fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r030-smll-174853813400162
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for CANConstruction-PT-005

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 64299.00 0.00 0.00 TFFTFFFTTFFFTFTT normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813400162.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400162
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 728K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 171K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748625094438

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CANConstruction-PT-005
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:11:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:11:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:11:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 133 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Transformed 140 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 140 transitions and 400 arcs in 332 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 72 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned [26, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 358 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 109 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 139
Applied a total of 2 rules in 27 ms. Remains 109 /110 variables (removed 1) and now considering 139/140 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/112 places, 139/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 852 ms. Remains : 109/112 places, 139/140 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 109 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (521 resets) in 1684 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 6/66 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (112 resets) in 455 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (132 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (116 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (135 resets) in 236 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (118 resets) in 358 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (133 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 17:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:11:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 89/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/108 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 139/247 variables, 108/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 45/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 248/248 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved in 1104 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 99/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/108 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 139/247 variables, 108/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 45/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 248/248 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved in 411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/5 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1552ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 166 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 109 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 109
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 63 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 63 transition count 80
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 63 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 79
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 57 transition count 74
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -8
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 52 transition count 82
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 52 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 50 transition count 80
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 50 transition count 80
Applied a total of 119 rules in 83 ms. Remains 50 /109 variables (removed 59) and now considering 80/139 (removed 59) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 83 ms. Remains : 50/109 places, 80/139 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1412 resets) in 295 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (267 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (272 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 4125 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 23145 steps, saw 4125 distinct states, run finished after 129 ms. (steps per millisecond=179 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 4125 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 23145 steps, saw 4125 distinct states, run finished after 116 ms. (steps per millisecond=199 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 17:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 109 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [38, 52]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 89 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 89 /91 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 359 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4926296681889338695.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9699711711965160150.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4926296681889338695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9699711711965160150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.08615,6156,2,1540,5,10529,6,0,447,8721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(A(A(E(((Node0WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node0NOshare>=1)) U ((Node2Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1))) U ((Node4Bootstrap>=1)||((Node1IsInser...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((Node2Request>=1)&&(Node4IsInserted>=1))))))) U (!(!((E(!(((Node...625
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t62, t66, t70, Intersection with reacha...229
(forward)formula 0,0,0.622303,22072,1,0,177,75897,245,108,2649,83755,231
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 109 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 84 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 111
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 81 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 66 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 66 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 64 transition count 84
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 82
Applied a total of 94 rules in 33 ms. Remains 62 /109 variables (removed 47) and now considering 82/139 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 322 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/143 variables, 61/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 45/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 144/144 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 4531 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 11/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/143 variables, 61/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 45/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 77/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 144/144 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 5398 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9982ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9986ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/109 places, 82/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10379 ms. Remains : 62/109 places, 82/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14304317024191851297.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11313447758973940177.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14304317024191851297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11313447758973940177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11490,0.246668,8788,2,3053,5,19955,6,0,315,17792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((Node1GiveAnswer4>=1)) U E((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1) U (((AG(A((Node1GiveAnswer0>=1) U (Node1GiveAnswer4>=1))) * (Node3WaitAnswer>=1)) *...425
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (Node1GiveAnswer4>=1))),(Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)) * ((Node4GiveAnswer0<1)||(Node...890
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t5, t7, t10, t13, t17, t21, t22, t25, t26, t30, t31, t37, t38, t51, t52, t56, t57...290
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.67521,91984,1,0,483,505215,217,283,2062,440838,525
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 15 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [38, 52]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 89 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 89 /91 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 257 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 541 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10264035195166947040.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14186942595645985823.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10264035195166947040.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14186942595645985823.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.129188,6408,2,1540,5,10529,6,0,447,8721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AG(((Node0WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node0NOshare>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((Node0WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node0NOshare>=1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t62, t66, t70, Intersection with reacha...229
