Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r044-tall-174854029200834.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r044-tall-174854029200834
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 330K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 292K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748669107472

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 61 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Transformed 140 places.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Transformed 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 140 places and 128 transitions and 416 arcs in 148 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
Support contains 140 out of 140 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-31 05:25:08] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 220 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:25:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 389 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 7019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 112/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 12049 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19142ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19557 ms. Remains : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Support contains 140 out of 140 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 54 to 49
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1422 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 2/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 217 ms. (183 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 174 ms. (228 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 12/15 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 12/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 21/36 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 21/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 12/48 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 12/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/268 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 60 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 48/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 0/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 70ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4032833537459384052.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15803165107002205006.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4032833537459384052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15803165107002205006.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.15039,168796,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((RecBuff_3_4==0)||(all_passive_3==0))&&((all_passive_4==0)||(RecBuff_4_3==0)))&&(((RecBuff_2_3==0)||(all_passive_2==0))&&((a...3251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((RecBuff_3_4==0)||(all_passive_3==0))&&((all_passive_4==0)||(RecBuff_4_3=...4578
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:25:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6419347770576370155.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6419347770576370155.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6419347770576370155.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6419347770576370155.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6419347770576370155.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14380551096365476246.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8952355068718412105.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14380551096365476246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8952355068718412105.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,2.44126,86456,6527,35,233188,264,343,148006,43,437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((i9.u27.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(i5.u37.all_passive_3==0))&&((i6.u16.all_passive_4==0)||(i4.u31.RecBuff_4_3==0)))&&(((i4.u12.RecBuf...4295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((i9.u27.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(i5.u37.all_passive_3==0))&&((i6.u16.all_passive...6006
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 6478 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 112/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 11959 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18460ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18463ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18709 ms. Remains : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7506931439128116991.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18106813022771180113.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7506931439128116991.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18106813022771180113.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,7.07962,199584,2,102080,5,980803,6,0,691,698570,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!((((((Modify_1_2==1)||(Modify_2_3==1))||((Modify_1_1==1)||(Modify_2_4==1)))||(((Modify_4_2==1)||(Modify_2_2==1))||((Modify_4_4==1)...5212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Active_3_2==1))&&((Acknowledge_2...19363
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph645589389102531446.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph645589389102531446.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph645589389102531446.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph645589389102531446.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph645589389102531446.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 76 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability223869910436964357.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability62766168726541561.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability223869910436964357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability62766168726541561.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...259
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.26399,57640,8093,58,172212,248,347,90054,60,360,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!((((((i3.u15.Modify_1_2==1)||(i1.u41.Modify_2_3==1))||((i2.u6.Modify_1_1==1)||(i8.u22.Modify_2_4==1)))||(((i3.u15.Modify_4_2==1)||...6808
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i0.u3.Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(i3.u15.Active_3_2==1))&&((...27022
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 6530 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 112/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 12027 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18573ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18575ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18806 ms. Remains : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10346619734839115546.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7767934327401802554.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10346619734839115546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7767934327401802554.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,7.50238,199692,2,102080,5,980803,6,0,691,698570,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(EX((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==0)||(Active_3_2==0))||((Acknowledge_2_2==0)||(Acknowledge_4_2==0)))&&(((Acknowledge_1_2==0)||(Active_2_...3685
