Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813400137.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-18, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400137
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 612K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 177K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748608394168

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-18
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 12:33:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 12:33:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 259 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Transformed 717 places.
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Transformed 642 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 717 places and 642 transitions and 1860 arcs in 511 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 31 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 29 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 15 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 88 out of 702 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 702/702 places, 627/627 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 694 transition count 627
Discarding 86 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 86 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 608 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 608 transition count 541
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 608 transition count 540
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 566 transition count 498
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 566 transition count 498
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 565 transition count 497
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 565 transition count 497
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 268 place count 564 transition count 496
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 564 transition count 496
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 563 transition count 495
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 563 transition count 495
Applied a total of 271 rules in 355 ms. Remains 563 /702 variables (removed 139) and now considering 495/627 (removed 132) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 495 rows 563 cols
[2025-05-30 12:33:17] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 50 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1086 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:33:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 494 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:33:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 494 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/562 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 494 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/563 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 494 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 516 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 340 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 327 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 283 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 360 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 435 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 315 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 309 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 393 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 369 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 476 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 470 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 396 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 397 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 397 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 453 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30491ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 494 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30523ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 563/702 places, 495/627 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34275 ms. Remains : 563/702 places, 495/627 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 563 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 12:33:52] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 12:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 152 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 12:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 495 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 563 places (down from 88) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (209 resets) in 2449 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 21/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
[2025-05-30 12:33:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 210/247 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 186/433 variables, 48/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 118/551 variables, 40/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/552 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 488/1040 variables, 552/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1040 variables, 0/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 15/1055 variables, 8/666 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1055 variables, 0/666 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 3/1058 variables, 3/669 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1058 variables, 0/669 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/1058 variables, 0/669 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1058/1058 variables, and 669 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 3998 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 563/563 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 210/247 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 186/433 variables, 48/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 180 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 182 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 288 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 249 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 245 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 232 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 208 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 228 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 243 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 220 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 227 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 218 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 215 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 206 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 222 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 211 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 210 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 9193ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 37 out of 563 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 253 edges and 563 vertex of which 6 / 563 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 7 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1232 edges and 558 vertex of which 557 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 67 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 67 transitions
Performed 67 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 67
Iterating post reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 557 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 490 transition count 416
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 486 transition count 416
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 486 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 3 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 21 places
Reduce places removed 121 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 221 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 365 transition count 316
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 383 place count 347 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 347 transition count 298
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 347 transition count 295
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 13 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 344 transition count 295
Performed 116 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 116 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 233 rules applied. Total rules applied 640 place count 227 transition count 179
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 642 place count 226 transition count 182
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 643 place count 226 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 225 transition count 181
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 647 place count 225 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 224 transition count 180
Applied a total of 648 rules in 294 ms. Remains 224 /563 variables (removed 339) and now considering 180/495 (removed 315) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 294 ms. Remains : 224/563 places, 180/495 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1207 resets) in 1371 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 7/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (469 resets) in 221 ms. (180 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (323 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (368 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (298 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (300 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (302 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (402 resets) in 186 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 224 cols
[2025-05-30 12:34:03] [INFO ] Computed 84 invariants in 9 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/69 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/162 variables, 49/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/165 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 37/202 variables, 19/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 178/380 variables, 202/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 24/404 variables, 22/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/404 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 404/404 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/69 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 93/162 variables, 49/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/165 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 37/202 variables, 19/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 178/380 variables, 202/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 24/404 variables, 22/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 404/404 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 348 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 685ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 12:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 495 transitions.
