Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300103.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-13, examination is ReachabilityFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300103
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748587357145

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-13
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
ReachabilityFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 200 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Transformed 593 places.
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Transformed 536 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 06:42:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 593 places and 536 transitions and 1582 arcs in 401 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityFireability.xml in 27 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 20 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (286 resets) in 2035 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 14/16 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (55 resets) in 837 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 12/14 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
[2025-05-30 06:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 350 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (47 resets) in 702 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 06:42:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (44 resets) in 368 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 06:42:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4060943429931397591.gal : 49 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 272 ms. (146 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 06:42:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9208237274716093261.prop : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4060943429931397591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9208237274716093261.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (49 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (50 resets) in 227 ms. (175 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (50 resets) in 196 ms. (203 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (49 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9208237274716093261.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (46 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (47 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (55 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (43 resets) in 244 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 585 cols
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 19
[2025-05-30 06:42:41] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 48 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :19 after 28
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :28 after 125
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :125 after 247
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :247 after 4.84367e+14
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 337/479 variables, 52/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 337/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 0/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/493 variables, 5/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 14/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 0/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 92/585 variables, 37/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 92/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 0/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 528/1113 variables, 585/1265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1113/1113 variables, and 1265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved in 5159 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 585/585 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 585/585 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 139/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 340/479 variables, 52/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 340/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 392 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 267 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 270 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 282 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 212 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 265 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 403 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 295 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 254 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 204 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 203 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 201 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 211 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10395ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 10 unsolved
Fused 10 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 108 out of 585 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 585/585 places, 528/528 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1197 edges and 585 vertex of which 579 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 579 transition count 472
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 1 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 524 transition count 458
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 510 transition count 458
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 510 transition count 359
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 208 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 401 transition count 359
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 348 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 3 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 348 transition count 306
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 348 transition count 305
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 347 transition count 305
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 289 transition count 247
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 289 transition count 247
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 288 transition count 246
Applied a total of 576 rules in 222 ms. Remains 288 /585 variables (removed 297) and now considering 246/528 (removed 282) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 236 ms. Remains : 288/585 places, 246/528 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (772 resets) in 859 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (150 resets) in 429 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (134 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (150 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (145 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (152 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (150 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (145 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (152 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (139 resets) in 232 ms. (171 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 246 rows 288 cols
[2025-05-30 06:42:53] [INFO ] Computed 80 invariants in 10 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 136/239 variables, 49/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/243 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/284 variables, 28/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 246/530 variables, 284/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 1/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/534 variables, 4/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/534 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/534 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 534/534 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 2256 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 288/288 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 136/239 variables, 49/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 15/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 17/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/243 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 41/284 variables, 28/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 170 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 4/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 204 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 140 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 157 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 147 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 144 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 20/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 158 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 20/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 158 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 20/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 161 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 164 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 164 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 170 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 159 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 155 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 167 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 163 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 160 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 165 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 165 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 159 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 12/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 246/530 variables, 284/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 1/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 4/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 151 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 153 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 147 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 149 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 145 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 165 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 159 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 145 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 147 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 20/620 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 149 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 143 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 147 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 136 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 146 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 149 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 148 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 144 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 150 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 20/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 152 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 143 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 163 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 191 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 146 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 173 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 147 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 149 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 159 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 152 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 146 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 20/660 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 1/661 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 136 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 153 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 160 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 157 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/530 variables, 4/665 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 47383ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 54 out of 288 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 288/288 places, 246/246 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 288 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 280 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 278 transition count 236
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 278 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 267 transition count 228
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 261 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 261 transition count 222
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 261 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 260 transition count 221
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 226 transition count 190
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 224 transition count 188
Applied a total of 122 rules in 132 ms. Remains 224 /288 variables (removed 64) and now considering 188/246 (removed 58) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 134 ms. Remains : 224/288 places, 188/246 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1268 resets) in 262 ms. (152 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (272 resets) in 394 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (246 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (266 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (272 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (278 resets) in 108 ms. (367 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (270 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 579631 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=193 ) properties seen :5 out of 6
Probabilistic random walk after 579631 steps, saw 124071 distinct states, run finished after 3010 ms. (steps per millisecond=192 ) properties seen :5
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 224 cols
[2025-05-30 06:43:44] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 65/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/170 variables, 45/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/218 variables, 21/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 187/406 variables, 219/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 6/412 variables, 5/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 431 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 65/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/170 variables, 45/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/218 variables, 21/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 187/406 variables, 219/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-13-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/412 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 454 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 219/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 904ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 65692 ms.

BK_STOP 1748587424970

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ ReachabilityFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-13"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-13, examination is ReachabilityFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300103"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-13.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-13 execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;