Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200057.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-08, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200057
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 440K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748557741121

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-08
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 22:29:03] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 22:29:03] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 177 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Transformed 393 places.
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Transformed 344 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 393 places and 344 transitions and 911 arcs in 368 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 24 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 10 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 13 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 373 transition count 331
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 322 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 322 transition count 280
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 298 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 298 transition count 256
Applied a total of 157 rules in 128 ms. Remains 298 /380 variables (removed 82) and now considering 256/331 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 256 rows 298 cols
[2025-05-29 22:29:04] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 31 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 661 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:29:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 746 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/298 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 193 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 187 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 200 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 178 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 208 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 183 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 204 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 279 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 262 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 194 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 228 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 228 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 199 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 219 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 195 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 190 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 198 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 200 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 19/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 256/554 variables, 298/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 173 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 554/554 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 30044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/298 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 44/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 182 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 181 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 6/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 197 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 256/554 variables, 298/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 255/659 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 216 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 152 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 210 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 193 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 200 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 192 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60193ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60288ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/380 places, 256/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61915 ms. Remains : 298/380 places, 256/331 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 298 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 256 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (336 resets) in 3125 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 11/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (59 resets) in 241 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (61 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 9/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (58 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 2/9 properties
[2025-05-29 22:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 39/43 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 225/268 variables, 47/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 227/495 variables, 268/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 43/538 variables, 18/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 4/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 16/554 variables, 12/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 0/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/554 variables, 0/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 554/554 variables, and 354 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1100 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 39/43 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 225/268 variables, 47/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/495 variables, 268/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 1/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 43/538 variables, 18/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 2/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 16/554 variables, 12/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/554 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 554/554 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 124 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 16 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 256 transitions.
Computed a total of 101 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 617 edges and 298 vertex of which 296 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.17 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 271 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 271 transition count 229
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 259 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 259 transition count 217
Applied a total of 78 rules in 57 ms. Remains 259 /298 variables (removed 39) and now considering 217/256 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 259 cols
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:30:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 844 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 167 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 145 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 167 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 160 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 209 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 6/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/476 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 28/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 216/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 7/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 1/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 476/476 variables, and 561 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60087ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61252 ms. Remains : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:31:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:31:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17551144483395130688.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16986500187993738968.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17551144483395130688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16986500187993738968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,9.71014,218848,2,43181,5,453369,6,0,1253,1.41302e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1704483978455901628.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1704483978455901628.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1704483978455901628.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1704483978455901628.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1704483978455901628.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 112 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3711464094474986311.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9462541467230051681.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3711464094474986311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9462541467230051681.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,11.5254,241780,11244,26,285085,290,511,1.01395e+06,36,630,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 279 transition count 238
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 279 transition count 237
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 270 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 270 transition count 228
