Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200066.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200066
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748562438928

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-09
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 206 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Transformed 403 places.
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Transformed 374 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 23:47:21] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 403 places and 374 transitions and 1148 arcs in 437 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 31 ms.
Support contains 129 out of 403 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 403/403 places, 374/374 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 402 transition count 374
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 367 transition count 339
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 367 transition count 339
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 357 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 357 transition count 329
Applied a total of 91 rules in 172 ms. Remains 357 /403 variables (removed 46) and now considering 329/374 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 357 cols
[2025-05-29 23:47:22] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 69 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 720 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:47:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 665 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1453 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 36/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 376 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 295 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 262 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 313 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 276 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 289 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 263 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 269 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 242 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 275 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 255 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 253 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 164 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 179 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 162 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 181 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 288 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 302 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 287 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 314 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 300 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 299 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 308 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 318 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 259 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 306 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 298 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 297 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 276 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 292 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 297 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 301 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 328 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 284 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 302 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 299 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 303 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 292 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 278 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 292 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 312 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30253ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30285ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 357/403 places, 329/374 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31944 ms. Remains : 357/403 places, 329/374 transitions.
Support contains 129 out of 357 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
Support contains 127 out of 357 places (down from 129) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (412 resets) in 2223 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 23/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
[2025-05-29 23:47:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 216/266 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 168 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 165 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 207 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 199 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 195 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 198 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 178 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 10/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/296 variables, 8/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 58/354 variables, 27/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 295 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 318 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 291 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 304 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 309 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 296 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 284 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5195ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 15 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 34 out of 357 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 157 edges and 357 vertex of which 7 / 357 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 5 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 788 edges and 351 vertex of which 350 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 350 transition count 280
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 310 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 308 transition count 278
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 308 transition count 223
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 6 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 223 transition count 200
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 223 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 220 transition count 198
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 157 transition count 137
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 156 transition count 140
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 156 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 154 transition count 138
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 154 transition count 138
Applied a total of 388 rules in 200 ms. Remains 154 /357 variables (removed 203) and now considering 138/329 (removed 191) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 200 ms. Remains : 154/357 places, 138/329 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1318 resets) in 882 ms. (45 steps per ms) remains 7/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (486 resets) in 247 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (336 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (421 resets) in 266 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (382 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (464 resets) in 235 ms. (169 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (420 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (402 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 154 cols
[2025-05-29 23:48:01] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/101 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/123 variables, 16/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/152 variables, 17/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 138/291 variables, 153/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 10/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 4/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp57 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/292 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved in 1322 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/48 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 71/119 variables, 33/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 33/152 variables, 17/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/292 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved in 316 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/7 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1668ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 15 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 357 places (down from 88) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 217 stabilizing places and 219 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 796 edges and 357 vertex of which 356 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.14 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 328 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 328 transition count 300
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 321 transition count 293
Applied a total of 72 rules in 67 ms. Remains 321 /357 variables (removed 36) and now considering 293/329 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 321 cols
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 392 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 605 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1001 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 35/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 281 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 257 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 239 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 238 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 273 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 227 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 258 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 251 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 261 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 225 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 211 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 219 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 227 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 257 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 265 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 285 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 265 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 218 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 261 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 295 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 282 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 296 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 291 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 251 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 274 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 236 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 289 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 195 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 176 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 179 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 170 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30129ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 21 dead transitions in 30139ms
Found 21 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 21 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 21 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 321/357 places, 272/329 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 320 transition count 272
Applied a total of 1 rules in 19 ms. Remains 320 /321 variables (removed 1) and now considering 272/272 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 320 cols
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 353 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 643 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 998 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 320/357 places, 272/329 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32227 ms. Remains : 320/357 places, 272/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17058815547141462143.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6211158240238454049.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17058815547141462143.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6211158240238454049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10344919513311175878.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10344919513311175878.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10344919513311175878.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10344919513311175878.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10344919513311175878.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 140 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8071568383293773042.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11732763573867578662.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8071568383293773042.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11732763573867578662.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.05371e+18,4.28331,92888,3875,40,149175,515,813,308030,60,1417,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((AX((((((i14.i0.u34.p111==1)&&(i8.i2.u80.p260==1))&&((i14.i0.u29.p336==1)&&(i13.i1.u74.p233==1)))||(i1.u2.p8==1))||(((i8.i1.u30.p99==...460
