Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200041.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-06, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200041
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748549420695

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 211 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Transformed 376 places.
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Transformed 297 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 20:10:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 376 places and 297 transitions and 830 arcs in 450 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 40 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 12 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 93 out of 375 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 375/375 places, 296/296 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 373 transition count 296
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 344 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 344 transition count 267
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 331 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 331 transition count 254
Applied a total of 86 rules in 170 ms. Remains 331 /375 variables (removed 44) and now considering 254/296 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 254 rows 331 cols
[2025-05-29 20:10:24] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 59 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 785 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:10:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2098 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:10:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/331 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 194 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 178 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 174 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 172 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 250 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 246 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 241 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 166 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 215 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 192 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 175 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 209 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 257 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 185 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 200 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 210 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 189 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 196 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 176 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 178 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 178 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 164 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 183 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 169 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 197 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 245 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 239 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 228 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 228 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 233 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 228 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 184 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 184 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 331/585 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/331 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 60/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 185 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 7/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 237 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 8/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 1)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 1)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 1)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 1)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 1)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 1)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 1)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 1)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 1)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 1)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 1)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 1)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 1)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 1)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 1)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 1)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 1)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 1)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 1)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 1)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 331/585 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/253 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60247ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60274ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 331/375 places, 254/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62589 ms. Remains : 331/375 places, 254/296 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 331 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 20:11:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-05-29 20:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 104 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 20:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 331 places (down from 93) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (414 resets) in 2382 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 7/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (73 resets) in 344 ms. (115 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (73 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (75 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (107 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (69 resets) in 170 ms. (233 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (66 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-29 20:11:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/53 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 142/195 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 112/307 variables, 45/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 229/536 variables, 307/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/536 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 37/573 variables, 15/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 0/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 12/585 variables, 9/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 0/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/585 variables, 0/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 585/585 variables, and 411 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 926 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 331/331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 38/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 152/194 variables, 30/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 113/307 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 229/536 variables, 307/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/536 variables, 1/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 106 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/536 variables, 9/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/536 variables, 0/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 37/573 variables, 15/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 2/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 12/585 variables, 9/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 0/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/585 variables, 0/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 585/585 variables, and 430 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 2901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 331/331 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 3846ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1189 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 331 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 150 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 635 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 325 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 287 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 285 transition count 205
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 285 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 212 transition count 141
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 196 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 196 transition count 125
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 111 transition count 48
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 111 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 110 transition count 47
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 110 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 109 transition count 46
Applied a total of 417 rules in 107 ms. Remains 109 /331 variables (removed 222) and now considering 46/254 (removed 208) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 109/331 places, 46/254 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 176 steps (0 resets) in 15 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
Computed a total of 324 stabilizing places and 245 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 642 edges and 331 vertex of which 330 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.11 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 150 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 324 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 286 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 285 transition count 207
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 285 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 137 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 212 transition count 143
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 196 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 196 transition count 127
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 114 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 113 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 112 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 111 transition count 51
