About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BusinessProcesses-PT-14
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | FTTTTFT?FTT?F?FT | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300105.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-14, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300105
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748587436924
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-14
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 220 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Transformed 624 places.
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Transformed 564 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 06:43:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 624 places and 564 transitions and 1657 arcs in 465 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 31 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 23 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 92 out of 616 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 616/616 places, 556/556 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 611 transition count 556
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 537 transition count 482
Iterating global reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 537 transition count 482
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 503 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 503 transition count 448
Applied a total of 221 rules in 263 ms. Remains 503 /616 variables (removed 113) and now considering 448/556 (removed 108) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 448 rows 503 cols
[2025-05-30 06:44:00] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 76 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1197 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:44:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2740 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4024 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 447 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:44:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/503 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/503 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 286 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 265 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 238 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 423 ms of which 153 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 318 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 289 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 231 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 242 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 240 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 314 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 231 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 216 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 254 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 252 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 246 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 229 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 227 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 245 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 283 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/503 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 256 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 280 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 286 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 217 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 389 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 371 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30319ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30341ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 503/616 places, 448/556 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34668 ms. Remains : 503/616 places, 448/556 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 503 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 06:44:35] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 06:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 06:44:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 448 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 503 places (down from 92) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (273 resets) in 1844 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 30/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 75 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
[2025-05-30 06:44:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 209/261 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 130/391 variables, 31/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 103/494 variables, 39/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 442/936 variables, 494/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 369 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/936 variables, 1/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/936 variables, 0/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 13/949 variables, 7/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 949/951 variables, and 596 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 501/503 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 209/260 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 130/390 variables, 31/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 186 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 193 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 173 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 230 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 287 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 279 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 282 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 159 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 166 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 299 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 190 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 188 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 189 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 183 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 170 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 177 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 191 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10114ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 29 unsolved
Fused 29 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 51 out of 503 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 199 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1118 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 496 transition count 392
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 449 transition count 391
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 448 transition count 391
Performed 77 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 77 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 448 transition count 314
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 363 transition count 314
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 357 transition count 308
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 357 transition count 308
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 357 transition count 307
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 356 transition count 307
Performed 116 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 116 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 232 rules applied. Total rules applied 506 place count 240 transition count 191
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 239 transition count 195
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 510 place count 239 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 512 place count 237 transition count 193
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 237 transition count 193
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 237 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 236 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 524 place count 235 transition count 192
Applied a total of 524 rules in 188 ms. Remains 235 /503 variables (removed 268) and now considering 192/448 (removed 256) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 235/503 places, 192/448 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (878 resets) in 1022 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 7/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (250 resets) in 313 ms. (127 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (354 resets) in 375 ms. (106 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (252 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (322 resets) in 254 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (347 resets) in 166 ms. (239 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (259 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (354 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-30 06:44:47] [INFO ] Computed 85 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/95 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/121 variables, 19/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/179 variables, 30/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/183 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 182/365 variables, 183/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 4/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 56/421 variables, 47/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 18/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 4/425 variables, 3/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/427 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/95 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/121 variables, 19/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/179 variables, 30/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/183 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 182/365 variables, 183/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 4/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 56/421 variables, 47/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 18/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 4/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 131 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 201 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 155 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 162 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 162 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 157 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 210 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 180 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 206 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 20/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 184 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 226 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 227 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 208 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 194 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 215 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 218 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 212 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 220 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 155 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 225 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 154 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 166 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 153 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 189 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 227 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 20/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 169 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 216 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 185 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 228 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 148 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 162 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 162 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 220 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 214 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 202 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 227 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 219 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 233 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 206 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 176 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 199 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 218 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 221 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 0/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 4/425 variables, 3/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/427 variables, 3/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 0/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 392 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved in 14496 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 15268ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 299 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 192/192 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 235 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 222 transition count 179
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 222 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 200 transition count 166
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 194 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 194 transition count 160
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 168 transition count 137
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 168 transition count 137
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 167 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 167 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 166 transition count 135
Applied a total of 126 rules in 93 ms. Remains 166 /235 variables (removed 69) and now considering 135/192 (removed 57) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 166/235 places, 135/192 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1711 resets) in 359 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (956 resets) in 249 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 4194 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 54 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 )
Probabilistic random walk after 4194 steps, saw 1490 distinct states, run finished after 61 ms. (steps per millisecond=68 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 448 transitions.
