Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300106.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-14, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300106
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748587519090

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-14
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 06:45:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 06:45:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 374 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Transformed 624 places.
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Transformed 564 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 624 places and 564 transitions and 1657 arcs in 616 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 22 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
Support contains 136 out of 616 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 616/616 places, 556/556 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 611 transition count 556
Discarding 70 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 70 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 541 transition count 486
Iterating global reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 541 transition count 486
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 510 transition count 455
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 510 transition count 455
Applied a total of 207 rules in 259 ms. Remains 510 /616 variables (removed 106) and now considering 455/556 (removed 101) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 510 cols
[2025-05-30 06:45:22] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 74 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1156 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:45:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2392 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3618 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 454 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/510 variables, 56/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 4/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 307 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 284 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 335 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 296 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 295 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 278 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 302 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 291 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 316 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 308 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 301 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30464ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30493ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 510/616 places, 455/556 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34414 ms. Remains : 510/616 places, 455/556 transitions.
Support contains 136 out of 510 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 145 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Support contains 128 out of 510 places (down from 136) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (270 resets) in 2490 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 49/74 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 49/49 properties
[2025-05-30 06:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 239/327 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 48 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/422 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 47 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/502 variables, 37/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 46 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 402 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 275 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 352 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 348 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 347 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 320 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 340 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 282 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 386 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 353 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5109ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 46 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 75 out of 510 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1132 edges and 510 vertex of which 509 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 509 transition count 408
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 463 transition count 404
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 459 transition count 404
Performed 72 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 72 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 459 transition count 332
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 5 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 378 transition count 332
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 369 transition count 323
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 369 transition count 323
Performed 110 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 223 rules applied. Total rules applied 495 place count 256 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 256 transition count 212
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 503 place count 256 transition count 212
Applied a total of 503 rules in 206 ms. Remains 256 /510 variables (removed 254) and now considering 212/455 (removed 243) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 256/510 places, 212/455 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1621 resets) in 1178 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (21 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 46/46 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 350048 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties seen :22 out of 46
Probabilistic random walk after 350048 steps, saw 64980 distinct states, run finished after 3007 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties seen :22
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 256 cols
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 114/164 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 54/218 variables, 31/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 35/253 variables, 23/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 216 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 160 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 212 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 190 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 223 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 215 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 180 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 20/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 218 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 226 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 206 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 225 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 11/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 160 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 206 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 202 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 204 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 192 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 214 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 233 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 225 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 216 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 218 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 223 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 219 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 222 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 212 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 221 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 221 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 227 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 214 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 209 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 14/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 221 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 218 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 221 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 234 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 229 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 212 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 5/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 212/465 variables, 253/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 192 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 229 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 3/468 variables, 3/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 204 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 219 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp57 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 5/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/468 variables, 0/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 468/468 variables, and 423 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved in 25762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 256/256 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 19 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 111/148 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/216 variables, 39/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 37/253 variables, 24/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 72/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 212/465 variables, 253/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 18/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 3/468 variables, 3/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 119 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 156 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 185 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 161 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 222 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 5/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 1/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 192 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 192 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/468 variables, 0/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 468/468 variables, and 449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved in 19120 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 256/256 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/24 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 44909ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 18 unsolved
