Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200042
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748549555260

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 197 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Transformed 376 places.
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Transformed 297 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 20:12:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 376 places and 297 transitions and 830 arcs in 456 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 31 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 8 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Support contains 129 out of 375 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 375/375 places, 296/296 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 373 transition count 296
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 354 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 354 transition count 277
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 350 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 350 transition count 273
Applied a total of 48 rules in 177 ms. Remains 350 /375 variables (removed 25) and now considering 273/296 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 350 cols
[2025-05-29 20:12:38] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 40 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 654 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:12:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1051 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1770 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:12:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/350 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 235 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 254 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 172 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 220 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 183 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 194 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 180 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 208 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 196 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 213 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 236 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 148 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 219 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 16/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 350/623 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30047 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/350 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/350 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 76/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 152 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 8/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 189 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 217 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 11/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 10/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 192 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 4/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 185 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 193 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 187 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 171 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 181 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 174 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 155 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 159 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 148 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 20/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 1)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 1)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 1)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 1)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 1)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 1)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 1)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 1)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 1)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 1)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 1)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 1)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 1)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 1)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 1)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 1)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 1)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 1)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 1)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 1)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 1)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 1)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 1)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 1)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 1)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 1)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 1)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 1)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 1)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 1)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 0)
(s208 1)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 1)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 1)
(s218 0)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 1)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 1)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 1)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 0)
(s234 1)
(s235 0)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 1)
(s240 0)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 1)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 1)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 1)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 0)
(s257 0)
(s258 1)
(s259 0)
(s260 1)
(s261 1)
(s262 1)
(s263 1)
(s264 1)
(s265 1)
(s266 1)
(s267 1)
(s268 1)
(s269 1)
(s270 1)
(s271 1)
(s272 1)
(s273 0)
(s274 1)
(s275 1)
(s276 0)
(s277 1)
(s278 1)
(s279 1)
(s280 1)
(s281 0)
(s282 1)
(s283 1)
(s284 1)
(s285 0)
(s286 1)
(s287 1)
(s288 0)
(s289 1)
(s290 1)
(s291 1)
(s292 0)
(s293 1)
(s294 1)
(s295 1)
(s296 0)
(s297 1)
(s298 1)
(s299 1)
(s300 0)
(s301 1)
(s302 1)
(s303 1)
(s304 1)
(s305 1)
(s306 1)
(s307 1)
(s308 1)
(s309 0)
(s310 0)
(s311 1)
(s312 1)timeout

org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 350/623 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/350 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/272 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60221ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 350/375 places, 273/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62205 ms. Remains : 350/375 places, 273/296 transitions.
Support contains 129 out of 350 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
Support contains 128 out of 350 places (down from 129) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (404 resets) in 3107 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 10/85 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (69 resets) in 328 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (71 resets) in 304 ms. (131 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (75 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (80 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (82 resets) in 173 ms. (229 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (68 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (74 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (67 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 62/89 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 148/237 variables, 31/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/314 variables, 39/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 252/566 variables, 314/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/566 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 55/621 variables, 35/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 18/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 4/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp74 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/623 variables, 1/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/623 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/623 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 623/623 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved in 5001 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 350/350 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 39/57 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 175/232 variables, 35/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/312 variables, 39/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 236/548 variables, 312/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 3/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 