Computed a total of 137 stabilizing places and 130 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1126 edges and 503 vertex of which 502 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.27 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 477 transition count 422
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 467 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 467 transition count 412
Applied a total of 72 rules in 61 ms. Remains 467 /503 variables (removed 36) and now considering 412/448 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 412 rows 467 cols
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 390 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:45:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2541 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2938 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 411 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/467 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 424 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 359 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 370 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 344 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 346 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 447 ms of which 159 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 358 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 301 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 316 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 392 ms of which 115 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 415 ms of which 158 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30354ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 411 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30357ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 467/503 places, 412/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33369 ms. Remains : 467/503 places, 412/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 412 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12503124319604076166.gal : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 06:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8982520265811634062.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12503124319604076166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8982520265811634062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12684201484829752745.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12684201484829752745.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12684201484829752745.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12684201484829752745.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12684201484829752745.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 276 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 164 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8761735459124784683.gal : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality720951896058246855.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8761735459124784683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality720951896058246855.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 480 transition count 425
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 480 transition count 425
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 470 transition count 415
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 470 transition count 415
Applied a total of 66 rules in 41 ms. Remains 470 /503 variables (removed 33) and now considering 415/448 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 415 rows 470 cols
[2025-05-30 06:46:38] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 645 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:46:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:46:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1958 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2610 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 414 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:46:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 414 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 414 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/470 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 414 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/470 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 414 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 399 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 420 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 495 ms of which 198 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 391 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 430 ms of which 126 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 411 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 345 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 372 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 399 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 364 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 352 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 381 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 375 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30446ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 414 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30451ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 470/503 places, 415/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33105 ms. Remains : 470/503 places, 415/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 415 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14762559948058954945.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14504651356081792088.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14762559948058954945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14504651356081792088.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15562688849656211810.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15562688849656211810.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15562688849656211810.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15562688849656211810.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15562688849656211810.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 272 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9849746044263623865.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15923289553850702587.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9849746044263623865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15923289553850702587.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.34345e+26,25.1598,386036,24995,55,577200,590,1142,1.33559e+06,66,1366,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 241 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 495 transition count 379
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 435 transition count 379
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 435 transition count 283
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 208 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 323 transition count 283
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 354 place count 299 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 299 transition count 259
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 299 transition count 255
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 294 transition count 255
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 233 rules applied. Total rules applied 620 place count 176 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 175 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 174 transition count 139
Applied a total of 622 rules in 76 ms. Remains 174 /503 variables (removed 329) and now considering 139/448 (removed 309) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 174 cols
[2025-05-30 06:48:11] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 51, 55, 58, 130, 149]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 276 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/503 places, 139/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 139/139 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 154/503 places, 139/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10285826915963229947.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5629906103069962747.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10285826915963229947.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5629906103069962747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145536,0.207324,9340,2,3049,5,17814,6,0,754,14659,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF(((((p401==0)||(p228==1))&&(p563==0))&&(!((p59==0)||(p220==1))))) U AG(((p392==0)||(p125==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p392==0)||(p125==1))))))) * !(!(EG(!(((((p401==0)||(p228==1))&&(p563==0))&&(...296
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t82, t93, t94, t95, t128, t129, In...252
(forward)formula 0,1,4.8045,130364,1,0,394,681363,276,277,5756,604612,586
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 478 transition count 423
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 478 transition count 423
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 468 transition count 413
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 468 transition count 413
Applied a total of 70 rules in 49 ms. Remains 468 /503 variables (removed 35) and now considering 413/448 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 413 rows 468 cols
[2025-05-30 06:48:17] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 502 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:48:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1900 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2405 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 412 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:48:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/468 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 400 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 463 ms of which 156 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 264 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 259 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 390 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 269 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 244 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 347 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 307 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 272 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 265 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 345 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 415 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 360 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 348 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 364 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 262 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 388 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 361 ms of which 144 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 468/881 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/468 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 412/412 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/468 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 215 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 