Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300121.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300121
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748597311033

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-16
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 09:28:33] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 09:28:33] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 251 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Transformed 638 places.
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Transformed 578 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 638 places and 578 transitions and 1694 arcs in 522 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 32 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 23 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
Support contains 120 out of 630 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 570/570 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 625 transition count 570
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 557 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 557 transition count 502
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 525 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 525 transition count 470
Applied a total of 205 rules in 297 ms. Remains 525 /630 variables (removed 105) and now considering 470/570 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 470 rows 525 cols
[2025-05-30 09:28:34] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 66 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1241 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:28:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:28:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2908 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 469 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:28:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/525 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/525 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 525/995 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved in 30056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 0/525 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 469/469 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/525 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/525 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 459 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 481 ms of which 129 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 443 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 479 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 287 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 392 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 419 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 428 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 427 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 415 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 333 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 403 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 474 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 420 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 443 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 476 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 428 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 445 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 415 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 472 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/525 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 459 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 429 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 394 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 401 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 485 ms of which 133 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 455 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 499 ms of which 219 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 527 ms of which 196 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 479 ms of which 183 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60706ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 469 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60737ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 525/630 places, 470/570 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 65304 ms. Remains : 525/630 places, 470/570 transitions.
Support contains 120 out of 525 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 154 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 470 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 525 places (down from 120) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (264 resets) in 3091 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 35/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
[2025-05-30 09:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 324/393 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/414 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/516 variables, 38/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 464/980 variables, 516/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/980 variables, 0/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 13/993 variables, 7/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 993/995 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved in 5015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 523/525 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 326/393 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 325 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 307 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 306 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 327 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 339 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 187 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 195 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 182 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 177 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 159 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 157 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 214 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 237 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 325 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 317 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 247 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10088ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Fused 32 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 64 out of 525 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 206 edges and 525 vertex of which 6 / 525 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1152 edges and 520 vertex of which 519 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 519 transition count 413
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 470 transition count 408
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 465 transition count 408
Performed 78 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 78 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 465 transition count 330
Deduced a syphon composed of 78 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 377 transition count 330
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 357 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 357 transition count 310
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 357 transition count 309
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 356 transition count 309
Performed 97 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 98 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 195 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 258 transition count 212
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 257 transition count 216
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 257 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 256 transition count 215
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 256 transition count 215
Applied a total of 519 rules in 188 ms. Remains 256 /525 variables (removed 269) and now considering 215/470 (removed 255) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 256/525 places, 215/470 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1411 resets) in 1406 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 15/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (24 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (25 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (28 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (24 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (27 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 256 cols
[2025-05-30 09:29:52] [INFO ] Computed 84 invariants in 8 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 150/187 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/204 variables, 11/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/253 variables, 27/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 215/468 variables, 253/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 10/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/471 variables, 3/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/471 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 471/471 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 1531 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 256/256 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 150/187 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 157 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 155 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 160 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 158 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 197 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 213 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 181 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 172 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 185 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 146 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 147 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 155 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 153 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 10/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 152 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 147 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 144 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 10/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 14/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 153 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 146 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 18/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 8/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 17/204 variables, 11/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 107 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 49/253 variables, 27/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 192 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 222 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 170 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 5/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 215/468 variables, 253/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 10/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 14/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 185 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 177 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 210 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 4/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 159 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 172 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 224 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 189 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 220 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 6/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 176 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 224 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 218 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 209 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 468/471 variables, and 610 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved in 45012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 253/256 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/15 constraints, Known Traps: 249/249 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46561ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 30 out of 256 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 256/256 places, 215/215 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 256 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 250 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 249 transition count 208
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 249 transition count 194
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 231 transition count 194
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 228 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 228 transition count 191
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 210 transition count 175
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 210 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 209 transition count 174
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 209 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 208 transition count 173
Applied a total of 90 rules in 111 ms. Remains 208 /256 variables (removed 48) and now considering 173/215 (removed 42) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 111 ms. Remains : 208/256 places, 173/215 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (991 resets) in 445 ms. (89 steps per ms) remains 4/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (238 resets) in 256 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (251 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (328 resets) in 273 ms. (145 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (234 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-30 09:30:40] [INFO ] Computed 78 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 58/66 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 34/100 variables, 21/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/140 variables, 19/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/144 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 163/308 variables, 145/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 66/374 variables, 58/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 25/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/378 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 3/381 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/381 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 381/381 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 339 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 58/66 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 34/100 variables, 21/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/140 variables, 19/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/144 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 163/308 variables, 145/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 66/374 variables, 58/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 25/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 4/378 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 3/381 variables, 5/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/381 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 381/381 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 958ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 55 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 11 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 09:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 470 transitions.
