Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200065.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200065
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748562076923

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-09
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 23:41:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 23:41:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 209 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Transformed 403 places.
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Transformed 374 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 403 places and 374 transitions and 1148 arcs in 587 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 30 ms.
Support contains 67 out of 403 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 403/403 places, 374/374 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 355 transition count 326
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 355 transition count 326
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 339 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 339 transition count 310
Applied a total of 128 rules in 188 ms. Remains 339 /403 variables (removed 64) and now considering 310/374 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 310 rows 339 cols
[2025-05-29 23:41:20] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 63 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 842 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:41:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 930 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1845 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 309 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/339 variables, 35/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 278 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 303 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 249 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 151 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 218 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 250 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 240 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 203 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 171 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 148 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 170 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 183 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 287 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 289 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 280 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 265 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 287 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 276 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 286 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 281 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 280 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 260 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 261 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 276 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 295 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 257 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 275 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 241 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 277 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 253 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 277 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 271 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 273 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 224 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 253 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 280 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 225 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 253 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 279 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 260 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30237ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 309 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30265ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 339/403 places, 310/374 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32341 ms. Remains : 339/403 places, 310/374 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 339 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:53] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 23:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 310 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 339 places (down from 67) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (416 resets) in 2556 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 0/31 properties
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 310 transitions.
Computed a total of 205 stabilizing places and 206 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 777 edges and 339 vertex of which 337 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.9 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 155 edges and 339 vertex of which 6 / 339 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 771 edges and 334 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 331 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 297 transition count 268
Performed 68 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 68 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 297 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 219 transition count 200
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 206 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 206 transition count 187
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 206 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 205 transition count 186
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 132 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 131 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 130 transition count 115
Applied a total of 389 rules in 123 ms. Remains 130 /339 variables (removed 209) and now considering 115/310 (removed 195) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 11, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 183 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/339 places, 115/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 115/115 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 316 ms. Remains : 120/339 places, 115/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16193983787332819306.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9292721494834447934.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16193983787332819306.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9292721494834447934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24586e+07,0.526734,18844,2,1974,5,101658,6,0,595,47559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(A(((p248==0)||((p47==1)&&(p319==1))) U EF((p337==0))))) + EF(AG((((p179==0)&&(p305==1))||(p217==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((((p179==0)&&(p305==1))||(p217==1)))))))),TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p337=...271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t8, t9, t10, t21, t25, t26, t27, t28, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t71, t83, t85, t86...302
(forward)formula 0,0,1.79182,52276,1,0,185,307426,226,79,4599,160318,217
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 41 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-29 23:41:56] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 412 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 716 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 264 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 210 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 267 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 146 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 143 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 194 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 281 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 197 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 148 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 136 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 184 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 252 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 218 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 249 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 720 ms of which 508 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 232 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 210 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 341 ms of which 123 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 348 ms of which 139 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 277 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 275 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 217 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 190 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 211 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 265 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 286 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 274 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 259 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 270 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/606 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 288/288 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 279 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 341 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 297 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 202 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 258 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 228 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 278 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 208 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 255 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 248 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 247 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 261 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 253 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 215 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 269 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 278 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 267 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 216 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 233 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 239 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 209 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 206 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 195 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 198 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 230 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 287 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 286 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 279 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 317 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 316 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 303 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 306 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 233 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 249 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 177 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 161 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/606 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 264 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/288 constraints, Known Traps: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60132ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 264 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60136ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 265/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 317 /317 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61326 ms. Remains : 317/339 places, 265/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15928331134872551488.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15055427763170528172.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15928331134872551488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15055427763170528172.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15382567206599355674.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15382567206599355674.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15382567206599355674.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15382567206599355674.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15382567206599355674.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 122 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17153900374661344137.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2925516433818486166.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17153900374661344137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2925516433818486166.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,1.97225,49700,3372,64,80457,1281,753,191888,65,2972,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AG((i16.u110.p399!=1))) * EF((i13.u61.p177==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((i16.u110.p399!=1)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i13.u61.p177==0))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t7, t8, t9, t111, t135, t153, t161, t165, t171, t181, t208, t212, t246, t248, t255, t...845
