Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300089.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-12, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300089
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 146K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748578392845

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-12
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 04:13:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 04:13:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 194 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Transformed 586 places.
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Transformed 525 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 586 places and 525 transitions and 1560 arcs in 364 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 20 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 14 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 98 out of 582 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 582/582 places, 521/521 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 579 transition count 521
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 515 transition count 457
Iterating global reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 515 transition count 457
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 490 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 490 transition count 432
Applied a total of 181 rules in 189 ms. Remains 490 /582 variables (removed 92) and now considering 432/521 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 490 cols
[2025-05-30 04:13:15] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 40 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 872 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:13:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2417 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3368 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:13:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/490 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 343 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 273 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 241 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 244 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 287 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 318 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 267 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 244 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 267 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 273 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 216 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 238 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 225 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 237 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 272 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 255 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 253 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 250 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 255 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 490/922 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 0/490 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/490 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 40/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 264 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 222 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 241 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 213 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 263 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 219 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 218 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 213 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 204 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 206 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 205 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 213 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 225 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 167 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 239 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 240 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 226 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 238 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 217 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 224 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 219 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 219 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 264 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 236 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 218 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 214 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 238 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 230 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 217 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 215 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 195 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 238 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 253 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 237 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 216 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 214 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 226 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 218 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 214 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 242 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 215 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 255 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 254 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 235 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 242 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 249 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 255 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 238 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 242 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 236 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 274 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60527ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60558ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 490/582 places, 432/521 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 64163 ms. Remains : 490/582 places, 432/521 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 490 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 04:14:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 113 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 490 places (down from 98) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (292 resets) in 2055 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 26/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
[2025-05-30 04:14:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 224/271 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 98/369 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/483 variables, 42/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/484 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 428/912 variables, 484/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/912 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 9/921 variables, 5/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/921 variables, 0/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/922 variables, 1/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 922/922 variables, and 585 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 5009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 490/490 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 224/271 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 137 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 98/369 variables, 24/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 168 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 172 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 184 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 184 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 177 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10090ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 25 unsolved
Fused 25 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 40 out of 490 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1081 edges and 490 vertex of which 489 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 489 transition count 387
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 445 transition count 383
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 441 transition count 383
Performed 89 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 89 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 441 transition count 294
Deduced a syphon composed of 89 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 101 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 190 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 340 transition count 294
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 299 place count 328 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 328 transition count 282
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 328 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 327 transition count 281
Performed 104 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 104 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 105 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 209 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 222 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 222 transition count 176
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 525 place count 221 transition count 180
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 532 place count 221 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 533 place count 220 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 534 place count 219 transition count 179
Applied a total of 534 rules in 212 ms. Remains 219 /490 variables (removed 271) and now considering 179/432 (removed 253) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 212 ms. Remains : 219/490 places, 179/432 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2049 resets) in 1329 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 19/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (50 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (55 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (40 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (47 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 04:14:32] [INFO ] Computed 81 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 74/105 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 57/162 variables, 32/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 52/214 variables, 29/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 179/394 variables, 215/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/398 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/398 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 398/398 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 1434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 74/105 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 57/162 variables, 32/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 52/214 variables, 29/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 10/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 8/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 147 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 133 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 144 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 141 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 138 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 140 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 156 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 8/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 14/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 179/394 variables, 215/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 4/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 18/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 20/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 394/398 variables, and 622 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 45010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/51 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 215/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/19 constraints, Known Traps: 305/305 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46463ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 31 out of 219 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 179/179 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 219 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 217 transition count 177