Computed a total of 145 stabilizing places and 138 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1159 edges and 525 vertex of which 524 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.31 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 493 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 493 transition count 438
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 484 transition count 429
Applied a total of 82 rules in 65 ms. Remains 484 /525 variables (removed 41) and now considering 429/470 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 429 rows 484 cols
[2025-05-30 09:30:41] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 624 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:30:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2438 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3064 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 428 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 428 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 428 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/484 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 428 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 428 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 369 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 330 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 441 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 357 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 389 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 335 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 370 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 352 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 343 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 336 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 377 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 378 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 263 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 387 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30149ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 428 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30151ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 484/525 places, 429/470 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33283 ms. Remains : 484/525 places, 429/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 429 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5403529166323446870.gal : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15165242211568285717.ctl : 10 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5403529166323446870.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15165242211568285717.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17560572036688257842.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17560572036688257842.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17560572036688257842.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17560572036688257842.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17560572036688257842.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 283 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 248 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 40 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4827726045302301218.gal : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 09:31:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8470667453634641441.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4827726045302301218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8470667453634641441.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.73238e+27,3.94507,71216,5909,55,100113,591,1197,266078,66,1541,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AX((EG((i7.i2.u58.p187==1)) * AG(((i16.i0.u24.p77==0)||(i14.i1.u95.p300==1))))) * A(((((i15.i1.u106.p348==0)||(i10.i0.u43.p139==1))|...806
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!((EG((i7.i2.u58.p187==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i16.i0.u24.p77==0)||(i14.i1.u95....1702
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t180, t252, t276, t281, t290, t397, t398, t406, t407, t414, t420, t424, i0.i...1402
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 108 rules in 65 ms. Remains 471 /525 variables (removed 54) and now considering 416/470 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 471 cols
[2025-05-30 09:32:16] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 727 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:32:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2979 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3709 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 283 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 275 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 255 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 257 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 267 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 364 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 264 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 231 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 272 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 277 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 295 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 206 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 353 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 197 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 274 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 346 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 263 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 223 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 221 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 362 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 267 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30167ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30169ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 471 /471 variables (removed 0) and now considering 409/409 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33959 ms. Remains : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1450299728815193048.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:32:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10625463734344299815.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1450299728815193048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10625463734344299815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7395684523302028355.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7395684523302028355.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7395684523302028355.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7395684523302028355.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7395684523302028355.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 250 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9796222345218121678.gal : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5670435066910567215.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9796222345218121678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5670435066910567215.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07055e+27,2.52724,65152,6799,69,106607,868,1057,293027,72,2134,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG((i17.i0.u56.p202==1)) + EF(AX(((i7.i1.u107.p352==0)&&(i17.i1.u67.p209==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((i17.i0.u56.p202==1)))) + E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i7.i1.u107.p352==0)&&(i17.i1.u67.p209==1)))...170
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t10, t169, t241, t263, t268, t277, t377, t378, t386, t387, t394, t400, t401, t404, i0...1257
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 108 rules in 72 ms. Remains 471 /525 variables (removed 54) and now considering 416/470 (removed 54) transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:33:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 555 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:33:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:33:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2405 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2962 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:33:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 382 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 376 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 339 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 247 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 208 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 228 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 497 ms of which 222 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 332 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 349 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 362 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 321 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 321 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 347 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 332 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 315 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 337 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 314 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 224 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 228 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30109ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30113ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/525 places, 416/470 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33150 ms. Remains : 471/525 places, 416/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 416 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7956854457863247696.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2325574814141331329.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7956854457863247696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2325574814141331329.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11775738130327851351.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11775738130327851351.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11775738130327851351.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11775738130327851351.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11775738130327851351.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 280 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12693246852555066936.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:34:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14703979225877244966.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12693246852555066936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14703979225877244966.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 267 edges and 525 vertex of which 6 / 525 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1153 edges and 520 vertex of which 519 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 518 transition count 388
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 444 transition count 388
Performed 102 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 102 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 444 transition count 286
Deduced a syphon composed of 102 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 221 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 325 transition count 286
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 288 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 288 transition count 249
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 288 transition count 246
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 285 transition count 246
Performed 108 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 108 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 221 rules applied. Total rules applied 672 place count 172 transition count 138
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 674 place count 171 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 675 place count 170 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 676 place count 169 transition count 136