361 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 380 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 360 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 360 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 317 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 325 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 361 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 328 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 394 ms of which 135 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 364 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 335 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 345 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 240 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 268 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 366 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 355 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 340 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 384 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD317 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 373 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 396 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 286 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 309 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 302 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 275 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 329 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 326 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 370 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 350 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 325 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 370 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 297 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 326 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 333 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 337 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 313 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 298 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 303 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD351 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 399 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 468 ms of which 182 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 387 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 420 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 342 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 374 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 379 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 501 ms of which 200 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 380 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 370 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 366 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 382 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 393 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 332 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60218ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 401 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 11 dead transitions in 60222ms
Found 11 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 11 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 11 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 468/503 places, 402/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 468 /468 variables (removed 0) and now considering 402/402 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62696 ms. Remains : 468/503 places, 402/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 402 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9993703699832226607.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11621154623524579688.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9993703699832226607.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11621154623524579688.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10175706364920862507.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10175706364920862507.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10175706364920862507.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10175706364920862507.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10175706364920862507.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 225 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15961849030831056585.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15349595658282853104.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15961849030831056585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15349595658282853104.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24739e+26,1.88409,42428,4637,47,74609,631,1034,151611,62,1883,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((i13.i2.u121.p415==0)) * (E(EX(!(EG(((i15.i0.u134.p492==0)||(i13.i1.u60.p185==1))))) U (((AX((i16.u47.p146==1)) * AG(((i13.i2.u121.p4...308
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i13.i2.u121.p415==0)))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(E(EX(!(EG(((i15.i0.u134.p492==0)||(i13....423
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t167, t261, t266, t270, t276, t372, t373, t380, t382, t394, t395, i0.i0.u76....1279
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 245 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 63 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 63 transitions
Performed 63 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 63
Iterating post reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 495 transition count 376
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 432 transition count 376
Performed 94 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 94 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 432 transition count 282
Deduced a syphon composed of 94 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 205 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 321 transition count 282
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 356 place count 298 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 298 transition count 259
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 298 transition count 254
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 291 transition count 254
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 231 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 175 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 174 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 173 transition count 138
Applied a total of 624 rules in 71 ms. Remains 173 /503 variables (removed 330) and now considering 138/448 (removed 310) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 173 cols
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 53]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 285 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/503 places, 138/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 365 ms. Remains : 152/503 places, 138/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality688765824046575369.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9886083048843682803.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality688765824046575369.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9886083048843682803.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79260,0.393961,14556,2,4824,5,44473,6,0,745,23332,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((p375==1)&&((p210==0)||(p526==1))) U AF((((p544==1)||(p400==0))||(p442==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((p375==1)&&((p210==0)||(p526==1))) U !(EG(!((((p544==1)||(p400==0))||(p442==1))))))))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t8, t9, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t91, t92, t126, t127, t128, In...252
(forward)formula 0,0,2.4173,72712,1,0,214,359821,266,113,5444,228031,305
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 249 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 495 transition count 375
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 375
Performed 97 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 97 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 318 transition count 278
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 366 place count 292 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 292 transition count 252
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 292 transition count 247
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 285 transition count 247
Performed 113 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 113
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 229 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 169 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 168 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 167 transition count 133
Applied a total of 635 rules in 59 ms. Remains 167 /503 variables (removed 336) and now considering 133/448 (removed 315) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 50, 51, 52, 53]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 272 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 158 /158 variables (removed 0) and now considering 133/133 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 336 ms. Remains : 158/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6599082341630274799.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7976381231059434239.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6599082341630274799.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7976381231059434239.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,30788,0.361553,15988,2,4544,5,51521,6,0,763,35246,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p535!=1) U (p135==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p535!=1)) * (p135==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 131/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.463628,16244,1,0,10,51521,15,1,1522,35246,4
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 249 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 495 transition count 374
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 430 transition count 374
Performed 95 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 95 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 430 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 207 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 318 transition count 279
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 364 place count 293 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 293 transition count 254
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 293 transition count 249
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 286 transition count 249
Performed 116 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 116 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 235 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 637 place count 166 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 638 place count 165 transition count 132
Applied a total of 638 rules in 83 ms. Remains 165 /503 variables (removed 338) and now considering 132/448 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 289 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 301 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/503 places, 132/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 146 /146 variables (removed 0) and now considering 132/132 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 392 ms. Remains : 146/503 places, 132/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