(forward)formula 0,0,10.2061,236708,1,0,455603,1627,4710,894077,324,4399,901051
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 322 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 322 transition count 294
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 319 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 319 transition count 291
Applied a total of 39 rules in 24 ms. Remains 319 /339 variables (removed 20) and now considering 291/310 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 319 cols
[2025-05-29 23:43:39] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 320 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:43:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 861 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 290 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:43:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 258 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 254 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 235 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 235 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 219 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 263 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 278 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 285 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 274 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 275 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 305 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 305 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 246 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 237 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 242 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 236 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 253 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 275 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 281 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 289 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 293 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 227 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 222 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 210 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 305 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 309 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 307 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 299 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 317 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 285 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 274 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 263 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 260 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 274 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30267ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30271ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 319/339 places, 287/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 319 /319 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31491 ms. Remains : 319/339 places, 287/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16058479045615539634.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality859323360893624657.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16058479045615539634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality859323360893624657.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6244695485236740238.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6244695485236740238.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6244695485236740238.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6244695485236740238.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6244695485236740238.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17250812417927467503.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10340428469882002211.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17250812417927467503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10340428469882002211.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95767e+18,4.09854,97556,5885,58,160243,645,816,403650,69,1588,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(E((((i14.u108.p395==0)||(i10.i0.u54.p166==1))||(i3.i1.u65.p200==1)) U EF((i13.u90.p337==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E((((i14.u108.p395==0)||(i10.i0.u54.p166==1))||(i3.i1.u65.p200==1)) U E(TRUE U (i13.u90.p337==...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t7, t8, t9, t10, t21, t113, t137, t155, t167, t173, t183, t210, t214, t268, t270, t27...862
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,14.89,320788,1,0,646112,834,5207,1.33572e+06,355,2523,1335900
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 160 edges and 339 vertex of which 6 / 339 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 333 transition count 267
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 297 transition count 267
Performed 68 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 68 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 297 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 220 transition count 199
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 203 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 203 transition count 182
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 203 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 202 transition count 181
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 126 transition count 108
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 126 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 125 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 124 transition count 107
Applied a total of 411 rules in 58 ms. Remains 124 /339 variables (removed 215) and now considering 107/310 (removed 203) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-29 23:44:55] [INFO ] Computed 52 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 10, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 97]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 140 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/339 places, 107/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 113 /113 variables (removed 0) and now considering 107/107 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 213 ms. Remains : 113/339 places, 107/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10008176115710390825.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 23:44:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9943025583311098712.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10008176115710390825.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9943025583311098712.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34381e+07,3.74112,97580,2,23141,5,426026,6,0,557,323744,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p167==0)&&((p89==0)||(p141==1))) U !(EG(((p194==0)||(p122==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p167==0)&&((p89==0)||(p141==1)))) * !(EG(((p194==0)||(p122==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t19, t20, t21, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t60, t70, t71, t84, t85, t86, t88, t90, t91, t92...267
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13036031939535196990.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13036031939535196990.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13036031939535196990.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13036031939535196990.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13036031939535196990.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 29 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2481539958232133311.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12150929689956106112.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2481539958232133311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12150929689956106112.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34381e+07,0.502575,20076,635,318,20231,2316,417,93568,164,17846,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((i1.u9.p167==0)&&((i5.u28.p89==0)||(i0.u8.p141==1))) U !(EG(((i2.i0.u11.p194==0)||(i6.u7.p122==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((i1.u9.p167==0)&&((i5.u28.p89==0)||(i0.u8.p141==1)))) * !(EG(((i2.i0.u11.p194==0)||(i6.u7.p122==1))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t19, t20, t21, t54, t55, t56, t57, t71, t80, t88, t90, t91, t95, i2.t93, i2.i0.t60, i2.i...298
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,5.37158,125548,1,0,142453,7719,1907,813540,1209,48470,265589
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 160 edges and 339 vertex of which 6 / 339 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 771 edges and 334 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 331 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 295 transition count 266
Performed 67 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 67 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 295 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 218 transition count 199
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 203 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 203 transition count 184
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 203 transition count 183
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 202 transition count 183
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 124 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 123 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 122 transition count 107
Applied a total of 405 rules in 39 ms. Remains 122 /339 variables (removed 217) and now considering 107/310 (removed 203) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 122 cols
[2025-05-29 23:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 10, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 272 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/339 places, 107/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 107/107 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 326 ms. Remains : 112/339 places, 107/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13899055918956315403.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15210963138807351308.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13899055918956315403.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15210963138807351308.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18278e+07,1.44016,34856,2,16242,5,142776,6,0,555,121436,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E((p216!=1) U EF((p273==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p216!=1)),TRUE) * (p273==1))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 105/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,1.9088,34856,1,0,7,142776,16,1,1223,121436,6
