507 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 511 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 510 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 307 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 5/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 385 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 397 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 344 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 358 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 340 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 5/876 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 319 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 1/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 0/877 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 91/802 variables, 92/969 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 91/1060 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1061 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 91/1152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 276 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 243 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 201 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 224 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 233 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 185 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 198 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 6/1159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 149 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 167 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 2/1161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 190 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 176 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 154 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 272 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 253 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 242 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 151 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 6/1170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 119 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 184 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 162 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 143 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 5/1177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 131 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 214 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 4/1181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 180 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 1/1182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 178 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 140 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 148 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 145 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 159 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 137 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 114 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 124 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 5/1194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 3/1198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 220 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 233 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 220 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 201 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 4/1205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 162 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 177 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 160 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 4/1211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 3/1214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 212 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 55 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 1/1215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 201 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 56 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 4/1219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 169 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 58 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 119 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 60 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 4/1226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 173 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 182 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 61 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 156 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 62 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 123 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 171 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 153 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 63 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 6/1236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 134 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 126 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 64 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 3/1239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 65 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 66 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 1/1242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 139 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 67 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 3/1245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 68 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 2/1247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 69 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/1247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 70 (OVERLAPS) 0/802 variables, 0/1247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 802/802 variables, and 1247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 42048 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 402/402 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 200/200 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 402/402 constraints, ReadFeed: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 47902ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 9040 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 402 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 402/402 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 389 ms. Remains 402 /402 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 389 ms. Remains : 402/402 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 366 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 426 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 93 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:13:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 426 cols
[2025-05-30 22:13:21] [INFO ] Computed 226 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4742 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 364, 372, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4772 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 165 ms. Remains 404 /404 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5031 ms. Remains : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:13:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 560 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 418 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 374 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 421 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18212014028750955261.gal : 175 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10979362734500154099.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18212014028750955261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10979362734500154099.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.25736,133484,2,1613,5,244858,6,0,11819,69426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 363 ms
[2025-05-30 22:13:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 366 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15862197539012764698.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15862197539012764698.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15862197539012764698.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15862197539012764698.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15862197539012764698.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:14:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:14:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:14:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:14:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 924 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 312 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:14:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality531717837179628427.gal : 67 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12342446346847120005.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality531717837179628427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12342446346847120005.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.21998,41448,215,18,3294,5192,10638,2738,43,5171,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(A(AF(EX(((u68.flag_1_68==0)||(u9.p3_9==1)))) U (EF((u2.flag_0_2==1)) * (!(((u12.p1_12==0)||(u82.p0_82==1))) + EX((u74.p0_74==0))))) ...402
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((u20.p3_20==1)) U (!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U (u2.flag_0_2==1)) * (!(((u12.p1_12==0)||(u82.p0...1347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,25.4208,431336,1,0,1.21961e+06,5192,72129,556548,279,5171,1489793
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 156 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:14:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5298 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5321 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 402/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 159 ms. Remains 402 /402 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5642 ms. Remains : 402/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 534 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 403 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 377 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17902009300213855026.gal : 61 ms
[2025-05-30 22:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18377189821599774969.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17902009300213855026.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18377189821599774969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.67598,133224,2,1601,5,242408,6,0,11811,68910,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 435 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 396 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2359625179515827300.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2359625179515827300.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2359625179515827300.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2359625179515827300.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2359625179515827300.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:15:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:15:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:15:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:15:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 623 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 242 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12160737478657852063.gal : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4202290278031769889.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12160737478657852063.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4202290278031769889.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.14849,40412,214,18,2998,5194,10635,2442,40,5178,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX((u57.p1_57==1))) * !(E(!(((u55.flag_1_55==0)||(i99.u100.p0_31==1))) U (EG((AG(((u22.flag_0_22==0)||(u28.flag_0_28==1))) + (u99.fla...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(EX((u57.p1_57==1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,!(((u55.flag_1_55==0)||(i99.u100.p0_31==1)))) * EG(...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,21.3569,409564,1,0,1.20632e+06,5194,70110,540925,242,5178,1462693
