Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200050.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200050
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748553764746

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 225 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Transformed 386 places.
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Transformed 360 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 21:22:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 386 places and 360 transitions and 1110 arcs in 458 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 36 ms.
Support contains 138 out of 386 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 386/386 places, 360/360 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 385 transition count 360
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 346 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 346 transition count 321
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 333 transition count 308
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 333 transition count 308
Applied a total of 105 rules in 165 ms. Remains 333 /386 variables (removed 53) and now considering 308/360 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 333 cols
[2025-05-29 21:22:48] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 698 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:22:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 916 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1694 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 307 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 363 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 322 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 268 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 339 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 233 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 291 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 259 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 304 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 290 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 263 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 258 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 244 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 238 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 278 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 186 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 175 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 156 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 288 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 209 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 164 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 164 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 275 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 334 ms of which 112 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 286 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 296 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 278 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 263 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 318 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 320 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 292 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 313 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 305 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 302 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 197 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 295 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 276 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 275 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 261 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 274 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 278 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)timeout

(s42 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/641 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved in 30045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/333 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 307/307 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 50/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 239 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 277 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 290 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 226 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 267 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 268 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 289 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 271 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 268 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 259 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 299 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 289 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 287 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 287 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 267 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 263 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 274 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 284 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 276 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 284 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 279 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 335 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 292 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 249 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 253 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 268 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 281 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 271 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 276 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 265 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 268 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 266 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 243 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 280 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 252 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 260 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 250 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 286 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 265 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 235 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 238 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 233 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 229 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 257 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 251 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 267 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 264 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 272 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 228 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 271 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 263 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 267 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 265 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 260 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 242 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 273 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 310 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 275 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 290 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 356 ms of which 134 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 278 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 276 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 325 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 237 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60411ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 307 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60432ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 333/386 places, 308/360 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62328 ms. Remains : 333/386 places, 308/360 transitions.
Support contains 138 out of 333 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 21:23:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 114 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 308 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (430 resets) in 2636 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 22/96 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2025-05-29 21:23:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 175/234 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/257 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp88 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/331 variables, 29/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 307/638 variables, 331/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 210 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 298 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 184 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 177 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 152 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 154 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 151 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 178 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 232 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 291 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp91 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 239 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 230 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 261 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 231 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5154ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 48 out of 333 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 755 edges and 333 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 332 transition count 282
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 307 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 303 transition count 278
Performed 58 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 58 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 303 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 237 transition count 220
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 222 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 222 transition count 205
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 222 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 219 transition count 203
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 172 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 172 transition count 155
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 172 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 171 transition count 154
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 171 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 170 transition count 153
Applied a total of 324 rules in 124 ms. Remains 170 /333 variables (removed 163) and now considering 153/308 (removed 155) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 124 ms. Remains : 170/333 places, 153/308 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1382 resets) in 924 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 13/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (294 resets) in 546 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (287 resets) in 242 ms. (164 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (296 resets) in 202 ms. (197 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (294 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (276 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (308 resets) in 184 ms. (216 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (252 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (293 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (244 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (212 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (283 resets) in 166 ms. (239 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (279 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (292 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 170 cols
[2025-05-29 21:23:58] [INFO ] Computed 52 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 89/123 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/128 variables, 5/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/165 variables, 19/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 153/318 variables, 165/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp80 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp92 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/323 variables, 5/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 323/323 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 53/64 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 51/115 variables, 23/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 46/161 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 151/313 variables, 162/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 9/322 variables, 7/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 3/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/323 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 323/323 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved in 767 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/10 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1470ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 57 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=28 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 11 ms.
