Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200052.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200052
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748557378801

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 151 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Transformed 386 places.
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Transformed 360 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 22:23:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 386 places and 360 transitions and 1110 arcs in 326 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 19 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 47 out of 386 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 386/386 places, 360/360 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 385 transition count 360
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 337 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 316 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 316 transition count 291
Applied a total of 139 rules in 135 ms. Remains 316 /386 variables (removed 70) and now considering 291/360 (removed 69) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-29 22:23:02] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 29 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 636 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:23:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 669 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1360 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 290 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:23:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 386 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 288 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 299 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 289 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 319 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 289 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 276 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 288 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 276 ms of which 86 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 174 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 176 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 179 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 164 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 290 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 332 ms of which 99 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 242 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 238 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 213 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 314 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 308 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 208 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 261 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 264 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 283 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 282 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 207 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 311 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 285 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 280 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 260 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 275 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 206 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 235 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 250 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30200ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 286 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30222ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 316/386 places, 287/360 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 48 ms. Remains 316 /316 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31807 ms. Remains : 316/386 places, 287/360 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 316 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 22:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 34 to 33
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (429 resets) in 1616 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 3/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (76 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (83 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (78 resets) in 222 ms. (179 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 287 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 100/109 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 113/222 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/313 variables, 29/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 275 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 221 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 285/598 variables, 313/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 231 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 0/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 5/603 variables, 3/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/603 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 603/603 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 3058 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/86 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 133/219 variables, 28/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/312 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 193 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 179 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 178 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 259 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 272 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 296 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 295 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 288 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 306 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 276 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 288 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 296 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 15/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 285/598 variables, 313/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 3/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 0/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 5/603 variables, 3/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/603 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 603/603 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 4397 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 7492ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 1069 steps, including 12 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=152 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 15 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 197 stabilizing places and 195 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 728 edges and 316 vertex of which 315 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.14 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(X(p0)) U p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 307 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 307 transition count 278
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 306 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 306 transition count 277
Applied a total of 20 rules in 30 ms. Remains 306 /316 variables (removed 10) and now considering 277/287 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 277 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-29 22:23:43] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 455 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:23:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 916 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1373 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 276 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:23:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 276 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 276 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 276 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 276 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 204 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 270 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 348 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 260 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 302 ms of which 113 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 247 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 265 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 330 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 248 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 340 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 287 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 276 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 225 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 238 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 232 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 219 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 206 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 196 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 188 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 205 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 230 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 223 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 211 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 203 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 190 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 275 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 220 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 215 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 282 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 233 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 231 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 225 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 200 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 188 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 306/583 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved in 30037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 276/276 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 229 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 201 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 272 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 244 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 287 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 191 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 238 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 166 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 272 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 283 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 190 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 167 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 157 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 150 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 181 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 179 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 182 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 177 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 178 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 306 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 251 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 263 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 249 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 272 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 191 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 178 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 204 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 197 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 298 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 273 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 172 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 152 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 153 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 242 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 32 solved, 244 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 306/583 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 244 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/276 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60141ms problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 244 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 32 dead transitions in 60145ms
Found 32 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 32 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 32 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 303 transition count 245
Applied a total of 3 rules in 20 ms. Remains 303 /306 variables (removed 3) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:24:44] [INFO ] Computed 67 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 430 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:24:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 686 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 303/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62691 ms. Remains : 303/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 521 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 534 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 233 ms.
Computed a total of 186 stabilizing places and 155 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 635 edges and 303 vertex of which 302 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Computed a total of 186 stabilizing places and 155 stable transitions
Detected a total of 186/303 stabilizing places and 155/245 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-00 finished in 64150 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 146 edges and 316 vertex of which 6 / 316 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 722 edges and 311 vertex of which 310 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 309 transition count 245
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 275 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 274 transition count 244
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 274 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 201 transition count 180
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 193 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 193 transition count 172
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 193 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 192 transition count 171
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 119 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 118 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 117 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 116 transition count 103
Applied a total of 374 rules in 98 ms. Remains 116 /316 variables (removed 200) and now considering 103/287 (removed 184) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-29 22:24:47] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned [40, 41, 42]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 156 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/316 places, 103/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 113 /113 variables (removed 0) and now considering 103/103 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 113/316 places, 103/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15715 reset in 397 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15797 reset in 670 ms.