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),EX((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==0)||(Active_3_2==0))||((Acknowledge_2_2==0)||(Acknowledge_4_2=...410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6414890810721291355.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6414890810721291355.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6414890810721291355.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6414890810721291355.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6414890810721291355.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 76 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1752087198628009975.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8189966430246164806.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1752087198628009975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8189966430246164806.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.99771,78644,8923,58,234907,257,340,131029,60,354,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(EX((((((((i0.u4.Acknowledge_1_2==0)||(i2.u11.Active_3_2==0))||((i9.u3.Acknowledge_2_2==0)||(i3.u10.Acknowledge_4_2==0)))&&(((i0.u4...4805
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),EX((((((((i0.u4.Acknowledge_1_2==0)||(i2.u11.Active_3_2==0))||((i9.u3.Acknowledge_2_2==0)...4884
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,1,10.3316,320400,1,0,843226,597,1517,718346,222,2417,1338447
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 140 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 120 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 104 transition count 96
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 104 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 88 transition count 80
Applied a total of 100 rules in 24 ms. Remains 88 /140 variables (removed 52) and now considering 80/128 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 84/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 12/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/88 variables, 6/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 80/168 variables, 88/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 2473 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 88/88 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 84/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 12/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/88 variables, 6/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 80/168 variables, 88/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 64/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 4578 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 88/88 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7059ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/140 places, 80/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7229 ms. Remains : 88/140 places, 80/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11775928437847408308.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15293493680754892011.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11775928437847408308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15293493680754892011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,671809,0.081534,7924,2,5008,5,18038,6,0,435,13290,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Active_3_2==1))&&((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_4_2==1)))||(((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Active_2_2==1))&...1474
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Active_3_2==1))&&((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_4_2==1)))||(((Ack...1519
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 32/273/48
(forward)formula 0,1,1.52221,72476,1,0,6,361001,20,1,2527,191992,8
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-31 05:28:57] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 05:28:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:28:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:28:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 6553 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 136/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/140 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/268 variables, 140/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 112/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 12233 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 140/140 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18810ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18955 ms. Remains : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17693221987482352558.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17016574182401681769.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17693221987482352558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17016574182401681769.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,8.20396,199704,2,102080,5,980803,6,0,691,698570,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((A(((((((WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1))||((Mutex_4==1)&&(WaitMutex_4_4==1)))||(((WaitMutex_4_1==1)&&(Mutex_1==1))||((Mutex_3==1)&&(...5243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!((((((((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Active_3_2==1))&&((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_4_2==1))...7044
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16965336897983904543.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16965336897983904543.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16965336897983904543.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16965336897983904543.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16965336897983904543.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 76 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7215293273369663058.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13380439904504580986.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7215293273369663058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13380439904504580986.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.70502,77988,10446,58,230275,261,341,127174,60,366,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((A(((((((u18.WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(i4.u17.Mutex_2==1))||((i9.u33.Mutex_4==1)&&(u16.WaitMutex_4_4==1)))||(((u16.WaitMutex_4_1==1)&&(i1.u...6847
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!((((((((i0.u40.Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(i4.u17.Active_3_2==1))&&((i8.u10.Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&...10770
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 140 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 104 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 72 transition count 64
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 72 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 56 transition count 48
Applied a total of 164 rules in 9 ms. Remains 56 /140 variables (removed 84) and now considering 48/128 (removed 80) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 56 cols
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 43, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 54]
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 6, 14, 20, 19, 32, 36, 54]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/140 places, 48/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 48/140 places, 48/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8725591088395370350.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6078738384710186816.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8725591088395370350.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6078738384710186816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4929,0.021537,4700,2,852,5,4382,6,0,243,3261,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_4==1))||((all_active_2==1)||(all_active_3==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_4==1))||((all_active_2==1)||(all_active_3==1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/0/32
