Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063400042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063400042
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 131K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748558231208

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 169 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:37:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 383 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 98 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 135
Applied a total of 26 rules in 57 ms. Remains 98 /109 variables (removed 11) and now considering 135/150 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 391 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 785 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:37:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 135/233 variables, 98/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 60/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 8/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 12/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 5/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 4/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 25/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 135/233 variables, 98/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 60/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 134/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60366ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60386ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61262 ms. Remains : 98/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 53 to 51
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9127 resets) in 2271 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 26/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (176 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (207 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (397 resets) in 70 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (193 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (434 resets) in 72 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (183 resets) in 56 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (201 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (206 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (219 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (193 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (192 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (176 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (196 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (224 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (206 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 25/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (184 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (416 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (382 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (181 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (153 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (412 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (800 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (111 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (416 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (104 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/25 properties
[2025-05-29 22:38:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:38:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 16/84 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/212 variables, 84/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 53/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 21/233 variables, 14/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved in 2113 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 19/81 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 127/208 variables, 81/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 52/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 25/233 variables, 17/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 8/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved in 5012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7174ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 31 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 90 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 90 transition count 126
Applied a total of 16 rules in 30 ms. Remains 90 /98 variables (removed 8) and now considering 126/135 (removed 9) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 90/98 places, 126/135 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9116 resets) in 388 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (207 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (218 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (423 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (210 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (415 resets) in 69 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (203 resets) in 80 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (190 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (185 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (193 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (193 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (180 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (199 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (200 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (203 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (412 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (177 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (191 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (387 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (800 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (106 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (389 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 112745 steps, run visited all 21 properties in 503 ms. (steps per millisecond=224 )
Probabilistic random walk after 112745 steps, saw 46675 distinct states, run finished after 509 ms. (steps per millisecond=221 ) properties seen :21
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 98 places (down from 56) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 17 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 329 edges and 98 vertex of which 97 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 99
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 65 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 80
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 63 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 63 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 61 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 61 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 61 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 60 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 60 transition count 70
Applied a total of 83 rules in 25 ms. Remains 60 /98 variables (removed 38) and now considering 70/135 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 235 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 69 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:38:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 70/130 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 26/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 2675 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 70/130 variables, 60/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 26/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 69/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 7284 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9993ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/98 places, 70/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10254 ms. Remains : 60/98 places, 70/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6495239041278088109.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15802448149096699311.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6495239041278088109.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15802448149096699311.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13346e+07,1.74647,43552,2,12244,5,155691,6,0,310,168945,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l496>=1)))) + AX(AF(((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U !(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1)))))) * !(EG(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l496>=...305
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t37, t38, t39, t44, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57,...314
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10164470295661027435.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10164470295661027435.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10164470295661027435.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10164470295661027435.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10164470295661027435.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 78 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 55 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:39:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10587261381900389384.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1027572791870993967.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10587261381900389384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1027572791870993967.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13346e+07,13.4486,201216,1464,318,198548,15598,235,1.40236e+06,48,86556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(((EG(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u10.l345>=1))) * EG(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u12.l496>=1)))) + AX(AF(((i3.u5.s0>=1)&&(i5.u0.l0>=1)))))) U !(EF...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U ((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u10.l33>=1)))))) * !(EG(((EG(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u10.l345>=1...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t10, t24, t28, t37, t39, t51, t52, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64,...313
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 67 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 66 transition count 80
Applied a total of 68 rules in 14 ms. Remains 66 /98 variables (removed 32) and now considering 80/135 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:39:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/146 variables, 66/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 24/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 154 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 5441 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/146 variables, 66/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 24/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 79/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 9437 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14932ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14934ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15241 ms. Remains : 66/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15539997839360066818.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14891450556961901416.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15539997839360066818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14891450556961901416.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.64318e+07,12.6919,235984,2,19935,5,986137,6,0,344,854720,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(EG(((EF(((s1<1)||(l510<1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l485>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG(((E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l510<1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l485>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t50, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t7...301
