Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300122.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300122
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748597313851

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-16
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 267 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Transformed 638 places.
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Transformed 578 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 638 places and 578 transitions and 1694 arcs in 525 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 31 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 25 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 630 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 570/570 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 625 transition count 570
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 546 transition count 491
Iterating global reduction 1 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 546 transition count 491
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 514 transition count 459
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 514 transition count 459
Applied a total of 227 rules in 287 ms. Remains 514 /630 variables (removed 116) and now considering 459/570 (removed 111) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 459 rows 514 cols
[2025-05-30 09:28:37] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 83 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1069 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:28:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2952 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4094 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 458 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:28:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/513 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/513 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/514 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/973 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved in 30063 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 0/514 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 458/458 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/513 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/513 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/514 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 447 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 455 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 338 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 436 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 275 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 648 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 441 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 441 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 552 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 424 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 456 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 435 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 423 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 439 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 368 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 287 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 364 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 381 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 376 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 430 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 472 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 520 ms of which 115 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 457 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 745 ms of which 377 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 404 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 281 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 423 ms of which 160 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 381 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 391 ms of which 112 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60747ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 458 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60777ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 514/630 places, 459/570 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 65201 ms. Remains : 514/630 places, 459/570 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 514 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 09:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 459 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 514 places (down from 109) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (266 resets) in 2624 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 52/74 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
[2025-05-30 09:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 291/375 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 37/412 variables, 12/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 50 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/505 variables, 37/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/505 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/506 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 283 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 376 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 381 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 406 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 515 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 505 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5452ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 49 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 80 out of 514 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1147 edges and 514 vertex of which 513 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 513 transition count 418
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 473 transition count 411
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 466 transition count 411
Performed 77 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 77 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 466 transition count 334
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 4 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 380 transition count 334
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 372 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 372 transition count 326
Performed 107 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 107 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 216 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 263 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 263 transition count 218
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 493 place count 262 transition count 222
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 501 place count 262 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 502 place count 261 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 503 place count 260 transition count 221
Applied a total of 503 rules in 266 ms. Remains 260 /514 variables (removed 254) and now considering 221/459 (removed 238) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 266 ms. Remains : 260/514 places, 221/459 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1883 resets) in 1694 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 46/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (32 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (29 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (28 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 332370 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=110 ) properties seen :22 out of 46
Probabilistic random walk after 332370 steps, saw 59080 distinct states, run finished after 3008 ms. (steps per millisecond=110 ) properties seen :22
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 260 cols
[2025-05-30 09:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 83 invariants in 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/135 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/159 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/220 variables, 28/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/223 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 221/444 variables, 223/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 3/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 220 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 195 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 167 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 192 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 8/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 217 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 220 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 212 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 197 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 37/481 variables, 37/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 17/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 0/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/481 variables, 0/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 481/481 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved in 9101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 260/260 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 93/125 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 24/149 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 68/217 variables, 28/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/220 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 220/440 variables, 220/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 11/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 17 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 41/481 variables, 40/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 18/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 5/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 8/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 201 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 243 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 244 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 195 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 8/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 190 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 219 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 2/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 1/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 192 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 4/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/481 variables, 1/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 165 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 206 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 202 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 6/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 1/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 0/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/481 variables, 0/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 481/481 variables, and 402 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved in 25332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 260/260 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/24 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 34457ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 15 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 3472 ms.