Computed a total of 67 stabilizing places and 76 stable transitions
Computed a total of 67 stabilizing places and 76 stable transitions
Detected a total of 67/113 stabilizing places and 76/103 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 371 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6849 resets) in 738 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1851 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (2147 resets) in 227 ms. (175 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-29 22:24:49] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 30/32 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/82 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/86 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 98/184 variables, 86/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 30/214 variables, 26/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 13/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 215/216 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 48/53 variables, 10/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/82 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/86 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 98/184 variables, 86/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 30/214 variables, 26/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 13/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 215/216 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 270 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 551ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 526 steps, including 95 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 3 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 26 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-01 finished in 2836 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U G(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 146 edges and 316 vertex of which 6 / 316 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 722 edges and 311 vertex of which 310 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 309 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 274 transition count 244
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 274 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 201 transition count 180
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 194 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 194 transition count 173
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 194 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 193 transition count 172
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 117 transition count 99
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 116 transition count 102
Applied a total of 376 rules in 69 ms. Remains 116 /316 variables (removed 200) and now considering 102/287 (removed 185) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-29 22:24:50] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 278 ms returned [1, 2, 10, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 281 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/316 places, 102/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 369 ms. Remains : 106/316 places, 102/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[p0, true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 7826 steps with 1598 reset in 49 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-02 finished in 557 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||(p1 U (p2||G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 306 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 306 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 304 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 304 transition count 275
Applied a total of 24 rules in 28 ms. Remains 304 /316 variables (removed 12) and now considering 275/287 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 275 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:24:50] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 354 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:24:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:24:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 572 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 929 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 274 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:24:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 236 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 236 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 233 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 225 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 234 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 191 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 212 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 201 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 242 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 278 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 282 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 312 ms of which 103 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 268 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 302 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 239 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 249 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 224 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 173 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 266 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 245 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 267 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 216 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 232 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 207 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 199 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 195 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 294 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 281 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 269 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 263 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/579 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 274/274 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 58/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 208 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 206 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 205 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 246 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 216 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 287 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 280 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 326 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 248 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 243 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 232 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 262 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 279 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 219 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 215 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 251 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 220 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 287 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 290 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 278 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 287 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 261 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 239 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 260 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 300 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 281 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60256ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 15 dead transitions in 60260ms
Found 15 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 15 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 15 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/316 places, 260/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 303 transition count 260
Applied a total of 1 rules in 12 ms. Remains 303 /304 variables (removed 1) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 387 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:25:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 836 ms returned [251]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1225 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 302/316 places, 260/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 302 /302 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62466 ms. Remains : 302/316 places, 260/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 168 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 201 ms.
Computed a total of 185 stabilizing places and 170 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 672 edges and 302 vertex of which 301 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.11 ms
Computed a total of 185 stabilizing places and 170 stable transitions
Detected a total of 185/302 stabilizing places and 170/260 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 3/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 24 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-03 finished in 63084 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X(p0))) U (F(p1) U p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 306 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 306 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 304 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 304 transition count 275
Applied a total of 24 rules in 27 ms. Remains 304 /316 variables (removed 12) and now considering 275/287 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 275 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 389 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:25:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 867 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 274 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 250 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 221 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 219 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 273 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 203 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 212 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 263 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 243 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 247 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 237 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 233 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 218 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 258 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 258 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 278 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 194 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 195 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 205 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 184 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 200 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 240 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 241 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 232 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 232 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 235 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 258 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 218 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/579 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 274/274 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 247 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 354 ms of which 153 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 243 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 229 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 238 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 227 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 233 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 183 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 131 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 136 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 201 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 216 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 258 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 247 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 241 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 274 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 261 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 287 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 285 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 296 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 267 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 225 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 216 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 202 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 158 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 176 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 303 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 290 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 270 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 277 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 250 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 169 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 245 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 220 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 218 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 216 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 304/579 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 250 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/274 constraints, Known Traps: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60076ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 250 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60077ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/316 places, 251/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 303 transition count 251