Successfully simplified 13 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 21:23:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 308 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 333 places (down from 98) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 208 stabilizing places and 210 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 755 edges and 333 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.13 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 287
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 306 transition count 281
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 306 transition count 281
Applied a total of 54 rules in 52 ms. Remains 306 /333 variables (removed 27) and now considering 281/308 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 281 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-29 21:24:00] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 337 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:24:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 641 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 980 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 280 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:24:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 222 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 223 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 228 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 285 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 275 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 213 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 217 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 207 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 253 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 260 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 198 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 206 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 195 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 202 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 190 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 187 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 202 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 258 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 209 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 234 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 213 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 203 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 198 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 199 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 197 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 192 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 315 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 269 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 253 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 254 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 231 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 209 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 223 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 209 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 210 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 210 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30283ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 273 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30287ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/333 places, 274/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 306 /306 variables (removed 0) and now considering 274/274 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31333 ms. Remains : 306/333 places, 274/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 274 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14940481818413513102.gal : 45 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7323493099818532762.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14940481818413513102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7323493099818532762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3027691037546945645.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3027691037546945645.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3027691037546945645.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3027691037546945645.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3027691037546945645.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 197 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7552972565278009226.gal : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8426376144890175158.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7552972565278009226.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8426376144890175158.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.50061e+17,6.47616,153800,5062,47,303823,590,817,457714,68,1631,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((i8.i0.u54.p159==0)) * EF((((AX((i14.u80.p265==1)) + (i14.u79.p283!=1)) + ((i4.i1.u69.p214==1)||(i3.i0.u82.p286==1))) + (((i15.i1....211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((i8.i0.u54.p159==0))))),TRUE) * !(EX(!((i14.u80.p265==1)))))] != FALSE...534
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t134, t152, t164, t170, t202, t206, t256, t257, t259, t266, i0.t...838
(forward)formula 0,1,12.0188,221384,1,0,497494,725,5745,715476,339,2277,1080345
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 310 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 310 transition count 285
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 304 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 304 transition count 279
Applied a total of 58 rules in 18 ms. Remains 304 /333 variables (removed 29) and now considering 279/308 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 620 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 989 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 278 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 255 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 215 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 245 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 263 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 227 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 222 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 202 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 229 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 274 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 206 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 242 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 232 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 219 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 204 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 312 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 285 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 280 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 287 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 262 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 268 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 231 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 256 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 235 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 226 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 248 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 240 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 277 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 280 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 259 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 276 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30297ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 268 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 30299ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/333 places, 269/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 304 /304 variables (removed 0) and now considering 269/269 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31317 ms. Remains : 304/333 places, 269/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 269 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11363811841865228031.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3955042686899376685.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11363811841865228031.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3955042686899376685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1028269408927656558.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1028269408927656558.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1028269408927656558.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1028269408927656558.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1028269408927656558.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 181 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11347339427338462730.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14809273778889194765.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11347339427338462730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14809273778889194765.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.36914e+17,7.91615,148692,12478,65,277028,666,876,492476,70,1753,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX((((u44.p135==0)&&(i13.i2.u65.p193==0)) + EF((i15.u81.p276==0)))) * EF((((i4.i0.u26.p95==1)&&(i4.i2.u76.p247==1))&&(i14.i1.u86.p36...231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((EY(Init) * ((i0.u43.p133==0)&&((i14.i0.u31.p102==0)||(i4.i1.u32.p105==0)))) * !(EX(!((((u44.p135==0)&&(...295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t108, t132, t150, t158, t162, t174, t200, t204, t251, t252, t254...830
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 287
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 308 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 308 transition count 283
Applied a total of 50 rules in 20 ms. Remains 308 /333 variables (removed 25) and now considering 283/308 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 283 rows 308 cols
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 359 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 861 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 282 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:26:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 259 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 264 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 340 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 259 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 277 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 225 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 211 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 260 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 267 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 271 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 269 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 270 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 250 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 222 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 215 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 271 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 248 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 265 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 274 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 206 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 293 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 227 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 199 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 183 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 176 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 244 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 235 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 275 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 308/591 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 282/282 