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 217 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 210 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 209 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 209 transition count 172
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 204 transition count 167
Applied a total of 27 rules in 30 ms. Remains 204 /219 variables (removed 15) and now considering 167/179 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 204/219 places, 167/179 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2621 resets) in 500 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 18/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (65 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (66 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (61 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (64 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (65 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (68 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (69 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (70 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (69 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (72 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (64 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (66 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (64 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (61 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (61 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (63 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 320712 steps, run visited all 18 properties in 1291 ms. (steps per millisecond=248 )
Probabilistic random walk after 320712 steps, saw 62091 distinct states, run finished after 1297 ms. (steps per millisecond=247 ) properties seen :18
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
Computed a total of 475 stabilizing places and 417 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1081 edges and 490 vertex of which 489 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.18 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 236 edges and 490 vertex of which 6 / 490 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1075 edges and 485 vertex of which 484 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 483 transition count 364
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 423 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 422 transition count 363
Performed 94 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 94 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 422 transition count 269
Deduced a syphon composed of 94 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 204 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 312 transition count 269
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 351 place count 289 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 289 transition count 246
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 289 transition count 243
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 286 transition count 243
Performed 112 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 112 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 228 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 170 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 609 place count 169 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 168 transition count 130
Applied a total of 610 rules in 80 ms. Remains 168 /490 variables (removed 322) and now considering 130/432 (removed 302) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 168 cols
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 237 ms returned [0, 1, 5, 6, 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 40, 41, 46, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 136, 138]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 239 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/490 places, 130/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 130/130 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 328 ms. Remains : 148/490 places, 130/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2720399963514389631.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality373956372807040288.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2720399963514389631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality373956372807040288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12834,0.119653,6808,2,1695,5,8700,6,0,722,7477,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((p192==0) * AG((p205==1)))) U (p480==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((p192==0) * !(E(TRUE U !((p205==1))))))) * (p480==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t87, t88, t89, t101, t105, t106, t107, ...261
(forward)formula 0,1,0.854637,27256,1,0,166,86835,248,87,5425,57873,236
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 470 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 470 transition count 412
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 461 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 461 transition count 403
Applied a total of 58 rules in 47 ms. Remains 461 /490 variables (removed 29) and now considering 403/432 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 403 rows 461 cols
[2025-05-30 04:15:21] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 419 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:15:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2540 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 402 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:15:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/461 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 208 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 225 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 240 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 235 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 218 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 212 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 220 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 218 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 218 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 239 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 210 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 209 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 257 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 212 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 213 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 262 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 233 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 248 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 218 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 219 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 219 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 205 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 223 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 228 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 213 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 178 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 198 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 198 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 214 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 218 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 190 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 221 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 221 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 217 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 220 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 212 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30171ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 402 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30176ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 461/490 places, 403/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32769 ms. Remains : 461/490 places, 403/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 403 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4011911622782619506.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 04:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10268089583726029721.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4011911622782619506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10268089583726029721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 04:16:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1926321522939671825.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1926321522939671825.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1926321522939671825.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1926321522939671825.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1926321522939671825.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 256 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 158 ms
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 29 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality127765016982473960.gal : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 04:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15087700780214039778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality127765016982473960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15087700780214039778.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4153e+23,1.60447,38296,4100,69,58376,683,1091,147614,69,1836,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(A(((EX((i12.i0.u92.p274!=1)) + !(((i5.i3.u112.p360==0)||(i6.u67.p197==1)))) + (((i15.i2.u115.p373==0)||(i0.u124.p512==1))&&(i13.i3.u...456
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(EY(Init),!((((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i13.i3.u153.p561==0)||(i13.i0.u35.p110==1)))))) * E(TRUE U ((i7.u4.p8...2811
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t160, t168, t258, t268, t391, t393, t395, t396, i0.u124.t26, i0.u124.t41, i0.u124...1252
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 464 transition count 406
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 464 transition count 406
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 454 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 454 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 61 ms. Remains 454 /490 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 454 cols
[2025-05-30 04:16:55] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 556 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:16:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:16:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2676 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3235 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:16:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 217 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 211 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 219 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 218 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 228 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 231 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 223 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 231 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 232 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 233 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 225 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 224 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 220 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 205 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 220 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 209 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 217 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 216 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 251 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 298 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 245 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 251 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 225 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 223 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 226 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 811 ms of which 638 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30786ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 6 dead transitions in 30788ms
