About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BusinessProcesses-PT-19
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ?F?FFTFTFTTF???F | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813400146.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-19, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400146
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 644K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 189K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748613574753
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-19
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 267 ms
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Transformed 772 places.
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Transformed 685 transitions.
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 13:59:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 772 places and 685 transitions and 1981 arcs in 521 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 39 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 15 transitions.
Support contains 133 out of 757 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 757/757 places, 670/670 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 749 transition count 670
Discarding 86 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 86 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 663 transition count 584
Iterating global reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 663 transition count 584
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 626 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 626 transition count 547
Applied a total of 254 rules in 321 ms. Remains 626 /757 variables (removed 131) and now considering 547/670 (removed 123) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 547 rows 626 cols
[2025-05-30 13:59:38] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 67 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 13:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1589 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 13:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 13:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4844 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 546 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 13:59:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 625/1173 variables, and 44 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30061 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/71 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 44/46 constraints, State Equation: 0/626 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 546/546 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/626 variables, 71/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 411 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 351 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 323 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 323 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 351 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 341 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 284 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 319 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 341 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 467 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 300 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 295 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 336 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 312 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 338 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 354 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 375 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 355 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 287 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 284 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 289 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 328 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 526 ms of which 163 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 405 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 322 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 332 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 323 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 468 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60779ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60801ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 626/757 places, 547/670 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 66009 ms. Remains : 626/757 places, 547/670 transitions.
Support contains 133 out of 626 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 14:00:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 547 transitions.
Support contains 131 out of 626 places (down from 133) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (215 resets) in 2356 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 42/85 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
[2025-05-30 14:00:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp82 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 392/472 variables, 65/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/492 variables, 6/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 40 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp80 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/612 variables, 45/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/612 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 538/1150 variables, 612/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 276 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 300 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 516 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 460 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5072ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 39 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 71 out of 626 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1365 edges and 626 vertex of which 625 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 625 transition count 485
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 564 transition count 479
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 558 transition count 479
Performed 105 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 105 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 558 transition count 374
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 4 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 121 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 437 transition count 374
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 377 place count 421 transition count 358
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 421 transition count 358
Performed 131 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 131 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 136 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 267 rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 285 transition count 227
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 285 transition count 226
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 663 place count 284 transition count 229
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 669 place count 284 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 670 place count 283 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 671 place count 282 transition count 228
Applied a total of 671 rules in 286 ms. Remains 282 /626 variables (removed 344) and now considering 228/547 (removed 319) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 282/626 places, 228/547 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1649 resets) in 1050 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 34/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (29 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 282 cols
[2025-05-30 14:00:52] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 9 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 151/213 variables, 48/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/241 variables, 22/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 36/277 variables, 25/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 228/505 variables, 277/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/505 variables, 4/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/505 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/510 variables, 5/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 381 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved in 3674 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 282/282 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 155/207 variables, 47/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 161 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 157 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 165 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 177 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 134 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 177 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 169 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 171 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 173 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 158 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 156 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 158 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 170 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 164 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 142 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 29/236 variables, 23/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 40/276 variables, 25/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 145 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 151 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 175 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 189 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 191 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 161 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 203 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 225 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 174 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 214 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 206 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 232 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 198 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 185 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 158 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 211 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 211 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 214 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 186 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 233 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 224 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 235 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 189 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 221 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 224 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 213 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 221 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 208 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 221 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 158 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 268 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 253 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 243 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 233 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 221 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 243 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 189 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 201 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 48830ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 30 unsolved
Fused 30 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 52 out of 282 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 282/282 places, 228/228 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 282 transition count 227
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 281 transition count 227
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 281 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 274 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 273 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 273 transition count 220
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 262 transition count 209
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 262 transition count 209