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 87 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:15:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:15:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4756 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4765 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 88 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4943 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 325 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 375 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 364 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 373 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8859234360590920374.gal : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 22:15:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14575268579210349600.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8859234360590920374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14575268579210349600.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.6246,133116,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:16:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 421 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:16:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 503 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3703391007680919434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3703391007680919434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3703391007680919434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3703391007680919434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3703391007680919434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:16:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:16:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:16:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:16:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 667 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 267 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:16:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14689464821286979968.gal : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12478077657038222568.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14689464821286979968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12478077657038222568.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.31676,39052,203,10,2973,5175,10615,2301,26,5100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((u65.flag_1_65==0)||(u74.p1_74==1)) U !((A((EF((u20.p1_20==0)) * (EX((u73.p1_73==1)) + EG((u43.flag_1_43==1)))) U AX((((u51.flag_0_51=...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU((FwdU(Init,((u65.flag_1_65==0)||(u74.p1_74==1))) * !((u72.p1_72==1))),!(!(EX(!((((u51.flag_0_51==0)|...576
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,24.3188,430988,1,0,1.21302e+06,5175,71215,550056,179,5100,1480079
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 90 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:16:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4588 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4598 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 155 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4845 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 473 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 388 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 355 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 364 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5975661649012848138.gal : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 22:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14798036036003245813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5975661649012848138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14798036036003245813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.84501,132932,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 356 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12635909415888794713.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12635909415888794713.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12635909415888794713.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12635909415888794713.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12635909415888794713.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:17:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:17:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:17:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:17:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 537 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 129 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6021629892658803121.gal : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13515495749451741588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6021629892658803121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13515495749451741588.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.2738,39564,203,10,2876,5175,10615,2397,26,5097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF((u93.flag_1_93==0)) * AX(AG(AF((u42.flag_1_42==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U (u93.flag_1_93==0))) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((u42.flag_1_42==1)))))))))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,22.0901,408972,1,0,1.20665e+06,5175,69672,541260,168,5097,1462341
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1031 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6652 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6664 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 765 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8461 ms. Remains : 401/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 318 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 359 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 518 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17342845869305435695.gal : 82 ms
[2025-05-30 22:17:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10786141445370788189.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17342845869305435695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10786141445370788189.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.34711,133172,2,1595,5,241196,6,0,11807,68656,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 438 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:18:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 529 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1305194580939625390.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1305194580939625390.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1305194580939625390.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1305194580939625390.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1305194580939625390.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:18:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:18:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:18:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:18:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 572 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 123 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:18:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11242980859486152302.gal : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9522525541773645016.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11242980859486152302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9522525541773645016.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.23567,40336,205,15,3177,5189,10620,2510,36,5130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((AF(((u56.p1_56==0)||(u2.flag_0_2==1))) + ((u2.flag_1_2==0)&&(u15.p0_15==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(((u56.p1_56==0)||(u2.flag_0_2==1))))) + ((u2.flag_1_2==0)&&(u15.p0_15==0))))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,22.7878,429584,1,0,1.20836e+06,5189,70899,543506,240,5130,1468309
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 91 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:18:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:18:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5662 ms returned [208, 215, 229, 234, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 410, 415]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5689 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 156 ms. Remains 404 /404 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5939 ms. Remains : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 532 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 432 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 360 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16280987005736567074.gal : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 22:18:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3985263009895696716.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16280987005736567074.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3985263009895696716.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.99505,133292,2,1609,5,243328,6,0,11819,69119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:19:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 444 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:19:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 479 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18405610526775267689.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18405610526775267689.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18405610526775267689.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18405610526775267689.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18405610526775267689.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:19:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:19:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:19:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29598 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:19:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 548 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 128 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:19:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3751549246614676122.gal : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13912002900881844352.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3751549246614676122.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13912002900881844352.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.11496,40108,215,18,2904,5192,10638,2446,43,5244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(AG((u62.flag_0_62==0))) U (u12.p1_13==0)) * AF((AX(!(A((i44.u101.p0_45==1) U (u100.p0_10==0)))) + ((!(A(((u87.p3_87==0)||(u93.flag_0...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!((u12.p1_13==0))) * !((u12.p1_13==0))) * !(E(TRUE U !((u62.flag_0_62==0)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(In...623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1251
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,23.2639,428204,1,0,1.20714e+06,5192,71242,541934,281,5244,1465301