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 21 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-29 23:45:33] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:45:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 770 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1016 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:45:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 167 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 245 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 296 ms of which 98 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 208 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 249 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 271 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 702 ms of which 487 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 222 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 199 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 207 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 324 ms of which 121 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 336 ms of which 140 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 281 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 234 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 225 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 209 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 193 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 263 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 237 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 254 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 274 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 284 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 267 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 261 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 260 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 274 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/606 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 288/288 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 258 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 319 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 235 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 292 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 248 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 245 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 255 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 237 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 204 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 190 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 247 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 244 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 254 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 250 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 210 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 269 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 258 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 273 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 213 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 235 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 243 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 198 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 175 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 291 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 285 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 269 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 264 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 307 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 298 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 301 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 286 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 169 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 267 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 232 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 281 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 162 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 169 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 172 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 291 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 281 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60228ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 264 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60230ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 265/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 317 /317 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61285 ms. Remains : 317/339 places, 265/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4267495211640475340.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3289627907024637159.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4267495211640475340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3289627907024637159.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9543964699495735259.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9543964699495735259.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9543964699495735259.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9543964699495735259.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9543964699495735259.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 120 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13509074316195202771.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14225307891003710721.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13509074316195202771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14225307891003710721.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,4.45105,105412,3964,53,176435,567,818,397444,62,1435,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((i4.u20.p56==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i4.u20.p56==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t7, t9, t10, t135, t153, t165, t171, t181, t208, t212, t246, t248, t255, t256, t257, ...878
(forward)formula 0,1,11.8479,204228,1,0,366791,596,4831,799277,304,1688,702570
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 157 edges and 339 vertex of which 6 / 339 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 771 edges and 334 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 331 transition count 267
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 296 transition count 267
Performed 69 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 69 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 296 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 219 transition count 198
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 204 transition count 183
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 204 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 203 transition count 182
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 131 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 130 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 129 transition count 112
Applied a total of 393 rules in 34 ms. Remains 129 /339 variables (removed 210) and now considering 112/310 (removed 198) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 52 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [38, 43, 44, 45, 46, 101]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 152 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/339 places, 112/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 112/112 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 123/339 places, 112/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7096033804569787583.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2697729479322390232.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7096033804569787583.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2697729479322390232.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05771e+07,1.15946,33148,2,7847,5,164832,6,0,603,104720,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((p135==1) + AG(((p316==0)||((p217==0)&&(p345==1)))))) + (AF((p132==1)) * EG((p286==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(((p135==1) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p316==0)||((p217==0)&&(p345==1)))))))))))),!((p132==1)))] = ...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t6, t16, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t65, t68, t78, t79, t...308
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 109/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,16.5555,392752,1,0,356,2.63654e+06,232,173,4824,1.91048e+06,414
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 323 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 323 transition count 295
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 319 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 319 transition count 291
Applied a total of 39 rules in 23 ms. Remains 319 /339 variables (removed 20) and now considering 291/310 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 319 cols
[2025-05-29 23:47:34] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:47:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 780 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1057 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 290 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:47:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/319 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 205 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 243 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 230 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 246 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 221 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 251 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 287 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 283 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 270 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 280 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 284 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 288 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 202 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 255 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 246 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 260 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 225 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 289 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 243 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 278 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 208 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 199 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30079ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 266 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 30084ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 319/339 places, 267/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 319 /319 variables (removed 0) and now considering 267/267 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31175 ms. Remains : 319/339 places, 267/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 267 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3831759411750797851.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6774990845622703922.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3831759411750797851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6774990845622703922.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18179703479523331323.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18179703479523331323.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18179703479523331323.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18179703479523331323.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18179703479523331323.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 122 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6227071724458048767.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 23:48:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7628650314559783677.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6227071724458048767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7628650314559783677.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0507e+18,14.5227,233496,5082,47,311395,422,841,1.36075e+06,57,1184,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AX(FALSE) U !(EX((((i0.u44.p127==0)||(i12.i0.u70.p205==1))&&((i14.i0.u34.p98==0)||(i2.i1.u10.p27==1))))))) + (AX(EX((((i0.u4.p9==0)&...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!(!(EX((((i0.u44.p127==0)||(i12.i0.u70.p205==1))&&((i14.i0.u34.p98==0)||(i2.i1.u10.p27==1...896
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t7, t9, t10, t113, t137, t155, t163, t167, t173, t179, t210, t214, t247, t248, t250, ...894