Applied a total of 56 rules in 19 ms. Remains 270 /298 variables (removed 28) and now considering 228/256 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 270 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 821 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1035 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:32:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 169 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 159 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 160 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 190 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 5/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 228/498 variables, 270/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 7/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 498/498 variables, and 352 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 32/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 228/498 variables, 270/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 227/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 5/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 498/498 variables, and 590 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 270/298 places, 228/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61143 ms. Remains : 270/298 places, 228/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6000812665952675247.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1338014089952758935.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6000812665952675247.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1338014089952758935.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24618e+17,18.2186,415612,2,60104,5,776374,6,0,1308,2.78561e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((p70==0)&&(p337==1)) * EF((p99==0))) + (!(A((((p43==1)&&(p275==0)) * AX((p327==1))) U AX((p321==0)))) * (!(E(((p165==0)||(p93==1)) ...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p70==0)&&(p337==1))),TRUE) * (p99==0))] != FALSE + ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(!...600
(forward)formula 0,1,18.4038,415612,1,0,10,776374,10,2,2035,2.78561e+06,4
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 275 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 275 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 275 transition count 233
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 265 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 265 transition count 223
Applied a total of 66 rules in 32 ms. Remains 265 /298 variables (removed 33) and now considering 223/256 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 265 cols
[2025-05-29 22:33:32] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:33:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 750 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1006 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/265 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 163 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 151 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 187 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 163 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 6/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/488 variables, 265/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/488 variables, 7/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 488/488 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 265/265 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/265 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 33/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 223/488 variables, 265/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/488 variables, 222/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/488 variables, 5/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 488/488 variables, and 579 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 265/265 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 265/298 places, 223/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61109 ms. Remains : 265/298 places, 223/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality761139944567972409.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12697980246344949668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality761139944567972409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12697980246344949668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24416e+17,12.8539,269828,2,48549,5,535463,6,0,1283,1.72837e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14427959555595658493.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14427959555595658493.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14427959555595658493.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14427959555595658493.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14427959555595658493.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10968437045775694115.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18110489255351773199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10968437045775694115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18110489255351773199.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24416e+17,0.785137,20684,4034,25,28419,447,560,60538,38,960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((i9.u41.p147==0) U !(EG(EX(EX(TRUE))))) + (EF(((i6.i1.u61.p218==0)&&(i0.i2.u82.p321==1))) * E(((AF((i13.i1.u66.p234==1)) + (i5.u11.p30...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(i9.u41.p147==0)) * !(EG(EX(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((i6.i1.u61.p218==0)&&...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t110, t195, t202, t206, t208, t209, t213, t218, t220, t221, i0.i0.u40.t103, i0.i1.u38.t106, i...854
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 274 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 274 transition count 232
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 274 transition count 231
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 263 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 263 transition count 220
Applied a total of 71 rules in 16 ms. Remains 263 /298 variables (removed 35) and now considering 220/256 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 263 cols
[2025-05-29 22:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 675 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 846 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/263 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 174 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 153 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 145 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 143 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 220/483 variables, 263/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 184 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 7/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 483/483 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 263/263 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/263 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 29/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/483 variables, 263/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 219/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 6/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 483/483 variables, and 574 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 263/263 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 263/298 places, 220/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60926 ms. Remains : 263/298 places, 220/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5981377738328343729.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality51040835865977509.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5981377738328343729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality51040835865977509.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28065e+17,12.3495,263488,2,52621,5,540575,6,0,1269,1.68529e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8045002651875469167.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8045002651875469167.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8045002651875469167.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8045002651875469167.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8045002651875469167.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 3 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17638319043990553298.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17773471329043138608.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17638319043990553298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17773471329043138608.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28065e+17,6.46916,142656,15063,31,197612,308,510,560162,39,686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 271 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 271 transition count 229
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 259 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 259 transition count 217
Applied a total of 78 rules in 15 ms. Remains 259 /298 variables (removed 39) and now considering 217/256 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 259 cols
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 594 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 770 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 158 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 153 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 138 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 184 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 6/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/476 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 28/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 216/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 7/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 1/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 476/476 variables, and 561 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60833 ms. Remains : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13252975842051289203.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11920472492211158685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13252975842051289203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11920472492211158685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,9.50313,218976,2,43181,5,453369,6,0,1253,1.41302e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,9.52325,218976,1,0,6,453369,7,1,1518,1.41302e+06,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 10 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 289 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 244 transition count 201
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 244 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 182 transition count 149
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 159 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 158 transition count 126
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 158 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 156 transition count 124