Applied a total of 40 rules in 97 ms. Remains 262 /282 variables (removed 20) and now considering 209/228 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 262/282 places, 209/228 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2184 resets) in 863 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (52 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 29/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (47 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 86 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 98 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (51 resets) in 82 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (40 resets) in 80 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (54 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 66 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 72 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 72 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 76 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 76 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 90 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 72 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 82 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 325559 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=108 ) properties seen :19 out of 29
Probabilistic random walk after 325559 steps, saw 60129 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=108 ) properties seen :19
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 262 cols
[2025-05-30 14:01:44] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 161/184 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/217 variables, 27/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/258 variables, 23/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 209/467 variables, 258/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/471 variables, 4/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/471 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 471/471 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 1131 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 71/71 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 262/262 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 161/184 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 168 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 164 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 154 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 165 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 168 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 167 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 159 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 160 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 192 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 177 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 155 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 163 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 159 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 164 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 169 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 164 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 10/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 161 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 5/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 157 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 157 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 14/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 158 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 169 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 158 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 10/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 33/217 variables, 27/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 41/258 variables, 23/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 222 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 216 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 209/467 variables, 258/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 4/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 8/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 188 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 222 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 196 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 224 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 221 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 239 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 190 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 20/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 239 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 213 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 224 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 212 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 227 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 225 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 225 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 215 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 222 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 183 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 219 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 221 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 227 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 204 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 210 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 206 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 191 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 212 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 20/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 217 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 224 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 2/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 3/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 4/471 variables, 4/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 1/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 168 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 1/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 3/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/471 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 471/471 variables, and 499 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved in 32383 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 71/71 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 262/262 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/10 constraints, Known Traps: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 33529ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 1674 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 262 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 262/262 places, 209/209 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 53 edges and 262 vertex of which 2 / 262 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 261 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 250 transition count 196
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 250 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 224 transition count 178
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 217 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 217 transition count 171
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 217 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 216 transition count 170
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 197 transition count 151
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 196 transition count 162
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 196 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 194 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 193 transition count 159
Applied a total of 128 rules in 73 ms. Remains 193 /262 variables (removed 69) and now considering 159/209 (removed 50) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 193/262 places, 159/209 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1978 resets) in 269 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 7185 steps (155 resets) in 41 ms. (171 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 10 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 14:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 70 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:20] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 14:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 547 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 626 places (down from 105) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 569 stabilizing places and 500 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1365 edges and 626 vertex of which 625 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.33 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 597 transition count 518
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 597 transition count 518
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 588 transition count 509
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 588 transition count 509
Applied a total of 76 rules in 74 ms. Remains 588 /626 variables (removed 38) and now considering 509/547 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 509 rows 588 cols
[2025-05-30 14:02:20] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 877 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:02:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:02:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3044 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3923 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 508 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:02:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/587 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/587 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/588 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/588 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 588/1097 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/588 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 508/508 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/587 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/587 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/588 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/588 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 266 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 313 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 293 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 318 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 296 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 313 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 291 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 406 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 313 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 259 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 403 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 266 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 249 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 249 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 269 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 254 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 257 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/588 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 268 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 277 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 299 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 316 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 291 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 294 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 314 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 303 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 292 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 304 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 424 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 425 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 384 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 377 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 370 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 307 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 437 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 509 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 525 ms of which 120 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 485 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60352ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 508 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60357ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 588/626 places, 509/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 64358 ms. Remains : 588/626 places, 509/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:03:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 509 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability869466249843495767.gal : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7295165175784354471.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability869466249843495767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7295165175784354471.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8275483077043141252.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8275483077043141252.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8275483077043141252.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8275483077043141252.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8275483077043141252.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 295 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 177 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 46 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1116556176315052728.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 14:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15260191221330967860.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1116556176315052728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15260191221330967860.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10873e+33,4.63519,114572,5283,62,213066,917,1231,495167,80,2186,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EF(((AG((i19.u186.p705==1)) * EX((i8.u66.p208==1))) + (i19.u157.p613==1)))) + ((AG((i10.i2.u88.p275==1)) * AF(((i19.u165.p603==1)||(...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((!(E(TRUE U !((i19.u186.p705==1)))) * EX((i8.u66.p208==1))) + (i19.u157.p613==1)))) + (...354