Computed a total of 505 stabilizing places and 447 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1245 edges and 563 vertex of which 562 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.33 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 282 edges and 563 vertex of which 6 / 563 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1238 edges and 558 vertex of which 557 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 78 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 78 transitions
Performed 78 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 78
Iterating post reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 556 transition count 409
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 478 transition count 409
Performed 111 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 111 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 478 transition count 298
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 24 places
Reduce places removed 135 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 246 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 343 transition count 298
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 428 place count 319 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 318 transition count 274
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 318 transition count 271
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 315 transition count 271
Performed 131 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 131 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 264 rules applied. Total rules applied 723 place count 182 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 724 place count 181 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 725 place count 180 transition count 139
Applied a total of 725 rules in 145 ms. Remains 180 /563 variables (removed 383) and now considering 139/495 (removed 356) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 180 cols
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Computed 78 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 242 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 244 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/563 places, 139/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 139/139 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 397 ms. Remains : 152/563 places, 139/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8567067753020201335.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16278178980959330781.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8567067753020201335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16278178980959330781.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,598464,0.154185,8520,2,1691,5,13403,6,0,745,9348,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(A(!(EF((p447==1))) U AG((((p699==0)||(p553==1))||(p149==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p699==0)||(p553==1))||(p149==1)))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U (p447==1)))) * !(!(E(...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t40, t70, t71, t72, t73, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, t103, t106, t...260
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.906535,24792,1,0,197,97630,276,119,5746,57873,302
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 278 edges and 563 vertex of which 6 / 563 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1238 edges and 558 vertex of which 557 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 75 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 75 transitions
Performed 75 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 75
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 556 transition count 412
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 481 transition count 410
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 479 transition count 410
Performed 112 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 112 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 479 transition count 298
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Reduce places removed 137 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 249 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 342 transition count 298
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 427 place count 320 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 319 transition count 276
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 319 transition count 273
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 316 transition count 273
Performed 131 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 131 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 264 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 183 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 721 place count 182 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 722 place count 181 transition count 141
Applied a total of 722 rules in 73 ms. Remains 181 /563 variables (removed 382) and now considering 141/495 (removed 354) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 181 cols
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 77 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 250 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/563 places, 141/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 156 /156 variables (removed 0) and now considering 141/141 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 333 ms. Remains : 156/563 places, 141/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality774768171172220189.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17899534511327721941.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality774768171172220189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17899534511327721941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98685e+06,0.231452,9908,2,1970,5,18350,6,0,763,12610,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF((((p77==0)&&(p184==1))&&((p640==0)||(p535==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U (((p77==0)&&(p184==1))&&((p640==0)||(p535==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t69, t74, t75, t76, t77, t95, t96, t97, t98, t99,...280
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.38074,40160,1,0,216,201925,278,122,5847,123451,299
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 544 transition count 476
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 544 transition count 476
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 539 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 539 transition count 471
Applied a total of 48 rules in 46 ms. Remains 539 /563 variables (removed 24) and now considering 471/495 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 471 rows 539 cols
[2025-05-30 12:34:08] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 677 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:34:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2471 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 470 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:34:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/539 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 346 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 400 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 391 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 382 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 375 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 402 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 264 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 397 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 275 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 297 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 234 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 266 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 386 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 264 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 252 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 328 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 344 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 276 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/539 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 539/1010 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved in 30065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/539 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 470/470 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/539 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/539 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 233 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 360 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 416 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 394 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 357 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 363 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 369 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 387 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 429 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 415 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 423 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 428 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 424 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 394 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 412 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 393 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 372 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 379 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 423 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 414 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/539 variables, 20/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 470 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 420 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 408 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 397 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 365 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 367 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 360 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 355 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 416 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 402 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 402 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 434 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 425 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 421 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 407 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 393 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 446 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 410 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 398 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 396 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD401 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD404 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD410 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/539 variables, 20/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 466 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 420 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 404 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 386 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60176ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 466 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 60179ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 539/563 places, 467/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 539 /539 variables (removed 0) and now considering 467/467 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63411 ms. Remains : 539/563 places, 467/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 467 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8848858397035346340.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3460017937993586524.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8848858397035346340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3460017937993586524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14937595301998007093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14937595301998007093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14937595301998007093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14937595301998007093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14937595301998007093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 265 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 147 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 32 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10243931651575043568.gal : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 12:35:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8050652181322580493.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10243931651575043568.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8050652181322580493.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.32385e+30,5.31747,101696,7585,59,157001,820,1122,306807,58,1704,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U AX((EF(!(((i14.i2.u128.p424==0)||(i19.u168.p641==1)))) + (A(((i19.u179.p620==0)||(i15.u24.p61==1)) U !(((i9.i0.u83.p255==0)|...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U !(((i14.i2.u128.p424==0)||(i19.u168.p641==1)))) + (!((E(!(!(((i9.i0.u83.p255==...1150