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,19.9692,258888,1,0,216,1.2498e+06,191,106,2472,932187,254
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 86 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 86 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 86 transition count 113
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 81 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 79 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 78 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 77 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 100
Applied a total of 47 rules in 29 ms. Remains 77 /98 variables (removed 21) and now considering 100/135 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 77 cols
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:40:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/177 variables, 77/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 3423 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/177 variables, 77/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 99/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 21779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25291ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25292ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/98 places, 100/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25653 ms. Remains : 77/98 places, 100/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17417136202208757821.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5611456232001589347.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17417136202208757821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5611456232001589347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10656e+08,27.3009,489860,2,37771,5,2.29995e+06,6,0,408,1.4743e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2679527066120781865.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2679527066120781865.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2679527066120781865.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2679527066120781865.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2679527066120781865.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 70 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5295755563977306776.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9195900917377164836.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5295755563977306776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9195900917377164836.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10656e+08,11.091,135620,3947,1235,166200,10918,259,611570,132,175049,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((!(A(E(((u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u6.l337>=1)) U ((u1.s1>=1)&&(u4.l150>=1))) U A(((u1.s1>=1)&&(i0.u9.l488>=1)) U ((u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u11.l485>=1)...452
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(!((E(!(!((E(!(((u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u11.l485>=1))) U (!(((u1.s1>=1)&&(i0.u9.l488>=1))) * !(((u1.s1>=1...921
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t7, t8, t9, t27, t61, t62, t63, t69, t73, t74, t76, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t86...336
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 107
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 73 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 73 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 73 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 72 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 72 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 70 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 91
Applied a total of 60 rules in 27 ms. Remains 70 /98 variables (removed 28) and now considering 91/135 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 70 cols
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 277 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/161 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 38/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 4330 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/161 variables, 70/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 38/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 90/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 14139 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18510ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18511ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 91/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18824 ms. Remains : 70/98 places, 91/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5464698326577636409.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10723666257255759723.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5464698326577636409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10723666257255759723.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.21971e+07,6.46472,129052,2,15659,5,512516,6,0,371,519225,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1)) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))))) * (p19>=1)) * (l126>=1))) + EG(((A(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1)) U...372
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!((E(!(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)...2034
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t55, t56, t57, t58, t6...381
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph170461943595513918.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph170461943595513918.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph170461943595513918.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph170461943595513918.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph170461943595513918.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 80 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 62 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18040356670196087900.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability647132429937767774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18040356670196087900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability647132429937767774.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.21971e+07,28.4964,323928,3192,1135,302362,28602,277,1.66015e+06,122,259357,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 105
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 75 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 75 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 75 transition count 98
Applied a total of 49 rules in 5 ms. Remains 75 /98 variables (removed 23) and now considering 98/135 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 282 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 460 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 98/173 variables, 75/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 37/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 5527 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/173 variables, 75/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 37/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 97/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 25263 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 30860ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30861ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/98 places, 98/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31326 ms. Remains : 75/98 places, 98/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability714421344223055071.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15219114928781819523.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability714421344223055071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15219114928781819523.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.78716e+08,22.6283,425640,2,27178,5,1.99194e+06,6,0,398,1.33638e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((AF(!((((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))) * ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))) + EF((((s1>=1)&&(l504>=...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EG(!(!((((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))))) * ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))) + !((...272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t56, t58, t59, t60, t6...391
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1579508616963686536.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1579508616963686536.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1579508616963686536.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1579508616963686536.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1579508616963686536.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 112 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11464245163093420518.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14125921499692764735.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11464245163093420518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14125921499692764735.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 78 transition count 99
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 63 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 77
Applied a total of 75 rules in 20 ms. Remains 63 /98 variables (removed 35) and now considering 77/135 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/140 variables, 63/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 26/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/140 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4819 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/140 variables, 63/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 76/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/140 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 12759 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17601ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17602ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/98 places, 77/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17843 ms. Remains : 63/98 places, 77/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12748007356274432582.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15124252141050650235.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12748007356274432582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15124252141050650235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93895e+07,6.10032,128136,2,16798,5,486025,6,0,329,523070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AG((((s1<1)||(l335<1))&&((s0<1)||(l0<1)))) + !(A(!(((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U AG(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !((((s1<1)||(l335<1))&&((s0<1)||(l0<1)))))) + !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t51, t56, t57, t58, t5...341