Applied a total of 409 rules in 89 ms. Remains 111 /331 variables (removed 220) and now considering 51/254 (removed 203) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 111 cols
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned [38]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/331 places, 51/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 110 /110 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 268 ms. Remains : 110/331 places, 51/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11005882991597625725.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10454302872696859499.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11005882991597625725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10454302872696859499.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,301004,1.3726,37120,2,29436,5,177358,6,0,490,133498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(E(((p139==0)||(p67==1)) U ((p234==0)&&(p341==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(((p139==0)||(p67==1)) U ((p234==0)&&(p341==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t17, t18, t27, t49, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rev...187
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,7.75196,178044,1,0,143,694180,133,86,3086,385055,169
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 315 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 315 transition count 238
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 310 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 310 transition count 233
Applied a total of 42 rules in 23 ms. Remains 310 /331 variables (removed 21) and now considering 233/254 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 310 cols
[2025-05-29 20:11:41] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 255 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:11:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 978 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:11:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/310 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 196 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 213 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 213 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 218 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 203 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 206 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 183 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 180 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 176 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 189 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 184 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 147 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 176 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 12/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 6/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 226 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 228 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 221 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30097ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30101ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 310/331 places, 233/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31366 ms. Remains : 310/331 places, 233/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 233 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11295842846518014112.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8007004357589566490.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11295842846518014112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8007004357589566490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9847521567865195000.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9847521567865195000.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9847521567865195000.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9847521567865195000.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9847521567865195000.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12714104534523374130.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality983286165015043850.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12714104534523374130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality983286165015043850.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64213e+18,10.8462,245528,42793,27,598288,353,641,743394,41,924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 153 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 324 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 284 transition count 206
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 284 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 209 transition count 141
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 192 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 192 transition count 124
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 108 transition count 48
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 107 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 106 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 105 transition count 46
Applied a total of 420 rules in 44 ms. Remains 105 /331 variables (removed 226) and now considering 46/254 (removed 208) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 105 cols
[2025-05-29 20:13:13] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 306 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 33, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74]
Discarding 39 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 519 ms to find 39 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/331 places, 46/254 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 66 vertex of which 58 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 58 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 49 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 48 transition count 35
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 36 transition count 28
Applied a total of 40 rules in 7 ms. Remains 36 /66 variables (removed 30) and now considering 28/46 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 36 cols
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [33]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/331 places, 28/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 35 /35 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 661 ms. Remains : 35/331 places, 28/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 407 steps (161 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8758933006996348809.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16731705849082568404.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8758933006996348809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16731705849082568404.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 151 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 324 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 286 transition count 208
Performed 67 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 67 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 286 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 209 transition count 141
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 192 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 192 transition count 124
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 117 transition count 52
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 116 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 115 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 114 transition count 50
Applied a total of 407 rules in 52 ms. Remains 114 /331 variables (removed 217) and now considering 50/254 (removed 204) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 114 cols
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned [102, 104, 106]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 195 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/331 places, 50/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 253 ms. Remains : 111/331 places, 50/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6004965213290612970.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5608523329141927737.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6004965213290612970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5608523329141927737.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,243922,1.57169,32548,2,18843,5,146408,6,0,493,110129,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((A((p355==0) U (p263==1)) * ((p39==1)||(p119==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!((E(!((p263==1)) U (!((p355==0)) * !((p263==1)))) + EG(!((p263==1))))) * ((p39=...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t14, t15, t25, t26, t49, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,0,7.98209,156028,1,0,145,640127,132,85,3127,494441,175
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 314 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 314 transition count 237
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 309 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 309 transition count 232
Applied a total of 44 rules in 15 ms. Remains 309 /331 variables (removed 22) and now considering 232/254 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 309 cols
[2025-05-29 20:13:22] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 835 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1066 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 231 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 187 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 175 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 179 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 197 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 201 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 9/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 193 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 6/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 213 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 216 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 192 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 200 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 187 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 161 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30131ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30132ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 309/331 places, 232/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31216 ms. Remains : 309/331 places, 232/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 232 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15316398137819320695.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:13:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16295259297471509423.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15316398137819320695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16295259297471509423.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5392204708434935773.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5392204708434935773.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5392204708434935773.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5392204708434935773.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5392204708434935773.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18231558838681143089.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3776965005066505724.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18231558838681143089.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3776965005066505724.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64213e+18,11.2232,226144,27858,37,603829,665,649,368079,48,1445,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 316 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 316 transition count 239