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 217 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 232 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 223 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 242 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 234 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 273 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 25 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 289 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 237 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 259 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 273 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 187 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 229 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 229 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 230 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 235 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 228 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 234 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 164 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 262 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 261 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 276 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 256 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 271 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 156 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 291 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 260 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 308/591 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 246 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/282 constraints, Known Traps: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 246 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 36 dead transitions in 60091ms
Found 36 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 36 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 36 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 305 transition count 247
Applied a total of 3 rules in 11 ms. Remains 305 /308 variables (removed 3) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 21:27:47] [INFO ] Computed 67 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 361 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 713 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1076 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 305/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62424 ms. Remains : 305/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 247 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16814429622586400682.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18227101965467954946.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16814429622586400682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18227101965467954946.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6186565807605401822.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6186565807605401822.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6186565807605401822.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6186565807605401822.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6186565807605401822.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 66 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18132879349718298817.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4191148690685722908.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18132879349718298817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4191148690685722908.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23639e+17,28.8121,489448,53014,60,825595,1262,669,1.49423e+06,70,2746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 60 rules in 17 ms. Remains 303 /333 variables (removed 30) and now considering 278/308 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 252 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 845 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1099 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:28:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 266 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 274 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 238 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 225 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 326 ms of which 127 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 205 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 220 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 261 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 262 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 229 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 224 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 212 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 239 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 248 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 221 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 196 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 189 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 279 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 226 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 189 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 178 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 159 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 260 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 245 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 232 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 227 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 267 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 212 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 288 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 285 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 231 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 242 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30175ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30177ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/333 places, 271/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31304 ms. Remains : 303/333 places, 271/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16316690174330280455.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14322378173864930643.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16316690174330280455.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14322378173864930643.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5700335161042234699.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5700335161042234699.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5700335161042234699.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5700335161042234699.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5700335161042234699.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 195 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16229241158120158007.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9335277603523124976.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16229241158120158007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9335277603523124976.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 310 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 310 transition count 285
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 304 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 304 transition count 279
Applied a total of 58 rules in 18 ms. Remains 304 /333 variables (removed 29) and now considering 279/308 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 21:30:20] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:30:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 612 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 855 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 278 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:30:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 288 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 379 ms of which 185 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 303 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 264 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 302 ms of which 104 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 255 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 266 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 262 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 275 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 353 ms of which 138 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 266 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 209 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 191 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 268 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 189 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 195 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 179 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 291 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 204 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 249 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 259 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 265 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 264 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 248 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 220 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 224 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/583 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 278/278 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 201 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 264 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 284 ms of which 80 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 254 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 265 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 276 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 285 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 256 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 306 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 202 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 193 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 467 ms of which 242 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 232 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 287 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 299 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 285 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 284 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 294 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 288 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 243 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 267 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 264 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 289 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 281 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 246 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 271 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 207 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 181 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 274 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 245 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 235 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 238 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 378 ms of which 172 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 224 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 238 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 211 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 228 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 206 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 211 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 260 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60149ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 245 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 33 dead transitions in 60150ms
