Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063700180.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Dekker-PT-015, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063700180
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 608K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748640419355

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-015
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 207 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Transformed 75 places.
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Transformed 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 21:27:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 75 places and 255 transitions and 1830 arcs in 430 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 47 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 28 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 21:27:03] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 469 ms returned [30, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 551 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/75 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 641 ms. Remains : 62/75 places, 255/255 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 62 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 115 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 32 to 30
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2833 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 5/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 318 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 263 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 140 ms. (283 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-05-30 21:27:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 21:27:06] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 67/109 variables, 41/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 41/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 13/122 variables, 15/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 300 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 67/109 variables, 41/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 41/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 13/122 variables, 15/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 473 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 819ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 28 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 44 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1065 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1287968 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=429 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1287968 steps, saw 98287 distinct states, run finished after 3015 ms. (steps per millisecond=427 ) properties seen :0
[2025-05-30 21:27:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:27:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 21:27:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 67/109 variables, 41/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 41/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 13/122 variables, 15/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 241 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 67/109 variables, 41/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 41/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 13/122 variables, 15/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 364 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 616ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 46 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 31 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 32 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 29 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:27:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 226 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 33 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 289 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 368 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1621824 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=540 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1621824 steps, saw 114670 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=540 ) properties seen :0
[2025-05-30 21:27:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-30 21:27:14] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 65/107 variables, 39/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 39/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 13/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 13/120 variables, 13/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 193 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/16 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 26/42 variables, 15/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 65/107 variables, 39/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 39/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 13/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 13/120 variables, 13/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 288 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 492ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 778 steps, including 48 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 17 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(p0)))'
Support contains 15 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 21:27:16] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 205 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 412 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1226 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(((p1&&G(p2))||p0))))'
Support contains 7 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 202 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 61/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 226 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 880 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 632 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 747 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 181 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1271 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 30117 steps (7 resets) in 469 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p2 p0) (OR p0 p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 1018 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 7 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 61 cols
[2025-05-30 21:27:21] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 215 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 267 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 486 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 25 ms returned []
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 21:27:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 29/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 18/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 60/121 variables, 61/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 17638 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 61/61 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 29/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 38/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 60/121 variables, 61/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 240/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 18/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 1/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 507 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30044 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 61/61 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 47889ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47899ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48440 ms. Remains : 61/61 places, 255/255 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 679 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 497 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 2/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 36725 steps (8 resets) in 130 ms. (280 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p2 p0) (OR p0 p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 1000 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 673 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 498 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12925058751732255218
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:28:14] [INFO ] Built C files in 94ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12925058751732255218
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12925058751732255218;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1515 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12925058751732255218;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 63 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12925058751732255218;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12260195448346253002.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 7 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 21:28:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 29/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 18/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 60/121 variables, 61/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 15673 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 61/61 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 29/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 38/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 60/121 variables, 61/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 240/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 18/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 1/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 508 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 61/61 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 45784ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45786ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46086 ms. Remains : 61/61 places, 255/255 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2125298083401255946
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 13 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:29:15] [INFO ] Built C files in 62ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2125298083401255946
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2125298083401255946;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1060 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2125298083401255946;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 43 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2125298083401255946;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased13091252872331172731.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 683 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-01 finished in 120274 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(!((X(p1)&&p0) U X(X((X(p1) U !p2)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 135 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 276 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), true, (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-02 finished in 442 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 438 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 18 steps with 0 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-03 finished in 686 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((!p0&&X((!p0 U (X(!p1)||G(!p0))))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 252 ms :[p0, p0, (AND p0 p1), (AND p0 p1), (AND p0 p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23790 reset in 426 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 623 steps with 146 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 8 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-04 finished in 869 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G((G(p0)||F(p1)))&&X((G(X(p2)) U p3)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 949 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3325 reset in 659 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 257 steps with 11 reset with depth 30 and stack size 30 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-05 finished in 1854 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 15 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 435 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 522 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 33335 steps (7 resets) in 306 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 174 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 15 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 202 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 353 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 21:29:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 30/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 18/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/120 variables, 60/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 13028 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 30/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 38/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 60/120 variables, 60/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 240/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 8/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 10/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 1/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 510 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43138ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43140ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43516 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 255/255 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 170 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 13337 steps (3 resets) in 109 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 199 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2 reset in 369 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 446 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14651916257603033832
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:30:08] [INFO ] Built C files in 46ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14651916257603033832
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14651916257603033832;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1085 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14651916257603033832;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14651916257603033832;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15111491853480859707.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 15 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 21:30:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 30/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 18/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/120 variables, 60/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 12359 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 60/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 30/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 38/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 60/120 variables, 60/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 240/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 8/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 10/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 1/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 510 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 42445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42447ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42734 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 255/255 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14992904497535572605
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 255 transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 21:31:06] [INFO ] Built C files in 44ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14992904497535572605
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14992904497535572605;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1192 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14992904497535572605;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14992904497535572605;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5912993717708733477.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7207927601882204640.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL10208525071823463719.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7207927601882204640.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut16874634863202483467.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL10208525071823463719.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL10208525071823463719.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut16874634863202483467.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t33, t50, t67, t84, t101, t118, t135, t152, t169, t186, t203, t220, t237, t254, Interse...247
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
2 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
18 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.243893,19868,1,0,535,29804,540,258,4421,19883,533
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-06 finished in 120417 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((F(p1)&&p0)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 171 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3227 reset in 571 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 28 steps with 0 reset with depth 29 and stack size 29 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-07 finished in 939 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(!p0))))'
Support contains 3 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 167 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[true, p0, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 32 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-09 finished in 319 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(X((G(p1)&&p0))) U p1) U (G(p3)&&p2)))'
Support contains 23 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 501 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-10 finished in 664 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((((p0 U p1)||X(X(G(p1)))) U X(X(!p2))))'
Support contains 8 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 605 ms :[p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND p2 (NOT p1)), p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 296 steps with 97 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-11 finished in 793 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 9 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 143 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5546 reset in 390 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 53 steps with 7 reset with depth 4 and stack size 4 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-13 finished in 619 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p1)||p0) U (F(p3)&&p2)))'
Support contains 20 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [32]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 144 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 161 ms. Remains : 61/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1579 reset in 669 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1002 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 21:31:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 195 similar events)
[2025-05-30 21:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 21:31:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned [32, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 157 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 60/62 places, 255/255 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 88 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3231 reset in 619 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Dekker-PT-015-LTLFireability-15 finished in 895 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 264699 ms.

BK_STOP 1748640687082

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-015"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-015, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063700180"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-015.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-015 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;