Fused 18 Parikh solutions to 16 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 16 properties in 2954 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 256 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 256/256 places, 212/212 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 69 edges and 256 vertex of which 2 / 256 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 255 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 241 transition count 196
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 241 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 210 transition count 173
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 200 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 200 transition count 163
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 170 transition count 135
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -21
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 168 transition count 156
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 168 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 166 transition count 154
Applied a total of 169 rules in 63 ms. Remains 166 /256 variables (removed 90) and now considering 154/212 (removed 58) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 166/256 places, 154/212 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1665 resets) in 356 ms. (112 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (832 resets) in 231 ms. (172 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (514 resets) in 168 ms. (236 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 124/129 variables, 54/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/163 variables, 17/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 162 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 175 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 13/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 154/317 variables, 163/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 12/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 3/320 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 3004 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 124/129 variables, 54/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/163 variables, 17/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 13/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 154/317 variables, 163/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 12/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 3/320 variables, 3/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 272 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 824 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3836ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 22 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 166 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 166/166 places, 154/154 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 166 transition count 153
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 165 transition count 153
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 165 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 164 transition count 152
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 163 transition count 151
Applied a total of 6 rules in 39 ms. Remains 163 /166 variables (removed 3) and now considering 151/154 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 39 ms. Remains : 163/166 places, 151/154 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1828 resets) in 343 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1040 resets) in 266 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2685 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=107 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2685 steps, saw 1073 distinct states, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 06:47:00] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 06:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 06:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Support contains 87 out of 510 places (down from 92) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 138 stabilizing places and 131 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1132 edges and 510 vertex of which 509 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.29 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 479 transition count 424
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 479 transition count 424
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 469 transition count 414
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 469 transition count 414
Applied a total of 82 rules in 50 ms. Remains 469 /510 variables (removed 41) and now considering 414/455 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 469 cols
[2025-05-30 06:47:00] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 439 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:47:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1830 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:47:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/469 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 210 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 324 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 215 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 317 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 203 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 262 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 205 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 330 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 329 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 319 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 328 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 334 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 347 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 358 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 343 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 214 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 274 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 272 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 250 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD335 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 282 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 254 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 469/883 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved in 30043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/469 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 413/413 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/469 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 23/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 221 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 231 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 228 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 289 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 275 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 232 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 304 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 267 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 275 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 266 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 268 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 217 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 386 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 370 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 367 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 359 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 407 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 378 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 386 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 373 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 377 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 372 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 369 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 352 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 371 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 266 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 323 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 322 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 313 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 327 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 353 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 347 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 445 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 379 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 366 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 357 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 364 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 206 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 203 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 340 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 204 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 354 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 381 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 335 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 340 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 338 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 307 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 318 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 328 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 378 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 355 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 369 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 331 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD313 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 243 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 360 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 365 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 353 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 308 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60419ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 397 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 16 dead transitions in 60421ms