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,!((!(EX(!((((((i14.i0.u34.p111==1)&&(i8.i2.u80.p260==1))&&((i14.i0.u29.p336==1)&&(i13.i1.u74.p233...524
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t7, t8, t10, t139, t157, t165, t169, t175, t185, t212, t252, t255, t262, t263, t264, t267...903
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 328 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 328 transition count 300
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 321 transition count 293
Applied a total of 72 rules in 19 ms. Remains 321 /357 variables (removed 36) and now considering 293/329 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 321 cols
[2025-05-29 23:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:49:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 939 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1319 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:49:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 245 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 267 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 271 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 231 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 226 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 236 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 255 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 260 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 236 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 270 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 247 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 221 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 199 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 185 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 230 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 217 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 206 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 206 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 198 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 195 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/614 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/321 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 162 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 263 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 315 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 319 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 267 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 273 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 264 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 232 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 245 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 187 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD271 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 242 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 235 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 207 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 206 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 206 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 201 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 197 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 194 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 264 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 257 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD270 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 238 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 241 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 266 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 266 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 239 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 263 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 121 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 154 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 242 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 261 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 131 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 202 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 248 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60277ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 21 dead transitions in 60280ms
Found 21 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 21 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 21 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 321/357 places, 272/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 321 /321 variables (removed 0) and now considering 272/272 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61630 ms. Remains : 321/357 places, 272/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16782679518119123567.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5351993084736571301.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16782679518119123567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5351993084736571301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17906118597027153826.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17906118597027153826.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17906118597027153826.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17906118597027153826.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17906118597027153826.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 129 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9026581437183591860.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6316680006556312053.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9026581437183591860.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6316680006556312053.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07296e+18,20.4289,428388,17941,39,800252,456,831,1.28527e+06,58,1431,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 327 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 327 transition count 299
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 319 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 319 transition count 291
Applied a total of 76 rules in 20 ms. Remains 319 /357 variables (removed 38) and now considering 291/329 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 319 cols
[2025-05-29 23:51:38] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 238 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 607 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 846 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 290 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 268 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 259 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 274 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 299 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 234 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 277 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 268 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 266 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 238 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 241 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 264 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 260 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 204 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 257 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 276 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 254 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 269 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 264 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 295 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 281 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 273 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/610 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/319 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 290/290 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 239 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 358 ms of which 156 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 250 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 239 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 268 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 266 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 196 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 282 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 286 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 214 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 273 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 255 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 277 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 243 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 255 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 251 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 260 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 271 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 211 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 235 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 241 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 240 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 254 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 260 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 189 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 160 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 197 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 184 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 185 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 194 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 257 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 267 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 249 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 218 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 264 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 248 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 255 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 319/610 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 272 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/319 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/290 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60081ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 60082ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 319/357 places, 273/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 319 /319 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60960 ms. Remains : 319/357 places, 273/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability179719075051992692.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17553717708141623671.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability179719075051992692.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17553717708141623671.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6333609944902698325.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6333609944902698325.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6333609944902698325.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6333609944902698325.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6333609944902698325.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 149 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability784421069807240108.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8139438766036641627.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability784421069807240108.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8139438766036641627.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 328 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 328 transition count 300
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 320 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 320 transition count 292
Applied a total of 74 rules in 23 ms. Remains 320 /357 variables (removed 37) and now considering 292/329 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 292 rows 320 cols