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 16 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-29 23:49:05] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 274 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:49:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 911 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 293 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 262 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 324 ms of which 107 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 281 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 275 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 288 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 676 ms of which 460 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 168 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 322 ms of which 120 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 345 ms of which 142 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 255 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 283 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 209 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 176 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 170 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 270 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 261 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 282 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 270 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 242 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/606 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 288/288 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 60/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 287 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 263 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 242 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 241 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 275 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 186 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 188 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 187 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 197 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 227 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 249 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 271 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 193 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 192 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 202 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 197 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 289 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 282 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 273 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 225 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 237 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 190 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 184 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 295 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 280 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 281 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 270 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 278 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 251 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 255 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 263 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 260 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 265 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 262 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 227 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 165 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 187 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 266 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 261 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 272 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 267 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 211 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 257 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/606 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 257 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 0/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/288 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 257 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 31 dead transitions in 60091ms
Found 31 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 31 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 31 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 258/310 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 316 transition count 258
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 316 /317 variables (removed 1) and now considering 258/258 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 258 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Computed 68 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 340 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:50:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 717 ms returned [77, 265]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1060 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 314/339 places, 258/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 314 /314 variables (removed 0) and now considering 258/258 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62374 ms. Remains : 314/339 places, 258/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12913607717992258923.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality491588929833739516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12913607717992258923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality491588929833739516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15084117371437435431.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15084117371437435431.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15084117371437435431.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15084117371437435431.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15084117371437435431.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 93 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18012011020196312083.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1763758806352440418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18012011020196312083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1763758806352440418.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,2.22634,52008,3847,53,92381,973,719,159847,71,2039,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((i15.i0.u48.p146==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i15.i0.u48.p146==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t8, t10, t111, t135, t153, t165, t171, t181, t208, t212, t238, t239, t241, t248, t249...840
(forward)formula 0,1,7.69237,171816,1,0,353052,1181,4398,638724,343,2471,720690
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 17 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-29 23:50:46] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 352 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:50:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:50:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 960 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:50:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 291 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 262 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 260 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 318 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 268 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 272 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 627 ms of which 444 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 208 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 318 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 338 ms of which 141 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 277 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 263 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 223 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 204 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 266 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 242 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 269 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 263 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 271 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 260 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 258 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 263 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30222ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 30223ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 317 /317 variables (removed 0) and now considering 279/279 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31566 ms. Remains : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 279 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11224907465504589380.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5107961545448669466.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11224907465504589380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5107961545448669466.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15861879172694504919.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15861879172694504919.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15861879172694504919.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15861879172694504919.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15861879172694504919.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 187 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12831541580402181480.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16260936132688945456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12831541580402181480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16260936132688945456.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,4.39005,99268,3672,41,196247,453,827,297233,53,1294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EX((i6.i0.u110.p392==0))) U EX(AG(EF((i15.u84.p281==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i15.u84.p281==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i15.u84.p...269
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t111, t135, t153, t165, t177, t181, t208, t212, t259, t260, t262...843
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 16 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:52:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1017 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 282 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 271 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 295 ms of which 101 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 272 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 284 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 246 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 280 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 702 ms of which 508 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 143 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 327 ms of which 123 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 333 ms of which 143 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 272 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 281 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 216 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 194 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 232 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 253 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 257 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 279 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 261 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 273 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 206 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30230ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 30233ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 317 /317 variables (removed 0) and now considering 279/279 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31560 ms. Remains : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 279 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11732494523710568252.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 23:52:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4765315936472181845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11732494523710568252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4765315936472181845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1148249083711548056.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1148249083711548056.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1148249083711548056.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1148249083711548056.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1148249083711548056.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 184 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9688111457528319681.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6318058774349623064.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9688111457528319681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6318058774349623064.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,9.82222,236492,18370,53,511182,582,833,632175,58,1568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 325 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 325 transition count 297