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 84 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 83 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 82 transition count 52
Applied a total of 402 rules in 83 ms. Remains 82 /298 variables (removed 216) and now considering 52/256 (removed 204) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 82 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [1, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/298 places, 52/256 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 52/52 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 80/298 places, 52/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14998320678181531167.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1879449097908194745.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14998320678181531167.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1879449097908194745.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,189,0.026542,4400,2,392,5,2061,6,0,369,1833,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((p332==1)) * EF((p304==0))) * ((p323==0)||(p25==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (p332==1)) * E(TRUE U (p304==0))) * ((p323==0)||(p25==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t6, t49, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inters...176
(forward)formula 0,1,0.128425,7728,1,0,79,14652,132,55,2421,11395,127
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 289 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 244 transition count 201
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 244 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 182 transition count 149
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 159 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 158 transition count 126
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 158 transition count 125
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 157 transition count 125
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 83 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 82 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 81 transition count 52
Applied a total of 403 rules in 42 ms. Remains 81 /298 variables (removed 217) and now considering 52/256 (removed 204) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 81 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/298 places, 52/256 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 52/52 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 147 ms. Remains : 80/298 places, 52/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9986136564291188509.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10102942118774715188.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9986136564291188509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10102942118774715188.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,386,0.038882,4392,2,293,5,1881,6,0,368,1672,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(AG((p387==0))) + AF((((p172==0)||(p355==1)) * AG((p198==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p387==0))))))))),!((((p172==0)||(p355==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p198=...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t5, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inters...176
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.197993,7592,1,0,91,15269,138,71,2509,13442,158
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 164 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 289 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 245 transition count 202
Performed 53 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 53 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 245 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 53 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 181 transition count 149
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 157 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 156 transition count 125
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 156 transition count 123
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 154 transition count 123
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 81 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 80 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 79 transition count 51
Applied a total of 406 rules in 37 ms. Remains 79 /298 variables (removed 219) and now considering 51/256 (removed 205) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 79 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned [0, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 63]
Discarding 36 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 317 ms to find 36 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/298 places, 51/256 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 43 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 39 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 46
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 34 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 34 transition count 42
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 34 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 33 transition count 41
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 30 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 30 transition count 37
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 30 transition count 37
Applied a total of 31 rules in 10 ms. Remains 30 /43 variables (removed 13) and now considering 37/51 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 30 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 30/298 places, 37/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 439 ms. Remains : 30/298 places, 37/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18168961789243588967.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5279227295598133851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18168961789243588967.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5279227295598133851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,480,0.011399,3940,2,106,5,715,6,0,155,658,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((AF(((p226==0) * AF((p285==1)))) * (p30==1))) U !(AF(!((AG((p276==1)) * A(((p192==0)||(p221==1)) U (p192==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(((p226==0) * !(EG(!((p285==1)))))))) * (p30==1)))),!(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p276==1))...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t20, t24, t26, t32, t34, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (dest...196
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.133919,8420,1,0,257,25096,129,193,983,30718,360
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 271 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 271 transition count 229
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 259 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 259 transition count 217
Applied a total of 78 rules in 14 ms. Remains 259 /298 variables (removed 39) and now considering 217/256 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 259 cols
[2025-05-29 22:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 547 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 715 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 165 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 173 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 181 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 174 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 150 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 6/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/476 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 28/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 216/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 8/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60043ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60774 ms. Remains : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18234262388020680688.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality532960013317865415.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18234262388020680688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality532960013317865415.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,11.3984,218940,2,43181,5,453369,6,0,1253,1.41302e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16276898962207259497.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16276898962207259497.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16276898962207259497.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16276898962207259497.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16276898962207259497.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11810963817997503356.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13692795150190546793.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11810963817997503356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13692795150190546793.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,4.46518,89448,8686,25,113969,358,528,356672,36,857,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EG(((i16.u44.p155==0)||(i11.u71.p269==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(((i16.u44.p155==0)||(i11.u71.p269==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t106, t156, t189, t193, t196, t200, t204, t207, t212, t214, t215, i0.u36.t109, i1.i0.u32.t117...820
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 273 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 273 transition count 232
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 273 transition count 231
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 262 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 262 transition count 220
Applied a total of 72 rules in 23 ms. Remains 262 /298 variables (removed 36) and now considering 220/256 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 262 cols