[2025-05-29 23:53:40] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 866 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 291 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:53:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 35/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 242 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 243 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 254 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 224 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 194 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 209 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 190 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 210 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 441 ms of which 239 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 270 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 372 ms of which 159 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 307 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 287 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 280 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 286 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 276 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 265 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 234 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 228 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 227 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 223 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 233 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 238 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 250 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 238 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 241 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 223 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 220 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 242 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/612 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/320 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 35/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 203 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 264 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 250 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 261 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 244 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 268 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 287 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 313 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 361 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 228 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 212 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 239 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 219 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 233 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 261 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 300 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 295 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 192 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 212 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 245 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 229 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 234 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 200 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 185 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 271 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 208 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 196 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 220 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 214 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60215ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 27 solved, 264 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 27 dead transitions in 60217ms
Found 27 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 27 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 27 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 320/357 places, 265/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 320 /320 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61384 ms. Remains : 320/357 places, 265/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability474241965390717556.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10843087512532857170.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability474241965390717556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10843087512532857170.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18346135927150309723.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18346135927150309723.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18346135927150309723.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18346135927150309723.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18346135927150309723.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7313457386565813135.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7197647280946120971.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7313457386565813135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7197647280946120971.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07713e+18,9.49915,179836,8639,64,297973,1007,785,544463,76,2396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(A(EF(((i16.u66.p196==1)&&(i9.i1.u80.p266==1))) U AF((i2.u9.p24!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i2.u9.p24!=1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((i16.u66.p196==1)&&(i9.i1.u80.p266==1))...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t137, t155, t167, t173, t179, t211, t215, t246, t248, t255, t257, t260, i0.i0.t113, i...873
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 326 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 326 transition count 298
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 318 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 318 transition count 290
Applied a total of 78 rules in 17 ms. Remains 318 /357 variables (removed 39) and now considering 290/329 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 290 rows 318 cols
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 844 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 289 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:55:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/318 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 255 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 251 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 244 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 253 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 249 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 294 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 317 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 271 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 252 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 220 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 204 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 200 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 225 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 304 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 227 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 211 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 241 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 245 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 246 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 259 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 248 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 247 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 262 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 200 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 198 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 197 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 219 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 285 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 217 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 229 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 248 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 324 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 321 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 327 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 235 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 209 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 198 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30198ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 285 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30199ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 318/357 places, 286/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 318 /318 variables (removed 0) and now considering 286/286 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31332 ms. Remains : 318/357 places, 286/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 286 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3154835023208939601.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17801671219177390487.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3154835023208939601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17801671219177390487.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph440109391468971321.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph440109391468971321.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph440109391468971321.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph440109391468971321.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph440109391468971321.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 210 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13226573155788474781.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12608255221443045575.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13226573155788474781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12608255221443045575.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,1.88583,46964,3072,64,85303,973,849,146282,74,2108,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AG(AF((i13.i2.u82.p268==0))) + AF((i11.i1.u8.p21==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((i13.i2.u82.p268==0))))))) + !(EG(!((i11.i1.u8.p21==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t7, t8, t9, t10, t112, t136, t154, t166, t172, t178, t209, t213, t266, t267, t269...864
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 328 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 328 transition count 300
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 321 transition count 293
Applied a total of 72 rules in 17 ms. Remains 321 /357 variables (removed 36) and now considering 293/329 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 321 cols
[2025-05-29 23:57:13] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 325 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:57:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 981 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1308 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:57:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 260 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 267 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 248 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 272 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 261 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 239 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 237 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 211 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 194 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 271 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 277 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 282 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 269 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 241 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 250 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 254 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 254 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 243 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 244 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 267 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 275 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 287 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 292 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 265 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/614 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/321 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 144 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 183 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 199 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 201 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 266 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 261 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 235 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 252 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 281 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 272 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 263 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 300 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 266 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 236 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 231 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 367 ms of