Found 16 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 16 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 16 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/510 places, 398/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 469 /469 variables (removed 0) and now considering 398/398 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62768 ms. Remains : 469/510 places, 398/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17487785648856471960.gal : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4122195139995560577.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17487785648856471960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4122195139995560577.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:48:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:48:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9424036806466920356.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9424036806466920356.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9424036806466920356.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9424036806466920356.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9424036806466920356.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 204 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 149 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 5 labels/synchronizations in 35 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4936161240540869231.gal : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability642746571000100063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4936161240540869231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability642746571000100063.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 477 transition count 422
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 466 transition count 411
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 466 transition count 411
Applied a total of 88 rules in 44 ms. Remains 466 /510 variables (removed 44) and now considering 411/455 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 411 rows 466 cols
[2025-05-30 06:49:04] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 603 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:49:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2377 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2981 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 410 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/466 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 619 ms of which 309 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 348 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 377 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 379 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 374 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 313 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 334 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 359 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 337 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 323 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 327 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 351 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 343 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 339 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30368ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30370ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33397 ms. Remains : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 411 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15883936030868878678.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3387268318788297361.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15883936030868878678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3387268318788297361.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6181032928440993328.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6181032928440993328.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6181032928440993328.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6181032928440993328.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6181032928440993328.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 272 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12754952840633674319.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10394245162599668430.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12754952840633674319.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10394245162599668430.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 479 transition count 424
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 479 transition count 424
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 469 transition count 414
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 469 transition count 414
Applied a total of 82 rules in 35 ms. Remains 469 /510 variables (removed 41) and now considering 414/455 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 469 cols
[2025-05-30 06:50:38] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 598 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:50:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2746 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3346 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/469 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 390 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 378 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 404 ms of which 112 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 252 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 244 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 249 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 258 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30263ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30266ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/510 places, 414/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33649 ms. Remains : 469/510 places, 414/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 414 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5833501467423640488.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5239544023187027210.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5833501467423640488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5239544023187027210.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14200980662598943231.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14200980662598943231.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14200980662598943231.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14200980662598943231.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14200980662598943231.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 272 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12228152041451285236.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9565806834007263056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12228152041451285236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9565806834007263056.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 482 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 482 transition count 427
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 473 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 473 transition count 418
Applied a total of 74 rules in 42 ms. Remains 473 /510 variables (removed 37) and now considering 418/455 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 418 rows 473 cols
[2025-05-30 06:52:12] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 596 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:52:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2606 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 417 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 380 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 397 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 406 ms of which 114 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 371 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 365 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 361 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 385 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 334 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 385 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 384 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 354 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 378 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30064ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 417 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/510 places, 418/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33314 ms. Remains : 473/510 places, 418/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 418 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17681960078808717014.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14410766301848217977.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17681960078808717014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14410766301848217977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph933962459529503800.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph933962459529503800.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph933962459529503800.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph933962459529503800.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph933962459529503800.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 271 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7188870048555357336.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12816070377979993392.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7188870048555357336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12816070377979993392.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.22602e+26,2.99432,71200,10817,67,121952,691,1156,240403,75,1792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EX((A(AX((i7.i1.u17.p43==1)) U AF((i0.i1.u77.p235==1))) * (i9.i1.u127.p483==0)))) + EX(E(((!(AG((i9.i1.u127.p444==1))) * ((((i5.i0.u2...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EX(E(((!(!(E(TRUE U !((i9.i1.u127.p444==1))))) * ((((i5.i0.u29.p86==1)&&(i13.u114.p386==1))&&(i9....483
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t170, t242, t264, t269, t388, t389, t396, t398, t410, i0.i0.u124.t72, i0.i0....1351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 478 transition count 423
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 478 transition count 423
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 467 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 467 transition count 412
Applied a total of 86 rules in 36 ms. Remains 467 /510 variables (removed 43) and now considering 412/455 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 412 rows 467 cols