3/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 59/607 variables, 24/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/607 variables, 4/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/607 variables, 6/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 223 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 206 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 211 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 207 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 193 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 183 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/607 variables, 6/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/607 variables, 5/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 178 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/607 variables, 1/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 607/623 variables, and 459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 336/350 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/9 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 10027ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 18 out of 350 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 152 edges and 350 vertex of which 6 / 350 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 6 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 656 edges and 345 vertex of which 344 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 344 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 300 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 299 transition count 219
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 299 transition count 165
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 236 transition count 165
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 210 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 210 transition count 139
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 127 transition count 64
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 127 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 126 transition count 63
Applied a total of 421 rules in 168 ms. Remains 126 /350 variables (removed 224) and now considering 63/273 (removed 210) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 126/350 places, 63/273 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 28651 steps (3692 resets) in 833 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 20:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
Computed a total of 343 stabilizing places and 264 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 663 edges and 350 vertex of which 349 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.12 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 322 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 322 transition count 245
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 309 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 309 transition count 232
Applied a total of 82 rules in 72 ms. Remains 309 /350 variables (removed 41) and now considering 232/273 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 309 cols
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 982 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 231 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 148 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 187 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 232 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 9/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 194 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 157 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 6/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 181 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 181 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 174 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 309/541 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/309 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 231/231 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 62/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 3/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 232/541 variables, 309/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/541 variables, 231/684 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 197 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/541 variables, 18/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 541/541 variables, and 702 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 309/309 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 231/231 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60099ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60104ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 309/350 places, 232/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61467 ms. Remains : 309/350 places, 232/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 232 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13982513807482169677.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16313000050457362280.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13982513807482169677.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16313000050457362280.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:15:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:15:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17460396095916936204.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17460396095916936204.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17460396095916936204.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17460396095916936204.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17460396095916936204.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 414 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16297574479408877396.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9241941892362506826.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16297574479408877396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9241941892362506826.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64213e+18,16.2322,350888,72739,35,843209,666,656,600697,47,1417,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 324 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 324 transition count 247
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 311 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 311 transition count 234
Applied a total of 78 rules in 58 ms. Remains 311 /350 variables (removed 39) and now considering 234/273 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 234 rows 311 cols
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1016 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 233 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:15:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 177 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 270 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 179 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 200 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 177 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 178 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 9/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 16/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/545 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 64/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 173 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 206 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 8/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 172 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 237 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 244 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 4/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 234/545 variables, 311/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/545 variables, 233/713 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 545/545 variables, and 713 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 311/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60065ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60067ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 311/350 places, 234/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61385 ms. Remains : 311/350 places, 234/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 234 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5422573504995446427.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14498675953746991909.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5422573504995446427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14498675953746991909.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph646656675499430757.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph646656675499430757.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph646656675499430757.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph646656675499430757.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph646656675499430757.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15307188567173260021.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3765929713723229571.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15307188567173260021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3765929713723229571.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69916e+18,1.18033,32776,6410,32,73581,485,653,76173,45,1628,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((i9.i1.u107.p351==0) * E((!(((((i7.i2.u27.p74==1)&&(i7.i2.u28.p77==1))&&((i7.i1.u30.p80==1)&&(i7.i2.u32.p83==1)))&&(((i7.i0.u33.p86=...343