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t209, t313, t321, t395, t398, t471, t476, t478, t481, t483, t486, t495, t504...1606
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 596 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 596 transition count 517
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 587 transition count 508
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 587 transition count 508
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 586 transition count 507
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 586 transition count 507
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 585 transition count 506
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 585 transition count 506
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 584 transition count 505
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 584 transition count 505
Applied a total of 84 rules in 82 ms. Remains 584 /626 variables (removed 42) and now considering 505/547 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 505 rows 584 cols
[2025-05-30 14:04:26] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 784 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:04:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:04:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2681 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 504 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:04:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/583 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/583 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/584 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 1.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 1.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 1.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 1.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 1.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 1.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 1.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 1.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 1.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 1.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/584 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 584/1089 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/584 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 504/504 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/583 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/583 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/584 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/584 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 438 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 454 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 443 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 435 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 448 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 439 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 465 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 419 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 451 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 663 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 467 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 387 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 453 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 453 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 461 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 444 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 449 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 455 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 448 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 434 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/584 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 450 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60313ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 504 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60317ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 584/626 places, 505/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63872 ms. Remains : 584/626 places, 505/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 505 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9489842438870951475.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:05:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2738653239559995573.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9489842438870951475.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2738653239559995573.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10022938236278297747.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10022938236278297747.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10022938236278297747.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10022938236278297747.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10022938236278297747.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 286 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11335275539174309859.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4732749524826726967.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11335275539174309859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4732749524826726967.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24523e+33,1.5079,41576,4102,70,75607,995,1271,148346,71,2601,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((i18.u158.p692==1)||(i18.u161.p576==1))||(i18.u188.p705==1))) + ((EF((((i8.u140.p470==0)||(i4.i0.u44.p124==0))||((i16.i1.u132.p4...286
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((((i18.u158.p692==1)||(i18.u161.p576==1))||(i18.u188.p705==1))))))] != FALSE + ([((F...613
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t205, t309, t313, t392, t395, t469, t473, t475, t478, t480, t482, t491, i0.u...1622
(forward)formula 0,1,6.51549,170088,1,0,318401,995,7300,704726,293,2601,883354
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1365 edges and 626 vertex of which 625 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 624 transition count 471
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 550 transition count 468
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 547 transition count 468
Performed 128 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 128 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 547 transition count 340
Deduced a syphon composed of 128 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 23 places
Reduce places removed 151 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 279 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 396 transition count 340
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 465 place count 365 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 365 transition count 309
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 365 transition count 308
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 364 transition count 308
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 499 place count 363 transition count 307
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 363 transition count 307
Performed 142 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 142 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 147 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 289 rules applied. Total rules applied 789 place count 216 transition count 165
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 216 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 796 place count 215 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 214 transition count 164
Applied a total of 797 rules in 112 ms. Remains 214 /626 variables (removed 412) and now considering 164/547 (removed 383) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 214 cols
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 366 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 368 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/626 places, 164/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 189 /189 variables (removed 0) and now considering 164/164 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 488 ms. Remains : 189/626 places, 164/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6949065263287374506.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2037385240571297843.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6949065263287374506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2037385240571297843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.19434e+07,5.96685,127732,2,32084,5,340795,6,0,920,397564,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF((A((p734==1) U (p335==1)) * ((((p187==1)&&(p498==1))&&(p763==1))||(((p257==1)&&(p543==1))&&(p709==1)))))) + E((EG((p434!=1)) * AG(...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((p335==1)) U (!((p734==1)) * !((p335==1)))) + EG(!((p335==1))))) * ((((p187==1)&&(p...396
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t12, t14, t50, t58, t59, t62, t63, t64, t65, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t94, t111, t112, t...326
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3019996238269137075.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3019996238269137075.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3019996238269137075.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3019996238269137075.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3019996238269137075.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 148 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability592945164619427226.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15822294048842124806.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability592945164619427226.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15822294048842124806.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.19434e+07,3.81481,109908,919,338,148835,3367,647,822312,165,17197,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF((A((i4.u53.p734==1) U (i5.u28.p335==1)) * ((((i8.u6.p187==1)&&(i8.u36.p498==1))&&(i8.u55.p763==1))||(((i2.i0.u8.p257==1)&&(i2.i0.u...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((i5.u28.p335==1)) U (!((i4.u53.p734==1)) * !((i5.u28.p335==1)))) + EG(!((i5.u28.p33...530
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t62, t63, t64, t65, t81, t82, t83, t84, t94, t111, t116, t117, t118, t130, t135, t142, t144, ...411
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,4.84044,109908,1,0,148835,4956,3356,822312,1290,17197,206764
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 316 edges and 626 vertex of which 6 / 626 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1359 edges and 621 vertex of which 620 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 619 transition count 453
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 533 transition count 452
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 532 transition count 452
Performed 124 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 124 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 532 transition count 328
Deduced a syphon composed of 124 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Reduce places removed 149 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 273 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 383 transition count 328
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 480 place count 352 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 511 place count 352 transition count 297
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 511 place count 352 transition count 295
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 350 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 516 place count 349 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 349 transition count 294
Performed 146 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 146 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 151 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 297 rules applied. Total rules applied 814 place count 198 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 815 place count 197 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 816 place count 196 transition count 147