Applied a total of 676 rules in 90 ms. Remains 169 /525 variables (removed 356) and now considering 136/470 (removed 334) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 169 cols
[2025-05-30 09:35:24] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 339 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:35:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 961 ms returned [54, 56, 58, 60, 61, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1303 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/525 places, 136/470 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 140 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 132 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 131 transition count 127
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 125 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 125 transition count 121
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 125 transition count 118
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 122 transition count 118
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 115 transition count 113
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 113 transition count 111
Applied a total of 52 rules in 22 ms. Remains 113 /140 variables (removed 27) and now considering 111/136 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 09:35:25] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 666 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 46, 47]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 855 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/525 places, 111/470 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 320 edges and 92 vertex of which 83 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 74 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 74 transition count 71
Applied a total of 19 rules in 10 ms. Remains 74 /92 variables (removed 18) and now considering 71/111 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 74 cols
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [6, 7, 8]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 71/525 places, 71/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 71/71 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 4 iterations and 2387 ms. Remains : 71/525 places, 71/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16617508243974082809.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12990308909665197589.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16617508243974082809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12990308909665197589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5886,0.041603,4928,2,544,5,5692,6,0,353,3344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p554==0)||(p235==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p554==0)||(p235==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t19, t23, t24, t25, t26, t32, t46, t52, t57, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, Intersection with ...234
(forward)formula 0,1,0.192477,9408,1,0,127,25934,162,62,2153,16285,154
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 486 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 486 transition count 431
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 104 rules in 77 ms. Remains 473 /525 variables (removed 52) and now considering 418/470 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:35:27] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 545 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:35:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1761 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 236 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 347 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 298 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 268 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 278 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 264 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 313 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 321 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 296 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 300 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 271 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 228 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 256 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 377 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 504 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 241 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 254 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 257 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 342 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 333 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 214 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 360 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 263 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30282ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 405 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 12 dead transitions in 30283ms
Found 12 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 12 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 12 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/525 places, 406/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 473 /473 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32697 ms. Remains : 473/525 places, 406/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13590190588311652741.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14291066235070432999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13590190588311652741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14291066235070432999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14063920996613957682.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14063920996613957682.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14063920996613957682.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14063920996613957682.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14063920996613957682.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 233 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1457586783108497653.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 09:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7277147793169205439.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1457586783108497653.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7277147793169205439.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07797e+27,1.61583,37368,4446,39,63022,465,1074,155382,55,1232,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF((!(E(((i6.i0.u25.p83==0)||(i17.i0.u54.p205==1)) U (i17.i1.u64.p204==0))) * EG(((i10.i0.u39.p129==0)&&(i4.i1.u93.p285==1)))))) + EG...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (!(E(((i6.i0.u25.p83==0)||(i17.i0.u54.p205==1)) U (i17.i1.u64.p204==0))) * EG(((i10.i0.u39....355
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t171, t243, t265, t270, t279, t373, t375, t383, t384, t391, t396, t398, t400...1313
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 485 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 485 transition count 430
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 472 transition count 417
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 472 transition count 417
Applied a total of 106 rules in 31 ms. Remains 472 /525 variables (removed 53) and now considering 417/470 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 417 rows 472 cols
[2025-05-30 09:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 590 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:37:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2386 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2979 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 416 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/472 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 400 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 409 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 417 ms of which 121 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 342 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 262 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 223 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 366 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 353 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 236 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 277 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 223 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 347 ms of which 175 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 368 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 327 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 286 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 290 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 360 ms of which 145 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 378 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 255 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 260 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 262 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 231 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 245 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 367 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 292 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 268 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30214ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 416 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30216ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 472/525 places, 417/470 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33229 ms. Remains : 472/525 places, 417/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 417 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9111950513412872061.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8946673908946808087.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9111950513412872061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8946673908946808087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11449515362151489135.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11449515362151489135.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11449515362151489135.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11449515362151489135.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11449515362151489135.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 279 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7926107004114341230.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1880545591271360225.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7926107004114341230.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1880545591271360225.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07055e+27,16.9922,348500,9401,56,601489,762,1157,1.5356e+06,72,1708,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((i4.i1.u22.p73==0)||(i16.u149.p588==1))) * AG(((i15.i1.u56.p214==0)||(i7.i1.u141.p553==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(((i4.i1.u22.p73==0)||(i16.u149.p588==1))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i15.i1.u56.p214==0...191
(forward)formula 0,0,17.1767,348628,1,0,601489,762,1168,1.5356e+06,77,1708,8217
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 266 edges and 525 vertex of which 6 / 525 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1153 edges and 520 vertex of which 519 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 75 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 75 transitions
Performed 75 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 75
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 518 transition count 387
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 443 transition count 387
Performed 98 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 98 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 443 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 212 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 329 transition count 289