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * EG(((i9.i1.u107.p351==0) * E((!(((((i7.i2.u27.p74==1)&&(i7.i2.u28.p77==1))&&((i7.i1.u30.p80==1)&&(i...497
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t107, t115, t151, t155, t163, t167, t171, i0.u37.t132, i0.u53.t114, i1.u20.t154, i2.t159,...739
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 326 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 326 transition count 249
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 315 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 315 transition count 238
Applied a total of 70 rules in 46 ms. Remains 315 /350 variables (removed 35) and now considering 238/273 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 315 cols
[2025-05-29 20:17:57] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 449 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:17:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 774 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 237 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 171 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 180 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 138 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 182 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 203 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 18/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 17/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 5/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 315/553 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 63/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 9/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 144 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 8/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 160 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 233 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 10/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 5/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 238/553 variables, 315/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 237/727 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 553/553 variables, and 728 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60084ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60085ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 315/350 places, 238/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61384 ms. Remains : 315/350 places, 238/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6866759453640500526.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4905061860050149236.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6866759453640500526.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4905061860050149236.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15863761973202138737.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15863761973202138737.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15863761973202138737.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15863761973202138737.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15863761973202138737.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2350856320675592563.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14892886214883000480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2350856320675592563.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14892886214883000480.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71357e+18,10.239,235936,39849,32,698678,651,667,413953,49,1384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 167 edges and 350 vertex of which 6 / 350 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 657 edges and 345 vertex of which 344 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 343 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 297 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 295 transition count 217
Performed 66 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 66 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 295 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 220 transition count 151
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 193 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 193 transition count 124
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 130 transition count 61
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 129 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 128 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 127 transition count 59
Applied a total of 423 rules in 68 ms. Remains 127 /350 variables (removed 223) and now considering 59/273 (removed 214) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Computed 69 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 99]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 182 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/350 places, 59/273 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 260 ms. Remains : 123/350 places, 59/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15487633104654546330.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18062240934891978220.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15487633104654546330.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18062240934891978220.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,230817,1.6695,41060,2,36227,5,173214,6,0,550,145090,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AF(!(A((p319==1) U (p50==1)))) U AG((((AF((p351==1)) + (p346==1)) + ((p29==1)||(p105==1))) + ((p190!=1)||(((p119==1)&&(p243==1))&&(p...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EG(!(!(!((E(!((p50==1)) U (!((p319==1)) * !((p50==1)))) + EG(!((p50==1))))))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t6, t21, t23, t33, t58, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed...191
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,23.5273,440040,1,0,444,1.7931e+06,168,245,3542,1.71728e+06,527
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 350 vertex of which 6 / 350 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 657 edges and 345 vertex of which 344 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 50 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 50 transitions
Performed 50 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 50
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 343 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 293 transition count 215
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 293 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 219 transition count 150
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 191 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 191 transition count 122
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 109 transition count 48
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 108 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 107 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 106 transition count 46
Applied a total of 457 rules in 43 ms. Remains 106 /350 variables (removed 244) and now considering 46/273 (removed 227) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 202 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/350 places, 46/273 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 46/46 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 251 ms. Remains : 105/350 places, 46/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16082892660516703305.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14468514696189072994.prop : 1 ms
RANDOM walk for 1449 steps (456 resets) in 29 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16082892660516703305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14468514696189072994.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 323 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 323 transition count 246
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 311 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 311 transition count 234
Applied a total of 78 rules in 27 ms. Remains 311 /350 variables (removed 39) and now considering 234/273 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 234 rows 311 cols