Applied a total of 816 rules in 80 ms. Remains 196 /626 variables (removed 430) and now considering 147/547 (removed 400) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 196 cols
[2025-05-30 14:06:42] [INFO ] Computed 86 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 261 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/626 places, 147/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 169 /169 variables (removed 0) and now considering 147/147 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 169/626 places, 147/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 6 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10446544574648632313.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16155033786875918578.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10446544574648632313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16155033786875918578.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 593 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 593 transition count 514
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Applied a total of 94 rules in 140 ms. Remains 579 /626 variables (removed 47) and now considering 500/547 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 500 rows 579 cols
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 595 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:06:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:06:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3798 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 499 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:06:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 579/1079 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/579 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 499/499 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 293 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 397 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 446 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 398 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 409 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 364 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 454 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 497 ms of which 135 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 431 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 447 ms of which 134 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 784 ms of which 475 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 403 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 407 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 1417 ms of which 1049 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 352 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 1011 ms of which 662 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 296 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 308 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 400 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 263 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60285ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60288ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 579/626 places, 500/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 64229 ms. Remains : 579/626 places, 500/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 500 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13882339675189956218.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9883973631722648931.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13882339675189956218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9883973631722648931.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1729950250697696803.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1729950250697696803.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1729950250697696803.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1729950250697696803.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1729950250697696803.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 288 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14493900994097321388.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15001586079833492279.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14493900994097321388.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15001586079833492279.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24521e+33,2.92778,81416,5291,61,166073,904,1059,340573,66,2212,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((i5.i1.i0.u126.p395==1) U AG((AF((i16.u185.p708==1)) * ((i2.u13.p28!=1)||(i3.u20.p49==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(i5.i1.i0.u126.p395==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((i16.u185.p708==1)))) * ((i2.u13.p28!=1)||(i3.u2...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t201, t285, t301, t387, t390, t463, t464, t468, t470, t472, t473, t475, t477...1435
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 313 edges and 626 vertex of which 6 / 626 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1359 edges and 621 vertex of which 620 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 619 transition count 453
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 533 transition count 453
Performed 123 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 123 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 533 transition count 330
Deduced a syphon composed of 123 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Reduce places removed 148 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 271 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 385 transition count 330
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 355 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 505 place count 355 transition count 300
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 505 place count 355 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 507 place count 354 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 508 place count 353 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 509 place count 353 transition count 298
Performed 148 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 148 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 153 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 301 rules applied. Total rules applied 810 place count 200 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 199 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 812 place count 198 transition count 149
Applied a total of 812 rules in 73 ms. Remains 198 /626 variables (removed 428) and now considering 149/547 (removed 398) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 198 cols
[2025-05-30 14:08:47] [INFO ] Computed 86 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 317 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 320 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/626 places, 149/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 171 /171 variables (removed 0) and now considering 149/149 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 171/626 places, 149/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 149 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13945222169529716217.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4085793348764318415.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13945222169529716217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4085793348764318415.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.45437e+06,0.536797,14424,2,3657,5,28843,6,0,831,30249,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p496==1) + A((p361==1) U (p434==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p496==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((p434==1))))) * !(E(!((p434==1)) U (!((p...193
(forward)formula 0,1,0.540462,14680,1,0,7,28843,8,1,834,30249,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 314 edges and 626 vertex of which 6 / 626 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1359 edges and 621 vertex of which 620 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 619 transition count 453
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 533 transition count 453
Performed 125 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 125 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 533 transition count 328
Deduced a syphon composed of 125 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Reduce places removed 150 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 275 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 383 transition count 328
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 480 place count 352 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 511 place count 352 transition count 297
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 511 place count 352 transition count 296
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 351 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 514 place count 350 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 350 transition count 295
Performed 146 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 146 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 151 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 297 rules applied. Total rules applied 812 place count 199 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 198 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 814 place count 197 transition count 148
Applied a total of 814 rules in 80 ms. Remains 197 /626 variables (removed 429) and now considering 148/547 (removed 399) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 197 cols
[2025-05-30 14:08:48] [INFO ] Computed 86 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, 59, 60]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 299 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/626 places, 148/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 171 /171 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 384 ms. Remains : 171/626 places, 148/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7185625081310687046.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1544373493383584534.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7185625081310687046.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1544373493383584534.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1544373493383584534.prop.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8189 resets) in 359 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 12
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :12 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :27 after 54
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :54 after 237
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (2370 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :237 after 1554
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1554 after 5235
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :5235 after 245829
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :245829 after 1.94083e+06
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,5.42506e+06,0.332679,11552,2,2483,14,22379,7,0,833,15341,0
Total reachable state count : 5425056
Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-06 is true.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-06,2,0.334958,11680,2,199,14,22379,7,0,836,15341,0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 748961 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=249 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 748961 steps, saw 211348 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=249 ) properties seen :0
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 593 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 593 transition count 514
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Applied a total of 94 rules in 123 ms. Remains 579 /626 variables (removed 47) and now considering 500/547 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 500 rows 579 cols
[2025-05-30 14:08:52] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 595 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:08:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2431 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3028 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 499 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 1.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 1.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 1.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 1.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 1.0)
(s310 1.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 1.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 1.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 1.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 1.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 1.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 1.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 1.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 1.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 1.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 1.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 1.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 1.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 timeout