Found 33 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 33 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 33 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/333 places, 246/308 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 302 transition count 246
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 302 /304 variables (removed 2) and now considering 246/246 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 246 rows 302 cols
[2025-05-29 21:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 720 ms returned [252]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1092 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 301/333 places, 246/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 301 /301 variables (removed 0) and now considering 246/246 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62135 ms. Remains : 301/333 places, 246/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 246 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14162342888675085707.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9106009311678919132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14162342888675085707.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9106009311678919132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2683348703727760027.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2683348703727760027.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2683348703727760027.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2683348703727760027.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2683348703727760027.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12589270478801085154.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4615465239432689437.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12589270478801085154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4615465239432689437.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23707e+17,2.79162,74980,4042,35,136327,459,699,235505,61,1346,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(EF((i0.i0.u44.p138==1))) + (AX(FALSE) * (((i17.u87.p315==0) + E((i7.u38.p121==1) U (i14.u62.p184==1))) + (AF((i1.u81.p290==1)) * (...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(E(TRUE U (i0.i0.u44.p138==1)))))) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE * ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) ...459
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t132, t150, t162, t168, t200, t204, t228, t231, t238, t239, t240, i0.i0.u44.t119, i0.i1.u...817
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 287
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 308 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 308 transition count 283
Applied a total of 50 rules in 22 ms. Remains 308 /333 variables (removed 25) and now considering 283/308 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 283 rows 308 cols
[2025-05-29 21:32:23] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:32:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 743 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 994 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 282 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 275 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 257 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 291 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 260 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 253 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 273 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 262 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 273 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 240 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 206 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 254 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 233 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 259 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 233 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 259 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 323 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 256 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 217 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 197 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 230 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 217 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 242 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 188 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 217 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 236 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 257 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 266 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 233 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 244 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 224 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 308/591 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 282/282 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 232 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 264 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 273 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 274 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 276 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 258 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 271 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 279 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 259 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 221 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 204 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 233 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 229 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 276 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 235 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 272 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 263 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 255 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 279 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 276 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 281 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 269 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 268 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 327 ms of which 127 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 263 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 255 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 255 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 274 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 255 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 282 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 208 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 221 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 190 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 182 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 247 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 253 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 277 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 283 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 268 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 260 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 279 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 266 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 273 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 190 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 160 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 237 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 224 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 233 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 179 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 224 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 213 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 188 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 247 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 290 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60269ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 60270ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/333 places, 273/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 308 /308 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61298 ms. Remains : 308/333 places, 273/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7004619723077894480.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9527742381486768173.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7004619723077894480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9527742381486768173.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1632932553014579403.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1632932553014579403.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1632932553014579403.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1632932553014579403.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1632932553014579403.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 180 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12767059528108768072.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7442794424562408051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12767059528108768072.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7442794424562408051.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 151 edges and 333 vertex of which 7 / 333 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 326 transition count 263
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 289 transition count 262
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 288 transition count 262
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 288 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 222 transition count 203
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 206 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 206 transition count 187
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 206 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 202 transition count 184
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 141 transition count 125
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 141 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 140 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 139 transition count 124
Applied a total of 368 rules in 76 ms. Remains 139 /333 variables (removed 194) and now considering 124/308 (removed 184) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 139 cols
[2025-05-29 21:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned [12, 41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 113]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 273 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 131/333 places, 124/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 131 /131 variables (removed 0) and now considering 124/124 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 131/333 places, 124/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6389669908727078791.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12601800526678300044.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6389669908727078791.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12601800526678300044.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.72581e+07,2.66043,70824,2,18605,5,361240,6,0,646,232309,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AF(((p199==1)||(p194==1)))) U E(EG((p301!=1)) U (EF((((p79==1)||(p193==1)) * A((p338==1) U (p59==1)))) * (((EF((p313==1)) + A((p161=...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(EG((p301!=1)) U (E(TRUE U (((p79==1)||(p193==1)) * !((E(!((p59==1)) U (!((p338==1)) * !((p59=...1073
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t9, t11, t12, t16, t36, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t73, t...343