Found 6 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 6 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 6 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 454 /454 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 34099 ms. Remains : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7532694965611597254.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11514954373597093029.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7532694965611597254.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11514954373597093029.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 04:17:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10395366865501005395.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10395366865501005395.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10395366865501005395.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10395366865501005395.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10395366865501005395.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:17:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:17:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:18:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 225 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1430250802094714478.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14268647343006006149.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1430250802094714478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14268647343006006149.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40929e+23,0.545852,18964,3488,55,30571,795,925,55115,63,1512,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EX(TRUE))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t155, t163, t175, t253, t261, t378, t379, t380, t382, t383, i0.u76.t158, i0.u80.t...1069
(forward)formula 0,0,3.15266,117268,1,0,195611,795,5458,748423,274,1612,422841
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 466 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 466 transition count 408
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 457 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 457 transition count 399
Applied a total of 66 rules in 38 ms. Remains 457 /490 variables (removed 33) and now considering 399/432 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 399 rows 457 cols
[2025-05-30 04:18:03] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 452 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:18:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2830 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 398 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:18:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/457 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 223 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 224 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 222 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 216 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 198 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 206 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 210 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 203 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 205 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 210 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 227 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 225 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 232 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 221 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 227 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 212 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 225 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 237 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 221 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 206 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 220 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 219 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 201 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 192 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 219 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 228 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 201 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 182 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 219 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 265 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 241 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 231 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 217 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 222 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 457/856 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 52/52 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 0/457 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 398/398 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/457 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD364 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD368 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD369 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD378 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 55/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 211 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 199 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 237 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 214 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 214 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 215 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 209 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 195 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 208 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 220 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 198 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 217 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 231 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 390 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 224 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 222 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 225 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 221 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 234 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 223 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 215 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 219 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 216 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 223 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 209 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 233 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 216 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 219 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 214 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 225 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 230 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 243 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 240 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD374 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD380 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD382 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 383 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 196 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 226 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 236 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 208 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 215 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 223 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 218 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 224 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 226 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 231 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 239 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 243 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 261 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 233 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD341 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 378 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 252 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 219 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 226 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 238 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 238 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 227 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 220 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 223 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 220 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 208 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 200 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 230 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 221 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 215 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 209 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 229 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 229 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 378 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 222 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 230 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 232 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 224 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 207 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 222 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 221 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60107ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 20 solved, 378 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 20 dead transitions in 60109ms
Found 20 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 20 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 20 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 457/490 places, 379/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 457 /457 variables (removed 0) and now considering 379/379 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63444 ms. Remains : 457/490 places, 379/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 379 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11330549909543805008.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6719279257810253165.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11330549909543805008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6719279257810253165.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1678230514313874365.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1678230514313874365.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1678230514313874365.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1678230514313874365.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1678230514313874365.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:19:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:19:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:19:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 167 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:19:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:19:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10851941817216851261.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 04:19:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality500408341854791838.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10851941817216851261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality500408341854791838.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.41074e+23,0.88422,24220,3491,52,38780,494,987,86223,56,1237,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(EG(!(A(((i10.i0.u17.p45==0)||(i0.u69.p208==1)) U ((i15.u121.p524==0)||(i2.i3.u130.p474==1))))) U EX(((i1.i1.u13.p33!=1)&&(!((i5.i1....222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(EX(((i1.i1.u13.p33!=1)&&(!((i5.i1.u58.p185==0)||(i15.u121.p466==1)))))) U (!(EG(!(!((E(!(((i1...553
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t157, t161, t169, t177, t255, t367, t369, t371, t372, i0.t165, i0.u69.t172, i...1210
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 465 transition count 407
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 465 transition count 407
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 456 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 456 transition count 398
Applied a total of 68 rules in 36 ms. Remains 456 /490 variables (removed 34) and now considering 398/432 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 398 rows 456 cols