1.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 579/1079 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/579 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 499/499 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 269 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 253 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 350 ms of which 144 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 248 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 250 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 314 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 250 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 258 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 271 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 281 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 265 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 264 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 265 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 279 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 293 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 270 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 261 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 249 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 255 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 245 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 244 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 244 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 252 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 253 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 281 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 286 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 302 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 336 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 331 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 328 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 272 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 276 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 272 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 390 ms of which 123 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 432 ms of which 228 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 256 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 420 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 269 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 328 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60402ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60404ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 579/626 places, 500/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63556 ms. Remains : 579/626 places, 500/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 500 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17978835361670339001.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 14:09:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1311690928694252520.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17978835361670339001.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1311690928694252520.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17263088730418068740.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17263088730418068740.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17263088730418068740.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17263088730418068740.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17263088730418068740.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 286 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11379232252634275891.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:10:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9113372883922886065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11379232252634275891.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9113372883922886065.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24521e+33,2.06901,55708,4041,67,104644,853,1242,250774,75,2106,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(!(E(EF((i9.i2.u147.p509==1)) U (i5.i1.u104.p323==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(E(TRUE U (i9.i2.u147.p509==1)) U (i5.i1.u104.p323==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t201, t285, t297, t309, t387, t390, t463, t468, t470, t472, t475, t477, t486...1565
(forward)formula 0,0,6.98437,183324,1,0,339031,853,8390,901003,368,2106,810648
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 594 transition count 515
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 594 transition count 515
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 583 transition count 504
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 583 transition count 504
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Applied a total of 92 rules in 77 ms. Remains 580 /626 variables (removed 46) and now considering 501/547 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 501 rows 580 cols
[2025-05-30 14:10:33] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:10:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 813 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:10:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:10:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3568 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4383 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 500 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:10:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/580 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/580 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 580/1081 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/580 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 500/500 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/580 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/580 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 500 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 332 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 248 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 385 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 264 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 397 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 400 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 398 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 310 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 227 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 303 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 332 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 308 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 237 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 230 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 276 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 270 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD407 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD417 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD418 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD420 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD422 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD424 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD435 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD453 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD455 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/580 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 490 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 403 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 240 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 288 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 284 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 362 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 435 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 397 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 410 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 373 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 405 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 360 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 517 ms of which 262 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 330 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 303 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 306 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 324 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 306 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 257 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 276 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/580 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 490 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 580/1081 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 490 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/580 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/500 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60154ms problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 490 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 60156ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 580/626 places, 491/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 580 /580 variables (removed 0) and now considering 491/491 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64635 ms. Remains : 580/626 places, 491/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 491 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability742708906423014003.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 14:11:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15191984154093461042.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability742708906423014003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15191984154093461042.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2576454203515508434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2576454203515508434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2576454203515508434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2576454203515508434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2576454203515508434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 241 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11807308921556652496.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2699707796452229922.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11807308921556652496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2699707796452229922.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29238e+33,2.32721,56256,5808,60,96865,757,1202,188643,65,1848,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(!(AF(((i19.i1.u134.p446==1)&&(i21.u153.p536==1)))) U EF(((i11.i0.u197.p755==1)&&(i11.i1.u199.p758==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((i19.i1.u134.p446==1)&&(i21.u153.p536==1)))))) U E(TRUE U ((i11.i0.u197.p755==1)&&(i1...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t202, t286, t306, t391, t455, t459, t461, t463, t464, t466, t468, t477, t485, i0....1555
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 596 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 596 transition count 517
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 586 transition count 507
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 586 transition count 507
Applied a total of 80 rules in 39 ms. Remains 586 /626 variables (removed 40) and now considering 507/547 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 507 rows 586 cols