which 147 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 287 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 268 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 280 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 262 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 221 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 270 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 204 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 218 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 235 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 243 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 298 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 262 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 270 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 265 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 276 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 292 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 270 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 283 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 270 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 268 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 284 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 321 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 277 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 205 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 232 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 217 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 230 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 222 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 215 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 222 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 259 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 249 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 304 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60241ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 289 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 3 dead transitions in 60242ms
Found 3 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 3 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 3 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 321/357 places, 290/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 321 /321 variables (removed 0) and now considering 290/290 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61579 ms. Remains : 321/357 places, 290/329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 290 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17743968042822320176.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8158725932112941350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17743968042822320176.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8158725932112941350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13573847569821128829.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13573847569821128829.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13573847569821128829.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13573847569821128829.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13573847569821128829.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 211 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5219306904757719490.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14484545207708892875.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5219306904757719490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14484545207708892875.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 326 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 326 transition count 298
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 318 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 318 transition count 290
Applied a total of 78 rules in 17 ms. Remains 318 /357 variables (removed 39) and now considering 290/329 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 290 rows 318 cols
[2025-05-29 23:59:15] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:59:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 866 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 289 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:59:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/318 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 253 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 253 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 231 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 260 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 261 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 238 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 282 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 250 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 262 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 232 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 232 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 262 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 282 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 278 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 265 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 243 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 255 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 283 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 273 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/608 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/318 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 289/289 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/318 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 165 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 147 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 305 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 280 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 275 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 306 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 276 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 245 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 284 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 242 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 245 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 274 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 278 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 268 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 292 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 262 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 272 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 271 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 267 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 262 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 273 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 261 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 226 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 220 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 197 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 241 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 213 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 165 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 143 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 146 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 256 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 264 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 258 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 273 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 265 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 278 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 280 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 260 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 279 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 277 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 245 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 276 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 277 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 274 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 242 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 276 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 150 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 266 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 272 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 283 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 253 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 241 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 174 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 190 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 276 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/608 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 276 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/318 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/289 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60077ms problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 276 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 13 dead transitions in 60078ms
Found 13 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 13 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 13 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 318/357 places, 277/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 318 /318 variables (removed 0) and now considering 277/277 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61240 ms. Remains : 318/357 places, 277/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 277 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7288863926753690710.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13013260239541682057.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7288863926753690710.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13013260239541682057.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11581837180138125505.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11581837180138125505.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11581837180138125505.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11581837180138125505.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11581837180138125505.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 172 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:00:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15270317636416499951.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:00:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1355981133499511890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15270317636416499951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1355981133499511890.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 177 edges and 357 vertex of which 7 / 357 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 789 edges and 351 vertex of which 350 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 349 transition count 273
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 302 transition count 272
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 301 transition count 272
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 301 transition count 209
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 135 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 229 transition count 209
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 200 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 200 transition count 180
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 200 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 194 transition count 175
Performed 65 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 127 transition count 110
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 436 place count 126 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 125 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 124 transition count 108
Applied a total of 438 rules in 70 ms. Remains 124 /357 variables (removed 233) and now considering 108/329 (removed 221) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 10, 36, 39, 42, 43, 44]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 145 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/357 places, 108/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 115 /115 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 115/357 places, 108/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12170237456832279605.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability278670589121037985.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12170237456832279605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability278670589121037985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.0054e+07,0.712084,19800,2,6813,5,83266,6,0,569,51909,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((p140==1)&&(p129==1))&&((p220==1)&&(p344==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p140==1)&&(p129==1))&&((p220==1)&&(p344==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t20, t21, t22, t23, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t78, t79, t87, t94, t95, t96, t98, t99, t10...270