[2025-05-30 04:20:07] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 470 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:20:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2739 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 397 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:20:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/456 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 214 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 203 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 208 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 211 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 199 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 199 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 211 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 218 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 237 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 231 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 222 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 265 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 219 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 222 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 215 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 214 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 231 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 205 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 179 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 236 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 222 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 235 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 215 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 218 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 218 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 207 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 203 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30118ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 456/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33368 ms. Remains : 456/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6887776091200262279.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 04:20:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6274738794766097281.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6887776091200262279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6274738794766097281.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3699739915857430697.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3699739915857430697.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3699739915857430697.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3699739915857430697.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3699739915857430697.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 255 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12539240857622243213.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality315776754460729810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12539240857622243213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality315776754460729810.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.75114e+23,0.883367,25288,2986,63,42822,648,1081,76318,63,1511,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((AX((i2.u18.p46!=1)) * ((AX(((i6.i0.u81.p241==0)||(i6.i1.u79.p236==1))) + (i11.i1.u98.p294==0)) + ((i14.i1.u109.p346==1)||(i14.i0.u...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!((i2.u18.p46!=1)))) * ((!(EX(!(((i6.i0.u81.p241==0)||(i6.i1.u79.p236==1)))...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t155, t167, t253, t386, t390, t391, i0.t175, i0.u65.t182, i0.u67.t178, i0.u69...1171
(forward)formula 0,1,4.59046,123592,1,0,224435,705,6959,496484,301,1862,552274
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 468 transition count 410
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 468 transition count 410
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 459 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 459 transition count 401
Applied a total of 62 rules in 33 ms. Remains 459 /490 variables (removed 31) and now considering 401/432 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 401 rows 459 cols
[2025-05-30 04:21:15] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 437 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:21:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2396 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2835 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/459 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 210 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 204 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 200 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 214 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 227 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 204 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 220 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 214 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 189 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 208 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 233 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 231 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 235 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 242 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 231 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 277 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 288 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 225 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 246 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 211 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 238 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 203 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 139 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30095ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 459/490 places, 401/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32966 ms. Remains : 459/490 places, 401/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3327051463226247650.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 04:21:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3176134466238781181.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3327051463226247650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3176134466238781181.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1549100311413018639.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1549100311413018639.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1549100311413018639.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1549100311413018639.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1549100311413018639.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 252 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9061240518107543619.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 04:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13113388176215104032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9061240518107543619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13113388176215104032.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.46223e+23,0.790759,24576,2976,67,40646,725,1117,73389,67,1816,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(((EX((i9.u109.p350==1)) + E(((i1.i0.u82.p246==0)||(i16.u148.p537==1)) U (i14.i2.u33.p103==1))) + (EG(((i1.i1.u147.p534==0)||(i14.i...294
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * ((i13.i0.u128.p441==0)||(i14.i2.u22.p80==1))),((EX((i9.u109.p350==1)) + E(((i1.i0.u82.p246==0)...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t159, t171, t179, t258, t390, t391, t393, t394, i0.i0.u76.t162, i0.i0.u80.t15...1213
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 466 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 466 transition count 408
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 457 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 457 transition count 399
Applied a total of 66 rules in 33 ms. Remains 457 /490 variables (removed 33) and now considering 399/432 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 399 rows 457 cols
[2025-05-30 04:22:48] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:22:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 429 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:22:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:22:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2049 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2480 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 398 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:22:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/457 variables, 54/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 208 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 217 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 210 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 204 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 202 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 213 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 204 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 220 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 192 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 207 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 200 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 216 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 210 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 209 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 211 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 217 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 206 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 219 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 398 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 299 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 213 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 226 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 233 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 339 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 231 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 235 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD378 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 218 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 202 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 201 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 220 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 225 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 224 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 236 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 207 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 220 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 219 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30153ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 395 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 3 dead transitions in 30154ms
Found 3 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 3 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 3 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 457/490 places, 396/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 457 /457 variables (removed 0) and now considering 396/396 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32678 ms. Remains : 457/490 places, 396/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 396 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality418706104492862397.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15296331322812721130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality418706104492862397.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15296331322812721130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18346263183015439293.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18346263183015439293.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18346263183015439293.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18346263183015439293.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18346263183015439293.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 245 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13723624210624747736.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3915309587644947153.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13723624210624747736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3915309587644947153.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.53449e+23,1.23779,33408,4746,72,56574,705,857,128125,59,1576,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((E((AG(((i15.u125.p424==1)||(i12.u117.p388==0))) + !(AF(((i15.u123.p491==0)||(i16.u24.p83==1))))) U (i3.i1.u110.p354==1)) * (((i3.i0.u...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E((!(E(TRUE U !(((i15.u125.p424==1)||(i12.u117.p388==0))))) + !(!(EG(!(((i15.u123.p491==0)||(i16...315