[2025-05-30 06:53:46] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 434 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:53:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1937 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2374 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 411 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/467 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 701 ms of which 388 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 373 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 595 ms of which 300 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 428 ms of which 142 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 397 ms of which 112 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 347 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 400 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 357 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 316 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 344 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 395 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 367 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30283ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30284ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 467/510 places, 412/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32699 ms. Remains : 467/510 places, 412/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 412 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11463568647732520122.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10264466476240692981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11463568647732520122.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10264466476240692981.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12803078748121694754.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12803078748121694754.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12803078748121694754.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12803078748121694754.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12803078748121694754.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 275 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9339342831707983909.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:54:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12897434597147054074.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9339342831707983909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12897434597147054074.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24739e+26,6.54474,127120,10964,59,215929,829,1112,392141,74,2244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1132 edges and 510 vertex of which 509 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 508 transition count 395
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 450 transition count 392
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 447 transition count 392
Performed 103 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 103 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 447 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 103 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 223 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 327 transition count 289
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 374 place count 299 transition count 261
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 298 transition count 261
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 298 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 295 transition count 259
Performed 112 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 227 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 180 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 179 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 637 place count 178 transition count 146
Applied a total of 637 rules in 88 ms. Remains 178 /510 variables (removed 332) and now considering 146/455 (removed 309) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 178 cols
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 237 ms returned [55, 56]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 239 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/510 places, 146/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 176 /176 variables (removed 0) and now considering 146/146 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 336 ms. Remains : 176/510 places, 146/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4358507667333676219.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1679242409525334369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4358507667333676219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1679242409525334369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210528,0.379075,15544,2,6245,5,37652,6,0,848,44301,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((p98==1) U (p46!=1))) + !(E((p536!=1) U E((!(((p398==1)&&(p206==1))) + EG(((p619==1)&&(p622==1)))) U EG((((p219==1)&&(p341==1))&&(p5...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(!(E((p98==1) U (p46!=1))))),(p536!=1)),(!(((p398==1)&&(p206==1))) + EG(((p619==1)&&(p6...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t11, t15, t32, t38, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t83, t84, t85, t86, t91, t99, ...285
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 144/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 107/76/39
(forward)formula 0,1,4.44319,126860,1,0,270,492217,304,142,6548,494892,363
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 257 edges and 510 vertex of which 6 / 510 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1126 edges and 505 vertex of which 504 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 503 transition count 379
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 435 transition count 378
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 434 transition count 378
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 434 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 318 transition count 279
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 288 transition count 249
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 287 transition count 249
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 287 transition count 246
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 283 transition count 246
Performed 112 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 227 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 168 transition count 134
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 653 place count 166 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 165 transition count 132
Applied a total of 654 rules in 66 ms. Remains 165 /510 variables (removed 345) and now considering 132/455 (removed 323) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/510 places, 132/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 146 /146 variables (removed 0) and now considering 132/132 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 255 ms. Remains : 146/510 places, 132/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 9 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6223950407007764156.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18281962009634696233.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6223950407007764156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18281962009634696233.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 477 transition count 422
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 466 transition count 411
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 466 transition count 411
Applied a total of 88 rules in 46 ms. Remains 466 /510 variables (removed 44) and now considering 411/455 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 411 rows 466 cols
[2025-05-30 06:55:24] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 396 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:55:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1588 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1986 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 410 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/466 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 396 ms of which 192 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 360 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 380 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 369 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 333 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 308 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 327 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 300 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 313 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 296 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 318 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 225 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 342 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 221 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 344 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 227 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 239 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 380 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 372 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 334 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 222 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 345 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 330 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 326 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 321 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 221 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 321 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30172ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30174ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32208 ms. Remains : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 411 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:55:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12332899517400517595.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 06:55:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17258900293122129868.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12332899517400517595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17258900293122129868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17171451302865384503.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17171451302865384503.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17171451302865384503.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17171451302865384503.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17171451302865384503.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 274 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 3 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5482991664697579657.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5911932340594232444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5482991664697579657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5911932340594232444.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.21552e+26,6.56166,139968,6061,66,234655,699,1098,473967,71,1757,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((EF(EX((i8.i0.u155.p608==1))) * ((E((i8.i2.u55.p173!=1) U !(((i8.i2.u56.p183==1)&&(i8.i2.u144.p569==1)))) + (i9.u72.p226==0)) + (((...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((E(TRUE U EX((i8.i0.u155.p608==1))) * ((E((i8.i2.u55.p173!=1) U !(((i8.i2.u56.p183==1...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t166, t238, t265, t274, t381, t390, t391, t398, t403, t404, i0.u68.t181, i1....1244