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1773049985035168429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1773049985035168429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1773049985035168429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1773049985035168429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1773049985035168429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 23 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12066027764436747279.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16102692372229961793.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12066027764436747279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16102692372229961793.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.72581e+07,2.10256,49464,1403,373,61095,5424,510,298506,165,23729,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AF(((i1.i0.u20.p199==1)||(i1.i2.u19.p194==1)))) U E(EG((i6.u33.p301!=1)) U (EF((((i3.u11.p79==1)||(i1.i1.u18.p193==1)) * A((i5.i1.u3...406
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(EG((i6.u33.p301!=1)) U (E(TRUE U (((i3.u11.p79==1)||(i1.i1.u18.p193==1)) * !((E(!((i0.i0.u7.p...1549
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t40, t41, t42, t43, t58, t59, t60, t61, t73, t84, t85, t87, t89, t93, t105, t106, t108, ...436
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 60 rules in 16 ms. Remains 303 /333 variables (removed 30) and now considering 278/308 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:35:25] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 240 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:35:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 776 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1022 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:35:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 165 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 171 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 179 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 178 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 267 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 250 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 346 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 159 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 163 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 172 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 179 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 184 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 184 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 170 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 276 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 182 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 262 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 175 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 158 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 164 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 285 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 228 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 209 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 172 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 172 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 250 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 222 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 214 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 217 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 225 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 282 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 197 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 165 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/581 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 277/277 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 248 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 246 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 253 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 283 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 260 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 262 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 239 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 223 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 207 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 187 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 203 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 142 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 273 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 201 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 195 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 259 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 256 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 220 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 205 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 211 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 183 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 220 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 266 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 236 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 25 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 208 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 211 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 211 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 235 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 173 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 215 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 161 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 176 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 212 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 216 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 226 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60094ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 31 dead transitions in 60095ms
Found 31 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 31 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 31 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 302 transition count 247
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 302 /303 variables (removed 1) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 302 cols
[2025-05-29 21:36:26] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 328 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:36:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 659 ms returned [251, 252]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 989 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62135 ms. Remains : 300/333 places, 247/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 247 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14260111300438753916.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6691049693790721883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14260111300438753916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6691049693790721883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3579573772624665134.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3579573772624665134.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3579573772624665134.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3579573772624665134.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3579573772624665134.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 91 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13188387660644157104.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2066152810044902512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13188387660644157104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2066152810044902512.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23627e+17,3.17317,75948,3313,53,142754,906,685,230218,68,1936,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX((E(!(((i1.u3.p6==1)||(i14.i1.u65.p189==1))) U A((i14.i1.u62.p178==1) U (i8.u32.p103==1))) + (i7.u22.p59==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(EY(Init)) * !((i7.u22.p59==1))) * !(E(!(((i1.u3.p6==1)||(i14.i1.u65.p189==1))) U !((E(!((i8.u32.p103==1)) ...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t7, t10, t131, t149, t161, t173, t199, t203, t229, t232, t239, t240, t241, i0.i0.u79.t53,...816
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 162 edges and 333 vertex of which 7 / 333 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 748 edges and 327 vertex of which 326 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 325 transition count 259
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 285 transition count 259
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 285 transition count 194
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 211 transition count 194
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 193 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 193 transition count 176
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 193 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 189 transition count 173
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 119 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 118 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 117 transition count 104
Applied a total of 404 rules in 49 ms. Remains 117 /333 variables (removed 216) and now considering 104/308 (removed 204) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2025-05-29 21:37:27] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned [0, 1, 9, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 171 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/333 places, 104/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 108/333 places, 104/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5957175616948951255.gal : 0 ms
RANDOM walk for 1940 steps (365 resets) in 26 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5696509932989511715.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5957175616948951255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5696509932989511715.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 755 edges and 333 vertex of which 332 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 331 transition count 270
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 295 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 293 transition count 268
Performed 70 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 70 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 293 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 214 transition count 198
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 194 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 194 transition count 178
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 194 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 190 transition count 175
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 120 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 119 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 118 transition count 106
Applied a total of 413 rules in 58 ms. Remains 118 /333 variables (removed 215) and now considering 106/308 (removed 202) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [0, 1, 9, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 173 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/333 places, 106/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 106/106 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 109/333 places, 106/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1173676307988267851.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4555715775700999234.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1173676307988267851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4555715775700999234.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.7079e+06,2.01374,43352,2,10351,5,164341,6,0,544,193604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p351==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p351==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/0/23
(forward)formula 0,0,4.77025,82072,1,0,9,405471,19,3,3228,193604,8
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 159 edges and 333 vertex of which 7 / 333 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 748 edges and 327 vertex of which 326 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 325 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 287 transition count 261