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t63, t158, t170, t178, t256, t264, t385, t386, t388, t389, i0.u122.t67, i0.u7...1070
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,14.6818,354304,1,0,601906,705,6880,1.37637e+06,293,2445,1178360
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 465 transition count 407
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 465 transition count 407
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 455 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 455 transition count 397
Applied a total of 70 rules in 32 ms. Remains 455 /490 variables (removed 35) and now considering 397/432 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 455 cols
[2025-05-30 04:24:06] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 445 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:24:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2500 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2947 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/455 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 225 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 219 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 222 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 227 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 214 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 222 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 207 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 212 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 216 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 209 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 220 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 204 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 183 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 212 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 237 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 302 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 244 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 258 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 215 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 232 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 232 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD364 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 392 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 211 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 218 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 221 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 208 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 212 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 212 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 218 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 208 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 229 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 213 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 218 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 214 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 225 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 213 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 215 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 236 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 220 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30088ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 392 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30090ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 455/490 places, 393/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 455 /455 variables (removed 0) and now considering 393/393 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33083 ms. Remains : 455/490 places, 393/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12789236966756021866.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 04:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18195753125884817571.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12789236966756021866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18195753125884817571.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9031420699674295210.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9031420699674295210.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9031420699674295210.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9031420699674295210.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9031420699674295210.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 236 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8764207698093613582.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1099744597251616230.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8764207698093613582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1099744597251616230.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40929e+23,1.76754,47704,4311,50,71354,610,1068,204416,54,1660,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AG((((i16.i2.u22.p69==0)||(i6.i2.u84.p258==1)) * ((i14.i1.u116.p398==0) + EF(((i14.i0.u142.p534==0)||(i15.u120.p528==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i16.i2.u22.p69==0)||(i6.i2.u84.p258==1)) * ((i14.i1.u116.p398==0) + E(TRUE U...219
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t156, t164, t176, t254, t381, t383, t385, t386, i0.u50.t203, i0.u52.t199, i0....1180
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 464 transition count 406
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 464 transition count 406
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 454 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 454 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 36 ms. Remains 454 /490 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 454 cols
[2025-05-30 04:25:40] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 416 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2630 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3047 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:25:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 219 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 202 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 250 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 220 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 235 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 228 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 236 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 226 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 227 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 217 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 221 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 216 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 217 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 214 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 237 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 219 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 236 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 301 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 233 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 221 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 210 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 242 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 826 ms of which 632 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 209 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30095ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 6 dead transitions in 30098ms
Found 6 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 6 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 6 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 454 /454 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33193 ms. Remains : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10615920412621126334.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4937413064871979364.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10615920412621126334.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4937413064871979364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3320043277394209754.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3320043277394209754.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3320043277394209754.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3320043277394209754.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3320043277394209754.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 231 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18319884649556264635.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:26:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13466421074070221225.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18319884649556264635.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13466421074070221225.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40929e+23,1.39326,38204,4236,45,64462,590,1040,155482,51,1382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(EF((i6.u11.p25==0)))) * AF(AX(EG((i14.i0.u159.p572==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i6.u11.p25==0))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(EG((i14.i0.u159...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t155, t163, t175, t253, t379, t380, t382, t383, i0.i0.u82.t150, i0.i1.u80.t153, i...1163
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 238 edges and 490 vertex of which 6 / 490 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1075 edges and 485 vertex of which 484 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 483 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 422 transition count 363
Performed 97 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 97 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 422 transition count 266
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 212 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 307 transition count 266
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 359 place count 284 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 284 transition count 243
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 284 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 281 transition count 240
Performed 109 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 222 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 168 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 611 place count 167 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 612 place count 166 transition count 130
Applied a total of 612 rules in 57 ms. Remains 166 /490 variables (removed 324) and now considering 130/432 (removed 302) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned [44, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/490 places, 130/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 158 /158 variables (removed 0) and now considering 130/130 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 307 ms. Remains : 158/490 places, 130/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14066873458857056590.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7188643188451407063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14066873458857056590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7188643188451407063.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23452,0.128403,7468,2,2234,5,11472,6,0,761,8697,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(E(A((p15==0) U (p434==1)) U (p156==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),E(!((E(!((p434==1)) U (!((p15==0)) * !((p434==1)))) + EG(!((p434==1))))) U (p156==1)))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t83, t87, t88, t89, t101, t105, t1...271
(forward)formula 0,1,1.63105,47776,1,0,269,203977,258,143,5643,178258,360
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 464 transition count 406
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 464 transition count 406
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 454 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 454 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 31 ms. Remains 454 /490 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 454 cols