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12673408782371179625.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12673408782371179625.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12673408782371179625.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12673408782371179625.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12673408782371179625.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6172788502430633459.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9364238463399617578.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6172788502430633459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9364238463399617578.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93895e+07,4.08173,90024,2079,567,83585,5540,268,675963,60,30851,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AG((((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i4.u11.l335<1))&&((i1.u5.s0<1)||(i0.u0.l0<1)))) + !(A(!(((i2.u2.p28>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1))) U AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i4.u11.l335<1))&&((i1.u5.s0<1)||(i0.u0.l0<1)))))...390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t9, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t33, t51, t56, t57, t58, t60, t61, t62, t63, ...334
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 79 transition count 102
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 70 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 67 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 67 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 65 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 65 transition count 83
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 63 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 63 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 62 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 62 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 76
Applied a total of 78 rules in 11 ms. Remains 62 /98 variables (removed 36) and now considering 76/135 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 75 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:45:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 76/138 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 28/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 2655 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 76/138 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 28/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 75/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 10450 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13129ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/98 places, 76/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13383 ms. Remains : 62/98 places, 76/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9096088850048234505.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4050482934517918471.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9096088850048234505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4050482934517918471.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16864e+07,3.13169,80432,2,16517,5,290731,6,0,324,317490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) * EF(AX(((s1<1)||(l150<1))))) * AX(((EX(((s1<1)||(l355<1))) + (s5<1)) + (l0<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * (E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))))))) * !(EX(!(((EX(((s1<1)||...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t42, t43, t44, t50, t5...356
(forward)formula 0,1,24.4336,504072,1,0,240,2.46371e+06,178,103,2292,2.50456e+06,264
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 81 transition count 102
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 74 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 74 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 74 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 73 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 73 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 73 transition count 91
Applied a total of 53 rules in 15 ms. Remains 73 /98 variables (removed 25) and now considering 91/135 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 73 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 207 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:46:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/164 variables, 73/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 31/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 2/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 11475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/164 variables, 73/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 31/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 90/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 12485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23988ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23990ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/98 places, 91/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24371 ms. Remains : 73/98 places, 91/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability438299714763051685.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17237928812904849033.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability438299714763051685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17237928812904849033.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28038e+08,18.7498,345464,2,26612,5,1.4086e+06,6,0,383,1.29746e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EF(((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l489>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l124>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))) U !(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))))) U (!(E(E...445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t50, t51, t52, t54, t57, t58, t59, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t7...346
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12069281616342851372.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12069281616342851372.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12069281616342851372.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12069281616342851372.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12069281616342851372.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17481649562760043636.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2407507803899431431.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17481649562760043636.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2407507803899431431.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28038e+08,5.85118,111572,2507,590,130864,11745,267,646653,77,91672,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EF(((AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u14.l489>=1))) + !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u16.l504>=1)))) + (((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l124>=1))||((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u16.l504>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5....580
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t28, t50, t51, t52, t54, t57, t58, t59, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, ...350
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 98
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 67 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 67 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 64 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 62 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 62 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 60 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 60 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 59 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 59 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 69
Applied a total of 86 rules in 25 ms. Remains 59 /98 variables (removed 39) and now considering 69/135 (removed 66) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 59 cols
[2025-05-29 22:47:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:47:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:47:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 162 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:47:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:47:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/128 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 2416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/128 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 68/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 7264 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9723ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9723ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/98 places, 69/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10014 ms. Remains : 59/98 places, 69/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17593410751007597653.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:47:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2762292366471449416.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17593410751007597653.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2762292366471449416.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.16082e+06,2.24494,56760,2,14057,5,202797,6,0,305,225135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/68
(forward)formula 0,0,12.9435,274096,1,0,20,1.12222e+06,20,4,1645,1.1395e+06,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 79 transition count 98
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 67 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 80
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 62 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 72
Applied a total of 78 rules in 4 ms. Remains 62 /98 variables (removed 36) and now considering 72/135 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-29 22:48:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:48:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 24/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 2763 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 24/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 71/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 11409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14194ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/98 places, 72/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14404 ms. Remains : 62/98 places, 72/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16670549314126692902.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14544784257952683807.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16670549314126692902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14544784257952683807.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61744e+07,9.31456,190888,2,23130,5,874807,6,0,320,624413,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF(((p11>=1)&&(l154>=1))) * EG((AF(EX(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + !(((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U !(AX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U ((p11>=1)&&(l154>=1))) * EG((!(EG(!(EX(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + !(((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1)))...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t42, t44, t45, t46, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t6...311
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5300941445424771165.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5300941445424771165.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5300941445424771165.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5300941445424771165.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5300941445424771165.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12609026924225595009.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:48:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2485310824730039177.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12609026924225595009.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2485310824730039177.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 105