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t125, t287, t307, t319, t355, t372, t375, t444, t445, t449, t451, t453, t456,...1463
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 271 edges and 563 vertex of which 6 / 563 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1238 edges and 558 vertex of which 557 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 556 transition count 416
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 485 transition count 415
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 484 transition count 415
Performed 111 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 111 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 484 transition count 304
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 24 places
Reduce places removed 135 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 246 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 349 transition count 304
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 412 place count 329 transition count 284
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 328 transition count 284
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 328 transition count 282
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 326 transition count 282
Performed 130 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 130 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 132 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 262 rules applied. Total rules applied 699 place count 194 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 700 place count 193 transition count 151
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 701 place count 192 transition count 151
Applied a total of 701 rules in 68 ms. Remains 192 /563 variables (removed 371) and now considering 151/495 (removed 344) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 192 cols
[2025-05-30 12:36:12] [INFO ] Computed 78 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 275 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/563 places, 151/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 191 /191 variables (removed 0) and now considering 151/151 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 350 ms. Remains : 191/563 places, 151/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4411803052717337285.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17735636946004111046.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4411803052717337285.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17735636946004111046.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.33991e+07,2.34073,66068,2,8812,5,278400,6,0,912,165580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((AF((p652==0)) + E((p225==1) U ((p226==0)||(p652==1)))) + !(E((p639==1) U (p101==1)))) U AG((p328==0))) * EF(EG((((AG((p63!=1)) * (p2...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p328==0))))) U (!(((!(EG(!((p652==0)))) + E((p225==1) U ((p226==0)||(p65...349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t6, t10, t14, t21, t23, t40, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t75, t76, t81, t82, t83, t84, t...343
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,17.103,419796,1,0,362,2.55491e+06,320,195,6880,1.61903e+06,463
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 539 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 539 transition count 471
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 533 transition count 465
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 533 transition count 465
Applied a total of 60 rules in 57 ms. Remains 533 /563 variables (removed 30) and now considering 465/495 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 465 rows 533 cols
[2025-05-30 12:36:30] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 730 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:36:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2965 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3709 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 464 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:36:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/532 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/532 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/533 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 417 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 398 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 392 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 383 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 380 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 403 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 381 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 400 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 380 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 383 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 383 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 386 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 373 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 369 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 348 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 336 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30291ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30293ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 533/563 places, 465/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34062 ms. Remains : 533/563 places, 465/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 465 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8182299908154925192.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2894233610382864302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8182299908154925192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2894233610382864302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7498102223210075325.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7498102223210075325.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7498102223210075325.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7498102223210075325.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7498102223210075325.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 285 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6262315885112317885.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 12:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16594487983958456249.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6262315885112317885.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16594487983958456249.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95507e+30,4.79498,113204,6165,64,180807,925,1003,655932,66,1936,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((i14.u164.p628==1)) + EG(EF(!(E(((i13.u71.p223==0)||(i8.u28.p81==1)) U (i0.u79.p249==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(((i13.u71.p223==0)||(i8.u28.p81==1)) U (i0.u79.p249==1)))))))) * !((i14.u164.p628...170
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t281, t293, t305, t313, t349, t366, t443, t447, t449, t451, t452, t454, t456,...1326
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 539 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 539 transition count 471
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 532 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 532 transition count 464
Applied a total of 62 rules in 46 ms. Remains 532 /563 variables (removed 31) and now considering 464/495 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 464 rows 532 cols
[2025-05-30 12:38:05] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 512 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:38:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1935 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 463 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:38:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/532 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 396 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 445 ms of which 127 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 393 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 404 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 390 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 380 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 386 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 383 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 396 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 454 ms of which 152 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 383 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 399 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 380 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 389 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30345ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30348ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 532/563 places, 464/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32848 ms. Remains : 532/563 places, 464/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:38:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 464 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17708094292582236682.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 12:38:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1844984281128384907.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17708094292582236682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1844984281128384907.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18168457140931428088.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18168457140931428088.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18168457140931428088.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18168457140931428088.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18168457140931428088.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 286 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3363565597562748712.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 12:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16422846322419091239.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3363565597562748712.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16422846322419091239.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95619e+30,2.82166,57024,4623,64,85572,534,1222,215650,61,1320,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((i6.i0.u43.p141==0)||(i2.i1.u19.p48==1)) + (EF(EX(AF((i6.i0.u47.p147==0)))) * AX(AF(((i7.i1.u144.p512==0)||(i9.i1.u140.p493==1)))))) ...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(TRUE))))) * !(E(!(EX(TRUE)) U (!((((i6.i0.u43.p141==0)||(i2.i1.u19.p48==1)) + (E(TRUE U EX(!...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t296, t304, t312, t348, t365, t368, t442, t446, t448, t450, t451, t453, t455,...1507
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 541 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 541 transition count 473
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 534 transition count 466
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 534 transition count 466
Applied a total of 58 rules in 44 ms. Remains 534 /563 variables (removed 29) and now considering 466/495 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 466 rows 534 cols