RANDOM walk for 13 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2751789441525783053.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15455723750210152205.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2751789441525783053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15455723750210152205.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 477 transition count 422
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 468 transition count 413
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 468 transition count 413
Applied a total of 70 rules in 49 ms. Remains 468 /503 variables (removed 35) and now considering 413/448 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 413 rows 468 cols
[2025-05-30 06:50:24] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 436 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1762 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 412 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/468 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 408 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 356 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 348 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 342 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 339 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 355 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 432 ms of which 156 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 362 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 315 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 351 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 361 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30348ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 412 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30352ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 468/503 places, 413/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32603 ms. Remains : 468/503 places, 413/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 413 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11804447857405298487.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16561187855478907223.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11804447857405298487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16561187855478907223.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2953323134007173861.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2953323134007173861.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2953323134007173861.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2953323134007173861.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2953323134007173861.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 273 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13673683665209113934.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11651333707812695078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13673683665209113934.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11651333707812695078.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30524e+26,6.24451,139996,5880,60,239576,795,1124,614527,73,1904,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(A(EG((i2.u6.p14==0)) U E(((i18.i0.u118.p409==0)||(i8.u31.p100==1)) U (i11.i1.u120.p422==1))) U EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(TRUE))) * !(!((E(!(E(((i18.i0.u118.p409==0)||(i8.u31.p100==1)) U (i11.i1.u120.p422...417
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t166, t238, t262, t267, t383, t391, t393, t400, t405, t406, i0.t170, i0.u68....1285
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 249 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 495 transition count 375
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 375
Performed 97 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 97 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 211 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 317 transition count 278
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 366 place count 292 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 292 transition count 253
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 292 transition count 248
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 285 transition count 248
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 233 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 637 place count 166 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 638 place count 165 transition count 132
Applied a total of 638 rules in 49 ms. Remains 165 /503 variables (removed 338) and now considering 132/448 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 06:51:57] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 277 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 292 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/503 places, 132/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 146 /146 variables (removed 0) and now considering 132/132 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 345 ms. Remains : 146/503 places, 132/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10772315716847241083.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8047001758063485822.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10772315716847241083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8047001758063485822.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21168,0.119499,7756,2,2208,5,12698,6,0,715,9834,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p528==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p528==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t83, t84, t85, t119, t120, t121, Inter...249
(forward)formula 0,0,0.767369,29880,1,0,167,113348,248,91,5251,62458,245
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 478 transition count 423
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 478 transition count 423
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 469 transition count 414
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 469 transition count 414
Applied a total of 68 rules in 25 ms. Remains 469 /503 variables (removed 34) and now considering 414/448 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 469 cols
[2025-05-30 06:51:58] [INFO ] Computed 94 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:51:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 401 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:51:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1608 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2016 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/469 variables, 55/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 377 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 398 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 408 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 392 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 359 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 404 ms of which 155 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 376 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 351 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 622 ms of which 363 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 211 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 227 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30191ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30193ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/503 places, 414/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32235 ms. Remains : 469/503 places, 414/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 414 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3740943265467823467.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 06:52:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14972718444342607466.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3740943265467823467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14972718444342607466.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14405788370564339553.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14405788370564339553.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14405788370564339553.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14405788370564339553.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14405788370564339553.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 275 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8860202437271016188.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3202766270358555053.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8860202437271016188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3202766270358555053.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 244 edges and 503 vertex of which 4 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1123 edges and 500 vertex of which 499 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 498 transition count 379
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 434 transition count 379
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 434 transition count 283
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 207 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 323 transition count 283
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 298 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 298 transition count 258
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 298 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 291 transition count 253
Performed 113 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 113
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 229 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 175 transition count 140
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 175 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 174 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 173 transition count 139
Applied a total of 631 rules in 42 ms. Remains 173 /503 variables (removed 330) and now considering 139/448 (removed 309) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 173 cols
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 354 ms returned [53, 54, 55, 56, 128, 138]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 373 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 167/503 places, 139/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 167 /167 variables (removed 0) and now considering 139/139 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 167/503 places, 139/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11321762718589157790.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13537947546826477598.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11321762718589157790.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13537947546826477598.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,28912,0.396175,16068,2,5236,5,44605,6,0,805,43359,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((AG(EF((p336==1))) * ((EG(((p144==0)||(p165==1))) + (p57==0)) + (p495==1))) U AF((p451==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p336==1))))) * ((EG(((p144==0)||(p165==1))) + (p57==0)) + (p495=...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t31, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t88, t89, t90, t91, t132, Interse...247