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 303 /304 variables (removed 1) and now considering 251/251 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 251 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:26:55] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:26:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 823 ms returned [251, 252]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1196 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 301/316 places, 251/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 301 /301 variables (removed 0) and now considering 251/251 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62579 ms. Remains : 301/316 places, 251/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 387 ms :[(NOT p0), false, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 78 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-05 finished in 63001 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 305 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 305 transition count 276
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 303 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 303 transition count 274
Applied a total of 26 rules in 26 ms. Remains 303 /316 variables (removed 13) and now considering 274/287 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:26:56] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 385 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:26:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:26:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 870 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 273 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:26:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 203 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 200 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 208 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 239 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 214 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 271 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 250 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 237 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 221 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 226 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 212 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 217 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 222 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 222 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 220 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 210 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 246 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 217 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 209 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 138 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 152 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 275 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 224 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 192 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 161 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 146 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 135 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 153 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 145 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 157 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 152 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 162 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 218 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/577 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 273/273 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 69/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 197 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 239 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 238 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 223 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 246 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 263 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 247 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 227 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 203 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 238 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 196 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 224 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 229 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 215 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 216 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 198 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 234 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 219 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 222 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 221 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 259 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 281 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 284 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 213 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 206 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 136 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 157 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 150 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 143 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 150 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 163 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 222 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 157 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 146 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 201 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 259 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 279 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 294 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 132 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 214 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 233 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 201 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 204 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 160 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 146 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 224 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 231 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 191 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 303/577 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 252 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/273 constraints, Known Traps: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 21 dead transitions in 60077ms
Found 21 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 21 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 21 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/316 places, 253/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 302 transition count 253
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 302 /303 variables (removed 1) and now considering 253/253 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 253 rows 302 cols
[2025-05-29 22:27:58] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 354 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:27:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:27:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 677 ms returned [70, 250]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1033 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/316 places, 253/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 253/253 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62416 ms. Remains : 300/316 places, 253/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 275 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 513 ms.
Computed a total of 183 stabilizing places and 163 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 654 edges and 300 vertex of which 299 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Computed a total of 183 stabilizing places and 163 stable transitions
Detected a total of 183/300 stabilizing places and 163/253 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 77 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 7797 steps (87 resets) in 21 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 300 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 300/300 places, 253/253 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 253/253 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 253 rows 300 cols
[2025-05-29 22:28:00] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:28:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 494 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 717 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:28:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/300 variables, 30/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 190 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 191 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 198 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 194 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 196 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 167 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 198 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 189 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 196 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 190 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 166 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 144 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 228 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 224 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 231 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 204 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 206 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 192 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 197 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 192 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 196 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 197 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 200 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 198 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 200 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 202 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 203 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 300/553 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 0/300 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/300 variables, 30/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 145 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 122 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 199 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 204 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 194 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 184 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 180 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 219 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 214 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 224 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 205 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 199 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 193 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 193 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 216 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 206 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 207 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 213 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 209 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 190 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 189 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 209 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 225 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 191 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 200 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 199 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 214 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 209 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 207 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 207 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 214 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 218 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 195 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 188 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 197 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 189 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 186 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 211 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 212 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 195 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 205 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 216 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 189 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 212 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 204 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 205 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 193 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 183 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 225 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 186 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 193 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 201 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 202 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 205 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 200 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 197 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 193 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 225 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 238 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 214 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 200 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 199 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 169 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 192 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 214 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 184 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 178 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 213 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 211 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 215 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 217 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 214 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 220 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 204 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 228 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 208 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 300/553 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 0/300 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/252 constraints, Known Traps: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60778 ms. Remains : 300/300 places, 253/253 transitions.