[2025-05-30 14:12:38] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:12:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 568 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:12:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:12:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2747 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3320 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 506 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:12:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/586 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 344 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 311 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 319 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 301 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 307 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 315 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 305 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 352 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 343 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 332 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 309 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 586/1093 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/586 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 506/506 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/586 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 12/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 407 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 417 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 398 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 373 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 359 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 343 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 340 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 355 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 338 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 325 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 270 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 260 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 248 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 255 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 249 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 256 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 246 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 264 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 20/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 406 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 279 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 543 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 418 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 294 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 456 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 460 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 458 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 420 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 429 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 461 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 436 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 402 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 383 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 378 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 364 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 352 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 452 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 464 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 20/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 435 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 419 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 413 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 432 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 424 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 413 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 403 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 434 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 415 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 429 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 416 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 438 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 411 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 420 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 420 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60218ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 506 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60220ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 586/626 places, 507/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63581 ms. Remains : 586/626 places, 507/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 507 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16014129201735818556.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:13:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7937309662328048588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16014129201735818556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7937309662328048588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8133272893200500747.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8133272893200500747.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8133272893200500747.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8133272893200500747.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8133272893200500747.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 294 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18137199734136055862.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 14:14:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9804975247596806401.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18137199734136055862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9804975247596806401.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.22287e+33,2.64824,63880,5557,47,111683,663,1268,238444,54,1811,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((i15.i3.u132.p414==1) U AG(!(A((i7.i2.u32.p89==1) U (i12.u50.p148==1)))))) * EX((((((EX((((i16.i0.u24.p68==0)||(i16.i1.u126.p388==0)...480
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(i15.i3.u132.p414==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!((i12.u50.p148==1)) U (!((i7.i2.u32.p89==1)) * !((i12...710
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t205, t289, t305, t313, t317, t393, t396, t469, t470, t474, t476, t478, t481...1609
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 593 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 593 transition count 514
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Applied a total of 94 rules in 76 ms. Remains 579 /626 variables (removed 47) and now considering 500/547 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 500 rows 579 cols
[2025-05-30 14:14:42] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 573 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:14:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2426 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3003 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 499 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:14:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 439 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 413 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 424 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 417 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 293 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 311 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 272 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 232 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 394 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 236 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 397 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 391 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 357 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 232 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 250 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 424 ms of which 121 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 391 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 284 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 273 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 262 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 579/1079 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/579 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 499/499 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 307 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 255 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 247 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 245 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 281 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 266 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 238 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 248 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 260 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 258 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 279 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 249 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 313 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 261 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 255 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 283 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 259 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 280 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 296 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 268 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD402 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD417 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD434 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD436 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD437 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD438 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD440 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD441 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD444 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 490 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 261 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 279 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 271 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 296 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 284 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 275 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 654 ms of which 430 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 243 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 260 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 261 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 263 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 256 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 262 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 257 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 262 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 263 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD425 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD427 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD428 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD429 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD430 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD432 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD445 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD448 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD450 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD452 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD453 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD454 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 477 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 278 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 331 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 268 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 278 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 267 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 299 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 279 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 277 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 280 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 290 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 261 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 260 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 280 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 280 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 276 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 269 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 270 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 450 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 292 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD419 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD423 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD449 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 25 solved, 474 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 265 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 271 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 355 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 374 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 261 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 254 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 331 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 259 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 259 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 253 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60079ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 25 solved, 474 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 25 dead transitions in 60082ms