(forward)formula 0,0,0.91575,22204,1,0,177,73008,241,106,2598,75778,230
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 109 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 74 transition count 104
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 60 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 60 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 60 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 58 transition count 74
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 55 transition count 71
Applied a total of 108 rules in 22 ms. Remains 55 /109 variables (removed 54) and now considering 71/139 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 55 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned [5, 16, 22]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/109 places, 71/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 52 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 48 transition count 67
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 46 transition count 65
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 46 /52 variables (removed 6) and now considering 65/71 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 46 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/109 places, 65/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 46/109 places, 65/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15883379652303747086.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17010885381991022910.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15883379652303747086.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17010885381991022910.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4478,0.126349,6784,2,1801,5,12202,6,0,234,10293,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((Node4IsInserted<1)||(Node2requestsent4<1))) * !(E((Node0GiveAnswer3>=1) U (Node1IsNonInsertedNode>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((Node4IsInserted<1)||(Node2requestsent4<1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,(Node0GiveAnswer3>=1)) * (...192
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 62/0/3
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t5, t6, t7, t9, t12, t16, t22, t25, t61, t62, t63, t64, Intersection with reachable ...224
(forward)formula 0,1,1.2673,35072,1,0,240,192765,160,131,1488,134735,268
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 109 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 107
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 75 transition count 105
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 60 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 60 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 60 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 57 transition count 72
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 53 transition count 68
Applied a total of 112 rules in 12 ms. Remains 53 /109 variables (removed 56) and now considering 68/139 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [5, 14, 22]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/109 places, 68/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 50 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 44 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 44 /50 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17627926736391797544.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5415754545552110506.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17627926736391797544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5415754545552110506.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2929,0.077543,6472,2,1623,5,11497,6,0,223,8911,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((Node3ResZone<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(Node3ResZone<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.284091,12872,1,0,14,43023,19,4,1145,21556,12
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 405 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18225303303900338110.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1373939842309028770.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18225303303900338110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1373939842309028770.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.131549,6404,2,1651,5,11354,6,0,444,9404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EX(((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node2Request>=1))) + (Node2GiveAnswer3>=1)) + AF((Node4JoinMsg>=1)))) * AF(AX(((Node1IsNonInsertedNode>=...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * !((EX(((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node2Request>=1))) + (Node2GiveAnswer3>=1)))),!((Node4JoinMsg>=...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t66, t69, t73, t87, t88, Inte...249
(forward)formula 0,0,1.79879,46620,1,0,287,190639,237,190,2512,253898,312
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 109 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 74 transition count 104
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 59 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 56 transition count 71
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 52 transition count 67
Applied a total of 114 rules in 13 ms. Remains 52 /109 variables (removed 57) and now considering 67/139 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [5, 15, 21]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/109 places, 67/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 49 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 44 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 43 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 43 transition count 61
Applied a total of 12 rules in 10 ms. Remains 43 /49 variables (removed 6) and now considering 61/67 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/109 places, 61/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 319 ms. Remains : 43/109 places, 61/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16788113179070964383.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2682664715384034803.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16788113179070964383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2682664715384034803.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3359,0.111951,6464,2,1658,5,11913,6,0,218,8810,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4requestsent2>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4requestsent2>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t9, t13, t17, t23, t59, t60, Intersection with reachable at each step en...209
(forward)formula 0,0,0.617155,16064,1,0,127,59598,143,70,1402,40708,141
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 101 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 101 transition count 124
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /109 variables (removed 8) and now considering 124/139 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/109 places, 124/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 95 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 95 transition count 121
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 95 /98 variables (removed 3) and now considering 121/124 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/109 places, 121/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 300 ms. Remains : 95/109 places, 121/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10500226660231265035.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12891374544004815795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10500226660231265035.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12891374544004815795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,95477,0.121034,7328,2,2030,5,14553,6,0,486,13432,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AF(((EX(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node2IsInserted>=1))) + AX((Node1GiveAnswer0>=1))) + (Node2GiveAnswer1>=1))) + AX((((Node4IsInserted>=1)...783
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(Init,((!(EG(!(((EX(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node2IsInserted>=1))) + !(EX(!((Node1GiveAnswer0>=1))))) +...869
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t74, ...342
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,6.72357,166652,1,0,640,993892,313,351,2992,916201,723
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 109 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 74 transition count 104
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 59 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 56 transition count 71
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 52 transition count 67
Applied a total of 114 rules in 14 ms. Remains 52 /109 variables (removed 57) and now considering 67/139 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [5, 14, 21]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/109 places, 67/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 49 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 44 transition count 62