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 287 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 213 transition count 196
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 196 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 196 transition count 179
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 196 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 192 transition count 176
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 122 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 121 transition count 107
Applied a total of 397 rules in 43 ms. Remains 121 /333 variables (removed 212) and now considering 107/308 (removed 201) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 121 cols
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned [0, 1, 9, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/333 places, 107/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 107/107 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 291 ms. Remains : 112/333 places, 107/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3349463643494858423.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15800614885121083267.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3349463643494858423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15800614885121083267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35168e+07,2.96602,72920,2,8926,5,351671,6,0,556,264218,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(!(A((p338!=1) U (p156==1)))) U (p56==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(!((E(!((p156==1)) U (!((p338!=1)) * !((p156==1)))) + EG(!((p156==1)))))))) * (p56==1))] != FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t17, t20, t21, t22, t23, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t74, t75, t90, t91, t93, t94, t95, ...270
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9161618066712879126.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9161618066712879126.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9161618066712879126.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9161618066712879126.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9161618066712879126.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 141 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 19 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11673547695240396062.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7095520390594860089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11673547695240396062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7095520390594860089.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35168e+07,3.75991,91028,782,143,93038,6743,376,619483,113,45474,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(!(A((i6.i2.u33.p338!=1) U (i3.u14.p156==1)))) U (i1.u3.p56==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(!((E(!((i3.u14.p156==1)) U (!((i6.i2.u33.p338!=1)) * !((i3.u14.p156==1)))) + EG(!((i3.u14.p156=...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, t22, t23, t49, t50, t51, t52, t74, t90, t93, t94, t95, t96, i1.t6, i6.t99, i6.t97, ...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 60 rules in 15 ms. Remains 303 /333 variables (removed 30) and now considering 278/308 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:38:33] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:38:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 929 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:38:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 263 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 272 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 259 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 249 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 335 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 218 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 238 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 258 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 268 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 241 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 208 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 198 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 186 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 289 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 231 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 207 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 177 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 275 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 236 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 232 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 212 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 223 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 277 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 206 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 263 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 293 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 282 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/581 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 277/277 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 163 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 157 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 293 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 300 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 280 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 278 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 252 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 210 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 227 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 216 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 220 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 208 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 248 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 244 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 281 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 275 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 187 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 264 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 285 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 269 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 276 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 289 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 256 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 267 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 248 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 15/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 237 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 252 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 303/581 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 241 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/277 constraints, Known Traps: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 36 dead transitions in 60062ms
Found 36 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 36 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 36 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/333 places, 242/308 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 300 transition count 242
Applied a total of 3 rules in 10 ms. Remains 300 /303 variables (removed 3) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 300 cols
[2025-05-29 21:39:35] [INFO ] Computed 67 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 352 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:39:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 678 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1034 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/333 places, 242/308 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62325 ms. Remains : 300/333 places, 242/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6589647496931004376.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5999617291826420084.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6589647496931004376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5999617291826420084.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6837162695328925980.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6837162695328925980.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6837162695328925980.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6837162695328925980.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6837162695328925980.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 64 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13231815796717772989.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8496695688672574420.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13231815796717772989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8496695688672574420.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 60 rules in 14 ms. Remains 303 /333 variables (removed 30) and now considering 278/308 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 330 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:40:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 919 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:40:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 255 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 251 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 274 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 287 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 271 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 248 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 323 ms of which 130 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 246 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 265 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 268 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 262 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 283 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 264 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 248 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 203 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 196 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 253 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 191 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 275 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 226 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 179 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 160 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 271 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 235 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 237 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 236 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 204 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 258 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 282 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 289 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30105ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30106ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/333 places, 271/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31381 ms. Remains : 303/333 places, 271/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12063309732264842016.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13053628107662744816.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12063309732264842016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13053628107662744816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10071276467142786789.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10071276467142786789.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10071276467142786789.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10071276467142786789.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10071276467142786789.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 196 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6316292599025495595.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17114359791314194441.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6316292599025495595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17114359791314194441.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 308/308 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 311 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 311 transition count 286