Support contains 17 out of 260 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 260/260 places, 221/221 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 51 edges and 260 vertex of which 2 / 260 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 259 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 250 transition count 210
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 250 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 225 transition count 192
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 216 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 216 transition count 183
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 216 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 215 transition count 182
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 189 transition count 159
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -17
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 188 transition count 176
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 188 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 186 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 184 transition count 172
Applied a total of 139 rules in 73 ms. Remains 184 /260 variables (removed 76) and now considering 172/221 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 184/260 places, 172/221 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1396 resets) in 310 ms. (128 steps per ms) remains 5/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (516 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (376 resets) in 140 ms. (283 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (516 resets) in 186 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (556 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 6250 steps (26 resets) in 25 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Successfully simplified 12 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 459 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 514 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 140 stabilizing places and 133 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1147 edges and 514 vertex of which 513 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.21 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 82 rules in 31 ms. Remains 473 /514 variables (removed 41) and now considering 418/459 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 413 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:30:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2611 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3026 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:30:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 414 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 381 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 358 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 381 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 369 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 226 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 218 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 216 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 274 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 385 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 482 ms of which 172 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30557ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30559ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/514 places, 418/459 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33619 ms. Remains : 473/514 places, 418/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 418 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2651439540921414739.gal : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4514336034699714944.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2651439540921414739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4514336034699714944.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15180474124716899232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15180474124716899232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15180474124716899232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15180474124716899232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15180474124716899232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:31:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:31:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:31:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 282 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 113 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:31:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13141953727546422470.gal : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10940852909501003919.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13141953727546422470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10940852909501003919.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15531e+27,1.06686,26852,3359,57,41479,562,1143,83082,69,1390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG((((i1.u41.p135==1) * EF((((i10.i0.u24.p76==1)&&(i10.i1.u124.p441==1))&&(i18.u127.p603==1)))) * EG((i18.u127.p524==1)))) U !(AX(((!(E...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(((!(EX((i17.i2.u148.p584==1))) * EG((i7.i0.u4.p11==1))) * (i16.i1.u107.p360!=1))))))))...520
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t171, t243, t265, t274, t279, t385, t386, t387, t394, t396, t403, t408, t410...1359
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,14.4302,339684,1,0,666745,562,8052,1.09864e+06,354,1780,1194701
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 258 edges and 514 vertex of which 6 / 514 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1141 edges and 509 vertex of which 508 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 507 transition count 386
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 442 transition count 385
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 385
Performed 101 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 101 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 284
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 219 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 323 transition count 284
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 384 place count 292 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 292 transition count 253
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 292 transition count 251
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 290 transition count 251
Performed 117 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 117 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 122 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 239 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 168 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 166 transition count 133
Applied a total of 660 rules in 82 ms. Remains 166 /514 variables (removed 348) and now considering 133/459 (removed 326) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 09:31:51] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 282 ms returned [0, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 48, 49, 50, 51]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 284 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/514 places, 133/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 133/133 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 378 ms. Remains : 148/514 places, 133/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18213175069546336798.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15528220497108318240.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18213175069546336798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15528220497108318240.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19488,0.529564,22164,2,5642,5,78680,6,0,724,41578,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF((p41==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p41==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t82, t83, t84, t120, t121, t122, Inte...250
(forward)formula 0,0,2.16946,68476,1,0,165,279275,250,89,5351,145075,248
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 488 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 488 transition count 433
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 480 transition count 425
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 480 transition count 425
Applied a total of 68 rules in 35 ms. Remains 480 /514 variables (removed 34) and now considering 425/459 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 480 cols
[2025-05-30 09:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 610 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:31:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1714 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2331 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 424 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/480 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 378 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 447 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 421 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 472 ms of which 172 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 345 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 348 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 294 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 327 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 336 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 364 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 367 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 378 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 382 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 366 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 397 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 404 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 844 ms of which 551 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 394 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 370 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 405 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD321 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD322 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD341 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 232 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 224 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 372 ms of which 187 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 355 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 381 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30402ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 15 dead transitions in 30404ms
Found 15 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 15 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 15 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 480/514 places, 410/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 410/410 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32798 ms. Remains : 480/514 places, 410/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 410 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10203160283885379758.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15805746937573919402.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10203160283885379758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15805746937573919402.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3261456383171886442.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3261456383171886442.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3261456383171886442.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3261456383171886442.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3261456383171886442.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 216 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2421926787638741766.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14453503261724895495.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2421926787638741766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14453503261724895495.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.20826e+27,25.9717,467452,39655,64,739696,1343,1063,1.7453e+06,69,3240,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 483 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 483 transition count 428
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 472 transition count 417
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 472 transition count 417
Applied a total of 84 rules in 40 ms. Remains 472 /514 variables (removed 42) and now considering 417/459 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 417 rows 472 cols