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1132 edges and 510 vertex of which 509 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 508 transition count 392
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 447 transition count 390
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 445 transition count 390
Performed 103 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 103 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 445 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 103 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 222 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 326 transition count 287
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 379 place count 296 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 295 transition count 257
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 295 transition count 254
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 291 transition count 254
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 225 rules applied. Total rules applied 642 place count 177 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 643 place count 176 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 175 transition count 142
Applied a total of 644 rules in 57 ms. Remains 175 /510 variables (removed 335) and now considering 142/455 (removed 313) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 175 cols
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [8, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 52, 53, 54, 55]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 215 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 162/510 places, 142/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 162 /162 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 287 ms. Remains : 162/510 places, 142/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5583904747658665218.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7569762473267473548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5583904747658665218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7569762473267473548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,161888,0.616545,15536,2,6322,5,38675,6,0,789,41485,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EF((((p65==1)&&(p351==1))&&(p589==1))) * (p77==1)) * ((p427==1)&&(p505==1))) * ((p587==1)||(p93==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p587==1)||(p93==1))) * ((p427==1)&&(p505==1))) * (p77==1)),TRUE) * (((p65==1)&&(p3...185
(forward)formula 0,0,0.983498,17456,1,0,12,48995,12,4,1511,53451,6
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 247 edges and 510 vertex of which 6 / 510 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1126 edges and 505 vertex of which 504 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 503 transition count 382
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 438 transition count 381
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 437 transition count 381
Performed 95 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 95 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 437 transition count 286
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 205 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 327 transition count 286
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 298 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 297 transition count 257
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 297 transition count 255
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 295 transition count 255
Performed 112 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 227 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 180 transition count 143
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 179 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 178 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 177 transition count 141
Applied a total of 633 rules in 65 ms. Remains 177 /510 variables (removed 333) and now considering 141/455 (removed 314) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 177 cols
[2025-05-30 06:56:58] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 54, 55, 56, 57]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/510 places, 141/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 158 /158 variables (removed 0) and now considering 141/141 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 158/510 places, 141/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:56:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10190561932783813542.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18360003939995425376.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10190561932783813542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18360003939995425376.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65664,0.133424,7264,2,1947,5,9257,6,0,772,8403,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AG((p570==1)) + EG((p137==1))) + (AF(((p183==1)&&(p569==1))) + (p460==0))) + ((EG(AG((p458==0))) * (p212==0)) + (((p138==1)&&(p372=...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((EG(!(E(TRUE U !((p458==0))))) * (p212==0)) + (((p138==1)&&(p372==1))&&(p534==1)))...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t37, t38, t40, t41, t42, t43, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t98, t99, t100, t134, t135, t136, ...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 132/0/9
(forward)formula 0,0,2.14546,62952,1,0,326,352426,295,189,6136,283206,413
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 482 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 482 transition count 427
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 471 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 471 transition count 416
Applied a total of 78 rules in 39 ms. Remains 471 /510 variables (removed 39) and now considering 416/455 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 471 cols
[2025-05-30 06:57:01] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 390 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:57:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1743 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 415 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/471 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 460 ms of which 155 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 309 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 352 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 344 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 325 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 332 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 331 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 371 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 362 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 329 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 376 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 381 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 372 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 349 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 414 ms of which 144 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 394 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 391 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 536 ms of which 216 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30256ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 415 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30257ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/510 places, 416/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32439 ms. Remains : 471/510 places, 416/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 416 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10280263733618993367.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 06:57:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9502811419316899539.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10280263733618993367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9502811419316899539.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9780846548859441275.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9780846548859441275.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9780846548859441275.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9780846548859441275.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9780846548859441275.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 274 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12132066137807404292.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:58:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1712074968141643280.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12132066137807404292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1712074968141643280.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.74153e+26,5.16461,107620,5680,63,201612,568,1104,295436,70,1606,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((AF(((i14.i0.u100.p314==0)&&(((i8.i0.u59.p198==0)||(i8.i0.u120.p412==0))||(i8.i0.u156.p600==0)))) * (AG((i3.i0.u23.p71==0)) + (((i1...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * ((!(EG(!(((i14.i0.u100.p314==0)&&(((i8.i0.u59.p198==0)||(i8.i0.u120.p412==0))||(i8.i0.u156.p600...851
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t169, t241, t270, t386, t387, t396, t403, t408, t409, i0.i0.u125.t69, i0.i0....1342
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 483 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 483 transition count 428
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 475 transition count 420
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 475 transition count 420
Applied a total of 70 rules in 58 ms. Remains 475 /510 variables (removed 35) and now considering 420/455 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 420 rows 475 cols