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 141 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:19:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:19:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6073 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6084 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 161 ms. Remains 401 /401 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6386 ms. Remains : 401/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 535 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 417 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 368 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 374 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12364304785890884312.gal : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 22:19:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13248159156913752682.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12364304785890884312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13248159156913752682.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.77253,133168,2,1595,5,241438,6,0,11807,68700,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 467 ms
[2025-05-30 22:20:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:20:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 466 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10952757020484090521.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10952757020484090521.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10952757020484090521.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10952757020484090521.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10952757020484090521.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:20:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:20:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:20:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29499 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:20:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 646 ms
[2025-05-30 22:20:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 126 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:20:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16203368715966984529.gal : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 22:20:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13616702706455594852.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16203368715966984529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13616702706455594852.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.19869,40020,213,13,2897,5178,10630,2231,30,5145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF((u45.flag_0_44==1)) + AX(EG(AX(((u3.p3_3==0)||(i37.u38.p0_37==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U (u45.flag_0_44==1)) + !(EX(!(EG(!(EX(!(((u3.p3_3==0)||(i37.u38.p0_37==1)))))))))))] != FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1251
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,23.4786,428500,1,0,1.20988e+06,5178,71200,544841,184,5145,1470650
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 95 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:20:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:20:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6799 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6823 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 159 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7077 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 504 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 560 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 368 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 376 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15005783210714254702.gal : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15008935910849493960.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15005783210714254702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15008935910849493960.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.57425,133116,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 527 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 375 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13713481506640251519.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13713481506640251519.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13713481506640251519.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13713481506640251519.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13713481506640251519.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:21:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:21:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:21:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 581 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 133 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2301827008333738639.gal : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 22:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2236546720461884808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2301827008333738639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2236546720461884808.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.46705,39436,203,10,2876,5175,10615,2201,26,5097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AG((u24.flag_0_24==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((u24.flag_0_24==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,22.4483,408332,1,0,1.2057e+06,5175,69660,539710,167,5097,1460459
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 92 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:22:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:22:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5251 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5265 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 156 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5515 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 558 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 358 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 418 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17572516006688312690.gal : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6139166997759237424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17572516006688312690.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6139166997759237424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,8.06509,133104,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 379 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7559903981044445329.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7559903981044445329.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7559903981044445329.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7559903981044445329.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7559903981044445329.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:22:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:22:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:22:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:22:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 547 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 124 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:22:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4063817120415397336.gal : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 22:22:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8793103517080291455.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4063817120415397336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8793103517080291455.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.26828,39564,203,10,3170,5175,10615,2691,26,5099,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(AX((u6.p1_6==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((u6.p1_6==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
(forward)formula 0,0,19.2837,391820,1,0,1.20661e+06,5175,68865,541401,163,5099,1461723
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 537 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:23:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 4480 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 4493 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 572 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5603 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 352 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 408 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 391 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 407 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7855303683052688535.gal : 59 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16364424568409113168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7855303683052688535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16364424568409113168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.75642,133152,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p3_20==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p3_20==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 10198/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,18.5876,140484,1,0,7,451531,19,2,99101,168019,8
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 153 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:23:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6943 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6956 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 156 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7266 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 472 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 404 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 393 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 408 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11015458386910817673.gal : 58 ms
[2025-05-30 22:23:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15737582877001961602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11015458386910817673.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15737582877001961602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.66222,133112,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EG((p3_23==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(p3_23==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 10198/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,19.8951,151872,1,0,8,451381,20,1,99560,167060,11