[2025-05-30 09:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 433 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:33:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1822 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 416 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:33:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/472 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 248 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 202 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 211 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 234 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 377 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 364 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 370 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 351 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 380 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 352 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 302 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 307 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 320 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 389 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 362 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 391 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 381 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 393 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30168ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30170ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 472/514 places, 417/459 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32470 ms. Remains : 472/514 places, 417/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 417 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2272438830702214015.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14631589539438916867.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2272438830702214015.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14631589539438916867.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16712261733706487488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16712261733706487488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16712261733706487488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16712261733706487488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16712261733706487488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 285 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9682500628109959994.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6424345140978979196.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9682500628109959994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6424345140978979196.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07055e+27,8.12312,145092,12814,52,235246,652,1111,516340,63,1534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG((i5.i1.u128.p495==0)) * ((AG((((i0.i0.u76.p238==0)||(i0.i2.u126.p447==0))||(i0.i2.u154.p599==0))) + (i9.i1.u20.p60==0)) + ((i4.i1....193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((i5.i1.u128.p495==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(((EY(Init) * !(((i4.i1.u96.p302==0)||(i9.i1....286
(forward)formula 0,0,13.6682,151492,1,0,245889,652,2612,549459,108,1534,694395
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 255 edges and 514 vertex of which 6 / 514 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1141 edges and 509 vertex of which 508 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 507 transition count 386
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 442 transition count 386
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 442 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 214 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 327 transition count 287
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 378 place count 295 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 295 transition count 255
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 295 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 293 transition count 253
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 235 rules applied. Total rules applied 649 place count 173 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 172 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 651 place count 171 transition count 137
Applied a total of 651 rules in 71 ms. Remains 171 /514 variables (removed 343) and now considering 137/459 (removed 322) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 247 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 248 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/514 places, 137/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 137/137 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 152/514 places, 137/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14481969006517038817.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2651304169482980963.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14481969006517038817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2651304169482980963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39276,0.576748,21104,2,8149,5,65924,6,0,745,43596,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p279==1) * AF((((p60==0)||(p332==0))||(p500==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p279==1)) * !(EG(!((((p60==0)||(p332==0))||(p500==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t103, t110, t124, ...267
(forward)formula 0,1,3.49704,94516,1,0,181,346238,261,95,5523,163373,256
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 483 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 483 transition count 428
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 82 rules in 31 ms. Remains 473 /514 variables (removed 41) and now considering 418/459 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:34:48] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 434 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:34:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1887 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 224 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 238 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 229 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 211 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 332 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 201 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 173 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 195 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 405 ms of which 140 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 349 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 239 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 254 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 227 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 271 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 214 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 331 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 222 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 220 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD319 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD333 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD364 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 410 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 210 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 218 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 232 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 215 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 223 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 270 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 264 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 286 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 265 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 237 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 264 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 270 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 344 ms of which 117 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 231 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 238 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 336 ms of which 151 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30077ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 410 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30079ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/514 places, 411/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 473 /473 variables (removed 0) and now considering 411/411 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32448 ms. Remains : 473/514 places, 411/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 411 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1741191145764655876.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6833216493707419752.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1741191145764655876.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6833216493707419752.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11915606076142848610.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11915606076142848610.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11915606076142848610.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11915606076142848610.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11915606076142848610.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:35:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 252 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14031124775544551500.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5284004815512125530.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14031124775544551500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5284004815512125530.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09731e+27,7.38053,157448,4904,47,260463,670,1036,543519,52,1955,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EX(((((i17.i0.u54.p180==0)||(i17.i0.u119.p417==0))||(i17.i0.u148.p626==0))&&(i18.u136.p578==0))) * (!(A((i18.u136.p526==1) U (i7.i...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((EX(((((i17.i0.u54.p180==0)||(i17.i0.u119.p417==0))||(i17.i0.u148.p626==0))&&(i...365
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t171, t243, t270, t279, t378, t379, t388, t389, t396, t401, t403, t405, t406...1322
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 482 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 482 transition count 427
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 86 rules in 33 ms. Remains 471 /514 variables (removed 43) and now considering 416/459 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 471 cols
[2025-05-30 09:36:21] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 404 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:36:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1863 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:36:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 335 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 284 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 197 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 260 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 309 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 222 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 205 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 267 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 268 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 221 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 249 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 216 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 200 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 349 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 220 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 347 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 221 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 325 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 317 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 349 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 234 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 375 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 324 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 247 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 234 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 265 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 245 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 236 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30250ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30252ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/514 places, 409/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 471 /471 variables (removed 0) and now considering 409/409 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32578 ms. Remains : 471/514 places, 409/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14050491344638878280.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7073174121985946862.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14050491344638878280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7073174121985946862.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13542801374142840542.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13542801374142840542.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13542801374142840542.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13542801374142840542.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13542801374142840542.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 249 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3483783156995615003.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16131808351724422473.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3483783156995615003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16131808351724422473.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 259 edges and 514 vertex of which 6 / 514 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1141 edges and 509 vertex of which 508 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 66 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 66 transitions
Performed 66 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 66
Iterating post reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 507 transition count 385
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 385
Performed 101 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 101 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 284
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 219 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 323 transition count 284
