Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200049.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200049
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748553722918

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 213 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Transformed 386 places.
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Transformed 360 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 21:22:05] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 386 places and 360 transitions and 1110 arcs in 448 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 38 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 132 out of 386 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 386/386 places, 360/360 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 348 transition count 322
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 348 transition count 322
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 338 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 338 transition count 312
Applied a total of 96 rules in 144 ms. Remains 338 /386 variables (removed 48) and now considering 312/360 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 312 rows 338 cols
[2025-05-29 21:22:06] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 47 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 749 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:22:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 683 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1498 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 311 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/338 variables, 35/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 286 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 311 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 292 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 324 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 296 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 304 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 259 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 165 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 165 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 265 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 217 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 287 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 319 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 162 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 154 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 165 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 174 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 161 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 163 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 159 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 169 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 160 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 161 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 168 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 154 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 189 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 291 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 282 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 265 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 294 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 276 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 278 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 284 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 285 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 274 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 280 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 276 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 291 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 292 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 307 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 280 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 284 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30295ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30317ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/386 places, 312/360 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31995 ms. Remains : 338/386 places, 312/360 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 338 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 312 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 338 places (down from 132) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (429 resets) in 2919 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 3/75 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (67 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (86 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (82 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-29 21:22:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 112/117 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 147/264 variables, 30/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/338 variables, 27/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 312/650 variables, 338/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/650 variables, and 400 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 112/117 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 147/264 variables, 30/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 167 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 182 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 173 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 191 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 201 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 207 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 206 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 204 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 192 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 160 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 175 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 185 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 177 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 185 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 183 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 165 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 20/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 186 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 199 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 209 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 192 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 184 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 210 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5500ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 5 out of 338 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 338 vertex of which 7 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 753 edges and 332 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 330 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 291 transition count 264
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 291 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 220 transition count 201
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 196 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 195 transition count 177
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 195 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 193 transition count 175
Performed 67 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 124 transition count 108
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 123 transition count 111
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 123 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 121 transition count 109
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 121 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 120 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 119 transition count 108
Applied a total of 412 rules in 175 ms. Remains 119 /338 variables (removed 219) and now considering 108/312 (removed 204) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 119/338 places, 108/312 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2550 resets) in 689 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (869 resets) in 260 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1196430 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=398 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1196430 steps, saw 376241 distinct states, run finished after 3007 ms. (steps per millisecond=397 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 119 cols
[2025-05-29 21:22:48] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/33 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/47 variables, 11/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/88 variables, 17/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/92 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/94 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 105/199 variables, 94/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 28/227 variables, 25/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 12/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/227 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 227/227 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 150 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/33 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/47 variables, 11/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/88 variables, 17/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/92 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/94 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 105/199 variables, 94/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 227/227 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 185 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 344ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 312 transitions.
Computed a total of 210 stabilizing places and 211 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 761 edges and 338 vertex of which 336 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 167 edges and 338 vertex of which 7 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 754 edges and 332 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 329 transition count 262
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 288 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 287 transition count 261
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 287 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 214 transition count 197
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 190 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 189 transition count 173
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 189 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 187 transition count 171
Performed 66 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 119 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 118 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 117 transition count 104
Applied a total of 412 rules in 132 ms. Remains 117 /338 variables (removed 221) and now considering 104/312 (removed 208) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned [0, 1, 9, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 230 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/338 places, 104/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 108/338 places, 104/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1928 steps (385 resets) in 29 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5939067778028055314.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2774872511383215369.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5939067778028055314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2774872511383215369.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 312 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 312 transition count 287
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 306 transition count 281
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 306 transition count 281