[2025-05-29 20:20:23] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 282 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:20:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1072 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 233 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 185 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 215 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 190 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 16/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 185 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 7/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/545 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 69/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 188 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 5/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 234/545 variables, 311/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/545 variables, 233/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/545 variables, 20/720 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 545/545 variables, and 725 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 311/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 311/350 places, 234/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61446 ms. Remains : 311/350 places, 234/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 234 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11739791261932741839.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13905335569793908552.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11739791261932741839.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13905335569793908552.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17992983428244594.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17992983428244594.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17992983428244594.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17992983428244594.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17992983428244594.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability334685904926587521.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15015129530055338058.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability334685904926587521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15015129530055338058.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77097e+18,5.10542,106048,18893,33,258475,604,602,348923,45,1269,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(EF((u8.p20==1)) U !((((i1.u20.p54==1)&&(i17.i1.u81.p233==1))&&(i1.u97.p310==1))))) * !(A(AG((i18.u99.p330==1)) U EG(AX((i18.u89.p...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(!((((i1.u20.p54==1)&&(i17.i1.u81.p233==1))&&(i1.u97.p310==1)))) U (!(E(TRUE...762
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t107, t155, t163, t167, i0.t115, i0.u38.t132, i0.u54.t114, i1.t151, i1.u19.t158, i1.u21.t...738
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 325 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 325 transition count 248
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 313 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 313 transition count 236
Applied a total of 74 rules in 26 ms. Remains 313 /350 variables (removed 37) and now considering 236/273 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-29 20:22:25] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 254 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:22:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 916 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 235 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:22:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 197 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 181 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 179 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 152 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 152 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 138 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 176 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 18/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 186 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 166 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 205 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 16/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 313/549 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 66/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 204 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 5/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 8/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 236/549 variables, 313/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/549 variables, 235/714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/549 variables, 20/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 549/549 variables, and 734 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61246 ms. Remains : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:23:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9432417486708780429.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17359921667114922233.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9432417486708780429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17359921667114922233.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17436374041550199238.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17436374041550199238.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17436374041550199238.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17436374041550199238.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17436374041550199238.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1822776210951504541.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2247765514328841919.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1822776210951504541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2247765514328841919.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67434e+18,1.10262,37596,6040,29,75358,356,684,132551,41,1011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!((EX((i5.i1.u36.p93==1)) * (i17.i2.u104.p333!=1))) * (EF((i1.u102.p311!=1)) + EG(((i8.i0.u115.p366==1)||(i10.i0.u59.p145==1)))))) ...309
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(!(((E(TRUE U (i0.u55.p136==1)) + (i13.i1.u72.p184==1)) + ((i16.u101.p308==1)||((i14.i0...1573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t109, t117, t153, t161, t169, i0.u38.t134, i0.u54.t116, i1.t157, i1.u17.t164, i1.u19.t160...790
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 326 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 326 transition count 249
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 315 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 315 transition count 238
Applied a total of 70 rules in 15 ms. Remains 315 /350 variables (removed 35) and now considering 238/273 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 315 cols
[2025-05-29 20:24:27] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:24:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 821 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 237 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:24:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 191 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 167 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 182 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 202 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 188 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 13/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 169 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 11/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 193 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 209 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 18/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 8/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 315/553 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 73/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 17/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 238/553 variables, 315/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 237/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 15/736 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 553/553 variables, and 736 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 315/350 places, 238/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61217 ms. Remains : 315/350 places, 238/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12231240119424516156.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9847398038727140694.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12231240119424516156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9847398038727140694.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17956056929738329474.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17956056929738329474.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17956056929738329474.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17956056929738329474.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17956056929738329474.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15348805000497610525.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:25:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2514670646187043350.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15348805000497610525.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2514670646187043350.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77218e+18,1.82224,51548,8612,35,128964,646,670,104360,49,1470,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(EF((((i4.u8.p15==1)&&(i15.u74.p192==1))&&(i17.u92.p345==1)))) + AG(((EG(((i16.i1.u71.p179==1)&&(i17.u102.p326==1))) * ((A((((i9.u20....534