(forward)formula 0,0,16.5569,385044,1,0,192,2.47431e+06,200,84,4319,1.2154e+06,228
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 325 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 325 transition count 297
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 318 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 318 transition count 290
Applied a total of 78 rules in 16 ms. Remains 318 /357 variables (removed 39) and now considering 290/329 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 290 rows 318 cols
[2025-05-30 00:01:34] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:01:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 949 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 289 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:01:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/318 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 262 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 410 ms of which 185 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 287 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 295 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 279 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 298 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 272 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 287 ms of which 102 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 281 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 253 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 248 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 300 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 279 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 289 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 269 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 274 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 279 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 276 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 248 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 255 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 253 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 259 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 261 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 218 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 222 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 213 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 211 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 184 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30287ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 286 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 3 dead transitions in 30290ms
Found 3 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 3 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 3 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 318/357 places, 287/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 318 /318 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31527 ms. Remains : 318/357 places, 287/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4124922475369521846.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14687582805042503589.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4124922475369521846.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14687582805042503589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5034839735588528378.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5034839735588528378.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5034839735588528378.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5034839735588528378.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5034839735588528378.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 209 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3035610776373243920.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:02:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7753690919081194095.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3035610776373243920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7753690919081194095.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 328 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 328 transition count 300
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 320 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 320 transition count 292
Applied a total of 74 rules in 18 ms. Remains 320 /357 variables (removed 37) and now considering 292/329 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 292 rows 320 cols
[2025-05-30 00:03:05] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:03:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 790 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1050 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 291 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:03:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 246 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 282 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 270 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 274 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 275 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 302 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 335 ms of which 124 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 332 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 261 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 271 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 263 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 272 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 251 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 265 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 255 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 261 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 243 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 284 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 229 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 251 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 200 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 445 ms of which 224 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 270 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 257 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 230 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 225 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 276 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 216 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 220 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/612 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/320 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 196 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 222 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 217 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 200 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 226 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 249 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 245 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 258 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 250 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 250 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 219 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 240 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD270 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 203 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 248 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 262 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 250 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 241 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 263 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 250 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 255 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 230 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 247 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 353 ms of which 149 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 269 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 263 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 355 ms of which 147 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 291 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 265 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 240 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 253 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 243 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 378 ms of which 172 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 223 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 239 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 271 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 217 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 256 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 221 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 246 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 225 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 26 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 169 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 199 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 230 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 254 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60087ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 26 solved, 265 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 26 dead transitions in 60088ms
Found 26 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 26 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 26 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 320/357 places, 266/329 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 319 transition count 266
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 319 /320 variables (removed 1) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 319 cols
[2025-05-30 00:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 66 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 373 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:04:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 775 ms returned [76]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1150 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 318/357 places, 266/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 318 /318 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62326 ms. Remains : 318/357 places, 266/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14105541513871982584.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5042155115518788916.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14105541513871982584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5042155115518788916.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17850634990088177112.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17850634990088177112.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17850634990088177112.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17850634990088177112.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17850634990088177112.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 121 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4603680849680864038.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:04:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17063714827431660915.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4603680849680864038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17063714827431660915.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.15631e+18,20.5753,415284,22672,37,844404,555,753,1.2714e+06,57,1755,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 180 edges and 357 vertex of which 7 / 357 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 789 edges and 351 vertex of which 350 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 349 transition count 272
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 301 transition count 271
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 300 transition count 271
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 300 transition count 206
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 225 transition count 206
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 268 place count 197 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 197 transition count 178
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 197 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 191 transition count 173
Performed 66 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 123 transition count 107
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 122 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 121 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 120 transition count 105
Applied a total of 445 rules in 52 ms. Remains 120 /357 variables (removed 237) and now considering 105/329 (removed 224) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 120 cols