Computed a total of 183 stabilizing places and 163 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 654 edges and 300 vertex of which 299 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Computed a total of 183 stabilizing places and 163 stable transitions
Detected a total of 183/300 stabilizing places and 163/253 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 196 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 5617 steps (60 resets) in 36 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 143 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 190 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 167 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 181 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 300 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 300/300 places, 253/253 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 132 edges and 300 vertex of which 6 / 300 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 648 edges and 295 vertex of which 294 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 294 transition count 246
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 294 transition count 275
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 294 transition count 275
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 285 transition count 258
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 285 transition count 258
Performed 92 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 157 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 285 transition count 258
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 262 transition count 235
Deduced a syphon composed of 134 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 262 transition count 235
Deduced a syphon composed of 134 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 232 rules in 96 ms. Remains 262 /300 variables (removed 38) and now considering 235/253 (removed 18) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 234 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 262 cols
[2025-05-29 22:29:03] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/262 variables, 31/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 207 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 205 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 201 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 194 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 205 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 188 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 189 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 189 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 192 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 201 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 189 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 166 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 166 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 93 solved, 141 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 211 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 204 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 192 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 137 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 193 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 199 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 205 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 207 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 202 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 191 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 207 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 209 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 202 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 199 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 203 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 138 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 198 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 201 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 174 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 194 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 161 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 195 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 200 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 198 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 190 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 16/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 144 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 188 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 150 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 178 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 196 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 199 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 193 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 192 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 14/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 146 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 146 solved, 88 unsolved
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 234/496 variables, 262/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/496 variables, 9/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 496/497 variables, and 422 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 262/262 constraints, ReadFeed: 9/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/217 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 90/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/261 variables, 29/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 210 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 210 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 196 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 198 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 207 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 203 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 202 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 198 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 204 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 204 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 214 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 210 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 213 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 196 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 196 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 221 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 213 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 211 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 204 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 209 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 203 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 192 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 206 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 234/495 variables, 261/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 9/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 68/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 216 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/495 variables, 5/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 495/497 variables, and 530 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 261/262 constraints, ReadFeed: 9/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/234 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60071ms problems are : Problem set: 166 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 166 dead transitions in 60073ms
Found 166 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 166 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 166 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/300 places, 69/253 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 474 edges and 262 vertex of which 128 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 134 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 134 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 20 places
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 108 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /262 variables (removed 154) and now considering 74/69 (removed -5) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/300 places, 74/253 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60197 ms. Remains : 108/300 places, 74/253 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7817503298153858443
[2025-05-29 22:30:03] [INFO ] Built C files in 20ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7817503298153858443
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7817503298153858443;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1081 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7817503298153858443;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 79 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7817503298153858443;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10869452824978607500.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 194 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-06 finished in 188363 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(G((X(G(p0))||(p1 U (G(p1)||(p1&&G(!p2))))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 305 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 305 transition count 276
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 303 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 303 transition count 274
Applied a total of 26 rules in 26 ms. Remains 303 /316 variables (removed 13) and now considering 274/287 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 376 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:30:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 806 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 273 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 209 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 230 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 213 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 275 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 255 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 223 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 233 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 215 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 274 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 247 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 250 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 225 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 161 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 198 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 217 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 235 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 234 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 233 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 209 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 184 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 240 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 231 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 229 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 202 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 280 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 251 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 255 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 224 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 240 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 216 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 233 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 236 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 221 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 215 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/577 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 273/273 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 123 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 167 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 161 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 174 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 280 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 288 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 284 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 253 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 200 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 201 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 268 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 224 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 195 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 457 ms of which 286 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 198 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 244 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 229 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 26 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 222 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 219 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 238 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 231 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 213 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 231 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 249 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 222 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 227 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 29 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 245 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 281 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 281 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 275 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 267 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 268 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 281 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 250 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 285 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 267 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 1)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 303/577 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 29 solved, 244 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/273 constraints, Known Traps: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 29 solved, 244 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 29 dead transitions in 60075ms
Found 29 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 29 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 29 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 300 transition count 245
Applied a total of 3 rules in 11 ms. Remains 300 /303 variables (removed 3) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 300 cols
[2025-05-29 22:31:06] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 340 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:31:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 527 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 869 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62166 ms. Remains : 300/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 464 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p1) p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3570 steps with 39 reset in 28 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-08 finished in 62696 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(p0) U X((p1&&X(X(F(((p2&&X(p3))||G(p3))))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 306 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 306 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 304 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 304 transition count 275