Applied a total of 63 rules in 28 ms. Remains 306 /338 variables (removed 32) and now considering 281/312 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 281 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-29 21:22:50] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:22:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:22:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 746 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1020 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 280 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:22:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 293 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 265 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 269 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 271 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 283 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 332 ms of which 156 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 275 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 391 ms of which 150 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 281 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 276 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 231 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 259 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 243 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 276 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 290 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 309 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 243 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 338 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 280 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 276 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 269 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 281 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 257 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 267 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 302 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 255 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 268 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 260 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 253 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 264 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 208 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 275 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 278 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 203 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 205 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 259 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 264 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 238 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 194 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30249ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 14 solved, 266 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 14 dead transitions in 30252ms
Found 14 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 14 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 14 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/338 places, 267/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 306 /306 variables (removed 0) and now considering 267/267 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31318 ms. Remains : 306/338 places, 267/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 267 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5357869566504855882.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5229760821021799735.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5357869566504855882.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5229760821021799735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16738638791291198038.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16738638791291198038.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16738638791291198038.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16738638791291198038.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16738638791291198038.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 164 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:23:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8853215958705799005.gal : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:23:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17232240051101429338.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8853215958705799005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17232240051101429338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.52847e+17,4.48361,92808,5842,48,158770,477,842,284905,56,1339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(A(EF(((i14.u87.p321==0)||(i12.i0.u14.p40==1))) U E((i12.i0.u84.p297==1) U (i11.i0.u70.p226==1)))) + EG(EF((i5.u22.p63==0)))) + (EF(...390
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,((!(!((E(!(E((i12.i0.u84.p297==1) U (i11.i0.u70.p226==1))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((i14.u87.p321==0)||(i12....1536
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t10, t109, t133, t151, t164, t176, t202, t206, t249, t252, t259, t260...868
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 313 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 313 transition count 288
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 308 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 308 transition count 283
Applied a total of 59 rules in 16 ms. Remains 308 /338 variables (removed 30) and now considering 283/312 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 283 rows 308 cols
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:24:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 629 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 945 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 282 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:24:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 237 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 270 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 283 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 274 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 317 ms of which 95 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 222 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 277 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 260 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 255 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 256 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 261 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 258 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 271 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 272 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 279 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 282 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 270 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 266 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 270 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 198 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 247 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 213 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 253 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 256 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 228 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 203 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 210 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 190 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 165 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 291 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 289 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 279 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 308/591 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 282/282 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 263 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 272 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 257 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 238 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 261 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 275 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 241 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 284 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 266 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 224 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 227 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 227 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 180 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 158 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 305 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 285 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 236 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 210 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 261 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 281 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 240 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 261 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 267 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 265 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 269 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 278 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 284 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 249 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 262 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 261 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 282 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 328 ms of which 123 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 215 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 297 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 303 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 278 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 260 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 238 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 226 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 239 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 191 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60098ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60100ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/338 places, 259/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 308 /308 variables (removed 0) and now considering 259/259 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61069 ms. Remains : 308/338 places, 259/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18310705342977896145.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5403049056430477168.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18310705342977896145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5403049056430477168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9175035539623681554.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9175035539623681554.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9175035539623681554.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9175035539623681554.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9175035539623681554.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 119 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12084599288138276458.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:25:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1017912337302259866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12084599288138276458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1017912337302259866.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.37155e+17,11.6409,245424,21956,44,414893,541,795,835697,63,1658,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 311 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 311 transition count 285
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 305 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 305 transition count 279
Applied a total of 66 rules in 13 ms. Remains 305 /338 variables (removed 33) and now considering 279/312 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 21:26:23] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:26:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 640 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 891 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 278 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:26:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/305 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 239 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 277 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 265 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 264 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 239 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 229 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 255 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 332 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 238 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 243 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 206 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 179 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 182 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 261 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 239 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 239 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 215 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 202 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 203 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 208 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 197 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 180 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 226 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 208 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 199 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 194 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 258 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 275 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 201 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 192 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/584 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 278/278 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/305 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 60/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 192 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 236 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 245 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 322 ms of which 124 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 254 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 