(forward)formula 0,0,4.86031,139468,1,0,312,631532,280,175,5996,480403,442
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 248 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 495 transition count 374
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 430 transition count 374
Performed 95 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 95 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 430 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 206 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 319 transition count 279
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 363 place count 294 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 294 transition count 254
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 294 transition count 249
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 287 transition count 249
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 233 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 169 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 168 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 167 transition count 133
Applied a total of 635 rules in 34 ms. Remains 167 /503 variables (removed 336) and now considering 133/448 (removed 315) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 06:53:36] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 214 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 147 /147 variables (removed 0) and now considering 133/133 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 257 ms. Remains : 147/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10141023512117833687.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8000161863331135513.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10141023512117833687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8000161863331135513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,22680,0.191896,7752,2,2149,5,12562,6,0,720,10025,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p514==1)) * AG(((p581==0)||(p197==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (p514==1))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p581==0)||(p197==1))))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,0,0.197561,8008,1,0,7,12562,9,2,731,10025,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 237 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 495 transition count 381
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 437 transition count 380
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 436 transition count 380
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 436 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 320 transition count 281
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 298 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 298 transition count 259
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 298 transition count 257
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 295 transition count 257
Performed 115 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 115 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 232 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 178 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 617 place count 177 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 176 transition count 141
Applied a total of 618 rules in 50 ms. Remains 176 /503 variables (removed 327) and now considering 141/448 (removed 307) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 176 cols
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned [2, 5, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 52, 53, 54, 55]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 235 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/503 places, 141/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 163 /163 variables (removed 0) and now considering 141/141 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 291 ms. Remains : 163/503 places, 141/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 141 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12837612033235126333.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality312296197820007636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12837612033235126333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality312296197820007636.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145058,0.380954,14252,2,4800,5,39618,6,0,791,32811,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((AG((p103==0)) + (p477==1)) + ((EF(((p411==0)||(p360==1))) * (A((p470==0) U (p617==1)) + !(A((p600==1) U (p405==1))))) + ((p107==0...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !((p103==0)))) + (p477==1)) + ((E(TRUE U ((p411==0)||(p360==1))) *...348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t8, t9, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t81, t94, t95, t96, t127, ...267
(forward)formula 0,1,10.7319,252260,1,0,561,1.33148e+06,292,317,5833,1.17307e+06,742
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 503/503 places, 448/448 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 248 edges and 503 vertex of which 7 / 503 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 497 vertex of which 496 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 63 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 63 transitions
Performed 63 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 63
Iterating post reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 495 transition count 376
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 432 transition count 375
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 375
Performed 97 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 97 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 431 transition count 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 211 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 317 transition count 278
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 366 place count 292 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 292 transition count 253
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 292 transition count 248
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 285 transition count 248
Performed 114 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 114 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 231 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 168 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 167 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 166 transition count 133
Applied a total of 636 rules in 30 ms. Remains 166 /503 variables (removed 337) and now considering 133/448 (removed 315) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 199 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 133/133 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 234 ms. Remains : 148/503 places, 133/448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11453760680094398465.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8969012992566207700.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11453760680094398465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8969012992566207700.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58110,0.617357,19156,2,5731,5,69555,6,0,724,36381,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((p564==0)||(p416==1))) U EF((p61==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p61==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (p61==1))) U (!(!(((p564==0)||(p416==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t87, t88, t89, t121, t122, Inters...248
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,5.49142,154872,1,0,246,938733,259,147,5571,535017,321
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12992568094357888270.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12992568094357888270.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12992568094357888270.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12992568094357888270.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12992568094357888270.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 273 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17439955922497513720.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 06:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8068006859388141103.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17439955922497513720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8068006859388141103.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52468e+26,4.24149,98008,11221,79,172383,1037,1248,344833,80,3463,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((EX((i12.u99.p287==1)) + !(E((i3.i2.u25.p69==1) U (i8.i2.u134.p421==1)))) + AX(FALSE))) * EF(EX((i12.u99.p284==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((EX((i12.u99.p287==1)) + !(E((i3.i2.u25.p69==1) U (i8.i2.u134.p421==1)))) + !(EX(!(F...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t9, t10, t20, t192, t264, t299, t440, i0.t196, i0.u74.t207, i0.u76.t203, i0.u78.t199,...1660
(forward)formula 0,1,36.7984,884840,1,0,1.74534e+06,1466,9350,2.88058e+06,425,5164,4138075
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(((i9.i1.u115.p362==0) * !((((i15.i1.u119.p370==0)||(i11.i0.u145.p479==1)) * ((i1.u57.p164!=0) + EX(TRUE))))) U AF(AG(((i17.i2.u59.p167=...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((i9.i1.u115.p362==0) * !((((i15.i1.u119.p370==0)||(i11.i0.u145.p479==1)) * ((i1.u57.p164!=0) + EX(T...347
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 1,0,54.5976,1208080,1,0,2.26224e+06,1480,9754,4.26329e+06,463,5230,4839679
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-14-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:17:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 07:17:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 51 labels/synchronizations in 72 ms.
[2025-05-30 07:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3265070666277227064.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 07:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15056957375355688120.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3265070666277227064.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15056957375355688120.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 07:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 621 ms
[2025-05-30 07:40:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 448 transitions.
[2025-05-30 07:40:39] [INFO ] Transformed 503 places.
[2025-05-30 07:40:39] [INFO ] Transformed 448 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
P-invariant computation with GreatSPN timed out. Skipping.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 07:41:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1898374622385956815.gal : 835 ms
[2025-05-30 07:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18415473993249790677.ctl : 105 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1898374622385956815.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18415473993249790677.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-14"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-14, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300105"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-14.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-14 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;