[2025-05-30 12:39:38] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:39:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 568 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:39:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:39:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2082 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2655 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 465 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:39:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/533 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/533 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/534 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 368 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 370 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 364 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 340 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 343 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 376 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 380 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 377 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 385 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 377 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 395 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 401 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 411 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 388 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 325 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30311ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30313ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 534/563 places, 466/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33014 ms. Remains : 534/563 places, 466/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 466 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1559045935696841437.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15343132162817766812.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1559045935696841437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15343132162817766812.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14120899993720892977.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14120899993720892977.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14120899993720892977.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14120899993720892977.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14120899993720892977.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 283 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7844772759942386539.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 12:40:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13151706484457928975.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7844772759942386539.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13151706484457928975.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.99178e+30,18.4489,354384,25627,66,641985,760,1199,1.22395e+06,70,1890,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 543 transition count 475
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 543 transition count 475
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 538 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 538 transition count 470
Applied a total of 50 rules in 71 ms. Remains 538 /563 variables (removed 25) and now considering 470/495 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 470 rows 538 cols
[2025-05-30 12:41:12] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 764 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2096 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2862 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 469 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:41:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/538 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 405 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 384 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 396 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 371 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 342 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 300 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 295 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 333 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 342 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 323 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 321 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 281 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 290 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 288 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 247 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 416 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 401 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 424 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 538/1008 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/538 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 469/469 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/538 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 240 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 280 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 375 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 328 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 327 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 311 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 386 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 399 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 276 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 401 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 354 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 358 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 368 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 405 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 418 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 409 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 385 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 373 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 357 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 20/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 340 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 404 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 422 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 421 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 406 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 435 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 431 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 437 ms of which 121 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 419 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 409 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 405 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 429 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 426 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 410 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 410 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 354 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 363 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 429 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 395 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 425 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 20/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 407 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 423 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 439 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 401 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 379 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 427 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 408 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60519ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60521ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 538/563 places, 470/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63457 ms. Remains : 538/563 places, 470/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1696072096784219078.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10746167994003329077.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1696072096784219078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10746167994003329077.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13391223711196888606.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13391223711196888606.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13391223711196888606.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13391223711196888606.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13391223711196888606.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 279 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 13 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12335920179649365291.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 12:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14966399407197110454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12335920179649365291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14966399407197110454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.32482e+30,2.18983,42044,4087,61,55935,743,1195,192556,68,1539,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((EG((((i18.u156.p588!=1)||(i6.i1.u129.p458==1))||(i0.i0.u59.p184==0))) + A(((i19.i1.u52.p163==0)||(i2.u30.p85==1)) U ((i8.i2.u141.p...467
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U EG(((i18.u167.p625==0)||(i13.i1.u99.p315==1)))) * EX((i19.i1.u120.p410==1))...1167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t286, t302, t310, t318, t371, t374, t448, t452, t454, t456, t457, t459, t461,...1490
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 538 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 538 transition count 470
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 531 transition count 463
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 531 transition count 463
Applied a total of 64 rules in 45 ms. Remains 531 /563 variables (removed 32) and now considering 463/495 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 463 rows 531 cols
[2025-05-30 12:43:15] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 500 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2663 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 462 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/531 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 382 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 387 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 369 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 365 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 366 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 337 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 320 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 406 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 389 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 405 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 382 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 367 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 333 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 367 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 350 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 368 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 326 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 343 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 456 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 400 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD402 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD403 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD406 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD411 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD412 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD415 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD420 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD424 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD428 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD429 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 531/994 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/531 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 462/462 