(forward)formula 0,1,0.113888,9180,1,0,6,26377,19,1,1393,14193,8
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-31 05:30:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6791868850302752982.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10608019093718496968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6791868850302752982.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10608019093718496968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.83873,169152,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(AG((((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_4==1))||((all_active_2==1)||(all_active_3==1))))) + AG(EF(AX((((((updating_3_4==1)||(updating_...459
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !((((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_4==1))||((all_active_2==1)||(all_ac...547
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8197729737712689941.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8197729737712689941.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8197729737712689941.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8197729737712689941.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8197729737712689941.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8454155691880702597.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15899919970071420011.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8454155691880702597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15899919970071420011.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.99355,79036,6054,37,211688,322,332,137541,48,507,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(AG((((u18.all_active_1==1)||(u15.all_active_4==1))||((u21.all_active_2==1)||(i6.u16.all_active_3==1))))) + AG(EF(AX((((((i9.u35.up...582
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !((((u18.all_active_1==1)||(u15.all_active_4==1))||((u21.all_active_2=...670
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,11.3808,318468,1,0,733149,1184,1426,777328,186,3486,959203
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 140 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 112
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 92 transition count 80
Applied a total of 96 rules in 12 ms. Remains 92 /140 variables (removed 48) and now considering 80/128 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [5, 9, 10, 16, 21, 27, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56, 65, 67, 75, 83, 90]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/140 places, 80/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 135 ms. Remains : 76/140 places, 80/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12834499858277295095.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9247523392388372324.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12834499858277295095.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9247523392388372324.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.84662e+06,1.95883,68288,2,37122,5,325609,6,0,387,243339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF((((((updating_3_4==0)&&(updating_2_4==0))&&((updating_3_1==0)&&(updating_1_3==0)))&&(((updating_3_2==0)&&(updating_1_2==0))&&((u...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U (((((updating_3_4==0)&&(updating_2_4==0))&&((updating_3_1==0)&&(updating_1_3==0)))&&(((...413
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,10.2498,278432,1,0,6,1.51012e+06,21,0,2090,502172,8
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 29 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 29 transitions
Performed 29 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 29
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 140 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 110 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 102 transition count 91
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 102 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 76 transition count 65
Applied a total of 127 rules in 16 ms. Remains 76 /140 variables (removed 64) and now considering 65/128 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 76 cols
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned [3, 6, 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 25, 28, 35, 44, 46, 48, 52, 54, 61, 68, 74]
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [14, 17, 44, 48, 6, 16, 54, 61]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 120 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/140 places, 65/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 68/140 places, 65/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14790757080952568673.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9515211713129590316.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14790757080952568673.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9515211713129590316.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,344965,0.116194,9888,2,3809,5,30262,6,0,340,24275,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((((updating_2_4==1)&&(MesBuffReply_1_1==1))&&(all_active_1==1))))) U (MesBuffReply_4_1==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((updating_2_4==1)&&(MesBuffReply_1_1==1))&&(all_active_1==1)))))))))) * (Mes...183
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.616464,29816,1,0,8,144382,20,1,1897,59997,11
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-31 05:31:09] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 126 /126 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 126/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13800461625726824216.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5326132749738007335.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13800461625726824216.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5326132749738007335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.53597,164152,2,74431,5,803843,6,0,635,589088,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph615597594490572694.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph615597594490572694.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph615597594490572694.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph615597594490572694.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph615597594490572694.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 83 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6801028511375866817.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13388478785399149604.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6801028511375866817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13388478785399149604.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.9993,79556,6796,40,218737,239,335,126770,46,407,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((i2.u33.Message_3_3==1)) + (EX(!(A(((((u3.WaitMutex_4_3==1)&&(i2.u11.Mutex_3==1))||(((i1.u6.Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(i6.u27.Active_2_2==...462
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(i2.u33.Message_3_3==1))] != FALSE + [(EY((Init * EX(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (i8.u31.updating_2_1==1))) U ...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,6.11666,187332,1,0,507835,659,1677,362219,192,2689,833312