Applied a total of 10 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /49 variables (removed 5) and now considering 62/67 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 323 ms. Remains : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15364625725121829134.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11950019827964316704.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15364625725121829134.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11950019827964316704.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3789,0.146061,6856,2,1745,5,13250,6,0,223,10525,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((Node2IsNonInsertedNode<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(Node2IsNonInsertedNode<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.582748,15304,1,0,11,57893,19,4,1141,34404,10
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 109 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 106
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 76 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 74 transition count 104
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 59 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 56 transition count 71
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 53 transition count 68
Applied a total of 112 rules in 8 ms. Remains 53 /109 variables (removed 56) and now considering 68/139 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [5, 15, 21]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/109 places, 68/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 50 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 44 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 44 /50 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 44/109 places, 62/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12050338813817274070.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3409478812867389890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12050338813817274070.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3409478812867389890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3854,0.076469,6468,2,1601,5,11696,6,0,223,8630,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node4IsInserted>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node4IsInserted>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 49/0/13
(forward)formula 0,0,0.448179,15044,1,0,13,51551,20,4,1151,35750,11
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 98 transition count 118
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /109 variables (removed 11) and now considering 118/139 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [12, 38]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/109 places, 118/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 94 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 116
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 116/118 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6757923285506769193.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18363353399066480708.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6757923285506769193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18363353399066480708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94595,0.12445,7664,2,2354,5,16636,6,0,477,14667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node4IsInserted>=1))) * A(A(((E((Node4GiveAnswer1>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3requestsent0>=1))) * (Inse...545
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(!(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node4IsInserted>=1))) * !((E(!(!(EG(((Node2Request>=1)&&(Node3IsIns...1334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t37, t42, t48, t49, t58, t59, t62, t63, t66, t67, t70, t74, t75, ...310
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.93809,224936,1,0,947,1.27045e+06,311,606,3045,1.22912e+06,1185
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 95 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 95 transition count 112
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 95 /109 variables (removed 14) and now considering 112/139 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/109 places, 112/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 109/112 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 109/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 109/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16288774990106372728.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9279673117647316286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16288774990106372728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9279673117647316286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93206,0.144045,6800,2,1755,5,12548,6,0,450,11055,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(AX((Node1GiveAnswer4>=1))) + ((Node0Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1))) U AX((Node4GiveAnswer3>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(!(EX(!((Node1GiveAnswer4>=1))))) + ((Node0Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1)))) * !(EX(!((Node4Giv...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t81, t82, ...266
(forward)formula 0,1,1.80586,49308,1,0,275,196514,242,195,2545,277631,355
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 24 rules in 2 ms. Remains 97 /109 variables (removed 12) and now considering 116/139 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 91 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 113
Applied a total of 6 rules in 9 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:24] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 290 ms. Remains : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1790649125622977351.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9328963242215333667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1790649125622977351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9328963242215333667.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94202,0.109237,7084,2,1905,5,13376,6,0,462,11830,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=1)))))) * ((A((Node1DHTinfo>=1) U ((EmptyCAN...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * (!(EG(!((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)))) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=...1487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, ...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,6.62493,178740,1,0,849,1.00822e+06,273,520,2854,1.18045e+06,946
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 87 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 87 transition count 105
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 87 /90 variables (removed 3) and now considering 105/108 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 87 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:31] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 230 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 370 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/109 places, 105/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 458 ms. Remains : 87/109 places, 105/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13565741960117189754.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10966978225369120179.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13565741960117189754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10966978225369120179.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.153197,6660,2,1711,5,12001,6,0,438,9686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,0.768806,22124,1,0,173,78480,226,106,2416,81684,217
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 333 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16418521523998626106.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3576393931537082032.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16418521523998626106.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3576393931537082032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.085104,6664,2,1795,5,12203,6,0,444,9922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(EG(A((Node3Bootstrap>=1) U ((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))))) U (!(((Node3ID<1)||(Node0GiveAnswer2>=1))) + AG((EF(((Node...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(EG(!((E(!(((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))) U (!((Node3Bootstrap>=1)) * !(((Node2IsInser...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t69, t73, t77, t78, Inte...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.6425,98884,1,0,527,564675,264,300,2736,548695,639
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [12, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 298 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11175283021017522873.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9754608141805137619.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11175283021017522873.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9754608141805137619.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.111984,6796,2,1753,5,12265,6,0,444,10408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))) * AF(((EG((Node1JoinMsg>=1)) + AX(((Node0Request...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))))))...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, t74, t99, t100, Int...250
(forward)formula 0,1,1.06537,30324,1,0,241,127442,253,140,2507,137525,304
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 17:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 62027 ms.

BK_STOP 1748625158737

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CANConstruction-PT-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400162"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CANConstruction-PT-005.tgz
mv CANConstruction-PT-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;