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 68 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 66 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 65 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 65 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 83
Applied a total of 70 rules in 14 ms. Remains 65 /98 variables (removed 33) and now considering 83/135 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 236 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:49:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/148 variables, 65/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 32/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 3800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/148 variables, 65/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 32/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 82/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 18841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22678ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/98 places, 83/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23016 ms. Remains : 65/98 places, 83/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16594590492530542754.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13087608293146919864.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16594590492530542754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13087608293146919864.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.49309e+07,8.30311,170296,2,18019,5,600875,6,0,343,607341,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)) U E(((p22>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U AG(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))) U AF(E(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) U (((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) U (((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))))))) U (!(!((E(!...627
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t45, t46, t47,...384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9986602399921352459.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9986602399921352459.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9986602399921352459.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9986602399921352459.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9986602399921352459.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 87 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10345922930985323786.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:50:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability284382392855340291.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10345922930985323786.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability284382392855340291.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.49309e+07,15.4621,257828,2885,1390,196793,24861,285,1.90722e+06,88,646110,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(A(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u2.l354>=1)) U E(((i3.u11.p22>=1)&&(i5.u0.l0>=1)) U AG(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u9.l149>=1))))) U AF(E(((i5.u0.s1>=1...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(E(((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u9.l149>=1)) U (((i5.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u9.l149>=1))||((i5.u0.s1>=1)...850
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t46, t47, t48, t56, t61, t62, t...360
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 96
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 61 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 61 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 68
Applied a total of 84 rules in 5 ms. Remains 60 /98 variables (removed 38) and now considering 68/135 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:50:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/128 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 24/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 2741 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/128 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 24/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 67/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 8297 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/98 places, 68/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11330 ms. Remains : 60/98 places, 68/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13252503606416637534.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17022323213673652082.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13252503606416637534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17022323213673652082.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46664e+07,8.08984,142088,2,21059,5,621773,6,0,308,481915,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t42, t43, t44, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...301
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11884488254295192287.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11884488254295192287.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11884488254295192287.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11884488254295192287.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11884488254295192287.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10504136640650828078.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9382387558235587979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10504136640650828078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9382387558235587979.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 79 transition count 102
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 89
Applied a total of 60 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /98 variables (removed 28) and now considering 89/135 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 70 cols
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:52:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 89/159 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 32/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 159/159 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 8373 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/159 variables, 70/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 32/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 88/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 159/159 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 23104 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31506ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 89/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31808 ms. Remains : 70/98 places, 89/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16552820003662829549.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:52:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10516839395830389540.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16552820003662829549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10516839395830389540.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.06672e+07,20.1548,367932,2,25722,5,1.38914e+06,6,0,369,1.38977e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E((EG(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)))) + !(AX(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))))) U (EF(!(((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1)))) * AX(((p35>=1)&&(l136>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E((EG(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)))) + !(!(EX(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))))))) U (E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l12...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t54, t57, t58, t5...371
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15830486388661215010.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15830486388661215010.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15830486388661215010.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15830486388661215010.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15830486388661215010.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 75 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 43 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1863555958354155502.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15470778937035587102.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1863555958354155502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15470778937035587102.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 96
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 67 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 67 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 64 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 64 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 62 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 60 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 60 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 60 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 59 transition count 67
Applied a total of 85 rules in 16 ms. Remains 59 /98 variables (removed 39) and now considering 67/135 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 59 cols
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:53:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 67/126 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 23/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 3/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 126/126 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 4051 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/126 variables, 59/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 23/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 66/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 126/126 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 6482 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10555ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10556ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/98 places, 67/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10788 ms. Remains : 59/98 places, 67/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:53:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14076266902018640625.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8899357246749530667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14076266902018640625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8899357246749530667.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.15121e+06,1.47029,39776,2,12059,5,141512,6,0,303,145664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))) + ((s2>=1)&&(l496>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((s2>=1)&&(l496>=1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t5...291
(forward)formula 0,0,13.329,276180,1,0,160,1.28601e+06,157,70,2047,1.2514e+06,174
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 101
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 72 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 84
Applied a total of 63 rules in 4 ms. Remains 69 /98 variables (removed 29) and now considering 84/135 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 69 cols