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 312 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 312 transition count 235
Applied a total of 38 rules in 15 ms. Remains 312 /331 variables (removed 19) and now considering 235/254 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 312 cols
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 402 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:14:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 665 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1078 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 234 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:14:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/312 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 174 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 19/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 214 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 190 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 190 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 13/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 201 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/547 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/312 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/312 variables, 34/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 66/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 235/547 variables, 312/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/547 variables, 234/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/547 variables, 11/711 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 547/547 variables, and 711 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 312/312 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 312/331 places, 235/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61183 ms. Remains : 312/331 places, 235/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 235 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3170102981284658942.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16622713449764320255.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3170102981284658942.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16622713449764320255.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16162650793188431370.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16162650793188431370.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16162650793188431370.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16162650793188431370.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16162650793188431370.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:16:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17097484681728062687.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13238566039277498032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17097484681728062687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13238566039277498032.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75618e+18,4.9876,103700,24843,35,261004,672,656,183316,49,1561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 152 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 324 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 285 transition count 207
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 285 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 210 transition count 142
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 194 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 194 transition count 126
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 109 transition count 49
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 108 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 107 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 106 transition count 47
Applied a total of 418 rules in 41 ms. Remains 106 /331 variables (removed 225) and now considering 47/254 (removed 207) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 302 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 33, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 489 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/331 places, 47/254 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 143 edges and 68 vertex of which 60 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 60 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 53 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 52 transition count 38
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 40 transition count 31
Applied a total of 36 rules in 6 ms. Remains 40 /68 variables (removed 28) and now considering 31/47 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 40 cols
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [37]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/331 places, 31/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 602 ms. Remains : 39/331 places, 31/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1734324730940637235.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14260610025584099400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1734324730940637235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14260610025584099400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21914,0.289227,10352,2,6703,5,37620,6,0,186,24198,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p227==1)&&((p204==0)||(p257==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p227==1)&&((p204==0)||(p257==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t4, t15, t27, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,0,1.10811,29572,1,0,71,125932,82,39,1089,61126,79
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 143 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 324 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 290 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 289 transition count 211
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 289 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 215 transition count 146
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 200 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 200 transition count 131
Performed 67 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 135 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 132 transition count 64
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 131 transition count 63
Applied a total of 378 rules in 29 ms. Remains 131 /331 variables (removed 200) and now considering 63/254 (removed 191) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 131 cols
[2025-05-29 20:16:57] [INFO ] Computed 69 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned [7, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 131 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/331 places, 63/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 165 ms. Remains : 123/331 places, 63/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2666242804424807384.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:16:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18373733579388620908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2666242804424807384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18373733579388620908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,603197,0.689974,22916,2,16747,5,91298,6,0,555,67881,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p23==1) * A(((EG((p119==1)) + E((((p290==0)||(p144==1))||(p272==1)) U (p125==1))) + ((p115==1)||((p15==1)&&((p130==0)||(p2==1))))) U...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p23==1)) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p316==0)||(p160==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(!(E...387
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t6, t8, t11, t23, t24, t25, t35, t40, Intersection with reachable at each step enabl...206
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,14.1537,314144,1,0,320,1.63529e+06,170,210,3769,1.39291e+06,398
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 318 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 318 transition count 241
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 314 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 314 transition count 237
Applied a total of 34 rules in 22 ms. Remains 314 /331 variables (removed 17) and now considering 237/254 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 314 cols
[2025-05-29 20:17:12] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:17:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 739 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 969 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:17:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 205 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 220 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 16/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 13/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 8/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 314/551 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/314 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 80/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 202 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 237/551 variables, 314/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 236/715 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 207 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 199 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 206 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 204 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 196 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 190 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 188 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 166 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 165 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 20/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 551/551 variables, and 735 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 314/314 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 314/331 places, 237/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61063 ms. Remains : 314/331 places, 237/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 237 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7984929704121065646.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18318314202191557648.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7984929704121065646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18318314202191557648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17822592271705265055.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17822592271705265055.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17822592271705265055.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17822592271705265055.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17822592271705265055.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1368443530595647310.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 20:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15643981684071141350.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1368443530595647310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15643981684071141350.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69225e+18,17.2762,363160,74340,30,888176,466,678,877683,41,1287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 316 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 316 transition count 239