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 292 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 292 transition count 252
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 292 transition count 249
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 289 transition count 249
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 670 place count 174 transition count 138
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 672 place count 173 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 673 place count 172 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 674 place count 171 transition count 136
Applied a total of 674 rules in 72 ms. Remains 171 /525 variables (removed 354) and now considering 136/470 (removed 334) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 288 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 53]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 290 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/525 places, 136/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 136/136 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 371 ms. Remains : 150/525 places, 136/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12694068430376767792.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11882466620826375984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12694068430376767792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11882466620826375984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21684,0.522688,15820,2,4620,5,53668,6,0,735,29569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(EF(((p507==0)||(p557==1))) U (p174==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E(TRUE U ((p507==0)||(p557==1))) U (p174==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t28, t29, t30, t32, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t90, t91, t92, t128, t129, t130, Intersecti...244
(forward)formula 0,0,2.21722,51832,1,0,164,225325,257,90,5412,113326,251
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 487 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 487 transition count 432
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 474 transition count 419
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 474 transition count 419
Applied a total of 102 rules in 49 ms. Remains 474 /525 variables (removed 51) and now considering 419/470 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 419 rows 474 cols
[2025-05-30 09:38:23] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 623 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:38:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2316 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2945 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 418 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:38:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/474 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 387 ms of which 149 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 271 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 275 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 361 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 369 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 339 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 304 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 380 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 404 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 267 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 190 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 341 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 505 ms of which 288 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 247 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 310 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 364 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 340 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 474/893 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 0/474 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 418/418 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/474 variables, 57/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 418 unsolved
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 18/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 414 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 223 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 265 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 246 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 546 ms of which 231 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 307 ms of which 129 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 291 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 244 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 324 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 206 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 206 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 267 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 217 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 200 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 188 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 360 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 331 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD341 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 411 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 361 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 357 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 399 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 364 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 293 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 273 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 264 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 274 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 271 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 416 ms of which 223 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 233 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 213 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 225 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 221 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 196 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 255 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 201 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD314 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD315 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 403 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 345 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 339 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 195 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 233 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 212 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 282 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 271 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 297 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 276 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 277 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 299 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 209 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 414 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 193 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD321 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD324 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD325 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD335 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD351 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 394 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 334 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 222 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 272 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60175ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 394 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60179ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 474/525 places, 395/470 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 473 transition count 395
Applied a total of 1 rules in 19 ms. Remains 473 /474 variables (removed 1) and now considering 395/395 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 395 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:39:26] [INFO ] Computed 97 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 431 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:39:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1818 ms returned [426]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2262 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 472/525 places, 395/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 472 /472 variables (removed 0) and now considering 395/395 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 65477 ms. Remains : 472/525 places, 395/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 395 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11941818727123111889.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5311138176837806858.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11941818727123111889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5311138176837806858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1636573425269354466.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1636573425269354466.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1636573425269354466.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1636573425269354466.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1636573425269354466.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 174 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9256180777265191428.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16484410665958280992.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9256180777265191428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16484410665958280992.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13131e+27,6.12637,116748,12077,47,190982,667,1002,492266,59,1865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 485 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 485 transition count 430
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 104 rules in 38 ms. Remains 473 /525 variables (removed 52) and now considering 418/470 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 09:40:29] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 552 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:40:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2669 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:40:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 271 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 367 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 542 ms of which 255 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 361 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 355 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 346 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 356 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 309 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 382 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 261 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 359 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 370 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 212 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 360 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 225 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 573 ms of which 292 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30252ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30253ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/525 places, 418/470 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32962 ms. Remains : 473/525 places, 418/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 418 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14230188325566968959.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8950475768884445977.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14230188325566968959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8950475768884445977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4228926096860267762.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4228926096860267762.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4228926096860267762.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4228926096860267762.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4228926096860267762.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 284 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality86479834555491698.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:41:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16202340848650335861.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality86479834555491698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16202340848650335861.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07055e+27,3.81716,73216,6793,64,100400,508,1119,394217,67,1371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((i6.i2.u129.p470==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i6.i2.u129.p470==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t171, t243, t265, t274, t279, t386, t387, t395, t396, t403, t407, t410, i0.t...1289