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 263 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:53:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/153 variables, 69/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 30/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 2426 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/153 variables, 69/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 30/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 83/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 9448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11901ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11902ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12169 ms. Remains : 69/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18394211585987526262.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17545662536623079013.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18394211585987526262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17545662536623079013.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.15972e+07,7.61903,154696,2,21083,5,621194,6,0,360,632677,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))) U EX(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1))) + A(((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1)))) + ((p23>...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))))),((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1)))] = FALSE * [((EY(Fwd...389
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/83
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t50, t51, t52, t55, t56, t57, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t6...336
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1874531494165671850.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1874531494165671850.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1874531494165671850.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1874531494165671850.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1874531494165671850.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 83 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1222571428928684171.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:54:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11015448771304697442.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1222571428928684171.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11015448771304697442.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 87
Applied a total of 59 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /98 variables (removed 28) and now considering 87/135 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2025-05-29 22:55:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:55:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:55:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:55:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/157 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 27/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 157/157 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 2972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/157 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 27/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 86/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 157/157 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 8317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11328ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11328ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11593 ms. Remains : 70/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3925184056251699244.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13142619032440352865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3925184056251699244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13142619032440352865.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03005e+07,8.79292,179348,2,17230,5,672739,6,0,367,648561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((!((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l505>=1)))) * AX(((p38>=1)&&(l136>=1))))) U !(EF(AX((A(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l336>=1)...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l505>=1)))) * !(EX(!(((p38>=1)&&(l136>=1)))))))) * !(E(...349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t54, t56, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69,...339
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15690450352029170846.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15690450352029170846.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15690450352029170846.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15690450352029170846.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15690450352029170846.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15328302426725973362.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:55:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18049825221519223376.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15328302426725973362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18049825221519223376.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5025256319981014491.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5025256319981014491.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5025256319981014491.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5025256319981014491.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5025256319981014491.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 113 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability226349528095125401.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:56:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6394401691638503641.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability226349528095125401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6394401691638503641.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.97042e+08,113.559,1843448,5145,11974,1.26318e+06,2.96025e+06,414,5.30952e+06,176,1.42151e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(((EG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l345>=1))) * EG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u16.l496>=1)))) + AX(AF(((i1.u2.s0>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))))) U !(EF(...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U ((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l33>=1)))))) * !(EG(((EG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l345>=1))...378
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t24, t28, t29, t31, t33, t34, t71, t73, t97, t98, t99, t101, t103, t104, t105, t106, ...583
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,506.621,2783000,1,0,2.00302e+06,2.96025e+06,1051,1.45542e+07,585,1.9837e+07,142296
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((((!(A(E(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i7.i1.u8.l337>=1)) U ((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u6.l150>=1))) U A(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u13.l488>=1)) U ((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&...503
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(!((E(!(!((E(!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u16.l485>=1))) U (!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u13.l488>=1))) * !(((i0.u...998
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,1,806.13,3113752,1,0,2.40247e+06,2.96025e+06,1004,1.47318e+07,571,2.34757e+07,2999778
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG((((((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u5.l149>=1)) + E(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l502>=1)) U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i7.i1.u8.l337>=1))))) * (i6.u16.p19>=1)...550
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!((E(!(!(!((E(!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l345>=1))) U (!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u6.l90>=1)))...2822
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,967.101,3466520,1,0,2.85602e+06,2.96025e+06,1170,1.68546e+07,630,2.34757e+07,1689562
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(E((AF(!((((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.i0.u14.l490>=1))&&((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u5.l149>=1))))) * ((EG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l491>=1))) + !(((i0.u...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EG(!(!((((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.i0.u14.l490>=1))&&((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u5.l149>=1))))))) * ((EG...363
(forward)formula 3,1,1326.17,4203992,1,0,3.25597e+06,2.96025e+06,1007,2.15145e+07,571,2.91092e+07,208722
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG((AG((((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i7.i0.u7.l335<1))&&((i1.u2.s0<1)||(i0.u0.l0<1)))) + !(A(!(((i0.u0.p28>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1))) U AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i7.i0.u7.l335<1))&&((i1.u2.s0<1)||(i0.u0.l0<1)))...392
(forward)formula 4,1,1390.95,4203992,1,0,3.25597e+06,2.96025e+06,1251,2.15145e+07,656,2.91092e+07,1541402
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(E(EF(((AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u13.l489>=1))) + !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l504>=1)))) + (((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u4.l124>=1))||((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0....361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l504>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u...570
(forward)formula 5,0,1481.14,4203992,1,0,3.25597e+06,2.96025e+06,1304,2.15145e+07,664,2.91092e+07,2735279
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((EF(((i3.u1.p11>=1)&&(i0.u0.l154>=1))) * EG((AF(EX(((i0.u0.p23>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))) + !(((i0.u0.p28>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))))) U !(AX(!((...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U ((i3.u1.p11>=1)&&(i0.u0.l154>=1))) * EG((!(EG(!(EX(((i0.u0.p23>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))))) ...242
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13424542291300738102.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 23:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18201196564960256937.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13424542291300738102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18201196564960256937.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.97042e+08,34.9991,560484,2,44077,5,2.92206e+06,6,0,527,1.52146e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF(((p11>=1)&&(l154>=1))) * EG((AF(EX(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + !(((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U !(AX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U ((p11>=1)&&(l154>=1))) * EG((!(EG(!(EX(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + !(((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1)))...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t54,...565
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,403.26,2744784,1,0,405,1.55452e+07,13,200,1688,1.51554e+07,145
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)) U E(((p22>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U AG(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))) U AF(E(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) U (((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) U (((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))))))) U (!(!((E(!...627
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,689.822,3437068,1,0,405,2.1717e+07,15,200,1803,1.51554e+07,139
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063400042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m09 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;