241 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 239 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 242 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 248 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 269 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 223 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 225 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 286 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 201 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 194 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 240 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 176 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 229 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 185 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 189 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 255 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 246 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 269 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 258 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 286 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 263 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 201 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 244 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 258 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 238 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 250 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 206 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 186 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 262 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 264 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 207 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 211 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60174ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 254 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 60176ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 304 transition count 255
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 304 /305 variables (removed 1) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 255 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 352 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:27:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 746 ms returned [253, 254]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1100 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 302/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 302 /302 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62197 ms. Remains : 302/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2577301734280245736.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5418746829857566511.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2577301734280245736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5418746829857566511.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17085933649133003632.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17085933649133003632.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17085933649133003632.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17085933649133003632.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17085933649133003632.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 129 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:27:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3447396705036154951.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1962500091334475439.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3447396705036154951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1962500091334475439.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 313 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 313 transition count 288
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 307 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 307 transition count 282
Applied a total of 61 rules in 13 ms. Remains 307 /338 variables (removed 31) and now considering 282/312 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 307 cols
[2025-05-29 21:28:26] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 509 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 752 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 255 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 303 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 258 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 271 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 233 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 230 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 255 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 254 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 255 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 261 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 229 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 258 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 246 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 276 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 245 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 227 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 251 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 187 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 252 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 249 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 260 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 265 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 295 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 236 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 239 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 252 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 247 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 227 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 247 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 251 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 243 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 255 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 307/589 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/307 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 173 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 227 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 230 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 231 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 233 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 249 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 250 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 191 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 202 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 189 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 227 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 258 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 259 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 257 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 264 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 258 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 268 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 264 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 263 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 268 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 205 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 238 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 236 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 219 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 240 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 254 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 320 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 271 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 256 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 191 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 219 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 236 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 269 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 205 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 186 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 206 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 237 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 241 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 243 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 237 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 235 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 246 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 242 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 253 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 248 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 256 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 247 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 201 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60088ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 27 solved, 254 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 27 dead transitions in 60089ms
Found 27 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 27 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 27 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 307/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 306 transition count 255
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 306 /307 variables (removed 1) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 255 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-29 21:29:26] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 360 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:29:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 719 ms returned [69, 70]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1081 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 304/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 304 /304 variables (removed 0) and now considering 255/255 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 61948 ms. Remains : 304/338 places, 255/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1928550434975051602.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6977537307175654050.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1928550434975051602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6977537307175654050.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15263989301756644824.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15263989301756644824.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15263989301756644824.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15263989301756644824.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15263989301756644824.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 109 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality828455065854548628.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9896825931663249597.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality828455065854548628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9896825931663249597.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.34812e+17,5.23989,96892,4496,44,155654,514,723,304901,67,1176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AG((((i1.i1.u66.p205==0)||(i5.u18.p49==1))||(i16.u81.p350==1))) * EX(EG((i3.u12.p34!=1)))) * (AX(EF(((i8.i0.u25.p90==0)||(i10.i0.u9...381
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * !((((i1.i1.u66.p205==0)||(i5.u18.p49==1))||(i16.u81.p350==1))))] = FALSE * [(F...619
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t7, t8, t10, t111, t135, t153, t165, t171, t203, t207, t237, t240, t247, t248, t249, ...845
(forward)formula 0,0,13.4326,190076,1,0,330839,514,3519,748370,269,1238,637833
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 311 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 311 transition count 286
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 305 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 305 transition count 280