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !((EX(E(TRUE U (((i4.u8.p15==1)&&(i15.u74.p192==1))&&(i17.u92.p345==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((EG(((i16...852
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t119, t159, t163, t167, t171, t179, i0.i0.u87.t55, i0.i0.u88.t52, i0.i1.t59, i0.i1.u85.t6...783
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 663 edges and 350 vertex of which 349 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 348 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 312 transition count 232
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 309 transition count 232
Performed 77 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 77 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 309 transition count 155
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 223 transition count 155
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 196 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 196 transition count 128
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 119 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 447 place count 118 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 117 transition count 54
Applied a total of 448 rules in 37 ms. Remains 117 /350 variables (removed 233) and now considering 54/273 (removed 219) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 117 cols
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [97, 101, 103, 105, 107]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 141 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/350 places, 54/273 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 182 ms. Remains : 112/350 places, 54/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15570153057344530543.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7692259963985846896.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15570153057344530543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7692259963985846896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,287718,1.02335,31016,2,22731,5,122047,6,0,503,125562,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E(A((p62!=1) U ((p261==1)||(p105==1))) U (((p82==1)&&(p187==1))&&(p345==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((E(!(((p261==1)||(p105==1))) U (!((p62!=1)) * !(((p261==1)||(p105==1))))) + EG(!(((p261...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t23, t32, t44, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,0,11.2414,272964,1,0,299,1.25065e+06,140,156,3167,1.1906e+06,326
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 322 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 322 transition count 245
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 309 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 309 transition count 232
Applied a total of 82 rules in 16 ms. Remains 309 /350 variables (removed 41) and now considering 232/273 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 309 cols
[2025-05-29 20:26:40] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 279 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:26:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 720 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1001 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 231 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 184 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 9/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 164 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 6/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 202 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 153 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 309/541 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/309 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 231/231 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 69/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 232/541 variables, 309/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/541 variables, 231/688 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 222 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 184 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/541 variables, 10/698 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 541/541 variables, and 698 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 309/309 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 231/231 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 309/350 places, 232/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61070 ms. Remains : 309/350 places, 232/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 232 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1128640899315854997.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12438658402866428425.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1128640899315854997.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12438658402866428425.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2628694232834869998.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2628694232834869998.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2628694232834869998.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2628694232834869998.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2628694232834869998.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7643775828231359650.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4705712900622334725.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7643775828231359650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4705712900622334725.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64213e+18,3.43367,86976,13583,27,221139,279,672,177718,42,666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((((i9.i0.u55.p134==0)||(i9.i1.u78.p213==0))||(i9.i1.u101.p337==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((i9.i0.u55.p134==0)||(i9.i1.u78.p213==0))||(i9.i1.u101.p337==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t105, t113, t149, t157, t165, t173, i0.u91.t33, i0.u103.t38, i1.t153, i1.u17.t160, i1.u19...742
(forward)formula 0,0,19.8191,418160,1,0,931009,279,3205,1.05599e+06,161,666,2297617
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 324 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 324 transition count 247
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 313 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 313 transition count 236
Applied a total of 74 rules in 26 ms. Remains 313 /350 variables (removed 37) and now considering 236/273 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-29 20:28:31] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 851 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 235 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:28:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 13/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 10/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 11/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 176 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 6/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 313/549 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 60/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 8/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 212 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 153 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 6/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 236/549 variables, 313/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/549 variables, 235/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 549/549 variables, and 722 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61207 ms. Remains : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1743788788130825462.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:29:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9574616981775004944.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1743788788130825462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9574616981775004944.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13504800665005033566.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13504800665005033566.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13504800665005033566.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13504800665005033566.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13504800665005033566.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability321485340134893978.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11921471383571607476.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability321485340134893978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11921471383571607476.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.68132e+18,1.32359,38408,6465,35,87616,671,667,84084,47,1624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((((i16.u73.p185==0) + EX((i4.i1.u5.p11==0))) + ((!(A((i17.u103.p339==1) U (i13.u82.p230==1))) + ((i16.u68.p167==0)&&(i0.i0.u60.p149...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((((i16.u73.p185==0) + EX((i4.i1.u5.p11==0))) + ((!(!((E(!((i13.u82.p230==1)) U (!((i17...328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t117, t161, t169, t177, i0.i0.u60.t105, i0.i1.u86.t55, i0.i1.u87.t52, i0.i1.u88.t49, i0.i...759
