Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813600260.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813600260
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 161K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 698K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748742327915

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-01 01:45:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-01 01:45:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-01 01:45:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 280 ms
[2025-06-01 01:45:31] [INFO ] Transformed 324 places.
[2025-06-01 01:45:31] [INFO ] Transformed 660 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:45:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 324 places and 660 transitions and 1800 arcs in 511 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 33 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 660/660 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 323 transition count 660
Applied a total of 1 rules in 83 ms. Remains 323 /324 variables (removed 1) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 42 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:45:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 569 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:45:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:45:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:45:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1360 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1997 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:45:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:45:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30332ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30367ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 323/324 places, 660/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32513 ms. Remains : 323/324 places, 660/660 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 323 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-01 01:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 144 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 660 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 21056 steps (94 resets) in 1404 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/27 properties
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 323 transition count 590
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 253 transition count 590
Performed 89 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 178 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 164 transition count 501
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 71 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 71 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 164 transition count 430
Applied a total of 389 rules in 178 ms. Remains 164 /323 variables (removed 159) and now considering 430/660 (removed 230) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-01 01:46:06] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 409 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:46:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:46:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1197 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1610 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 48 ms returned []
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:46:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:46:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 185 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 195 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 208 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 222 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 211 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 207 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 206 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 187 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 194 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/594 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30039 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 63/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 17/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 430/593 variables, 163/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 287/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 593/594 variables, and 962 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30076 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 163/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60271ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60276ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62126 ms. Remains : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 251 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 51 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-00 finished in 62494 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(((p0 U X(X((p1 U X(p2))))) U (G((p0 U X(X((p1 U X(p2))))))||(p2&&(p0 U X(X((p1 U X(p2)))))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:47:08] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:47:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:47:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:47:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1410 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:47:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30140ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30145ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31572 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 699 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 5 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-01 finished in 32339 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&(F(p1) U !p2))))'
Support contains 4 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:47:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 881 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:47:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30153ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30170ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31285 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 279 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p2), (OR (NOT p0) p2), true, (NOT p1), p2]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-02 finished in 31597 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||X(F((p1||X((p2||F((p1&&X(F(p2))))))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1097 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1375 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:48:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30138ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30141ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31526 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 158 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-04 finished in 31727 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 323 transition count 590
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 253 transition count 590
Performed 89 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 178 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 164 transition count 501
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 71 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 71 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 164 transition count 430
Applied a total of 389 rules in 85 ms. Remains 164 /323 variables (removed 159) and now considering 430/660 (removed 230) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-01 01:48:44] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 393 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:48:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:48:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 943 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:48:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:48:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 145 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 193 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 12/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 162 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/594 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 60/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 156 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 19/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 430/593 variables, 163/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60093ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61537 ms. Remains : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 61 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 46 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-05 finished in 61622 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(((p0&&X(X(p1)))||G(p1))) U p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:49:45] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:49:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:49:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:49:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1357 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1623 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:49:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:49:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30135ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30139ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31768 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 384 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20017 reset in 689 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19973 reset in 483 ms.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 279 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 16 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 16 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 266 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (182 resets) in 363 ms. (109 steps per ms) remains 1/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (20 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-01 01:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:50:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 299/301 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 18/319 variables, 9/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/321 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 216 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 188 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 185 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 152 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 660/981 variables, 321/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/981 variables, 190/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/981 variables, 0/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/983 variables, 2/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/983 variables, 0/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/983 variables, 0/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 983/983 variables, and 533 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1868 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 323/323 constraints, ReadFeed: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 299/301 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 18/319 variables, 9/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/321 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 166 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 178 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 186 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 199 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 247 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 355 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 279 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 275 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 352 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 347 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 378 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 337 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 304 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 375 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 310 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 269 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 6951ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 2 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 323 transition count 590
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 253 transition count 590
Performed 88 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 88 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 165 transition count 502
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 70 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 70 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 165 transition count 432
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 165 transition count 431
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 164 transition count 431
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 111 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 111 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 164 transition count 431
Applied a total of 499 rules in 88 ms. Remains 164 /323 variables (removed 159) and now considering 431/660 (removed 229) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 164/323 places, 431/660 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (798 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (77 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 976958 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=325 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 976958 steps, saw 127099 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=324 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 431 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 396 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 140/142 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 18/160 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/162 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 194 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 153 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 8/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 431/593 variables, 162/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 396/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/595 variables, 2/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 0/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/595 variables, 0/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 595/595 variables, and 581 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1660 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 140/142 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 18/160 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/162 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 8/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 218 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 203 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 192 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 431/593 variables, 162/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 396/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 2/595 variables, 2/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 0/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/595 variables, 0/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 595/595 variables, and 585 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 396/396 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2948ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 15 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 12 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p2))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 711 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 16 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 16 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 337 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 347 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:50:34] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
