Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813300087.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is ReachabilityFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300087
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748578217139

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-11
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
ReachabilityFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 04:10:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 04:10:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 04:10:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 263 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:20] [INFO ] Transformed 567 places.
[2025-05-30 04:10:20] [INFO ] Transformed 508 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:10:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 04:10:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 567 places and 508 transitions and 1512 arcs in 516 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityFireability.xml in 31 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 20 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 7 transitions.
[2025-05-30 04:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 322 ms
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (306 resets) in 3409 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 12/16 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (52 resets) in 695 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 04:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 208 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (53 resets) in 338 ms. (118 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (54 resets) in 237 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 04:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4752271658855295010.gal : 163 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (52 resets) in 946 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 04:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5997227634364479509.prop : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4752271658855295010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5997227634364479509.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (55 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5997227634364479509.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (45 resets) in 380 ms. (104 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (66 resets) in 378 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (55 resets) in 242 ms. (164 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (52 resets) in 268 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 6
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (34 resets) in 228 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 7
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :7 after 11
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :11 after 61
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :61 after 101
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :101 after 353
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :353 after 609
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (54 resets) in 398 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :609 after 1997
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (62 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :1997 after 41565
// Phase 1: matrix 501 rows 560 cols
[2025-05-30 04:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 40 ms
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1.99523e+06 after 1.64196e+07
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 292/484 variables, 53/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 292/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :1.64196e+07 after 3.17094e+08
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 1/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 0/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 76/560 variables, 40/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,12 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :3.17094e+08 after 1.14665e+09
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/560 variables, 76/655 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/560 variables, 0/655 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 5309ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 192 out of 560 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 560/560 places, 501/501 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1140 edges and 560 vertex of which 556 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 556 transition count 479
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 534 transition count 476
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 531 transition count 476
Performed 70 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 70 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 531 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 458 transition count 406
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 422 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 422 transition count 370
Performed 41 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 381 transition count 329
Applied a total of 348 rules in 239 ms. Remains 381 /560 variables (removed 179) and now considering 329/501 (removed 172) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 252 ms. Remains : 381/560 places, 329/501 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (510 resets) in 819 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (77 resets) in 546 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (86 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (83 resets) in 345 ms. (115 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (85 resets) in 363 ms. (109 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (77 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (98 resets) in 212 ms. (187 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (84 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (88 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (53 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (84 resets) in 265 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (92 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 411131 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=136 ) properties seen :5 out of 11
Probabilistic random walk after 411131 steps, saw 65539 distinct states, run finished after 3014 ms. (steps per millisecond=136 ) properties seen :5
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 381 cols
[2025-05-30 04:10:32] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 202/290 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/298 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/376 variables, 39/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 328/704 variables, 376/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 0/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 6/710 variables, 5/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/710 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/710 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 710/710 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved in 3813 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 49/49 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 202/289 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 187 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 211 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 208 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 222 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 173 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 187 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 153 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 179 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 19/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 228 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 171 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 160 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 185 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 158 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 166 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 156 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 146 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 155 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 151 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 151 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 147 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 147 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 146 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 213 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 133 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 170 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 154 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 163 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 168 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 172 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 162 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 152 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 209 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 128 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 136 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 132 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 131 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 131 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 138 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 122 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 120 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 136 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 140 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 126 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 152 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 140 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 148 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 140 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 149 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 142 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 124 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 149 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 156 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 146 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 125 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 135 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 134 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 170 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 144 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 150 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 141 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 48954ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 69 out of 381 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 329/329 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 381 transition count 317
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 369 transition count 313
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 365 transition count 313
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 365 transition count 267
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 312 transition count 267
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 292 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 292 transition count 247
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 255 transition count 210
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 254 transition count 214
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 254 transition count 213
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 254 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 253 transition count 212
Applied a total of 254 rules in 139 ms. Remains 253 /381 variables (removed 128) and now considering 212/329 (removed 117) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 253/381 places, 212/329 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1115 resets) in 479 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (206 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (204 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (143 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (209 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 542694 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=180 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 542694 steps, saw 84825 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=180 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 253 cols
[2025-05-30 04:11:25] [INFO ] Computed 81 invariants in 8 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 121/190 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/243 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/455 variables, 243/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 10/465 variables, 10/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/465 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 465/465 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 48/48 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 33/33 constraints, State Equation: 253/253 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 121/190 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 6/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 53/243 variables, 33/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 212/455 variables, 243/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 5/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 4/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 1/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 141 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 2/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 1/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09 is UNSAT
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SMT_REFINEMENT
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 10/465 variables, 10/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 3/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 2/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 184 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 186 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 2/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 138 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 04:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 3/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/465 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 465/465 variables, and 435 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 12783 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 48/48 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 33/33 constraints, State Equation: 253/253 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 14176ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARIKH_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARIKH_WALK
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 287 ms.
Support contains 23 out of 253 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 212/212 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 763 edges and 253 vertex of which 252 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 252 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 248 transition count 207
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 248 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 215 transition count 181
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 210 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 210 transition count 176
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 188 transition count 155
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 188 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 187 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 186 transition count 154
Applied a total of 124 rules in 59 ms. Remains 186 /253 variables (removed 67) and now considering 154/212 (removed 58) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 186/253 places, 154/212 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2467 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (572 resets) in 163 ms. (243 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1009591 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 2772 ms. (steps per millisecond=364 )
Probabilistic random walk after 1009591 steps, saw 161987 distinct states, run finished after 2778 ms. (steps per millisecond=363 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 83127 ms.

BK_STOP 1748578302861

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ ReachabilityFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is ReachabilityFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813300087"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-11.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;