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 108 rules in 35 ms. Remains 471 /525 variables (removed 54) and now considering 416/470 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 471 cols
[2025-05-30 09:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 598 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:42:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2759 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 360 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 357 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 399 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 339 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 329 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 228 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 500 ms of which 221 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 344 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 316 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 323 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 348 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 340 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 377 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 371 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 306 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 338 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 321 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 345 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 357 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 338 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 350 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 344 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 336 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30088ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30090ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 471 /471 variables (removed 0) and now considering 409/409 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32901 ms. Remains : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality579626201701177744.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:42:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15836967190523352310.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality579626201701177744.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15836967190523352310.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3502207889402622296.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3502207889402622296.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3502207889402622296.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3502207889402622296.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3502207889402622296.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12066999390774870006.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15541007959354953914.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12066999390774870006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15541007959354953914.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07055e+27,4.17521,73044,5901,62,107089,952,1110,286440,70,2092,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t10, t169, t241, t263, t268, t277, t376, t385, t387, t394, t399, t401, t404, i0.i0.u1...1292
(forward)formula 0,0,17.8262,350036,1,0,602640,952,6270,1.26763e+06,296,2092,1759343
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 266 edges and 525 vertex of which 6 / 525 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1153 edges and 520 vertex of which 519 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 76 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 76 transitions
Performed 76 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 76
Iterating post reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 518 transition count 386
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 442 transition count 386
Performed 97 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 97 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 442 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 329 transition count 289
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 402 place count 291 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 291 transition count 251
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 291 transition count 248
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 288 transition count 248
Performed 107 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 107 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 219 rules applied. Total rules applied 665 place count 176 transition count 141
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 667 place count 175 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 668 place count 174 transition count 139
Applied a total of 668 rules in 103 ms. Remains 174 /525 variables (removed 351) and now considering 139/470 (removed 331) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 174 cols
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 497 ms returned [140]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 499 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 173/525 places, 139/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 173 /173 variables (removed 0) and now considering 139/139 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 609 ms. Remains : 173/525 places, 139/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4355409750710622024.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10278470945822512751.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4355409750710622024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10278470945822512751.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21745,0.301655,13436,2,4894,5,35860,6,0,828,30636,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(AG(((p201==0)&&(p18==1)))) + (EG(AG((p253==0))) * (p155==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(((p201==0)&&(p18==1))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p155==0)),!(...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t78, t93, t94, t95, t131, t132, t133, t138,...256
(forward)formula 0,1,2.90099,73572,1,0,182,237334,275,103,6183,150182,271
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 493 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 493 transition count 438
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 483 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 483 transition count 428
Applied a total of 84 rules in 35 ms. Remains 483 /525 variables (removed 42) and now considering 428/470 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 483 cols
[2025-05-30 09:43:27] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 513 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:43:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2547 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3062 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 427 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:43:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/483 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 235 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 222 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 359 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 227 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 211 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 341 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 208 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 231 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 373 ms of which 139 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 357 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 374 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30390ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 427 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30392ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 483/525 places, 428/470 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33497 ms. Remains : 483/525 places, 428/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality326213946230136846.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14480162811210895658.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality326213946230136846.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14480162811210895658.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2002247701473915574.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2002247701473915574.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2002247701473915574.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2002247701473915574.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2002247701473915574.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 279 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7959687588036395464.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 09:44:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5619943015579604436.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7959687588036395464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5619943015579604436.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 108 rules in 60 ms. Remains 471 /525 variables (removed 54) and now considering 416/470 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 471 cols