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 291 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 291 transition count 252
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 291 transition count 250
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 289 transition count 250
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 235 rules applied. Total rules applied 656 place count 169 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 657 place count 168 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 167 transition count 134
Applied a total of 658 rules in 64 ms. Remains 167 /514 variables (removed 347) and now considering 134/459 (removed 325) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 234 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 248 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 319 ms. Remains : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality705973314838943635.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7394913614545251656.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality705973314838943635.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7394913614545251656.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 474 transition count 419
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 474 transition count 419
Applied a total of 80 rules in 33 ms. Remains 474 /514 variables (removed 40) and now considering 419/459 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 419 rows 474 cols
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 429 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:37:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2554 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 418 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/474 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 198 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 209 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 196 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 206 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 207 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 206 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 209 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 315 ms of which 156 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 215 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 213 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 204 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 206 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 222 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 221 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 223 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 205 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 200 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 202 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 215 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD364 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD365 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 406 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 208 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 333 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 196 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 208 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 199 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 228 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 365 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 385 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 214 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 1594 ms of which 1414 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 268 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 291 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 264 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 306 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 397 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 301 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 308 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 295 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 333 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD324 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD351 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 386 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 397 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30393ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 401 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 17 dead transitions in 30396ms
Found 17 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 17 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 17 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 474/514 places, 402/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 474 /474 variables (removed 0) and now considering 402/402 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33001 ms. Remains : 474/514 places, 402/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 402 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9758050420807001862.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability825739510217330490.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9758050420807001862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability825739510217330490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1871548454429619826.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1871548454429619826.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1871548454429619826.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1871548454429619826.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1871548454429619826.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 209 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12419782253968967601.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15115014056001042484.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12419782253968967601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15115014056001042484.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0779e+27,28.471,560516,7862,37,942125,474,1049,1.33868e+06,48,1280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 257 edges and 514 vertex of which 6 / 514 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1141 edges and 509 vertex of which 508 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 507 transition count 386
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 442 transition count 386
Performed 101 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 101 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 442 transition count 285
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 219 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 324 transition count 285
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 382 place count 293 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 293 transition count 254
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 293 transition count 252
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 291 transition count 252
Performed 117 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 117 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 122 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 239 rules applied. Total rules applied 656 place count 169 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 657 place count 168 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 167 transition count 134
Applied a total of 658 rules in 46 ms. Remains 167 /514 variables (removed 347) and now considering 134/459 (removed 325) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 09:39:27] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 255 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7596351199244488241.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15944968063804621366.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7596351199244488241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15944968063804621366.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15944968063804621366.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 12
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :12 after 15
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8330 resets) in 888 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :15 after 24
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :24 after 48
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :48 after 366
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (2425 resets) in 250 ms. (159 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Reachability property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-09 is true.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 129 fixpoint passes
Finished probabilistic random walk after 231 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 )
Probabilistic random walk after 231 steps, saw 149 distinct states, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=13 ) properties seen :1
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,1430,0.147974,5944,2,1833,12,6094,6,0,725,3259,0
Total reachable state count : 1430

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-09 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2025-09,66,0.149195,6072,2,322,12,6094,7,0,728,3259,0
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 483 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 483 transition count 428
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 82 rules in 48 ms. Remains 473 /514 variables (removed 41) and now considering 418/459 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 388 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2387 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2787 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 368 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 364 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 360 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 380 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 215 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 219 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 215 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 237 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 216 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 228 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 229 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 208 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 284 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 251 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 227 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 224 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30074ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/514 places, 418/459 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32912 ms. Remains : 473/514 places, 418/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 418 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17443686607497194791.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3037770321834597352.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17443686607497194791.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3037770321834597352.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7886876822876552477.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7886876822876552477.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7886876822876552477.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7886876822876552477.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7886876822876552477.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 282 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13418486282987960677.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5793845750943465152.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13418486282987960677.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5793845750943465152.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 487 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 487 transition count 432
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 477 transition count 422
Applied a total of 74 rules in 54 ms. Remains 477 /514 variables (removed 37) and now considering 422/459 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 477 cols