Applied a total of 65 rules in 14 ms. Remains 305 /338 variables (removed 33) and now considering 280/312 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 21:30:11] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 247 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 668 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 916 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 279 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 238 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 234 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 213 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 238 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 218 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 339 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 213 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 248 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 229 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 218 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 235 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 247 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 241 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 249 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 275 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 223 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 401 ms of which 205 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 221 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 203 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 229 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 240 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 207 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 223 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 216 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 232 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 255 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 238 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 246 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 249 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 232 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 413 ms of which 214 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 242 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 246 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 268 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/585 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 207 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 204 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 220 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 231 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 243 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 221 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 216 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 212 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 231 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 227 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 224 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 26 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 220 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 258 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 246 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 187 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 206 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 231 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 224 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 224 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 193 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 191 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 175 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 257 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 177 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 151 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 272 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 270 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 208 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 254 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 264 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 231 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 230 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 332 ms of which 118 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 258 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 223 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 199 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 186 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 246 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 230 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 223 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 270 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 232 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 170 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 173 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 305/585 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 246 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/279 constraints, Known Traps: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 246 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 33 dead transitions in 60075ms
Found 33 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 33 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 33 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 304 transition count 247
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 304 /305 variables (removed 1) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 21:31:12] [INFO ] Computed 66 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 571 ms returned [69]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 929 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 303/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 61947 ms. Remains : 303/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 247 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality681032617175263021.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17398788523513241838.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality681032617175263021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17398788523513241838.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15944981042068373365.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15944981042068373365.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15944981042068373365.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15944981042068373365.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15944981042068373365.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3034701316257919007.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10411132022302131824.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3034701316257919007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10411132022302131824.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.29416e+17,1.05695,26028,3090,45,45483,836,695,63001,68,1672,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AX(EF((i16.u69.p215==0))) + AG(!((((i8.u91.p85==0)||(i18.u109.p385==1))&&(i4.i0.u11.p36==0))))) U !(EF(((((i4.i2.u65.p194==1) + AG((i1...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (i16.u69.p215==0))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!((((i8.u91.p85==0)||(i18.u109.p385==1))&&(i4....351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t133, t151, t163, t169, t175, t201, t205, t229, t230, t232, t239, t240, t241, i0.t109...826
(forward)formula 0,1,7.29426,191532,1,0,434628,1448,4891,521353,347,3028,994002
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 160 edges and 338 vertex of which 7 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 754 edges and 332 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 329 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 292 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 291 transition count 265
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 291 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 221 transition count 202
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 198 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 197 transition count 179
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 197 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 195 transition count 177
Performed 65 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 128 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 127 transition count 111
Applied a total of 395 rules in 47 ms. Remains 127 /338 variables (removed 211) and now considering 111/312 (removed 201) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned [99, 101]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 176 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/338 places, 111/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 125 /125 variables (removed 0) and now considering 111/111 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 231 ms. Remains : 125/338 places, 111/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4557155391121107479.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13663154449853907963.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4557155391121107479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13663154449853907963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35591e+07,1.39306,34124,2,7648,5,167612,6,0,610,112488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((p291==1)) + ((!(A(((p148==0)||(p155==1)) U ((p134==0)||(p183==1)))) * (p268==0)) * (p381==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(!((E(!(((p134==0)||(p183==1))) U (!(((p148==0)||(p155==1))) * !(((p134==0)||(p183==1)...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t22, t23, t24, t25, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t67, t77, t78, t79, t92, t93, t95, t97, ...277
(forward)formula 0,0,14.0509,337684,1,0,250,2.28714e+06,220,114,4670,1.17751e+06,297
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 338 vertex of which 4 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 758 edges and 335 vertex of which 333 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 332 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 290 transition count 265
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 290 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 219 transition count 202
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 196 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 196 transition count 179
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 196 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 194 transition count 177
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 129 transition count 114
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 129 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 128 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 127 transition count 113
Applied a total of 401 rules in 42 ms. Remains 127 /338 variables (removed 211) and now considering 113/312 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned [47, 48, 89]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 176 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/338 places, 113/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 124/338 places, 113/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9112236218845146115.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16023739882968546219.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9112236218845146115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16023739882968546219.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.746e+06,1.38405,33632,2,5169,5,184068,6,0,609,89315,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((p343!=0)&&((p12==0)||(p6==1)))) U !(AG(!(AG((((p17==0)||(p299==1))||(p265==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((p343!=0)&&((p12==0)||(p6==1))))))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p17==0)||(p299==1))||(p265=...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t9, t22, t23, t24, t25, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t65, t67, t69, t79, t80, t93, t94, t97, ...283
(forward)formula 0,1,8.04572,199380,1,0,269,1.23284e+06,224,126,4755,829455,327
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 69 rules in 13 ms. Remains 303 /338 variables (removed 35) and now considering 278/312 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:32:14] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:32:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 886 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 242 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 256 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 258 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 265 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 246 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 346 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 263 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 219 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 236 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 250 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 232 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 251 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 263 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 270 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 257 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 215 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 249 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 239 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 211 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 197 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 183 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 292 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 232 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 210 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 190 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 184 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 263 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 232 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 227 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 228 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 268 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 211 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 269 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 304 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 295 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 240 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 234 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 253 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 241 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30130ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30131ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/338 places, 271/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31318 ms. Remains : 303/338 places, 271/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16932765119009823916.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11795616209970024663.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16932765119009823916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11795616209970024663.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14771216904590212974.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14771216904590212974.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14771216904590212974.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14771216904590212974.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14771216904590212974.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 192 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15389746124758944545.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15390269494850593899.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15389746124758944545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15390269494850593899.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23627e+17,7.13057,146484,4858,63,223426,658,768,655147,74,1479,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((i14.u35.p77!=0)&&(i14.u87.p324!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((i14.u35.p77!=0)&&(i14.u87.p324!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t7, t8, t9, t10, t107, t131, t149, t161, t173, t199, t203, t253, t256, t263, t264, t2...775