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/531 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 451 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 369 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 386 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 396 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 394 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 391 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 400 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 389 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 422 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 395 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 399 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 391 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 362 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 355 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 333 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 329 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 335 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 379 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 387 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 425 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 409 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD380 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD393 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD395 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD396 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD405 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 277 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 354 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 416 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 428 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 389 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 401 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 349 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 401 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 427 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 392 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 400 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 418 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 381 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 397 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 376 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 412 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 424 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 427 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 414 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 423 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD416 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD418 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 431 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 458 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60126ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 19 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 19 dead transitions in 60129ms
Found 19 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 19 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 19 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 531/563 places, 444/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 531 /531 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63377 ms. Remains : 531/563 places, 444/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 444 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16324456214363616657.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3994168387861221149.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16324456214363616657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3994168387861221149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13197010916857134468.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13197010916857134468.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13197010916857134468.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13197010916857134468.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13197010916857134468.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 201 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12131969967809096418.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12018621818412479785.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12131969967809096418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12018621818412479785.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95506e+30,1.36974,32812,3291,43,57364,575,1082,119240,55,1491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((i2.u165.p622==1) + EX(((i8.i0.u86.p269==0)||(i16.i1.u112.p350==1)))) + AF((i17.i0.u181.p697==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i2.u165.p622==1) + EX(((i8.i0.u86.p269==0)||(i16.i1.u112.p350==1)))))),!((i17.i0.u1...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t7, t279, t295, t303, t347, t364, t367, t422, t426, t428, t430, t431, t433, t435, t44...1434
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,6.09115,158380,1,0,322480,708,7488,628808,299,2250,763441
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 282 edges and 563 vertex of which 6 / 563 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1238 edges and 558 vertex of which 557 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 77 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 77 transitions
Performed 77 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 556 transition count 410
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 479 transition count 409
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 478 transition count 409
Performed 112 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 112 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 478 transition count 297
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Reduce places removed 137 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 249 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 341 transition count 297
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 431 place count 317 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 316 transition count 273
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 316 transition count 270
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 313 transition count 270
Performed 132 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 132
Deduced a syphon composed of 132 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 134 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 266 rules applied. Total rules applied 728 place count 179 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 729 place count 178 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 730 place count 177 transition count 137
Applied a total of 730 rules in 59 ms. Remains 177 /563 variables (removed 386) and now considering 137/495 (removed 358) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 177 cols
[2025-05-30 12:44:55] [INFO ] Computed 77 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 291 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 292 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/563 places, 137/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 137/137 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 356 ms. Remains : 151/563 places, 137/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12637157751657682733.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5941411208048442.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12637157751657682733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5941411208048442.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...326
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5941411208048442.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 9
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :9 after 19
RANDOM walk for 19472 steps (2613 resets) in 368 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :19 after 129
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :129 after 276
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :276 after 1080
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 538 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 538 transition count 470
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 531 transition count 463
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 531 transition count 463
Applied a total of 64 rules in 47 ms. Remains 531 /563 variables (removed 32) and now considering 463/495 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 463 rows 531 cols
[2025-05-30 12:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 677 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:44:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:44:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2740 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3419 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 462 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:44:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/531 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 403 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 398 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 289 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 408 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 408 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 380 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 423 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 416 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 392 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 417 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 392 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 386 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 368 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 407 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 395 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 531/994 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/531 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 462/462 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/531 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 15/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 490 ms of which 134 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 407 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 446 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 423 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 464 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 434 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 454 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 432 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 402 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 385 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 277 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 305 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 275 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 293 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 344 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 421 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 395 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 282 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 280 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD379 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD403 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 459 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 424 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 427 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 236 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 256 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 388 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 412 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 401 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 415 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 417 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 417 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 289 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 347 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 362 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 292 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 488 ms of which 149 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 437 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 460 ms of which 128 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 418 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 345 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 285 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 459 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 338 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 425 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 393 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 385 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 426 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 395 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 362 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 369 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 345 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60323ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 459 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 3 dead transitions in 60325ms