[2025-05-30 04:27:15] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 425 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:27:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2670 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3097 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:27:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 212 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 209 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 202 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 227 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 227 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 324 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 220 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 228 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 229 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 235 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 222 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 195 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 215 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 198 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 232 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 211 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 214 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 217 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 313 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 245 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 251 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 219 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 211 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 222 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 844 ms of which 633 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 223 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30259ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 6 dead transitions in 30260ms
Found 6 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 6 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 6 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 454 /454 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33400 ms. Remains : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4000964242979321841.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2900221227261049693.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4000964242979321841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2900221227261049693.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5023417417967309417.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5023417417967309417.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5023417417967309417.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5023417417967309417.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5023417417967309417.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 225 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16220305897053846419.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12116484017407898388.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16220305897053846419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12116484017407898388.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40929e+23,1.45114,34144,3539,57,49955,624,1029,109658,63,1535,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(!(E(AX(FALSE) U ((i4.u19.p58==0)||(i0.u123.p547==1))))) + AX(EF((i10.u70.p205==1)))) + AG(EF(((i12.i2.u121.p406==0)&&(i7.i1.u150.p55...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(!(EX(!(FALSE))) U ((i4.u19.p58==0)||(i0.u123.p547==1))))))) + !(EX(!(E(TRUE U...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t155, t163, t175, t253, t378, t379, t380, t382, t383, i0.t10, i0.t8, i0.u123.t60,...1168
(forward)formula 0,1,10.3944,212192,1,0,348361,825,6645,797741,303,2297,926963
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-12-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 469 transition count 411
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 469 transition count 411
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 460 transition count 402
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 460 transition count 402
Applied a total of 60 rules in 30 ms. Remains 460 /490 variables (removed 30) and now considering 402/432 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 402 rows 460 cols
[2025-05-30 04:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 417 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2415 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2833 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 401 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:28:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/460 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 241 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 203 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 211 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 213 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 208 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 218 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 207 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 203 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 193 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 204 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 201 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 193 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 199 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 198 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 204 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 220 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 225 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 218 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 198 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 215 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 214 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 221 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 222 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 233 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 237 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 240 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 226 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 238 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 226 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 226 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 200 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 205 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 212 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 209 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 212 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 212 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 220 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 206 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 205 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 201 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 216 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 194 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 218 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 222 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 208 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 228 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 232 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 204 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 218 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30138ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 397 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30139ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 460/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 460 /460 variables (removed 0) and now considering 398/398 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33014 ms. Remains : 460/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5977963435250092580.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10206738269259428444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5977963435250092580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10206738269259428444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8097284648787483499.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8097284648787483499.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8097284648787483499.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8097284648787483499.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8097284648787483499.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 236 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17273739246760450691.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10066080602805288456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17273739246760450691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10066080602805288456.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.45813e+23,1.15782,39004,4085,67,66247,866,939,185918,70,1951,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((EF((i12.u104.p315==1)) + !(A((i14.u135.p475==1) U ((i11.u118.p379==1)||(i8.u71.p207==0))))) + !(((EX(EG((i4.u23.p66==1))) * (i7.u68...373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((FwdU(Init,!((((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i17.u140.p494==1))))))) + (E(TRUE U (i6.u162.p580==1)) * E(TRUE U (i...1038
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t160, t168, t180, t259, t267, t386, t387, t388, t390, t391, i0.u55.t203, i0.u...1159
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 464 transition count 406
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 464 transition count 406
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 454 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 454 transition count 396
Applied a total of 72 rules in 32 ms. Remains 454 /490 variables (removed 36) and now considering 396/432 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 396 rows 454 cols
[2025-05-30 04:30:02] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 434 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:30:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2510 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2945 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 395 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:30:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 204 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 203 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 194 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 204 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 235 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 226 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 225 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 395 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 225 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 224 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 235 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 229 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 205 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 220 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 207 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD357 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 220 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 208 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 237 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 301 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 234 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 233 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 223 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 218 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 227 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 822 ms of which 631 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 215 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30252ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 389 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 6 dead transitions in 30253ms
Found 6 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 6 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 6 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 454 /454 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33243 ms. Remains : 454/490 places, 390/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18238014085564452207.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9544971360703708086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18238014085564452207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9544971360703708086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9513040098578870712.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9513040098578870712.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9513040098578870712.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9513040098578870712.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9513040098578870712.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 224 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7551603649733696091.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12555132772347006163.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7551603649733696091.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12555132772347006163.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40929e+23,1.09455,35696,4288,65,65648,695,1073,100282,67,1631,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(AX(EX(((i11.u119.p396==0)||(i5.i0.u134.p488==1)))) U EF((i0.i2.u71.p210==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (i0.i2.u71.p210==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (i0.i2.u71.p210==1))) U (!(!(EX(!...254