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 186 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 195 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10221782359739815880.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7985446181127842976.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10221782359739815880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7985446181127842976.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.45502,169100,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((all_active_4==1) + EX((MesBuffReply_2_3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((all_active_4==1))) * !(EX((MesBuffReply_2_3==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,26.496,663112,1,0,10,4.19872e+06,12,4,2739,907108,5
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 182 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17056450459899246239.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11338360554431528958.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17056450459899246239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11338360554431528958.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.63026,168980,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((!(((AX((updating_1_4==1)) + EF((MesBuffReply_1_2==1))) + (((Mutex_1==1)&&(WaitMutex_2_1==1))||(!(((MesBuffReply_3_3==1)&&(updating_2...386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,(!(((!(EX(!((updating_1_4==1)))) + E(TRUE U (MesBuffReply_1_2==1))) + (((Mutex_1==1)&&(WaitMutex_2...827
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5038824426654699059.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5038824426654699059.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5038824426654699059.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5038824426654699059.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5038824426654699059.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7242222397815773815.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:32:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6181996244718270772.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7242222397815773815.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6181996244718270772.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,2.20242,82768,7835,44,223962,281,356,142077,48,482,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((!(((AX((i1.u2.updating_1_4==1)) + EF((i1.u38.MesBuffReply_1_2==1))) + (((i6.u17.Mutex_1==1)&&(u21.WaitMutex_2_1==1))||(!(((i3.u14.Me...484
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,(!(((!(EX(!((i1.u2.updating_1_4==1)))) + E(TRUE U (i1.u38.MesBuffReply_1_2==1))) + (((i6.u17.Mutex...1010
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,16.3092,483972,1,0,1.28226e+06,1032,1807,916046,211,3187,1921965
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 155 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 125 /125 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 125/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4790447275842699546.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4797310199217192112.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4790447275842699546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4797310199217192112.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.38437,172172,2,72242,5,844955,6,0,631,619887,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((all_passive_1==1)&&(RecBuff_1_3==1))) + (EX(EX(EX((all_active_1==1)))) * (((RecBuff_3_1==1)&&(all_passive_3==1)) + (A((MesBuffRe...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((all_passive_1==1)&&(RecBuff_1_3==1))))) + (EX(EX(EX((all_active_1==1)))) * (((RecBu...566
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8627189345331251602.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8627189345331251602.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8627189345331251602.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8627189345331251602.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8627189345331251602.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability403801536374724727.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5364244882458375520.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability403801536374724727.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5364244882458375520.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,2.5152,100804,7983,39,276722,279,337,183326,48,435,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((i0.u0.all_passive_1==1)&&(i11.u38.RecBuff_1_3==1))) + (EX(EX(EX((u23.all_active_1==1)))) * (((i2.u14.RecBuff_3_1==1)&&(i4.u13.al...469
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.all_passive_1==1)&&(i11.u38.RecBuff_1_3==1))))) + (EX(EX(EX((u23.all_active_1...683
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 195 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17648784489966076276.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7953059015276671643.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17648784489966076276.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7953059015276671643.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.30649,169284,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(A(!(AX((((MesBuffReply_4_3==1)&&(RecBuff_2_3==1))&&(all_passive_2==1)))) U AF(((RecBuff_2_3==1)&&(all_passive_2==1))))) * EX(AG(EF(((...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * EG(!((E(!(!(EG(!(((RecBuff_2_3==1)&&(all_passive_2==1)))))) U (!(!(!(EX(!((((MesBuffReply_4_3==1)&&...395
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12478338976203419658.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12478338976203419658.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12478338976203419658.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12478338976203419658.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12478338976203419658.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12684034303235492798.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2223268788119220052.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12684034303235492798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2223268788119220052.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,4.78105,185800,12745,25,497475,194,309,318423,35,268,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(A(!(AX((((i1.u12.MesBuffReply_4_3==1)&&(i9.u0.RecBuff_2_3==1))&&(i5.u31.all_passive_2==1)))) U AF(((i9.u0.RecBuff_2_3==1)&&(i5.u31.al...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * EG(!((E(!(!(EG(!(((i9.u0.RecBuff_2_3==1)&&(i5.u31.all_passive_2==1)))))) U (!(!(!(EX(!((((i1.u12.Me...465
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,19.1136,462020,1,0,1.0485e+06,424,1638,861695,155,1289,1604176
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 140 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 117 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 103 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 102 transition count 92
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 102 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 84 transition count 74
Applied a total of 110 rules in 11 ms. Remains 84 /140 variables (removed 56) and now considering 74/128 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 84 cols
[2025-05-31 05:34:49] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [3, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 23, 24, 29, 30, 48, 54, 56, 58, 60, 68, 72, 75, 77, 78, 82]