(forward)formula 0,1,16.0317,232756,1,0,386797,658,4018,1.27254e+06,310,1906,638607
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 155 edges and 338 vertex of which 7 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 754 edges and 332 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 329 transition count 267
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 293 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 291 transition count 265
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 291 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 221 transition count 203
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 198 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 197 transition count 180
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 197 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 195 transition count 178
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 139 transition count 122
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 138 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 137 transition count 121
Applied a total of 375 rules in 34 ms. Remains 137 /338 variables (removed 201) and now considering 121/312 (removed 191) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 137 cols
[2025-05-29 21:33:31] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [56, 107, 115, 117]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 206 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/338 places, 121/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 133 /133 variables (removed 0) and now considering 121/121 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 133/338 places, 121/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13103877495670687173.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18056407958378830052.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13103877495670687173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18056407958378830052.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25149e+08,1.98166,48516,2,8222,5,240296,6,0,652,155003,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(EF(((p275==1)||(p143==0)))) * EF((((p247==1) * AG(((p25==0)&&(p138==1)))) * (!(A((p90==1) U (p169==0))) * !(A(((p89==0)||(p42==1)) U...282
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * (EG(E(TRUE U ((p275==1)||(p143==0)))) * E(TRUE U (((p247==1) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p25==0)&&(p138==1))...444
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t8, t12, t14, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t74, t...322
(forward)formula 0,0,9.95226,223328,1,0,482,1.31367e+06,258,223,4969,1.10856e+06,557
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 311 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 311 transition count 286
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 305 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 305 transition count 280
Applied a total of 65 rules in 16 ms. Remains 305 /338 variables (removed 33) and now considering 280/312 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-29 21:33:42] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 259 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:33:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 648 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 909 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 279 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:33:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 246 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 265 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 285 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 273 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 273 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 239 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 252 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 252 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 255 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 249 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 248 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 249 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 241 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 254 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 242 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 185 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 235 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 255 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 266 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 250 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 214 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 234 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 247 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 230 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 211 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 254 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 272 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 274 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 253 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 276 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 264 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 220 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 214 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 240 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 231 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 226 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 241 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 244 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 258 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 253 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 238 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/585 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 208 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 206 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 224 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 219 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 223 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 218 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 256 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 252 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 251 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 260 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 257 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 265 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 230 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 239 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 244 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 217 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 216 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 211 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 254 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 219 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 256 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 244 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 239 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 236 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 236 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 268 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 212 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 204 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 186 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 182 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 259 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 270 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 213 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 215 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 239 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 238 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 238 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 230 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 244 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 243 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 240 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 235 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 235 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 218 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 268 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 228 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 229 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 170 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 264 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 213 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 257 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 273 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 271 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 242 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 236 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60222ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 21 dead transitions in 60223ms
Found 21 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 21 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 21 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/338 places, 259/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 305 /305 variables (removed 0) and now considering 259/259 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61156 ms. Remains : 305/338 places, 259/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2989581262317163029.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:34:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12010461407680500977.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2989581262317163029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12010461407680500977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17412755324567459023.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17412755324567459023.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17412755324567459023.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17412755324567459023.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17412755324567459023.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality541005789978999142.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1187620691341789394.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality541005789978999142.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1187620691341789394.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.41399e+17,2.54535,63512,3591,41,125314,502,823,168635,55,1476,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((((i6.i1.u36.p109==0)||(i7.u96.p344==1))&&((i11.i0.u58.p167==0)||(i12.i1.u66.p193==1))) U ((i8.u47.p139==0)||(i13.u95.p342==1))) U AG...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E((((i6.i1.u36.p109==0)||(i7.u96.p344==1))&&((i11.i0.u58.p167==0)||(i12.i1.u66.p193==1))) U ((i8.u47...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t8, t9, t10, t109, t133, t151, t163, t175, t201, t205, t242, t244, t251, t253, i0.u41...845
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 338 vertex of which 7 / 338 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 754 edges and 332 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 329 transition count 263
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 289 transition count 263
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 289 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 218 transition count 201
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 194 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 193 transition count 177
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 193 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 191 transition count 175
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 125 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 124 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 123 transition count 110