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 323 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 323 transition count 295
Applied a total of 31 rules in 15 ms. Remains 323 /339 variables (removed 16) and now considering 295/310 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 323 cols
[2025-05-29 23:53:49] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 274 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:53:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:53:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 908 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:53:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/323 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 253 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 250 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 277 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 277 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 251 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 261 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 255 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 196 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 264 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 268 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 252 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 268 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 266 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 272 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 266 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 262 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 238 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 246 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 253 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 250 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 268 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 256 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 248 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 261 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 254 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30071ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 290 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30073ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 323/339 places, 291/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 323 /323 variables (removed 0) and now considering 291/291 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31282 ms. Remains : 323/339 places, 291/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 291 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18196222924677798480.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9049177707847768044.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18196222924677798480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9049177707847768044.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8056813302022528232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8056813302022528232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8056813302022528232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8056813302022528232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8056813302022528232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 215 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2646590415693216626.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 23:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4773347161853670295.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2646590415693216626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4773347161853670295.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 338 transition count 310
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 321 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 321 transition count 293
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 317 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 289
Applied a total of 43 rules in 16 ms. Remains 317 /339 variables (removed 22) and now considering 289/310 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 289 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-29 23:55:21] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 23:55:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 734 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1002 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:55:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 284 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 227 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 319 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 274 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 269 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 270 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 288 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 295 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 281 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 727 ms of which 513 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 226 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 322 ms of which 120 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 345 ms of which 146 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 272 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 283 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 251 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 267 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 217 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 191 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 262 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 250 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 266 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 267 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 261 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 263 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 278 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 255 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 272 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 265 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30250ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 278 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 30251ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 317 /317 variables (removed 0) and now considering 279/279 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31279 ms. Remains : 317/339 places, 279/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 279 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17667783375528773301.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9546512977856746518.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17667783375528773301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9546512977856746518.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7633736035793075375.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7633736035793075375.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7633736035793075375.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7633736035793075375.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7633736035793075375.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 181 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16938287732259091142.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12251498165642218228.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16938287732259091142.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12251498165642218228.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.95625e+18,15.5669,290868,14468,67,460999,1291,741,894914,69,2923,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 339/339 places, 310/310 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 162 edges and 339 vertex of which 6 / 339 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 771 edges and 334 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 331 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 295 transition count 266
Performed 69 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 69 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 295 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 217 transition count 197
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 200 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 200 transition count 180
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 200 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 199 transition count 179
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 123 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 122 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 121 transition count 105
Applied a total of 408 rules in 31 ms. Remains 121 /339 variables (removed 218) and now considering 105/310 (removed 205) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 121 cols
[2025-05-29 23:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 10, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 95]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/339 places, 105/310 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /110 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 204 ms. Remains : 110/339 places, 105/310 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4487013491630468000.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 23:56:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6929511594502272860.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4487013491630468000.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6929511594502272860.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.98733e+06,0.99135,33692,2,14284,5,138892,6,0,546,109711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p147==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p147==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t18, t19, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t60, t70, t71, t84, t85, t86, t88, t90, t91, t92...267
(forward)formula 0,0,7.27103,183832,1,0,159,940013,194,69,4089,503593,191
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-09-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13554293580908906438.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13554293580908906438.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13554293580908906438.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13554293580908906438.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13554293580908906438.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 229 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4066958645030385662.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 23:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16689393239251149651.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4066958645030385662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16689393239251149651.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.92719e+18,37.3658,530224,10174,117,716571,1093,997,1.20864e+06,72,5496,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AX(FALSE) U !(EX((((i2.u43.p127==0)||(i9.i1.u70.p205==1))&&((i12.i2.u32.p98==0)||(i9.i0.u11.p27==1))))))) + (AX(EX((((i2.u4.p9==0)&&...252
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!(!(EX((((i2.u43.p127==0)||(i9.i1.u70.p205==1))&&((i12.i2.u32.p98==0)||(i9.i0.u11.p27==1)...893
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t131, t155, t173, t186, t192, t202, t229, t233, t302, i0.i1...1056
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 129 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11068077768382880594.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 00:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16475197207670606357.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11068077768382880594.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16475197207670606357.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200065"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-09.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-09 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;