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 325 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 325 transition count 248
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 314 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 314 transition count 237
Applied a total of 72 rules in 15 ms. Remains 314 /350 variables (removed 36) and now considering 237/273 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 314 cols
[2025-05-29 20:30:32] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:30:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1028 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:30:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 197 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 178 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 188 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 181 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 18/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 172 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 11/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30062ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 314/350 places, 237/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31327 ms. Remains : 314/350 places, 237/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 237 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3427457685574592899.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17864075312834181688.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3427457685574592899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17864075312834181688.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9476396625113427306.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9476396625113427306.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9476396625113427306.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9476396625113427306.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9476396625113427306.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11053009666908096340.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:31:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16118198002095292382.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11053009666908096340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16118198002095292382.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.7072e+18,3.20852,89112,18898,27,202101,321,666,289040,43,762,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(((!(E((((i9.i1.u41.p122==1)&&(i12.u85.p248==1))&&(i19.i1.u107.p367==1)) U (i8.i0.u24.p67==1))) * (i18.u96.p296==1)) + AG(EX((i16.i...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(((!(E((((i9.i1.u41.p122==1)&&(i12.u85.p248==1))&&(i19.i1.u107.p367==1)) U (i8.i0.u24.p67==1))) * ...503
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t162, t170, t174, i0.t110, i0.u54.t117, i0.u56.t113, i1.t158, i1.t154, i1.u19.t161, i1.u2...767
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 170 edges and 350 vertex of which 6 / 350 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 657 edges and 345 vertex of which 344 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 343 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 294 transition count 216
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 294 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 219 transition count 151
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 192 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 192 transition count 124
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 110 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 109 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 108 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 107 transition count 48
Applied a total of 454 rules in 58 ms. Remains 107 /350 variables (removed 243) and now considering 48/273 (removed 225) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 107 cols
[2025-05-29 20:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:32:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 372 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 34, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 39 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 541 ms to find 39 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/350 places, 48/273 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 140 edges and 68 vertex of which 60 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 60 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 50 transition count 37
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 37 transition count 30
Applied a total of 41 rules in 10 ms. Remains 37 /68 variables (removed 31) and now considering 30/48 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/350 places, 30/273 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 35 transition count 29
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 35 /36 variables (removed 1) and now considering 29/30 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 35 cols
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 35/350 places, 29/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 818 ms. Remains : 35/350 places, 29/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5832049758568264825.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8309372088869713008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5832049758568264825.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8309372088869713008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39398,0.094953,7388,2,4237,5,21358,6,0,168,14119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(AF((p118==1))) + (p282==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p282==0))),TRUE),!((p118==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.419025,16092,1,0,14,61154,23,6,874,28364,11
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 325 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 325 transition count 248
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 313 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 313 transition count 236
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 313 /350 variables (removed 37) and now considering 236/273 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-29 20:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1078 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1304 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 235 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 210 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 205 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 214 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 207 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 191 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 169 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 8/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 167 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 8/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 6/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 313/549 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 66/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/549 variables, 313/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/549 variables, 235/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/549 variables, 20/715 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 549/549 variables, and 716 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/235 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 235 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61366 ms. Remains : 313/350 places, 236/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1387112764160913249.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7460442745554190497.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1387112764160913249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7460442745554190497.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8408648296261277535.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8408648296261277535.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8408648296261277535.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8408648296261277535.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8408648296261277535.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability79023308019321402.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6318537235421803384.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability79023308019321402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6318537235421803384.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64229e+18,1.7318,47332,14686,37,110785,889,688,115400,53,1771,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AG(((!(EX((i16.u90.p270==1))) + (i5.u22.p63==1)) + (i8.i2.u76.p214==1))) U (i16.u100.p335==1)) + EX(((i5.u2.p7==0) * ((AX((i3.i0.u3.p1...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX((i16.u90.p270==1))) + (i5.u22.p63==1)) + (i8.i2.u76.p214==1)))))) * (i16.u100.p...406
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t157, t161, t169, i0.t177, i0.t173, i0.u6.t183, i0.u8.t180, i0.u10.t176, i2.i0.t165, i2.i...792