[2025-05-29 22:40:48] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 626 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 879 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/262 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 5/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 220/482 variables, 262/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 5/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 482/482 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 262/262 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/262 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 30/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/482 variables, 262/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 219/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 5/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 2/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60054ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/298 places, 220/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60959 ms. Remains : 262/298 places, 220/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2582996654760459865.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:41:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2765735841598373677.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2582996654760459865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2765735841598373677.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17713e+17,10.1805,229976,2,45953,5,462819,6,0,1268,1.48796e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4933984964379408866.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4933984964379408866.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4933984964379408866.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4933984964379408866.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4933984964379408866.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2521869057018357994.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12202527385878005931.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2521869057018357994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12202527385878005931.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17713e+17,1.35421,31120,3260,25,44677,352,546,99811,38,802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(E(((i9.u30.p107==0)||(i8.i1.u76.p310==1)) U (i11.i1.u54.p198!=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(((i9.u30.p107==0)||(i8.i1.u76.p310==1)) U (i11.i1.u54.p198!=0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t109, t159, t191, t196, t200, t203, t205, t207, t210, t215, t217, t218, i0.i0.u38.t102, i0.i0...824
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 157 edges and 298 vertex of which 6 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 611 edges and 293 vertex of which 291 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 290 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 249 transition count 207
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 249 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 181 transition count 150
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 159 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 159 transition count 128
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 88 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 87 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 86 transition count 57
Applied a total of 396 rules in 39 ms. Remains 86 /298 variables (removed 212) and now considering 57/256 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned [7, 72]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/298 places, 57/256 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 84 /84 variables (removed 0) and now considering 57/57 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 84/298 places, 57/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5561260918728619051.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15278311576747422247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5561260918728619051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15278311576747422247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,492,0.064304,5056,2,681,5,3228,6,0,392,3596,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(E((AF(((p40==0)||(p112==1))) * (AF((p290==1)) + (p204==1))) U EG(((p333==0)||(p76==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E((!(EG(!(((p40==0)||(p112==1))))) * (!(EG(!((p290==1)))) + (p204==1))) U EG(((p333==0)|...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t8, t19, t29, t30, t31, t43, t45, t47, t56, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,0.563728,17096,1,0,254,69593,155,149,2565,62506,328
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 272 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 272 transition count 231
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 272 transition count 230
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 261 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 261 transition count 219
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 261 /298 variables (removed 37) and now considering 219/256 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 261 cols
[2025-05-29 22:42:50] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:42:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 513 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 677 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 218 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:42:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 170 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 219/480 variables, 261/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 6/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/480 variables, and 340 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 28/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 219/480 variables, 261/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 218/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 6/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 7/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/480 variables, and 571 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/298 places, 219/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60735 ms. Remains : 261/298 places, 219/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4119719957071775418.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:43:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8094942675291891665.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4119719957071775418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8094942675291891665.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19012e+17,9.21409,203516,2,43648,5,426976,6,0,1263,1.26842e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6474292187944508790.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6474292187944508790.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6474292187944508790.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6474292187944508790.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6474292187944508790.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7865581339399375609.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10254121425195482064.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7865581339399375609.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10254121425195482064.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19012e+17,2.77506,64420,5305,25,78309,295,535,248800,36,676,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(A(AG(((i17.u52.p176==0)||(i4.u12.p31==1))) U AX(((i3.u83.p339==0)||(i18.i1.u82.p329==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((i3.u83.p339==0)||(i18.i1.u82.p329==1)))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i17.u52...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t108, t191, t195, t198, t202, t205, t206, t209, t214, t216, t217, i0.i0.u40.t101, i0.i0.u74.t...827
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,16.7901,378532,1,0,649115,295,3812,1.38958e+06,193,767,1256282
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 297 transition count 256
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 271 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 271 transition count 229
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 259 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 259 transition count 217
Applied a total of 78 rules in 19 ms. Remains 259 /298 variables (removed 39) and now considering 217/256 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 259 cols
[2025-05-29 22:44:37] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:44:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 776 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1014 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:44:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 6/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 4/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/476 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 259/259 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/259 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 28/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/259 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 217/476 variables, 259/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 216/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 8/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60035ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61070 ms. Remains : 259/298 places, 217/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13241452612481768888.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9407681032527059576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13241452612481768888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9407681032527059576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,9.42894,218872,2,43181,5,453369,6,0,1253,1.41302e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11750113383524017401.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11750113383524017401.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11750113383524017401.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11750113383524017401.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11750113383524017401.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2998662789193767371.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16325902186313533775.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2998662789193767371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16325902186313533775.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.17415e+17,2.20026,51724,4648,24,70464,357,537,196200,36,759,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(EF(EX((i15.i1.u62.p232==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX((i15.i1.u62.p232==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t106, t156, t189, t193, t197, t200, t202, t203, t207, t212, t214, t215, i0.u71.t34, i0.u72.t3...813