Found 25 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 25 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 25 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 579/626 places, 475/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 579 /579 variables (removed 0) and now considering 475/475 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63177 ms. Remains : 579/626 places, 475/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 475 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11162682855918288532.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 14:15:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability385908954395178835.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11162682855918288532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability385908954395178835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2722867438830385528.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2722867438830385528.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2722867438830385528.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2722867438830385528.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2722867438830385528.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 19 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13375439132082377175.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:16:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability472749310124827127.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13375439132082377175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability472749310124827127.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24521e+33,1.33383,36228,4491,59,62509,917,1257,129485,72,2135,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(AF(!(((i14.i0.u7.p14==1)&&(i9.i1.u117.p351==1))))) U ((EG((E((i0.i0.u4.p9==1) U (i14.i1.u91.p276==1)) + (((i1.i2.u102.p317!=1)&&(i7....243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(Init,EX(!(EG(!(!(((i14.i0.u7.p14==1)&&(i9.i1.u117.p351==1)))))))),(E((i0.i0.u4.p9==1) U (i14.i1.u91...465
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t285, t297, t305, t313, t342, t387, t390, t439, t443, t445, t448, t450, t452, t461, t469...1597
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 593 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 593 transition count 514
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Applied a total of 94 rules in 83 ms. Remains 579 /626 variables (removed 47) and now considering 500/547 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 500 rows 579 cols
[2025-05-30 14:16:46] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:16:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 578 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2654 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 499 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 265 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 269 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 248 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 241 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 234 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 250 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 434 ms of which 126 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 257 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 235 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 265 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 269 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 389 ms of which 199 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 313 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 557 ms of which 357 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 262 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 579/1079 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/579 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 499/499 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/579 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 326 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 308 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 298 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 304 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 299 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 293 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 297 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 232 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 300 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 297 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 285 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 293 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 245 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 289 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 288 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 299 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 251 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 338 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 310 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 248 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 417 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 386 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 337 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 258 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 311 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 295 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 242 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 395 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 431 ms of which 115 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 414 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 394 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 262 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 438 ms of which 134 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 260 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 262 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD444 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD445 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD448 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD449 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD450 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD452 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD453 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD454 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 490 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 265 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 268 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 420 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 274 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 432 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 255 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 408 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 262 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 415 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 253 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 415 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 264 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 413 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 451 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 316 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 364 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 291 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 356 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 344 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/579 variables, 20/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 490 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 579/1079 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 490 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/579 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/499 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60097ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 490 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 9 dead transitions in 60098ms
Found 9 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 9 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 9 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 579/626 places, 491/547 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 579 /579 variables (removed 0) and now considering 491/491 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63432 ms. Remains : 579/626 places, 491/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 491 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13449746305523197157.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 14:17:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7932750569988503655.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13449746305523197157.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7932750569988503655.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13448635048204541540.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13448635048204541540.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13448635048204541540.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13448635048204541540.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13448635048204541540.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 249 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17849398477005591129.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13313819927458807927.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17849398477005591129.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13313819927458807927.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29502e+33,4.25598,106044,5394,58,225343,998,1260,335289,73,2177,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((i1.u128.p405==1)) + (i15.i1.u124.p386==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i15.i1.u124.p386==0)))) * !((i1.u128.p405==1)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,4.55489,106172,1,0,225343,998,1888,335289,99,2177,57972
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 592 transition count 513
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 592 transition count 513
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 578 transition count 499
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 578 transition count 499
Applied a total of 96 rules in 82 ms. Remains 578 /626 variables (removed 48) and now considering 499/547 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 499 rows 578 cols
[2025-05-30 14:18:24] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 546 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:18:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2630 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 498 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/577 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/577 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/578 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 279 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 630 ms of which 411 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 282 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 298 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 277 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 1938 ms of which 1734 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30195ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 578/626 places, 499/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33460 ms. Remains : 578/626 places, 499/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 499 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14847898305326531257.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 14:18:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11505865792968169893.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14847898305326531257.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11505865792968169893.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7897251225384572596.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7897251225384572596.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7897251225384572596.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7897251225384572596.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7897251225384572596.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 289 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3949925395802501131.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 14:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12409903926395804351.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3949925395802501131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12409903926395804351.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24521e+33,2.1711,50848,5294,53,81814,627,1272,222635,61,1338,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((((i14.i2.u1.p2==1) * AF(((i11.i0.u143.p495==1)||(i17.i1.u13.p28==1)))) * !((EG(((i10.i0.u48.p141==1)&&(i20.u158.p571==1))) + ((i5.i...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((i14.i0.u96.p293==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(E...557
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t200, t284, t300, t341, t386, t389, t462, t463, t467, t469, t471, t472, t474...1578
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 593 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 593 transition count 514
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 582 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 582 transition count 503
Applied a total of 88 rules in 40 ms. Remains 582 /626 variables (removed 44) and now considering 503/547 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 503 rows 582 cols