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 10, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/357 places, 105/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /110 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 110/357 places, 105/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6135448906021408493.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14958079723000809404.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6135448906021408493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14958079723000809404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96429e+06,2.32877,56552,2,12098,5,235292,6,0,546,217588,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p294==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p294==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t76, t77, t91, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97...268
(forward)formula 0,1,6.35693,143684,1,0,154,702897,194,65,4145,350854,186
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 325 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 325 transition count 297
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 80 rules in 18 ms. Remains 317 /357 variables (removed 40) and now considering 289/329 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-30 00:05:15] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 321 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:05:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 947 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:05:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 285 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 313 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 270 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 273 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 277 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 288 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 279 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 722 ms of which 498 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 142 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 314 ms of which 120 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 340 ms of which 141 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 272 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 272 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 243 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 230 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 265 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 259 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 177 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 259 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 235 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 218 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 214 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 209 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 200 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 265 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 237 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 276 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/606 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 288/288 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 277 unsolved
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 300 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 277 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 224 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 247 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 244 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 268 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 273 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 275 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 259 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 284 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 226 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 273 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 268 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 271 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 261 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 246 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 248 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 249 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 197 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 205 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 209 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 192 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 226 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 234 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 217 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 272 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 281 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 226 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 298 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 231 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 218 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 192 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 192 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 177 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 179 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 281 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 285 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 272 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 253 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 220 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 260 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 204 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 192 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 279 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 319 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 218 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 274 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 258 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/606 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 258 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/288 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 30 dead transitions in 60077ms
Found 30 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 30 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 30 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/357 places, 259/329 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 316 transition count 259
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 316 /317 variables (removed 1) and now considering 259/259 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-30 00:06:16] [INFO ] Computed 66 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:06:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 795 ms returned [77, 265]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1168 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 314/357 places, 259/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 314 /314 variables (removed 0) and now considering 259/259 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62552 ms. Remains : 314/357 places, 259/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7012248783387566582.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16555328858063449255.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7012248783387566582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16555328858063449255.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9924376965000073222.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9924376965000073222.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9924376965000073222.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9924376965000073222.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9924376965000073222.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1175532088851361890.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:06:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12142348524977905749.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1175532088851361890.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12142348524977905749.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 327 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 327 transition count 299
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 320 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 320 transition count 292
Applied a total of 74 rules in 16 ms. Remains 320 /357 variables (removed 37) and now considering 292/329 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 292 rows 320 cols
[2025-05-30 00:07:17] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:07:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 763 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1034 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 291 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:07:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 236 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 267 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 228 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 209 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 204 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 236 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 285 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 301 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 278 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 287 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 270 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 266 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 246 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 252 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 249 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 266 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 218 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 200 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 213 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 222 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 233 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 263 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 308 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 234 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 266 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 298 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 268 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 254 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 275 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 284 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30189ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 287 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30191ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 320/357 places, 288/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 320 /320 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31252 ms. Remains : 320/357 places, 288/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10317560704901773021.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:07:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18297049253839410577.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10317560704901773021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18297049253839410577.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3843124913039149176.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3843124913039149176.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3843124913039149176.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3843124913039149176.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3843124913039149176.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 210 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2690832470745277968.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 00:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4606373856766989348.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2690832470745277968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4606373856766989348.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.00651e+18,5.32948,117960,5290,64,217702,660,926,357373,76,1661,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(A(((i9.u57.p172!=1)&&(i8.u0.p2!=1)) U ((i11.u61.p182==1) * AX(((i15.i0.i0.u28.p96==1)&&(i15.i0.i0.u93.p340==1))))))) * !(A(EX(((((i...315
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((i11.u61.p182==1) * !(EX(!(((i15.i0.i0.u28.p96==1)&&(i15.i0.i0.u93.p340==1))))))))...663
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t7, t8, t9, t10, t114, t138, t156, t168, t174, t184, t211, t215, t269, t271, t278, t279, ...851
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 327 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 327 transition count 299
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 320 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 320 transition count 292
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 320 /357 variables (removed 37) and now considering 292/329 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 292 rows 320 cols