Found 3 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 3 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 3 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 531/563 places, 460/495 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 531 /531 variables (removed 0) and now considering 460/460 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63807 ms. Remains : 531/563 places, 460/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 460 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13437739936315014608.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8526722574617286418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13437739936315014608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8526722574617286418.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2628631556387699441.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2628631556387699441.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2628631556387699441.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2628631556387699441.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2628631556387699441.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 266 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7560326597237977605.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12173842903708297685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7560326597237977605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12173842903708297685.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95506e+30,1.89979,50312,3582,65,80331,712,1176,264070,64,1717,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(EF(EX(((i17.i0.u159.p595==0)||(i0.i0.u89.p289==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((i17.i0.u159.p595==0)||(i0.i0.u89.p289==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t279, t299, t311, t347, t364, t367, t437, t438, t442, t444, t446, t449, t451,...1443
(forward)formula 0,1,7.53188,184712,1,0,333254,712,7763,880901,318,2249,722378
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-18-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 538 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 538 transition count 470
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 531 transition count 463
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 531 transition count 463
Applied a total of 64 rules in 46 ms. Remains 531 /563 variables (removed 32) and now considering 463/495 (removed 32) transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:46:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 502 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:46:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:46:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2060 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2564 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 462 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:46:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/531 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 413 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 400 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 372 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 399 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 423 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 378 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 422 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 439 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 402 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 405 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 408 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 414 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 383 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 396 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 396 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30226ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 462 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30228ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 531/563 places, 463/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32840 ms. Remains : 531/563 places, 463/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 463 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5385999199130854784.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13589101758242415473.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5385999199130854784.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13589101758242415473.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9280801327792011620.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9280801327792011620.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9280801327792011620.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9280801327792011620.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9280801327792011620.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 283 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8384929637307636542.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 12:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7558061813167947109.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8384929637307636542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7558061813167947109.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95506e+30,2.07505,55256,5394,61,110262,537,1200,158637,58,1251,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(A(AX((i15.i0.u14.p31==1)) U EX(((i0.i0.u85.p262==1)||(i7.i0.u65.p199==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(EX(((i0.i0.u85.p262==1)||(i7.i0.u65.p199==1)))) U (!(!(EX(!((i15.i0.u14.p31==1...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t279, t303, t311, t347, t364, t367, t440, t441, t445, t447, t449, t450, t452,...1456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 563/563 places, 495/495 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 539 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 539 transition count 471
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 532 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 532 transition count 464
Applied a total of 62 rules in 76 ms. Remains 532 /563 variables (removed 31) and now considering 464/495 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 464 rows 532 cols
[2025-05-30 12:48:11] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 690 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 12:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2689 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3387 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 463 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/531 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/532 variables, 65/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 418 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 379 ms of which 144 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 220 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 383 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 376 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 403 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 409 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 393 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 369 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 388 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 372 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 375 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 355 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 381 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 402 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 394 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 380 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30057ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 532/563 places, 464/495 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33524 ms. Remains : 532/563 places, 464/495 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 464 transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9660209929216814169.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 12:48:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7862112468744410158.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9660209929216814169.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7862112468744410158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3346360966565937280.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3346360966565937280.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3346360966565937280.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3346360966565937280.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3346360966565937280.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 288 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality130750224121548282.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7901333053606525889.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality130750224121548282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7901333053606525889.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.95507e+30,11.75,224596,10371,59,382758,574,1181,812926,59,1587,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13686060430239850414.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13686060430239850414.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13686060430239850414.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13686060430239850414.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13686060430239850414.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 276 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7933902354604751136.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 12:49:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13118020606734084580.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7933902354604751136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13118020606734084580.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00193e+31,13.4007,255460,14084,82,430033,634,1368,940085,68,1667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U AX((EF(!(((i6.i1.u133.p424==0)||(i0.u187.p641==1)))) + (A(((i0.u159.p620==0)||(i2.i0.u24.p61==1)) U !(((i7.i0.u85.p255==0)||...256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U !(((i6.i1.u133.p424==0)||(i0.u187.p641==1)))) + (!((E(!(!(((i7.i0.u85.p255==0)...1186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t308, t330, t472, t473, t477, t479, t481, t482, t484, t486, i0.t56, i0.t32, i...1824
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 136 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 213 labels/synchronizations in 126 ms.
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6289392413035079412.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 13:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17257067770456322222.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6289392413035079412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17257067770456322222.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-18"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-18, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813400137"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-18.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-18 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;