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 305 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 305 transition count 280
Applied a total of 56 rules in 15 ms. Remains 305 /333 variables (removed 28) and now considering 280/308 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 21:42:07] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 250 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:42:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 804 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1059 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 279 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:42:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 264 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 243 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 244 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 265 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 247 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 364 ms of which 150 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 274 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 289 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 259 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 265 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 239 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 234 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 272 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 254 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 186 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 212 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 232 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 227 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 248 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 269 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 268 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 264 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 271 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 203 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 262 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 252 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 213 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 204 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 205 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 297 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 300 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 289 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 282 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 217 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 208 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 201 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/585 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 158 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 225 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 239 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 227 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 210 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 214 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 230 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 247 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 223 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 230 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 241 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 233 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 224 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 224 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 238 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 230 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 172 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 268 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 271 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 257 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 197 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 253 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 249 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 259 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 266 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 271 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 277 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 262 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 259 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 266 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 184 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 175 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 293 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 276 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 254 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 229 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 230 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 209 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 215 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 261 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 172 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 201 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 260 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 262 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 253 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 266 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60277ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 20 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 20 dead transitions in 60279ms
Found 20 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 20 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 20 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/333 places, 260/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 305 /305 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61361 ms. Remains : 305/333 places, 260/308 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 260 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12162816481569030859.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3453117268000898559.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12162816481569030859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3453117268000898559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17508200383556403765.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17508200383556403765.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17508200383556403765.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17508200383556403765.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17508200383556403765.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 131 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18046401496025220358.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1797244154393475637.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18046401496025220358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1797244154393475637.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.52311e+17,6.04908,123892,5958,54,202667,533,745,407830,69,1243,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((AF((i15.i0.u24.p76==1)) * EX(EF((i4.u22.p63!=1)))) U E(EF(EX((i3.u11.p30==1))) U A((((i13.u95.p358==1) * A((i15.i0.u24.p76==1) U (i0.i...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(E(TRUE U EX((i3.u11.p30==1))) U !((E(!(!(EX((((i15.i1.u28.p92==1)&&(i13.u72.p232==1))&&(i13.u...1478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t8, t9, t107, t131, t150, t159, t163, t169, t201, t205, t242, t245, t252, t253, t254,...824
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15588200806317679676.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15588200806317679676.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15588200806317679676.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15588200806317679676.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15588200806317679676.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 225 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8378274093131342236.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:44:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5852805305315207912.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8378274093131342236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5852805305315207912.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.09353e+17,3.43054,77528,4038,67,129896,836,869,283204,80,3427,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX((((i11.u50.p135==0)&&(i10.u68.p193==0)) + EF((i14.u90.p276==0)))) * EF((((i4.u35.p95==1)&&(i15.u84.p247==1))&&(i15.u111.p362==1))...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((EY(Init) * ((i0.u49.p133==0)&&((i15.u39.p102==0)||(i15.u40.p105==0)))) * !(EX(!((((i11.u50.p135==0)&&(i...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t23, t126, t150, t164, t173, t186, t190, t196, t229, t233, t300, i0.u47.t145, i0.u49...1003
(forward)formula 0,1,9.86586,205144,1,0,420937,1083,6319,736140,402,4748,898349
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF(((i4.u115.p369==1)&&(i15.u116.p372==1))) * (AX(((!(A((i3.u23.p56==1) U (i2.u18.p45==1))) + (i10.u8.p20==0)) + ((((i3.u25.p66==1)&&(i1...470
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i4.u115.p369==1)&&(i15.u116.p372==1)))))] = FALSE * (([((Init * !(!(EX(!(((!(!((E(!((i2.u...1218
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 1,1,242.848,2360112,1,0,3.59538e+06,1140,2844,8.94802e+06,208,5023,2953136
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(EG(AX(AG(EF((i13.u118.p379==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i13.u118.p379==1)))))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,0,244.031,2360112,1,0,3.59538e+06,1140,3256,8.94802e+06,215,5023,3030080
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((EG(EF((i6.u51.p138==1))) + (AX(FALSE) * (((i14.u92.p315==0) + E((i9.u45.p121==1) U (i10.u67.p184==1))) + (AF((i10.u93.p290==1)) * (i6...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(E(TRUE U (i6.u51.p138==1)))))) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE * ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !...448
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 3,0,270.828,2360112,1,0,3.59538e+06,1140,4285,8.94802e+06,273,5023,3645286
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((((AF((i10.u10.p25==1)) + AF((i8.u20.p50==1))) + (EF((i4.u35.p73==1)) + AF((((i4.u35.p92==1)&&(i4.u80.p232==1))&&(i15.u111.p359==1))))...509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(EG(!((i10.u10.p25==1)))) + !(EG(!((i8.u20.p50==1))))) + (E(TRUE U (i4.u35.p73==1)...1880
(forward)formula 4,0,417.671,2797488,1,0,4.33187e+06,1140,3038,1.01046e+07,192,5023,3537443
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EG(AF(((i1.i1.i1.u72.p199==1)||(i1.i1.i0.u71.p194==1)))) U E(EG((i8.u97.p301!=1)) U (EF((((i15.u33.p79==1)||(i10.u68.p193==1)) * A((i14...403
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(EG((i8.u97.p301!=1)) U (E(TRUE U (((i15.u33.p79==1)||(i10.u68.p193==1)) * !((E(!((i3.u24.p59=...1522
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 125 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1991229867615761774.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:11:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4214268786000762994.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1991229867615761774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4214268786000762994.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200050"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-07.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;