Applied a total of 24 rules in 24 ms. Remains 304 /316 variables (removed 12) and now considering 275/287 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 275 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:31:07] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 372 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:31:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 827 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 274 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:31:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 235 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 248 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 244 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 238 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 307 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 286 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 212 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 211 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 246 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 243 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 265 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 257 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 222 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 225 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 285 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 331 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 330 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 252 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 231 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 268 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 293 ms of which 97 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 244 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 231 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 197 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 249 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 289 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 238 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 223 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 166 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)timeout

org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/579 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 274/274 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 208 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 215 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 219 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 194 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 238 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 263 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 252 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 219 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 225 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 200 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 231 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 230 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 233 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 237 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 248 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 230 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 229 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 237 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 239 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 246 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 126 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 147 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 242 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 235 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 196 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 172 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 237 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 258 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 267 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 237 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 264 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 230 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 261 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 304/579 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 261 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/274 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 261 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 13 dead transitions in 60074ms
Found 13 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 13 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 13 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/316 places, 262/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 304 /304 variables (removed 0) and now considering 262/262 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61308 ms. Remains : 304/316 places, 262/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 410 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-09 finished in 61797 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(X(X(F(p1)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 728 edges and 316 vertex of which 315 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 314 transition count 254
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 283 transition count 252
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 281 transition count 252
Performed 67 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 67 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 281 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 205 transition count 185
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 197 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 197 transition count 177
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 197 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 196 transition count 176
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 120 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 120 transition count 102
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 119 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 118 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 117 transition count 104
Applied a total of 382 rules in 70 ms. Remains 117 /316 variables (removed 199) and now considering 104/287 (removed 183) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:09] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 215 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:32:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 455 ms returned [43, 65, 67, 73, 75]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 672 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/316 places, 104/287 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 112 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 111 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 110 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 110 transition count 101
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 107 transition count 98
Applied a total of 10 rules in 14 ms. Remains 107 /112 variables (removed 5) and now considering 98/104 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 107 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:32:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 363 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 587 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 107/316 places, 98/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1345 ms. Remains : 107/316 places, 98/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12854 reset in 364 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12928 reset in 401 ms.
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5180 resets) in 195 ms. (204 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1558 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 24/28 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 29/57 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/83 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/87 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 98/185 variables, 87/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 6/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 20/205 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 8/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/205 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 205/205 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/205 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/16 constraints, State Equation: 0/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 219ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0)), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-10 finished in 2916 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G((p0||F(p1)))||G(p2))))'
Support contains 7 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 306 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 306 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 304 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 304 transition count 275
Applied a total of 24 rules in 25 ms. Remains 304 /316 variables (removed 12) and now considering 275/287 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 275 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 369 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:32:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 864 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 274 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:32:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 394 ms of which 195 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 196 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 251 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 293 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 253 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 224 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 203 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 196 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 347 ms of which 161 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 308 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 266 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 283 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 230 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 210 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 189 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 231 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 283 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 253 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 283 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 264 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 183 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 252 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 291 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 238 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30122ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 266 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 8 dead transitions in 30124ms
Found 8 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 8 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 8 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/316 places, 267/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 304 /304 variables (removed 0) and now considering 267/267 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31394 ms. Remains : 304/316 places, 267/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 270 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1092 reset in 283 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1094 reset in 323 ms.
Computed a total of 187 stabilizing places and 177 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 696 edges and 304 vertex of which 303 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Computed a total of 187 stabilizing places and 177 stable transitions
Detected a total of 187/304 stabilizing places and 177/267 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 543 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 206 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (425 resets) in 293 ms. (136 steps per ms) remains 4/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (57 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (57 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 267 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:45] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 38/45 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 133/178 variables, 27/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/265 variables, 18/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 36/301 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 265/566 variables, 301/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/566 variables, 0/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/571 variables, 3/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/571 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 366 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 458 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
Problem apf3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 45/571 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 48 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/31 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 518ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR p2 p0 p1)), (G (OR p2 (NOT p0) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 1284 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 7 out of 304 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 304/304 places, 267/267 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 696 edges and 304 vertex of which 303 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 302 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 277 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 275 transition count 238
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 275 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 204 transition count 175
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 155 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 125 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 125 transition count 98
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 124 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 123 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 122 transition count 100
Applied a total of 349 rules in 45 ms. Remains 122 /304 variables (removed 182) and now considering 100/267 (removed 167) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 122 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:47] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned [40, 41, 42, 43]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/304 places, 100/267 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 266 ms. Remains : 118/304 places, 100/267 transitions.