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t155, t163, t175, t253, t379, t380, t382, t383, i0.t167, i0.i0.u120.t70, i0.i0.u1...1186
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 465 transition count 407
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 465 transition count 407
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 456 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 456 transition count 398
Applied a total of 68 rules in 33 ms. Remains 456 /490 variables (removed 34) and now considering 398/432 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 398 rows 456 cols
[2025-05-30 04:31:36] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 402 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:31:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2574 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2978 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 397 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:31:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/456 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 209 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 207 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 211 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 200 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 193 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 217 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 215 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 200 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 193 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 214 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 219 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 210 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 205 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 328 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 213 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 203 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 197 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 208 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 210 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 214 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 198 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 194 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 205 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 208 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 196 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 220 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 202 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 212 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 209 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 227 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 229 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 230 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 218 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 196 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 216 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 270 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 241 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 232 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 231 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 160 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 209 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 216 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30135ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 397 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 456/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33149 ms. Remains : 456/490 places, 398/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12252392749077855915.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7989348251504665051.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12252392749077855915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7989348251504665051.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16378496723334017296.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16378496723334017296.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16378496723334017296.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16378496723334017296.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16378496723334017296.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 253 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12141892999563050034.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:32:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10459103819729507635.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12141892999563050034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10459103819729507635.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.48666e+23,12.2176,221252,20772,58,265992,1230,1044,930282,64,2554,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 490/490 places, 432/432 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 467 transition count 409
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 467 transition count 409
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 459 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 459 transition count 401
Applied a total of 62 rules in 31 ms. Remains 459 /490 variables (removed 31) and now considering 401/432 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 401 rows 459 cols
[2025-05-30 04:33:09] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 424 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 04:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2541 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:33:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/459 variables, 52/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 210 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 209 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 207 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 225 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 210 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 216 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 211 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 210 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 208 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 206 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 209 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 225 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 206 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 205 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 222 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 184 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 263 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 257 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 238 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 227 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 207 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 207 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 232 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 217 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 194 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 218 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 227 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 202 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 217 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 235 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 225 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 220 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30092ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 459/490 places, 401/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32668 ms. Remains : 459/490 places, 401/432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8888540492365143880.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 04:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16844840929314833061.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8888540492365143880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16844840929314833061.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18211736686251450641.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18211736686251450641.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18211736686251450641.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18211736686251450641.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18211736686251450641.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 254 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17517234673003530258.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9502709651163240089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17517234673003530258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9502709651163240089.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4093e+23,1.61116,48060,3537,72,70218,774,1077,265194,66,1996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((!(A(((i2.i1.u125.p432==0)||(i10.i1.u106.p345==1)) U (i10.i1.u107.p342==1))) + (i11.i2.u87.p262==1)) + (((i11.i2.u103.p326==0)&&(i...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((!(!((E(!((i10.i1.u107.p342==1)) U (!(((i2.i1.u125.p432==0)||(i10.i1.u106.p345==1))) *...340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t64, t160, t172, t258, t389, t390, t391, t393, i0.i0.u79.t155, i0.i0.u121.t68...1239
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12512713836596180272.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12512713836596180272.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12512713836596180272.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12512713836596180272.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12512713836596180272.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality341477379882045684.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 04:34:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14801720867033801239.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality341477379882045684.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14801720867033801239.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.03505e+23,1.88089,43280,5990,94,70403,865,1124,147566,79,2586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(A(((EX((i9.u95.p274!=1)) + !(((i5.i1.i2.u118.p360==0)||(i1.u69.p197==1)))) + (((i5.i1.i1.u122.p373==0)||(i16.u132.p512==1))&&(i10.u1...441
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(EY(Init),!((((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i10.u142.p561==0)||(i12.u37.p110==1)))))) * E(TRUE U ((i1.u4.p8==0)||...2738
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t6, t7, t9, t81, t183, t193, t205, t285, t421, t424, i0.t187, i0.i0.i0.u74.t196, ...1408
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 130 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 117 labels/synchronizations in 114 ms.
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality896822592065108700.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 04:37:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4251708270279116892.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality896822592065108700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4251708270279116892.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 05:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 424 ms
[2025-05-30 05:04:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 05:04:34] [INFO ] Transformed 490 places.
[2025-05-30 05:04:34] [INFO ] Transformed 432 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
P-invariant computation with GreatSPN timed out. Skipping.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 05:05:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10503101676292867516.gal : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 05:05:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15727329691895231114.ctl : 17 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10503101676292867516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15727329691895231114.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-12"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-12, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300089"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-12.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-12 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;