(forward)formula 0,0,10.5371,256524,1,0,499307,398,3869,820555,180,1055,1232794
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 167 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 289 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 243 transition count 200
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 243 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 178 transition count 146
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 154 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 153 transition count 122
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 153 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 151 transition count 120
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 78 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 77 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 76 transition count 48
Applied a total of 412 rules in 27 ms. Remains 76 /298 variables (removed 222) and now considering 48/256 (removed 208) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 76 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 382 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/298 places, 48/256 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 38 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 32 transition count 42
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 26 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 26 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 26 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 23 transition count 33
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 23 transition count 32
Applied a total of 31 rules in 6 ms. Remains 23 /38 variables (removed 15) and now considering 32/48 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 23 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/298 places, 32/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 494 ms. Remains : 23/298 places, 32/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 27 steps (7 resets) in 5 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7373150170769309524.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14859178220851583094.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7373150170769309524.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14859178220851583094.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 168 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 289 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 243 transition count 200
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 243 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 178 transition count 146
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 153 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 152 transition count 121
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 152 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 150 transition count 119
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 79 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 78 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 77 transition count 49
Applied a total of 410 rules in 24 ms. Remains 77 /298 variables (removed 221) and now considering 49/256 (removed 207) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 77 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 220 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60]
Discarding 32 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 32 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/298 places, 49/256 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 45 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 38 transition count 42
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 33 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 33 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 33 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 32 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 32 transition count 35
Applied a total of 27 rules in 9 ms. Remains 32 /45 variables (removed 13) and now considering 35/49 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 32 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 32/298 places, 35/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 460 ms. Remains : 32/298 places, 35/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13006792525833943240.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16001828420666199771.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13006792525833943240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16001828420666199771.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 256/256 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 158 edges and 298 vertex of which 7 / 298 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 609 edges and 292 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 289 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 249 transition count 206
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 249 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 183 transition count 151
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 163 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 162 transition count 131
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 162 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 160 transition count 129
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 88 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 87 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 86 transition count 58
Applied a total of 392 rules in 25 ms. Remains 86 /298 variables (removed 212) and now considering 58/256 (removed 198) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 268 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/298 places, 58/256 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 63 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 58 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 51 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 51 transition count 46
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 51 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 48 transition count 43
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 47 transition count 42
Applied a total of 32 rules in 10 ms. Remains 47 /63 variables (removed 16) and now considering 42/58 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/298 places, 42/256 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 41
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 37 /37 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/42 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 37/298 places, 41/256 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 773 ms. Remains : 37/298 places, 41/256 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17307508511049354378.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9369774177950270318.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17307508511049354378.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9369774177950270318.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1220,0.03406,4380,2,216,5,1913,6,0,186,2076,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((p210==0)||(p358==1))||(((p120==0)||(p321==1))&&((p65==0)||(p85==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p210==0)||(p358==1))||(((p120==0)||(p321==1))&&((p65==0)||(p85==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t21, t23, t28, t30, t32, t38, t39, Intersection with reachable at e...220
(forward)formula 0,0,0.242755,8860,1,0,169,25985,109,124,1151,30765,182
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5303424405745754833.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5303424405745754833.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5303424405745754833.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5303424405745754833.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5303424405745754833.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5051952608768111150.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4759992316577747858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5051952608768111150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4759992316577747858.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.48079e+17,6.55896,127856,9740,44,179414,629,675,462285,52,2097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(EF(AX((i9.i1.u78.p256==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((i9.i1.u78.p256==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t228, t239, t251, i0.t131, i0.u41.t134, i1.u20.t178, i1.u32.t153, i2.u9.t200, i2.u9.t20...1172
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,1,587.557,3839876,1,0,4.56527e+06,751,3501,1.12792e+07,205,2446,1158343
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (E((i8.i0.u46.p147==0) U !(EG(EX(EX(TRUE))))) + (EF(((i14.i1.u69.p218==0)&&(i17.u94.p321==1))) * E(((AF((i11.i0.u74.p234==1)) + (i16.i0.u...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(i8.i0.u46.p147==0)) * !(EG(EX(EX(TRUE)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((i14.i1.u69.p218==...404
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 1,1,1359.34,4605316,1,0,4.62818e+06,774,2276,1.12792e+07,137,2506,2509711
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11856393077262616073.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 23:12:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1924689699531285426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11856393077262616073.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1924689699531285426.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.48079e+17,136.99,3254844,48090,990,2.10214e+06,2562,1010,3.91619e+07,358,17922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-08"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-08, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200057"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-08.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-08 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;