Applied a total of 400 rules in 32 ms. Remains 123 /338 variables (removed 215) and now considering 110/312 (removed 202) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 123 cols
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 48 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [0, 1, 11, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 138 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/338 places, 110/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 114 /114 variables (removed 0) and now considering 110/110 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 114/338 places, 110/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3335685298968723569.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18196503045390879755.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3335685298968723569.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18196503045390879755.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.41655e+06,2.87433,75876,2,17707,5,321954,6,0,566,270432,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((E((p199==1) U (p72==1)) * (p34==0)) * ((p376==1)||(p278==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((E((p199==1) U (p72==1)) * (p34==0)) * ((p376==1)||(p278==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t18, t19, t22, t24, t25, t26, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t76, t77, t78, t91, t92, t...285
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9609949227642103227.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9609949227642103227.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9609949227642103227.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9609949227642103227.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9609949227642103227.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 141 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12538504667350883796.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13077937025732188494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12538504667350883796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13077937025732188494.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.41655e+06,11.4677,163556,1416,141,197084,3641,376,874115,111,29585,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((E((i0.u17.p199==1) U (i5.u32.p72==1)) * (i0.u1.p34==0)) * ((i4.u38.p376==1)||(i6.u31.p278==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((E((i0.u17.p199==1) U (i5.u32.p72==1)) * (i0.u1.p34==0)) * ((i4.u38.p376==1)||(i6.u31.p278=...172
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t25, t26, t51, t52, t53, t54, t76, t78, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99, t101, i0.u17.t6, i2.u2....321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 69 rules in 11 ms. Remains 303 /338 variables (removed 35) and now considering 278/312 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:36:43] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 234 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:36:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 787 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1023 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:36:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 243 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 251 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 227 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 239 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 236 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 220 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 338 ms of which 136 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 250 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 233 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 255 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 266 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 253 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 266 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 257 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 249 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 226 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 207 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 237 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 226 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 237 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 203 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 175 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 268 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 221 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 169 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 169 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 255 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 223 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 227 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 224 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 237 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 200 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 209 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 277 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 293 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 228 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 234 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 248 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 233 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 303/581 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 277/277 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 194 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 257 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 264 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 247 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 252 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 244 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 226 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 220 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 226 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 234 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 235 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 229 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 194 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 270 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 293 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 252 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 270 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 233 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 135 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 143 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 136 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 153 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 144 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 141 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 157 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 164 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 163 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 164 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 196 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 25 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 237 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 224 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 223 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 223 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 236 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 235 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 226 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 238 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 234 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 204 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 251 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 220 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 187 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 239 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 190 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 1)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 timeout
0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 303/581 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/303 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/277 constraints, Known Traps: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 246 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 31 dead transitions in 60060ms
Found 31 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 31 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 31 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 302 transition count 247
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 302 /303 variables (removed 1) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 302 cols
[2025-05-29 21:37:45] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:37:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 716 ms returned [251, 252]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1061 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 300/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 247/247 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 62167 ms. Remains : 300/338 places, 247/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 247 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10491517330118889135.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:37:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1271975834739514072.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10491517330118889135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1271975834739514072.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12596382769749030328.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12596382769749030328.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12596382769749030328.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12596382769749030328.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12596382769749030328.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7706454239202997751.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10240872536766853831.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7706454239202997751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10240872536766853831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 310 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 310 transition count 285
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 304 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 304 transition count 279
Applied a total of 67 rules in 12 ms. Remains 304 /338 variables (removed 34) and now considering 279/312 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-29 21:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 294 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:38:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 741 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1035 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 278 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 256 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 237 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 247 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 262 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 247 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 254 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 256 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 268 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 252 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 250 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 267 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 242 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 238 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 252 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 243 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 240 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 207 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 227 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 245 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 256 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 243 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 267 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 222 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 243 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 238 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 251 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 205 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 230 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 246 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 230 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 240 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 198 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 213 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 185 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 221 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 199 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 178 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 178 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 180 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 172 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 304/583 