Proved EG (NOT p2)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p2))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p2), (G (NOT p2))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 670 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 16 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-06 finished in 49991 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(G(p1))||p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:50:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:50:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:50:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:50:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 821 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1072 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:50:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:50:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30144ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30148ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31225 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 329 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 348 ms.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-07 finished in 32106 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 323 transition count 590
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 253 transition count 590
Performed 89 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 178 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 164 transition count 501
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 71 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 71 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 164 transition count 430
Applied a total of 389 rules in 47 ms. Remains 164 /323 variables (removed 159) and now considering 430/660 (removed 230) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-01 01:51:07] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1076 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1445 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:51:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:51:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 169 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 123 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 206 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 192 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 193 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 5/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 13/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 174 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 164 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 182 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/594 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 82/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 4/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 430/593 variables, 163/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 287/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 593/594 variables, and 969 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 163/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60137ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61645 ms. Remains : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1925 reset in 391 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 4643 steps with 90 reset with depth 28 and stack size 28 in 34 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-08 finished in 62233 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X((p0 U (G(p0)||p1)))) U (G(X(X((p0 U (p1||G(p0))))))||(p2&&(p0 U (p3||G(p0)))&&X(X((p0 U (p1||G(p0))))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:52:10] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:52:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:52:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:52:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:52:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 869 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:52:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:52:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30148ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30157ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31293 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 426 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 192 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 219 ms.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1 p3), (X p2), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1))))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 243 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 17 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 4 to 3
RANDOM walk for 8571 steps (34 resets) in 24 ms. (342 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1 p3), (X p2), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1))))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 343 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:52:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:52:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:52:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:52:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:52:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1068 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:52:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:52:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30150ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30152ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31389 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Computed a total of 42 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 103 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 4 to 3
RANDOM walk for 13376 steps (58 resets) in 100 ms. (132 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 186 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 167 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 174 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 255 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 277 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 323 transition count 660
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 323 transition count 660
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 323 transition count 660
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 303 transition count 640
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 303 transition count 640
Performed 98 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -156
Deduced a syphon composed of 138 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 303 transition count 796
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 263 transition count 756
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 263 transition count 756
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 70 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 70 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 263 transition count 686
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 348 rules in 117 ms. Remains 263 /323 variables (removed 60) and now considering 686/660 (removed -26) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 676 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 686 rows 263 cols
[2025-06-01 01:53:17] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 286 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 676 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 676 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 223 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD474 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD475 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD476 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD477 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD478 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD479 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD481 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD486 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD490 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD494 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD498 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD502 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD506 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD510 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD514 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD518 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD473 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD474 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD475 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD476 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD477 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD478 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD479 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD480 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD481 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD486 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD490 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD494 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD498 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD502 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD506 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD510 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD514 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD518 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 175 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 194 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 195 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/949 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/263 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 676/676 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 40/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 18/262 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 216 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 195 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 231 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 193 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 222 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/949 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/263 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/676 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60193ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 658 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 60196ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 263/323 places, 668/660 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1172 edges and 263 vertex of which 245 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 18 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 18 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 1 rules in 25 ms. Remains 245 /263 variables (removed 18) and now considering 668/668 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 245/323 places, 668/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60364 ms. Remains : 245/323 places, 668/660 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1544873066776846647
[2025-06-01 01:54:17] [INFO ] Built C files in 50ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1544873066776846647
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1544873066776846647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2241 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1544873066776846647;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 57 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1544873066776846647;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12609271150917597396.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 268 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-09 finished in 129972 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U (p1 U p0)) U (X((X(p2)||!F(p0))) U p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 660 rows 323 cols
[2025-06-01 01:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:54:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:54:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1079 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1327 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:54:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:54:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30121ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30122ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31460 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 449 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), false, (NOT p2), (AND p0 (NOT p2)), true, false, p0, false]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3041 steps with 13 reset in 17 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-10 finished in 31967 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0) U X(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 660/660 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 265 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:54:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1092 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1358 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 650 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:54:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:54:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 190 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 660/982 variables, 322/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30153ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 650 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30156ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31526 ms. Remains : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 220 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-13 finished in 31769 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 323 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 323/323 places, 660/660 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 323 transition count 590
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 253 transition count 590
Performed 89 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 178 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 164 transition count 501
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 71 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 71 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 164 transition count 430
Applied a total of 389 rules in 27 ms. Remains 164 /323 variables (removed 159) and now considering 430/660 (removed 230) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-01 01:55:23] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 392 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 659 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1053 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:55:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 287 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 13/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/594 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 73/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 9/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 430/593 variables, 163/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 287/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 593/594 variables, and 964 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 163/164 constraints, ReadFeed: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60109ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61198 ms. Remains : 164/323 places, 430/660 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 35 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010-LTLFireability-14 finished in 61291 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 654469 ms.

BK_STOP 1748742985110

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813600260"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010.tgz
mv CANInsertWithFailure-PT-010 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;