[2025-05-30 09:45:01] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 459 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:45:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2619 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:45:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 278 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 239 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 215 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 214 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 232 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 314 ms of which 133 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 246 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 314 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 328 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 328 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 348 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 356 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 312 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 312 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 327 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 361 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 316 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 339 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 350 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 331 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 321 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 359 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 324 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 313 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 315 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 207 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 300 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30251ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 408 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30254ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 471 /471 variables (removed 0) and now considering 409/409 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32946 ms. Remains : 471/525 places, 409/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1479044754809286983.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 09:45:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9060732388046413037.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1479044754809286983.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9060732388046413037.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9192999601997381167.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9192999601997381167.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9192999601997381167.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9192999601997381167.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9192999601997381167.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 247 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14601944770855518811.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12509219959330752164.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14601944770855518811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12509219959330752164.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 525/525 places, 470/470 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 488 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 488 transition count 433
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 476 transition count 421
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 476 transition count 421
Applied a total of 98 rules in 37 ms. Remains 476 /525 variables (removed 49) and now considering 421/470 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 421 rows 476 cols
[2025-05-30 09:46:34] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 526 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 09:46:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1912 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2440 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:46:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/476 variables, 56/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 5/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 273 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 262 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 283 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 295 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 473 ms of which 216 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 268 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 231 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 348 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 211 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 209 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 240 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 244 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 289 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 342 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 353 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 321 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 351 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 248 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 373 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 329 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 345 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 355 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 355 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 413 ms of which 130 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 353 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 472 ms of which 199 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 364 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 379 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 378 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 362 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 288 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 307 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/897 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/476 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/476 variables, 56/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 5/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 413 unsolved
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD365 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD366 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 40/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 273 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 300 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 389 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 227 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 270 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 272 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 258 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 339 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 377 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 358 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 346 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 372 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 350 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 393 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 346 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 334 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 291 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 372 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 231 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 341 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 359 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 339 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 408 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 401 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 387 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 366 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 344 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 333 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 353 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 331 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 325 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 279 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 327 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 356 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 384 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 248 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 376 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 410 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 282 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 400 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 315 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 412 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 257 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 375 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 337 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 230 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 360 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 350 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 349 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 332 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 319 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 298 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 476/897 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/476 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/420 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60090ms problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 398 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 22 dead transitions in 60091ms
Found 22 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 22 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 22 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 476/525 places, 399/470 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 476 /476 variables (removed 0) and now considering 399/399 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62590 ms. Remains : 476/525 places, 399/470 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 399 transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10378754221197705395.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 09:47:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17370269204696502370.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10378754221197705395.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17370269204696502370.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6876112351427182140.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6876112351427182140.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6876112351427182140.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6876112351427182140.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6876112351427182140.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 179 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2293835101744549764.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2870769131098529715.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2293835101744549764.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2870769131098529715.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21705e+27,12.8531,236996,20152,60,360732,797,1046,837839,76,1872,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 09:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 09:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11736441774850024835.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11736441774850024835.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11736441774850024835.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11736441774850024835.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11736441774850024835.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 282 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2997748156924547825.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 09:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12491324447054966359.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2997748156924547825.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12491324447054966359.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61398e+27,24.6428,417116,25944,96,747253,1229,1065,1.65317e+06,86,4102,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AX((EG((i17.u63.p187==1)) * AG(((i13.u25.p77==0)||(i5.u104.p300==1))))) * A(((((i10.u116.p348==0)||(i15.u48.p139==1))||((i1.u1.p2==0...747
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!((EG((i17.u63.p187==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i13.u25.p77==0)||(i5.u104.p300==1)...1598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t10, t82, t114, t211, t285, t314, t319, t326, t438, t439, t455, t460, i0.u141.t106, i...1630
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 134 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 118 labels/synchronizations in 148 ms.
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17528641918112154749.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 10:15:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15414354859751680333.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17528641918112154749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15414354859751680333.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-16"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300121"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-16.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-16 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;