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 311 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 311 transition count 234
Applied a total of 40 rules in 22 ms. Remains 311 /331 variables (removed 20) and now considering 234/254 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 234 rows 311 cols
[2025-05-29 20:19:13] [INFO ] Computed 79 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 20:19:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 951 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 233 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:19:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 195 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 186 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 188 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 181 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 212 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 210 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 9/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 145 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 19/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 8/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/545 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 40/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 76/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 234/545 variables, 311/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/545 variables, 233/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 162 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/545 variables, 19/718 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 545/545 variables, and 718 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 311/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 311/331 places, 234/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61355 ms. Remains : 311/331 places, 234/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 234 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8278256487365778393.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7006177996521895867.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8278256487365778393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7006177996521895867.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7749100615611416330.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7749100615611416330.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7749100615611416330.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7749100615611416330.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7749100615611416330.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1245268511517050222.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:20:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4799000755842666680.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1245268511517050222.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4799000755842666680.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64213e+18,2.98595,80048,17814,41,203954,917,652,162756,53,2002,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AG(EX((i9.u2.p5!=0))) * (((i16.i0.u83.p236==0)||(i0.i0.u89.p265==1))||(i5.u18.p53==0))) * ((i2.u11.p31==0) + (((i1.i0.u97.p302!=0)&...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(EX((i9.u2.p5!=0))))) * (((i16.i0.u83.p236==0)||(i0.i0.u89.p265==1...1062
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t107, t115, t151, t155, t163, t175, i0.i0.u55.t110, i0.i0.u59.t103, i0.i0.u89.t43, i0.i1....772
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 331/331 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 152 edges and 331 vertex of which 6 / 331 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 636 edges and 326 vertex of which 325 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 324 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 285 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 284 transition count 206
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 284 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 209 transition count 141
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 193 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 193 transition count 125
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 114 transition count 51
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 113 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 112 transition count 49
Applied a total of 410 rules in 44 ms. Remains 112 /331 variables (removed 219) and now considering 49/254 (removed 205) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Computed 64 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned [96, 98, 100]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 228 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/331 places, 49/254 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 49/49 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 279 ms. Remains : 109/331 places, 49/254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3978198962895803220.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4148436032245556761.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3978198962895803220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4148436032245556761.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,98101,0.363774,15540,2,12824,5,68337,6,0,485,39969,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AF((p106==0)) U (EF(AG((p171==1))) * !(EF((p146==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EG(!((p106==0)))) U (E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p171==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U (p146==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t16, t17, t26, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,0,3.5604,98888,1,0,110,432148,130,65,3089,290924,159
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16375774384632152718.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16375774384632152718.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16375774384632152718.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16375774384632152718.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16375774384632152718.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9757756582424504521.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 20:21:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15114919982448125656.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9757756582424504521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15114919982448125656.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.04899e+18,14.5365,325876,71054,46,829599,599,709,712666,54,1613,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(((AG(EX((i16.u103.p340==0))) + AX(FALSE)) * ((AF(EX(((i5.i0.i0.u51.p127==0)||(i6.u55.p139==1)))) + EF(((i0.u115.p337==0)||(i3.u14.p...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(((!(E(TRUE U !(EX((i16.u103.p340==0))))) + !(EX(!(FALSE)))) * ((!(EG(!(EX(((i5.i0.i0.u51.p127=...328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t127, t179, t187, t195, i0.t135, i0.u37.t152, i0.u53.t134, i1.t175, i1.t171, i1.u18.t178,...871
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,278.417,2769404,1,0,6.66756e+06,599,2467,7.05453e+06,132,1613,11518740
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(AG(EX(!(((i5.i0.i1.u127.p368==0)||(i7.u89.p243==1))))) U AG(EF((i6.u1.p4==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i5.i0.i1.u127.p368==0)||(i7.u89.p243==1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i6.u1.p...175
(forward)formula 1,0,278.456,2769660,1,0,6.66789e+06,599,2470,7.05511e+06,133,1613,11520059
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((AF(((((i5.i1.i1.u52.p129==0)||(i17.u123.p360==1)) * EF((i9.u72.p183==1))) + ((i15.u94.p255==0)&&(i2.u10.p29==1)))) + (A(!(((i7.u90.p...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(!(((i16.u112.p319==0)||(i5.i1.i0.u117.p367==1)))) U (!(!(((i7.u90.p248==0)||...633
(forward)formula 2,0,1362.79,5467816,1,0,9.7857e+06,599,1471,1.27024e+07,107,1613,5880552
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5037675048009386727.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 20:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality342628124624856873.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5037675048009386727.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality342628124624856873.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 21:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 170 ms
[2025-05-29 21:08:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
[2025-05-29 21:08:41] [INFO ] Transformed 331 places.
[2025-05-29 21:08:41] [INFO ] Transformed 254 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-29 21:08:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2918823643641922559.gal : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 21:08:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality315849306990102817.ctl : 45 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2918823643641922559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality315849306990102817.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...327
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-06, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200041"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-06.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;