[2025-05-30 09:41:01] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 528 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2005 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2537 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 421 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 421 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 421 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/477 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 421 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 421 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 284 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 280 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 277 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 251 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 245 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 275 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 369 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 349 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 355 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 336 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 337 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 347 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 344 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 347 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 351 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 379 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30252ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 421 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30254ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 477/514 places, 422/459 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32846 ms. Remains : 477/514 places, 422/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 422 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13747279261757909568.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10438780085859723519.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13747279261757909568.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10438780085859723519.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph602751787377409462.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph602751787377409462.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph602751787377409462.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph602751787377409462.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph602751787377409462.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 280 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5392123605537331624.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15134836076103174397.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5392123605537331624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15134836076103174397.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26454e+27,3.06847,62984,6556,74,104010,1305,1141,206516,78,3094,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF(AX((i16.u131.p459==1)))) + (!(E(((!(((i13.i3.u116.p390==1)&&(i6.u33.p110==1))) + AF((i11.i1.u105.p339==1))) + EF((i11.i1.u105.p339...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((i16.u131.p459==1)))))))))),((!(((i13.i3.u116.p390==1)&&(i6.u33.p...605
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t173, t278, t283, t390, t391, t399, t400, t407, t413, t414, t417, i0.i0.u126...1320
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 257 edges and 514 vertex of which 6 / 514 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1141 edges and 509 vertex of which 508 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 507 transition count 386
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 442 transition count 385
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 385
Performed 101 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 101 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 441 transition count 284
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 219 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 323 transition count 284
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 383 place count 293 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 293 transition count 254
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 293 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 292 transition count 253
Performed 118 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 118
Deduced a syphon composed of 118 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 123 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 241 rules applied. Total rules applied 656 place count 169 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 657 place count 168 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 167 transition count 134
Applied a total of 658 rules in 44 ms. Remains 167 /514 variables (removed 347) and now considering 134/459 (removed 325) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 308 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 48, 49, 50, 51]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 318 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 370 ms. Remains : 148/514 places, 134/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10823872559504972922.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13264892629231531027.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10823872559504972922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13264892629231531027.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13264892629231531027.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 12
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :12 after 15
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :15 after 24
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :24 after 48
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :60 after 354
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8343 resets) in 416 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :354 after 840
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :840 after 1620
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (2429 resets) in 239 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 468 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 )
Probabilistic random walk after 468 steps, saw 322 distinct states, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 514/514 places, 459/459 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 82 rules in 54 ms. Remains 473 /514 variables (removed 41) and now considering 418/459 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 534 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2609 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 339 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 353 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 350 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 349 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 413 ms of which 132 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 310 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 331 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 211 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 341 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 350 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 343 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 322 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 323 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 304 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 336 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 261 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 357 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 309 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 305 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 473/891 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 0/473 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 417/417 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 351 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 371 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 415 ms of which 127 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 324 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 313 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 313 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 350 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 360 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 325 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 329 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 426 ms of which 175 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 353 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 322 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 319 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 318 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 358 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 316 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 414 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 210 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 216 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 373 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 233 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 218 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 332 ms of which 129 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 213 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 217 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 192 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 209 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 271 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 377 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 371 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 374 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 369 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 353 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 381 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 382 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD315 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 411 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 367 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 353 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 332 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 397 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 329 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 404 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 377 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 430 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 347 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 342 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 374 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 439 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 387 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 367 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 367 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 379 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 380 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60255ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 411 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 6 dead transitions in 60258ms
Found 6 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 6 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 6 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/514 places, 412/459 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 473 /473 variables (removed 0) and now considering 412/412 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63476 ms. Remains : 473/514 places, 412/459 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 412 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1405279597392070773.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2819263329376670759.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1405279597392070773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2819263329376670759.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2485956456512877616.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2485956456512877616.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2485956456512877616.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2485956456512877616.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2485956456512877616.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 251 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9078302472272404487.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15632282877615828837.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9078302472272404487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15632282877615828837.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08595e+27,3.6821,76372,5810,55,120727,758,1094,305247,74,1827,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((AG((i4.i0.u12.p32==0)) + (i15.i1.u120.p420==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((i4.i0.u12.p32==0)))) + (i15.i1.u120.p420==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t170, t242, t269, t278, t379, t389, t390, t397, t402, t404, i0.i0.u74.t173, ...1291
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3686806446135939072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3686806446135939072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3686806446135939072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3686806446135939072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3686806446135939072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 273 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9414711788466820045.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15060953202663000589.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9414711788466820045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15060953202663000589.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82693e+27,42.1679,694828,54472,131,1.17603e+06,989,1266,2.36039e+06,94,3272,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((i15.i1.u72.p207==0)) * ((AF((((i8.i0.u19.p50==0)||(i16.i1.u137.p430==0)) * (E((i6.i0.u34.p101==1) U (i15.i1.u64.p184==1)) + ((i17...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((i15.i1.u72.p207==0)) * ((!(EG(!((((i8.i0.u19.p50==0)||(i16.i1.u137.p430==0)) * (E((i6.i0.u34.p10...310
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t19, t72, t199, t308, t317, t437, t444, t451, i0.i0.u142.t89, i0.i1.u82.t202...1780
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 139 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 75 ms.
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5367621124113016235.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 10:10:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16815633554808779999.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5367621124113016235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16815633554808779999.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-16"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300122"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-16.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-16 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;