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 88 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:23:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:23:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6477 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 284, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6502 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 403/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 158 ms. Remains 403 /403 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6749 ms. Remains : 403/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 529 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 421 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:24:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 358 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 369 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4537729319089663443.gal : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14625678622491612477.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4537729319089663443.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14625678622491612477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.20192,133472,2,1605,5,243016,6,0,11815,69041,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 447 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:24:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 482 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph370133590962167098.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph370133590962167098.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph370133590962167098.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph370133590962167098.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph370133590962167098.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:24:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:24:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:24:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29598 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:24:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 671 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 122 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:24:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1481247409272114238.gal : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 22:24:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality591213201946148421.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1481247409272114238.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality591213201946148421.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.26033,39976,214,18,3195,5194,10635,2737,40,5218,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF((((AX((u8.flag_0_8!=0)) * (u78.flag_1_78!=0)) * ((i33.u100.p0_33!=1)&&(u68.p1_68!=0))) * ((u43.flag_1_43!=1)&&((((u73.p0_73!=1)&&(...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!((((!(EX(!((u8.flag_0_8!=0)))) * (u78.flag_1_78!=0)) * ((i33.u100.p0_33!=1)&&(u68.p1_68!=0))...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,22.0791,437416,1,0,1.33191e+06,5194,69283,699330,242,5218,1645036
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 734 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:25:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:25:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6487 ms returned [208, 215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 396, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 6498 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 857 ms. Remains 400 /400 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8090 ms. Remains : 400/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:25:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 334 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 365 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 355 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 368 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13540454338896710024.gal : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4748129317154984441.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13540454338896710024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4748129317154984441.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.31638,133300,2,1591,5,241018,6,0,11803,68604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 357 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 367 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10267826028905094197.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10267826028905094197.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10267826028905094197.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10267826028905094197.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10267826028905094197.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:25:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:25:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:25:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29400 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:25:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 599 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 121 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:25:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2271734334661815242.gal : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 22:25:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3843305888245283799.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2271734334661815242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3843305888245283799.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,4.87958,40204,203,10,2876,5175,10615,2201,26,5097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((u8.flag_1_8==0)||(u61.flag_0_61==1))) U (u40.p1_40==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((u40.p1_40==1))))) * !(E(!((u40.p1_40==1)) U (!(!(EG(!(((u8.flag_1_8==0)||(u61.flag_0_61==1))))...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u1...1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,21.4582,410380,1,0,1.20967e+06,5175,70193,545450,170,5097,1468286
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 85 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5570 ms returned [215, 222, 229, 234, 241, 260, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 343, 361, 364, 367, 385, 405]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5592 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 409/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 149 ms. Remains 409 /409 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5827 ms. Remains : 409/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 448 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 371 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 359 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 375 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2431474764769703161.gal : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11736284607091085865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2431474764769703161.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11736284607091085865.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.56344,133612,2,1641,5,249950,6,0,11839,70510,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 359 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 370 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13806025512469236010.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13806025512469236010.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13806025512469236010.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13806025512469236010.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13806025512469236010.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:26:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:26:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:26:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29994 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 682 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 127 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15907305750424071699.gal : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 22:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17204130904526712671.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15907305750424071699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17204130904526712671.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.55652,41184,219,18,2915,5194,10654,2271,47,5553,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((E(((!(((u18.flag_1_18==0)||(u67.flag_0_64==1))) * E((i29.u31.p0_30==0) U ((u98.p0_95==0)||(u28.flag_0_28==1)))) * ((u96.p3_93==0)||...632
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY((Init * EX(((E(((!(((u18.flag_1_18==0)||(u67.flag_0_64==1))) * E((i29.u31.p0_30==0) U ((u98.p0_95==0)|...1926
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u5.t611, u6.t713, u7.t815, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u10.t1121, ...1254
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,29.6374,531296,1,0,1.36778e+06,5194,76430,734084,303,5553,1739796
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 426/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 90 ms. Remains 426 /426 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:27:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 400 transitions (discarded 9800 similar events)
[2025-05-30 22:27:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 5101 ms returned [222, 229, 234, 241, 267, 270, 275, 284, 289, 302, 319, 328, 343, 350, 361, 364, 367, 372, 385, 405, 410, 415]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 5114 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 130 ms. Remains 404 /404 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10200/10200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5334 ms. Remains : 404/426 places, 10200/10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 520 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 368 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:27:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 403 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 464 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8136424008153209976.gal : 88 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11020217799919747181.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8136424008153209976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11020217799919747181.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,7.45035,133312,2,1609,5,242879,6,0,11819,69037,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 22:27:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 364 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 22:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 374 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4350578243993792113.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4350578243993792113.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4350578243993792113.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4350578243993792113.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4350578243993792113.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 22:27:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 22:27:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 22:27:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29598 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 22:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 796 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 124 ms.
[2025-05-30 22:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15965882332786499748.gal : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 22:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13982253198752536619.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15965882332786499748.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13982253198752536619.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.46502e+31,5.091,39980,219,18,3013,5194,10646,2372,44,5255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((((u28.flag_1_28==1)||((u92.p1_92!=0)&&(i99.u100.p0_7!=1))) * EF(EX((u87.p0_87==1)))) + (i26.u101.p0_27==1)) + EX((u67.flag_0_67!=1...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((((u28.flag_1_28==1)||((u92.p1_92!=0)&&(i99.u100.p0_7!=1))) * E(TRUE U EX((u87.p0_87==1)))) + (i...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t101, u1.t203, u2.t305, u3.t407, u4.t509, u5.t611, u6.t713, u8.t917, u9.t1019, u10.t1121, ...1251
(forward)formula 0,0,17.4809,372140,1,0,1.20499e+06,5194,69223,539146,266,5255,1459410
FORMULA Dekker-PT-100-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 22:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 371 ms
[2025-05-30 22:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 381 ms
Total runtime 1042171 ms.

BK_STOP 1748644095057

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-100, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063700201"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-100.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-100 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;