[2025-05-30 06:58:34] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:58:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 498 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:58:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1766 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 419 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 419 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 419 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/475 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 419 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 419 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 344 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 396 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 384 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 376 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 385 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 458 ms of which 150 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 388 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 855 ms of which 556 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 207 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 350 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30072ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 419 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/510 places, 420/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32403 ms. Remains : 475/510 places, 420/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6948480401234779111.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5263286794948719698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6948480401234779111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5263286794948719698.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15919176394177292338.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15919176394177292338.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15919176394177292338.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15919176394177292338.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15919176394177292338.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 259 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4305877479996007112.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:59:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18079872539904444110.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4305877479996007112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18079872539904444110.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.54052e+26,3.2331,70688,6155,107,106804,904,1181,349801,100,2377,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EG(AG(EX((i9.i0.u33.p98==1)))) + (AF((i15.i0.u107.p350==1)) * (!(A((i4.u24.p76==1) U (i18.u137.p501==1))) + ((i2.u50.p155==1)&&((i12...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(EX((i9.i0.u33.p98==1))))))] != FALSE + (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((...868
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t7, t8, t9, t10, t18, t171, t244, t269, t274, t389, t391, t398, t400, t407, t412,...1340
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 477 transition count 422
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 466 transition count 411
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 466 transition count 411
Applied a total of 88 rules in 35 ms. Remains 466 /510 variables (removed 44) and now considering 411/455 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 411 rows 466 cols
[2025-05-30 07:00:06] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 461 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 07:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1781 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2244 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 410 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:00:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/466 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 610 ms of which 316 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 351 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 387 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 395 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 369 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 313 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 328 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 335 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 295 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 300 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 302 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 310 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 291 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 289 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 320 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 326 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 333 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30073ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 410 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32355 ms. Remains : 466/510 places, 411/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 411 transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14514887222503296720.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 07:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18353533593238033201.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14514887222503296720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18353533593238033201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10948178112562953521.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10948178112562953521.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10948178112562953521.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10948178112562953521.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10948178112562953521.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 277 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3787768405849348152.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17677322131878462462.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3787768405849348152.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17677322131878462462.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 510/510 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 256 edges and 510 vertex of which 6 / 510 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1126 edges and 505 vertex of which 504 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 503 transition count 379
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 435 transition count 378
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 434 transition count 378
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 434 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 318 transition count 279
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 386 place count 287 transition count 248
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 286 transition count 248
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 286 transition count 245
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 282 transition count 245
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 225 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 168 transition count 134
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 653 place count 166 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 165 transition count 132
Applied a total of 654 rules in 44 ms. Remains 165 /510 variables (removed 345) and now considering 132/455 (removed 323) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 282 ms returned [0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 291 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/510 places, 132/455 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 147 /147 variables (removed 0) and now considering 132/132 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 341 ms. Remains : 147/510 places, 132/455 transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17453730144174489431.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17549844988329780498.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17453730144174489431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17549844988329780498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52632,1.42295,39648,2,5908,5,166609,6,0,719,90618,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p46!=1) U (p188==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p46!=1)) * (p188==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 130/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,1.73905,39648,1,0,10,166609,15,1,1433,90618,4
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12782825707676152164.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12782825707676152164.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12782825707676152164.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12782825707676152164.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12782825707676152164.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 277 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6812882269177362070.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 07:01:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6811339474346427103.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6812882269177362070.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6811339474346427103.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.60129e+26,9.57913,166880,11473,75,242633,1207,1021,910481,74,4722,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((i18.u153.p495==1) U ((i18.u143.p481!=1) + AX(EF((((i16.u61.p207==1)&&(i16.u135.p412==1))&&(i16.u187.p618==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((i18.u153.p495==1) U ((i18.u143.p481!=1) + !(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((i16.u61.p207==1)&&(i16.u13...204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t10, t21, t196, t273, t305, t317, t424, t435, t447, i0.u81.t199, i0.u85.t190, i0.u83....1540
(forward)formula 0,1,99.1335,1313744,1,0,1.92808e+06,1207,7312,6.2571e+06,345,4722,4074715
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX((EF(EX((((i10.u78.p222==1)&&(i10.u114.p337==1))&&(i10.u173.p577==1)))) + AF(((i13.u93.p269==1)&&((i16.u71.p202==0)||(i16.u72.p205==0))...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EX((((i10.u78.p222==1)&&(i10.u114.p337==1))&&(i10.u173.p577==1)))))),!(((i13.u93.p2...213
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 1,1,106.914,1380304,1,0,2.04221e+06,1207,7974,6.62806e+06,375,4722,4269948
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E((i16.u170.p566==1) U AX(((i2.u53.p154==1) + E((i12.i1.i1.u106.p308!=1) U E((i16.u60.p171==1) U (i12.i0.i0.u103.p289==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(i16.u170.p566==1)) * !(EX(!(((i2.u53.p154==1) + E((i12.i1.i1.u106.p308!=1) U E((i16.u60.p171==1) U ...196
(forward)formula 2,1,146.73,1740264,1,0,2.52552e+06,1207,8077,8.02012e+06,376,4722,4749877
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 132 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 107 labels/synchronizations in 191 ms.
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8900258594861729078.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 07:27:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12025182573066498231.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8900258594861729078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12025182573066498231.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-14"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-14, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300106"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-14.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-14 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;