Computed a total of 73 stabilizing places and 73 stable transitions
Computed a total of 73 stabilizing places and 73 stable transitions
Detected a total of 73/118 stabilizing places and 73/100 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 998 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3698 resets) in 257 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 1/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (837 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-29 22:32:49] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-29 22:32:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 34/41 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/61 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 32/93 variables, 18/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/97 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 100/197 variables, 97/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 21/218 variables, 21/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 10/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 184 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 41/218 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 227ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 p1), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR p0 p2 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 1996 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9133 reset in 357 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9068 reset in 407 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7782376597432649370
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 100 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 100 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 100 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:32:53] [INFO ] Built C files in 27ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7782376597432649370
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7782376597432649370;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 551 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7782376597432649370;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 33 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7782376597432649370;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1329197695062113108.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 7 out of 118 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 100/100 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned [68, 74, 76]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 387 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/118 places, 100/100 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 115 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 114 transition count 99
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 113 transition count 98
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 113 /115 variables (removed 2) and now considering 98/100 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 387 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 586 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/118 places, 98/100 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 983 ms. Remains : 113/118 places, 98/100 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3468724133662695254
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 98 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 98 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 98 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:33:09] [INFO ] Built C files in 15ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3468724133662695254
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3468724133662695254;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 544 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3468724133662695254;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 51 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3468724133662695254;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9606882742587997731.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-29 22:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL12607657072738680950.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL9520580961257816214.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL12607657072738680950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut4331153939405591632.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL9520580961257816214.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL9520580961257816214.prop.
Loaded 3 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut4331153939405591632.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t155.t157.t158.t2.t159, t152.t153.t3.t159, t149.t150.t4.t159, t145.t146.t5.t159, t135.t1...888
Computing Next relation with stutter on 141120 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL6366694023699386816.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL659401351970787596.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL6366694023699386816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL659401351970787596.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...274
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X((G(("(p238==0)")||(F("(((p125==0)||(p231==0))||(p351==0))"))))||(G("(((p128==0)||(p182==0))||(p331==0))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : X(F(!"(p238==0)" & G!"(((p125==0)||(p231==0))||(p351==0))") & F!"(((p128==0)||(p182==0))||(p331==0))")
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t155.t157.t158.t2.t159, t152.t153.t3.t159, t149.t150.t4.t159, t145.t146.t5.t159, t135.t1...889
Computing Next relation with stutter on 141120 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5701817013420728491.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5701817013420728491.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5701817013420728491.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5701817013420728491.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5701817013420728491.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL9594388181655068511.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7613415541800275808.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL9594388181655068511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7613415541800275808.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X((G(("(u16.p238==0)")||(F("(((i0.u4.p125==0)||(u15.p231==0))||(i7.u22.p351==0))"))))||(G("(((i0.u5.p128==0)||(i1.i0.u6.p182==0))||...178
Formula 0 simplified : X(F(!"(u16.p238==0)" & G!"(((i0.u4.p125==0)||(u15.p231==0))||(i7.u22.p351==0))") & F!"(((i0.u5.p128==0)||(i1.i0.u6.p182==0))||(i0.u2...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t155_t157_t158_t2_t159, t152_t153_t3_t159, t149_t150_t4_t159, t145_t146_t5_t159, t32_t34_t35_...766
Computing Next relation with stutter on 141120 deadlock states
12 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
13 transitions explored
7 items max in DFS search stack
110 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,1.14956,40856,1,0,43500,4275,1938,77208,1357,11990,92934
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-12 finished in 103514 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(G(p0))&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 144 edges and 316 vertex of which 6 / 316 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 722 edges and 311 vertex of which 310 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 309 transition count 245
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 275 transition count 245
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 275 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 202 transition count 181
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 196 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 196 transition count 175
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 196 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 195 transition count 174
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 119 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 118 transition count 104
Applied a total of 372 rules in 28 ms. Remains 118 /316 variables (removed 198) and now considering 104/287 (removed 183) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-29 22:33:56] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned [1, 2, 10, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 195 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/316 places, 104/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 108/316 places, 104/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20612 reset in 234 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20439 reset in 348 ms.