(forward)formula 0,0,18.7028,489384,1,0,1.33429e+06,889,4151,1.33421e+06,251,1771,3406167
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 350 vertex of which 6 / 350 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 657 edges and 345 vertex of which 344 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 343 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 294 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 293 transition count 215
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 293 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 219 transition count 150
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 191 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 191 transition count 122
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 109 transition count 48
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 108 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 107 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 106 transition count 46
Applied a total of 457 rules in 33 ms. Remains 106 /350 variables (removed 244) and now considering 46/273 (removed 227) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [81]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/350 places, 46/273 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 46/46 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 105/350 places, 46/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1409992148033537567.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:33:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17832834911949302063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1409992148033537567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17832834911949302063.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79019,0.829587,26148,2,18780,5,123098,6,0,466,88604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((p32!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((p32!=1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t14, t23, t45, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...178
(forward)formula 0,0,5.30835,116708,1,0,86,407417,119,53,2916,253766,106
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 350/350 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 326 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 326 transition count 249
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 316 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 316 transition count 239
Applied a total of 68 rules in 24 ms. Remains 316 /350 variables (removed 34) and now considering 239/273 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-29 20:34:01] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:34:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 986 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 238 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 175 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 188 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 200 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 201 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 193 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 186 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 173 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 200 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 190 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 19/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 7/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 193 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 187 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 10/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 239/555 variables, 316/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 555/555 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 238/238 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 56/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 170 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 153 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 9/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 239/555 variables, 316/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 238/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 15/714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 555/555 variables, and 714 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 238/238 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 238 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 316/350 places, 239/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61380 ms. Remains : 316/350 places, 239/273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3567516606273209317.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17757063645094951137.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3567516606273209317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17757063645094951137.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph507225582020552231.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph507225582020552231.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph507225582020552231.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph507225582020552231.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph507225582020552231.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15563378656811153584.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:35:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10737013222368416746.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15563378656811153584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10737013222368416746.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.84124e+18,2.39869,52572,5929,37,107841,605,679,204482,49,1988,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF(((((i2.u10.p28==0)&&(i6.i0.u24.p73==1))&&((i3.u69.p172==1)&&(i15.u93.p345==1)))&&((((i14.i1.u35.p93==1)&&(i15.u95.p292==1))||(i11...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!(((((i2.u10.p28==0)&&(i6.i0.u24.p73==1))&&((i3.u69.p172==1)&&(i15.u93.p34...952
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t112, t160, t168, t172, t180, i0.t120, i0.u37.t137, i0.u53.t119, i1.i0.t156, i1.i0.u20.t1...800
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8729562672075403055.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8729562672075403055.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8729562672075403055.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8729562672075403055.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8729562672075403055.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9310803586095216692.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:36:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8670044346082724370.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9310803586095216692.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8670044346082724370.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.34454e+18,18.7285,430984,47823,44,1.1476e+06,719,829,1.09873e+06,48,2616,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((i8.i1.u34.p90==0) + AX(EX((i16.i1.u96.p255==1)))) + ((i17.i0.u102.p275==0) * AF((i15.i2.u63.p155==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i8.i1.u34.p90==0) + !(EX(!(EX((i16.i1.u96.p255==1)))))))) * !((i17.i0.u102.p275==0)))]...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t190, t194, t202, t206, i0.t146, i0.u54.t153, i0.u56.t149, i1.i2.t87, i1.i2.u94.t88, i2.i...1149
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,202.749,4233192,1,0,1.10891e+07,739,5073,9.29412e+06,233,2616,21905719
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(((i19.i1.u130.p351==0) * E((!(((((i8.i1.u27.p74==1)&&(i8.i0.u28.p77==1))&&((i8.i0.u29.p80==1)&&(i13.i1.u30.p83==1)))&&(((i8.i1.u32.p8...353
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * EG(((i19.i1.u130.p351==0) * E((!(((((i8.i1.u27.p74==1)&&(i8.i0.u28.p77==1))&&((i8.i0.u29.p80==1)&&(...507
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 1,1,1323.91,6385220,1,0,1.54774e+07,739,2230,1.30179e+07,110,2616,19233869
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((AX((i17.i1.u105.p284==1)) * ((AF((i17.i1.u114.p304==0)) + (i13.i1.u76.p189==1)) + (i16.i1.u97.p256==0))) * ((EG((((i1.i1.u39.p128==1...340
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!((i17.i1.u105.p284==1)))) * ((!(EG(!((i17.i1.u114.p304==0)))) + (i13.i1.u76.p1...720
(forward)formula 2,1,1435.01,6744396,1,0,1.64088e+07,739,2636,1.36375e+07,128,2616,6784736
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((!(A(EF((u8.p20==1)) U !((((i6.u20.p54==1)&&(i15.i0.u87.p233==1))&&(i6.u117.p310==1))))) * !(A(AG((i17.i1.u122.p330==1)) U EG(AX((i17....177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(!((((i6.u20.p54==1)&&(i15.i0.u87.p233==1))&&(i6.u117.p310==1)))) U (!(E(TRU...784
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15779460903261491411.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 21:03:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2486857536760503000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15779460903261491411.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2486857536760503000.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-06.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;