[2025-05-30 14:19:58] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 548 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2916 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 502 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:20:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/582 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 434 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 425 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 395 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 258 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 252 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 242 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 390 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 371 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 379 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 260 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 307 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 317 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 295 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 314 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 309 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 261 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 280 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 307 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 268 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 582/1085 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 70/70 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 47/47 constraints, State Equation: 0/582 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 502/502 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/582 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 258 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 247 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 265 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 258 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 267 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 261 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 249 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 260 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 252 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 259 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 259 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 258 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 253 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 247 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 290 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 282 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 284 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 304 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 400 ms of which 174 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 279 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 363 ms of which 165 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 284 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 261 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 248 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 289 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 275 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 283 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 264 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 322 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 317 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 270 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 280 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 441 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 327 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 285 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 271 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 307 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 262 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 317 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 327 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 312 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 254 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 259 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 278 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 263 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 260 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 259 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 262 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 412 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/582 variables, 20/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 225 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 244 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 250 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 250 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 243 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 242 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 266 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 410 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 271 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 264 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 267 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60112ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 502 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60114ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 582/626 places, 503/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63622 ms. Remains : 582/626 places, 503/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 503 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18298760701580501440.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2981821270093862837.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18298760701580501440.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2981821270093862837.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2259026534985572829.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2259026534985572829.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2259026534985572829.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2259026534985572829.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2259026534985572829.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 294 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16576827269115792249.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:21:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9117998733391494066.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16576827269115792249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9117998733391494066.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10873e+33,2.28061,53668,5001,54,80721,567,1236,234498,57,1213,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((i17.u175.p649==0) * AF((i0.u87.p264==1)))) + EX(((((A((i0.u89.p270==1) U (i1.u9.p20==1)) * (A((i11.i0.u101.p316==1) U (((i6.i0.u24....334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * (i17.u175.p649==0)) * !(EG(!((i0.u87.p264==1)))))] != FALSE + (([(((((EY(Init) * (i9.i1.u48.p570=...846
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t203, t303, t311, t315, t389, t392, t465, t470, t472, t474, t475, t477, t479...1571
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 626/626 places, 547/547 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 592 transition count 513
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 592 transition count 513
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 581 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 581 transition count 502
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 580 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 580 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 579 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 579 transition count 500
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 578 transition count 499
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 578 transition count 499
Applied a total of 96 rules in 82 ms. Remains 578 /626 variables (removed 48) and now considering 499/547 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 499 rows 578 cols
[2025-05-30 14:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 117 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 579 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 14:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3329 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3909 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 498 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:22:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/577 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/577 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/578 variables, 70/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 315 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 604 ms of which 398 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 262 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 432 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 411 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 2154 ms of which 1858 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 31899ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31900ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 578/626 places, 499/547 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35892 ms. Remains : 578/626 places, 499/547 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 499 transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5312750669833840242.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 14:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5866990562112289880.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5312750669833840242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5866990562112289880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5941884953995226365.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5941884953995226365.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5941884953995226365.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5941884953995226365.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5941884953995226365.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 288 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4097374550334744930.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11507779800835471316.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4097374550334744930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11507779800835471316.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24521e+33,2.54922,54220,5080,62,74801,1211,1272,256482,69,2906,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,2.56091,54220,1,0,74801,1211,1814,256482,77,2906,1782
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14978704044453277817.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14978704044453277817.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14978704044453277817.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14978704044453277817.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14978704044453277817.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 272 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12531483238714179801.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 14:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14928950485847594891.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12531483238714179801.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14928950485847594891.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65592e+33,5.772,126016,7852,157,217794,1963,1200,584956,104,6496,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EF(((AG((i18.u205.p705==1)) * EX((i16.u70.p208==1))) + (i18.u172.p613==1)))) + ((AG((i0.u92.p275==1)) * AF(((i18.u182.p603==1)||(i18...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((!(E(TRUE U !((i18.u205.p705==1)))) * EX((i16.u70.p208==1))) + (i18.u172.p613==1)))) + ...348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t93, t237, t328, t340, t352, t436, t509, t514, t516, t518, t519, t521, t533,...1816
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,0,781.028,2480760,1,0,3.25706e+06,2654,3995,1.12674e+07,240,8855,2360369
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(E((i14.u130.p395==1) U AG((AF((i18.u172.p708==1)) * ((i10.i1.i0.u12.p28!=1)||(i13.u19.p49==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(i14.u130.p395==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((i18.u172.p708==1)))) * ((i10.i1.i0.u12.p28!=1)||(i13...183
(forward)formula 1,0,1328.43,3577024,1,0,4.6361e+06,2654,3958,1.36224e+07,240,8855,3002705
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-19-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 132 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 157 ms.
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4540073099328123494.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 14:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17539911956012791055.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4540073099328123494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17539911956012791055.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-19"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-19, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400146"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-19.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-19 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;