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 54, 60, 72, 3, 48, 77]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/140 places, 74/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 77/140 places, 74/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3125448616503292289.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14188656943044948009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3125448616503292289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14188656943044948009.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,462501,0.163202,11556,2,4839,5,38531,6,0,385,31860,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((Message_3_2==1)) + !(E((AG((MesBuffReply_2_3==1)) * !(E((updating_2_3==1) U (((Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_2_2==1))&&((Active_...265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!((Message_3_2==1)))))),(!(E(TRUE U !((MesBuffReply_2_3==1)))) * !(E((updating_2_3==1) U ...334
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,2.30789,77852,1,0,16,496894,45,5,2121,194524,21
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned [7, 14, 16, 24, 34, 41, 42, 50, 55, 66, 84, 99, 103, 115, 129, 138]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 187 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 194 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 128/128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10556258880868788647.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 05:34:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12600915035041103637.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10556258880868788647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12600915035041103637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,5.24143,168324,2,70400,5,836220,6,0,627,616792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((!(A(AG(((Mutex_1==1)&&(WaitMutex_2_1==1))) U !(E((Message_1_4==1) U ((RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(all_passive_4==1)))))) * EG((((updating_3_1=...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(!(E((Message_1_4==1) U ((RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(all_passive_4==1))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U ...489
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11702637952378505837.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11702637952378505837.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11702637952378505837.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11702637952378505837.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11702637952378505837.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15436522085907967928.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3491260000159996625.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15436522085907967928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3491260000159996625.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.11721,51128,4475,39,145218,248,337,80785,45,371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((!(A(AG(((i6.u24.Mutex_1==1)&&(u13.WaitMutex_2_1==1))) U !(E((i9.u31.Message_1_4==1) U ((i9.u9.RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(i5.u16.all_passive_4...315
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(!(E((i9.u31.Message_1_4==1) U ((i9.u9.RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(i5.u16.all_passive_4==1))...595
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1732085136509737681.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1732085136509737681.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1732085136509737681.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1732085136509737681.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1732085136509737681.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 75 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14655058617706930185.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:35:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability171245253063514916.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14655058617706930185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability171245253063514916.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.14172,51372,6551,63,141716,288,358,78954,65,453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((i8.u28.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(i10.u37.all_passive_3==0))&&((i4.u16.all_passive_4==0)||(i11.u38.RecBuff_4_3==0)))&&(((i11.u0.RecB...4266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((i8.u28.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(i10.u37.all_passive_3==0))&&((i4.u16.all_passiv...5937
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 94 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13746400305314542945.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 05:38:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17849545658529508504.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13746400305314542945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17849545658529508504.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71789e+09,1.94814,85536,10775,128,216518,373,321,147912,112,790,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((u19.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(u13.all_passive_3==0))&&((u23.all_passive_4==0)||(u12.RecBuff_4_3==0)))&&(((u11.RecBuff_2_3==0)||(u24...3796
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((u19.RecBuff_3_4==0)||(u13.all_passive_3==0))&&((u23.all_passive_4==0)||(...5315
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,303.175,5542352,1,0,1.35995e+07,3087,1027,1.23751e+07,310,15698,4696840
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EF((!((((((u1.Modify_1_2==1)||(u4.Modify_2_3==1))||((u1.Modify_1_1==1)||(u4.Modify_2_4==1)))||(((u3.Modify_4_2==1)||(u4.Modify_2_2==1))...6032
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((u8.Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(u2.Active_3_2==1))&&((u14.Ack...23928
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
(forward)formula 1,0,753.51,12889000,1,0,2.8795e+07,3087,575,3.252e+07,224,15698,1
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF((A(((((((u1.WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(u8.Mutex_2==1))||((u5.Mutex_4==1)&&(u3.WaitMutex_4_4==1)))||(((u3.WaitMutex_4_1==1)&&(u7.Mutex_1==1))...6079
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!((((((((u8.Acknowledge_1_2==1)&&(u2.Active_3_2==1))&&((u14.Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(u17.Acknow...9550
(forward)formula 2,0,881.458,12889000,1,0,2.8795e+07,3087,1645,3.252e+07,321,15698,35663165
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AG(((u22.all_passive_1==1)&&(u6.RecBuff_1_3==1))) + (EX(EX(EX((u1.all_active_1==1)))) * (((u18.RecBuff_3_1==1)&&(u13.all_passive_3==1...425
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((u22.all_passive_1==1)&&(u6.RecBuff_1_3==1))))) + (EX(EX(EX((u1.all_active_1==1)))) ...629
(forward)formula 3,0,909.044,12889000,1,0,2.8795e+07,3087,1672,3.252e+07,323,15698,43254478
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF((!(A(AG(((u7.Mutex_1==1)&&(u4.WaitMutex_2_1==1))) U !(E((u16.Message_1_4==1) U ((u5.RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(u23.all_passive_4==1)))))) * EG...284
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(!(E((u16.Message_1_4==1) U ((u5.RecBuff_4_4==1)&&(u23.all_passive_4==1))))) U (!(...546
(forward)formula 4,0,910.907,12889000,1,0,2.8795e+07,3087,1675,3.252e+07,323,15698,43574210
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1737555 ms.

BK_STOP 1748670846254

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r044-tall-174854029200834"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04.tgz
mv DatabaseWithMutex-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;