Computed a total of 68 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Computed a total of 68 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Detected a total of 68/108 stabilizing places and 78/104 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 147 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 1803 steps (399 resets) in 8 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 230 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 108 cols
[2025-05-29 22:33:57] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:33:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 22:33:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 418 ms returned [10, 33, 55, 57, 63, 65]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 624 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/108 places, 104/104 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 382 edges and 102 vertex of which 93 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 92 transition count 99
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 84 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 84 transition count 69
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 81 transition count 66
Applied a total of 25 rules in 8 ms. Remains 81 /102 variables (removed 21) and now considering 66/104 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 81 cols
[2025-05-29 22:33:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:33:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned [10, 11]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 173 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 79/108 places, 66/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 66/66 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 815 ms. Remains : 79/108 places, 66/104 transitions.
Computed a total of 39 stabilizing places and 40 stable transitions
Computed a total of 39 stabilizing places and 40 stable transitions
Detected a total of 39/79 stabilizing places and 40/66 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 234 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 7672 steps (1642 resets) in 44 ms. (170 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 362 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21046 reset in 308 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20957 reset in 349 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1106918423363329493
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 66 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 66 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 66 transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-29 22:34:00] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1106918423363329493
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1106918423363329493;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 378 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1106918423363329493;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 51 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1106918423363329493;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6190087474764342201.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 5295 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-13 finished in 10163 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(p0)||G((F(p0)||(F(p1) U p2)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 305 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 305 transition count 276
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 303 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 303 transition count 274
Applied a total of 26 rules in 14 ms. Remains 303 /316 variables (removed 13) and now considering 274/287 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 22:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 245 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 822 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1069 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 273 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:34:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 203 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 225 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 215 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 266 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 234 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 235 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 250 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 277 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 243 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 219 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 222 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 220 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 238 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 256 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 230 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 232 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 233 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 217 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 236 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 216 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 210 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 202 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 279 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 267 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 248 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 224 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 222 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 229 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 231 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 220 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 196 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/577 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 273/273 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 154 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 164 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 173 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 291 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 287 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 291 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 238 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 224 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 219 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 221 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 202 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 204 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 258 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 221 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 196 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 277 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 581 ms of which 359 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 240 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 289 ms of which 85 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 26 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 225 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 226 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 237 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 233 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 212 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 235 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 234 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 233 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 29 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 253 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 280 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 289 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 283 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 280 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 282 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 272 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 246 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 287 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 261 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60159ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 29 solved, 244 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 29 dead transitions in 60161ms
Found 29 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 29 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 29 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 300 transition count 245
Applied a total of 3 rules in 8 ms. Remains 300 /303 variables (removed 3) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 300 cols
[2025-05-29 22:35:07] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:35:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 692 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1025 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62278 ms. Remains : 300/316 places, 245/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 78 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-14 finished in 62509 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((X(F(p0))&&G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 316 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 316/316 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 307 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 307 transition count 278
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 305 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 305 transition count 276
Applied a total of 22 rules in 26 ms. Remains 305 /316 variables (removed 11) and now considering 276/287 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 22:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 364 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:35:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 886 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 275 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:35:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 232 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 264 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 297 ms of which 100 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 255 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 203 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 222 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 219 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 241 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 244 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 215 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 206 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 153 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 154 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 189 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 257 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 260 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 218 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 196 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 223 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 303 ms of which 111 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 246 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 254 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 205 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 204 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 274 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 172 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/581 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 275/275 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 266 unsolved
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 292 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 228 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 209 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 235 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 231 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 220 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 207 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 246 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 226 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 227 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 187 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 172 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 266 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 253 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 282 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 284 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 274 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 254 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 247 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 212 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 262 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 226 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 225 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 222 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 257 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 305/581 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 257 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/275 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 257 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 60075ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/316 places, 258/287 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 304 transition count 258
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 304 /305 variables (removed 1) and now considering 258/258 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 258 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 22:36:10] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 350 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 22:36:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 22:36:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 779 ms returned [69]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1130 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 303/316 places, 258/287 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 258/258 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62508 ms. Remains : 303/316 places, 258/287 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-07-LTLFireability-15 finished in 62780 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 790210 ms.

BK_STOP 1748558171583

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200052"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-07.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;