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 278/278 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 60/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 182 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 344 ms of which 140 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 252 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 263 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 251 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 264 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 241 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 239 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 238 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 253 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 235 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 229 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 217 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 241 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 249 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 228 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 237 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 246 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 250 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 244 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 201 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 219 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 261 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 226 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 237 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 260 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 253 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 256 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 232 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 223 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 255 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 253 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 260 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 263 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 257 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 255 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 257 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 250 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 250 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 241 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 248 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 235 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 35 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 235 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 220 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 221 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 229 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 271 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 253 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 268 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 268 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 14/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 242 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 304/583 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 242 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/278 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 36 dead transitions in 60070ms
Found 36 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 36 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 36 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/338 places, 243/312 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 301 transition count 243
Applied a total of 3 rules in 7 ms. Remains 301 /304 variables (removed 3) and now considering 243/243 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 301 cols
[2025-05-29 21:39:47] [INFO ] Computed 67 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:39:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 667 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1011 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 301/338 places, 243/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62137 ms. Remains : 301/338 places, 243/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4219697175669766291.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 21:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2131119262721141531.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4219697175669766291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2131119262721141531.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1961530660282563299.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1961530660282563299.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1961530660282563299.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1961530660282563299.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1961530660282563299.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 66 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16699996858732271882.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7899971764688229454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16699996858732271882.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7899971764688229454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23627e+17,2.69007,64728,4143,37,108902,473,625,243130,58,1164,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX(AX((i11.u106.p380==0))) U ((i19.i1.u77.p263!=0) + (EF((((i4.u8.p19==0)||(u19.p53==1))&&(i17.u59.p176==1))) * ((i8.u4.p11==0)||(i19.i...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((i19.i1.u77.p263!=0) + (E(TRUE U (((i4.u8.p19==0)||(u19.p53==1))&&(i17.u59.p176==1))) * ((i8.u...526
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t108, t132, t150, t162, t168, t174, t200, t204, t225, t226, t228, t235, t236, t237, i0.i0...803
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 338/338 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 337 transition count 312
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 303 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 303 transition count 278
Applied a total of 69 rules in 11 ms. Remains 303 /338 variables (removed 35) and now considering 278/312 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 303 cols
[2025-05-29 21:40:48] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 238 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 21:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 891 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 277 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:40:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/303 variables, 33/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 240 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 244 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 232 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 235 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 339 ms of which 132 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 240 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 224 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 252 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 250 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 262 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 251 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 267 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 249 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 242 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 258 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 269 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 259 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 254 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 277 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 234 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 248 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 233 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 228 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 260 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 249 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 181 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 267 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 215 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 201 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 203 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 178 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 175 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 264 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 227 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 226 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 250 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 242 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 239 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 261 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 207 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 266 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 286 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 283 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 230 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 251 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 226 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 247 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 245 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 232 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30154ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 30156ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 303/338 places, 271/312 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 303 /303 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31305 ms. Remains : 303/338 places, 271/312 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2431603251829174340.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16453398620519855828.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2431603251829174340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16453398620519855828.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16312096145285409645.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16312096145285409645.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16312096145285409645.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16312096145285409645.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16312096145285409645.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 194 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3902099997967119861.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 21:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8643408444495761393.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3902099997967119861.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8643408444495761393.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23627e+17,8.3849,176128,8884,64,299682,638,825,458472,66,1521,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((i9.i1.u1.p2==1) U EX(AG(((i6.u27.p79==0)||(i6.u25.p85==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(i9.i1.u1.p2==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u27.p79==0)||(i6.u25.p85==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t7, t8, t9, t10, t131, t149, t161, t167, t199, t203, t253, t254, t256, t263, t264, t2...813
(forward)formula 0,0,21.1484,362752,1,0,706229,807,5107,910948,318,2202,1572485
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17108575731105830536.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17108575731105830536.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17108575731105830536.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17108575731105830536.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17108575731105830536.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 218 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13778042640940843371.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:42:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4204712384637443327.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13778042640940843371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4204712384637443327.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.12252e+17,115.984,1904924,16846,128,2.98693e+06,1197,1043,6.39085e+06,95,5065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(A(EF(((i15.u90.p321==0)||(i11.i0.u16.p40==1))) U E((i11.i0.u98.p297==1) U (i8.i1.u79.p226==1)))) + EG(EF((i5.u25.p63==0)))) + (EF((...392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,((!(!((E(!(E((i11.i0.u98.p297==1) U (i8.i1.u79.p226==1))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((i15.u90.p321==0)||(i11.i...1536
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t10, t68, t159, t190, t194, t200, t237, t294, i0.i0.t135, i0.i0.u48.t146, i0.i0.u...1125
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 126 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7085401279234991656.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 22:08:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8923510652678548971.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7085401279234991656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8923510652678548971.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-07, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200049"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-07.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;