[2025-05-30 00:08:49] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:08:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 247 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:08:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 569 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 818 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 291 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 270 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 302 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 281 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 273 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 241 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 240 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 263 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 194 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 241 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 234 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 167 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 203 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 188 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 191 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 284 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 266 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 254 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 230 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 263 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 213 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 211 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 173 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 280 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 282 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 267 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 271 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 285 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 344 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30137ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 284 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30138ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 320/357 places, 285/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 320 /320 variables (removed 0) and now considering 285/285 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 30980 ms. Remains : 320/357 places, 285/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 285 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11557360204387560938.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17655820036203434584.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11557360204387560938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17655820036203434584.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17779670241871108121.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17779670241871108121.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17779670241871108121.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17779670241871108121.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17779670241871108121.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 192 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8316562282696227480.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:09:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2075712154701345545.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8316562282696227480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2075712154701345545.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 357/357 places, 329/329 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 326 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 326 transition count 298
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 319 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 319 transition count 291
Applied a total of 76 rules in 16 ms. Remains 319 /357 variables (removed 38) and now considering 291/329 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 319 cols
[2025-05-30 00:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 261 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 00:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 703 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 966 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 290 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:10:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 251 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 238 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 239 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 248 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 372 ms of which 168 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 257 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 338 ms of which 132 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 233 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 228 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 229 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 380 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 267 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 321 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 240 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 277 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 304 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 283 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 223 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 208 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 219 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 231 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 287 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 193 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 263 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 306 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 357 ms of which 142 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 214 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 263 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 221 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/610 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/319 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 290/290 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 283 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 137 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 216 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 387 ms of which 182 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 319 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 260 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 391 ms of which 187 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 249 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 317 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 266 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 239 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 283 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 244 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 265 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 275 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 251 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 256 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 251 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 208 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 214 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 224 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 208 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 195 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 218 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 196 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 193 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 198 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 261 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 283 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 227 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 235 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 220 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 234 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 233 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 242 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 239 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 201 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 165 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 225 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 279 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 304 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 304 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 282 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 236 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 293 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 234 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 189 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 194 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 317 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 301 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 283 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60083ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 282 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 8 dead transitions in 60085ms
Found 8 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 8 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 8 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 319/357 places, 283/329 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 319 /319 variables (removed 0) and now considering 283/283 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61076 ms. Remains : 319/357 places, 283/329 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 283 transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9323329332474011792.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17725895442426536868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9323329332474011792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17725895442426536868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11588419492871981278.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11588419492871981278.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11588419492871981278.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11588419492871981278.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11588419492871981278.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 194 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14366489256004386098.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9592218961478994811.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14366489256004386098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9592218961478994811.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.99404e+18,13.072,276816,15208,46,520783,448,823,820502,60,1216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8115519767227696002.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8115519767227696002.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8115519767227696002.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8115519767227696002.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8115519767227696002.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 193 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2401681973599696769.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 00:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2526643049597288914.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2401681973599696769.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2526643049597288914.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97119e+18,20.7064,346532,15071,114,573511,1028,908,1.06048e+06,102,3730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((AX((((((i5.u87.p111==1)&&(i5.u87.p260==1))&&((i5.u87.p336==1)&&(i12.u80.p233==1)))||(i1.u3.p8==1))||(((i13.u30.p99==1)&&(i13.u84.p24...433
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,!((!(EX(!((((((i5.u87.p111==1)&&(i5.u87.p260==1))&&((i5.u87.p336==1)&&(i12.u80.p233==1)))||(i1.u3...497
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t5, t8, t9, t10, t29, t30, t144, t168, t204, t210, t312, t319, t321, i0.u48.t159,...1122
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:40:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 309 ms
[2025-05-30 00:40:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:40:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:40:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 125 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 373 ms
[2025-05-30 00:40:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1661 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:40:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14614496035178362002.gal : 133 ms
[2025-05-30 00:40:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6399978903592923575.ctl : 69 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14614496035178362002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6399978903592923575.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200066"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-09.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-09 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;