Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200033.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200033
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748547374203

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 19:36:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 19:36:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 194 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Transformed 368 places.
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Transformed 319 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 368 places and 319 transitions and 854 arcs in 441 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 28 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 16 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 77 out of 367 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 367/367 places, 318/318 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 365 transition count 318
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 321 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 321 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 321 transition count 273
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 306 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 306 transition count 258
Applied a total of 121 rules in 187 ms. Remains 306 /367 variables (removed 61) and now considering 258/318 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 258 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-29 19:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 734 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:36:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1930 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 257 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:36:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 272 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 220 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 197 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 229 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 209 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 216 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 187 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 189 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 211 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 229 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 182 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 192 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 249 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 246 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 264 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 237 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 249 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 234 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 229 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 239 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 209 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 237 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 211 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 195 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 163 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 147 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 157 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 175 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 14/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 306/564 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved in 30048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 0/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 257/257 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 54/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 151 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 141 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 149 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 258/564 variables, 306/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/564 variables, 257/678 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 177 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 169 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 149 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 156 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 166 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 219 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 220 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 564/564 variables, and 695 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 257/257 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60256ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60284ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/367 places, 258/318 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62445 ms. Remains : 306/367 places, 258/318 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 306 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 19:37:20] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-29 19:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 100 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 19:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 306 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (375 resets) in 2792 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 3/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (68 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (61 resets) in 140 ms. (283 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (63 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-05-29 19:37:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 263/281 variables, 53/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 233/514 variables, 281/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 40/554 variables, 17/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 10/564 variables, 8/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/564 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/564 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 564/564 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 430 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 263/281 variables, 53/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 7/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 233/514 variables, 281/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 554/564 variables, and 365 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 1493 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 298/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 1931ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
Computed a total of 300 stabilizing places and 250 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 638 edges and 306 vertex of which 305 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.19 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 299 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 204
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 183 transition count 147
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 156 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 156 transition count 120
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 82 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 81 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 80 transition count 48
Applied a total of 422 rules in 134 ms. Remains 80 /306 variables (removed 226) and now considering 48/258 (removed 210) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-29 19:37:23] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 341 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 493 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/306 places, 48/258 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 53 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 51 transition count 46
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 49 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 49 transition count 44
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 47 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 17 ms. Remains 47 /53 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/306 places, 42/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 796 ms. Remains : 47/306 places, 42/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3137711921577061412.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6952794892977105746.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3137711921577061412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6952794892977105746.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,66,0.028355,4172,2,239,5,966,6,0,229,759,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((p147==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p147==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t28, t38, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
(forward)formula 0,0,0.056456,5196,1,0,58,4417,105,42,1473,3135,96
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 280 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 280 transition count 232
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 271 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 271 transition count 223
Applied a total of 70 rules in 29 ms. Remains 271 /306 variables (removed 35) and now considering 223/258 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 271 cols
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:37:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 655 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 810 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:37:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 178 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 184 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 189 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 165 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 186 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 188 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 185 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 165 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 127 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/494 variables, 271/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 191 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 7/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 494/494 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 33/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 166 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 179 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 161 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 174 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 175 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 179 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 171 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 12/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/494 variables, 271/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 222/593 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 11/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 494/494 variables, and 604 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/306 places, 223/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60921 ms. Remains : 271/306 places, 223/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12674900974972527494.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9886861719533986155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12674900974972527494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9886861719533986155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41014e+17,4.68041,95368,2,40224,5,235223,6,0,1307,521387,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10706544786649980550.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10706544786649980550.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10706544786649980550.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10706544786649980550.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10706544786649980550.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8865385255265716509.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1254302287606991341.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8865385255265716509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1254302287606991341.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41014e+17,1.00949,26664,5291,23,33904,337,520,83730,35,682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AX((i20.i1.u82.p312==1)) * (((i15.u53.p164==0)||(i19.u93.p365==1))||(i9.u39.p124==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((i15.u53.p164==0)||(i19.u93.p365==1))||(i9.u39.p124==1))) * !(EX(!((i20.i1.u82.p312==...171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t153, t157, t201, t203, t208, t214, i0.u30.t122, i0.u32.t118, i0.u34.t114, i1.u28.t126, i2.u2...848
(forward)formula 0,1,8.70846,232488,1,0,449957,337,3324,721247,167,877,1062940
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 171 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 299 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 204
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 185 transition count 148
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 158 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 158 transition count 121
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 149 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 82 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 81 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 80 transition count 47
Applied a total of 423 rules in 39 ms. Remains 80 /306 variables (removed 226) and now considering 47/258 (removed 211) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/306 places, 47/258 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 47/47 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 79/306 places, 47/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7225670838154126067.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15858819885459406612.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7225670838154126067.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15858819885459406612.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 6091 steps (1776 resets) in 44 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 299 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 204
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 253 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 183 transition count 147
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 156 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 156 transition count 120
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 82 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 81 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 80 transition count 48
Applied a total of 422 rules in 54 ms. Remains 80 /306 variables (removed 226) and now considering 48/258 (removed 210) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 472 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/306 places, 48/258 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 33 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 33 transition count 35
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 33 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 29 transition count 31
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 29 transition count 31
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 29 transition count 30
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 29 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 28 transition count 29
Applied a total of 37 rules in 15 ms. Remains 28 /46 variables (removed 18) and now considering 29/48 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [3]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/306 places, 29/258 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 27 /27 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 678 ms. Remains : 27/306 places, 29/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 8 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15441623990407811984.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13821482837368549841.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15441623990407811984.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13821482837368549841.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 279 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 279 transition count 231
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 268 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 268 transition count 220
Applied a total of 76 rules in 61 ms. Remains 268 /306 variables (removed 38) and now considering 220/258 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 268 cols
[2025-05-29 19:39:06] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:39:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 820 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1023 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:39:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/268 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 179 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 184 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 190 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 185 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 176 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 178 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 4/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 188 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 181 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 220/488 variables, 268/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 176 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 488/488 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/268 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 33/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 182 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 175 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 279 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 169 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 176 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 4/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 164 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 162 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 220/488 variables, 268/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/488 variables, 219/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/488 variables, 9/593 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 488/488 variables, and 593 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 268/306 places, 220/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61169 ms. Remains : 268/306 places, 220/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality361512568577223225.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7589060084825760317.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality361512568577223225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7589060084825760317.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41012e+17,4.70832,95904,2,39598,5,234706,6,0,1292,533990,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3290970904192413353.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3290970904192413353.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3290970904192413353.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3290970904192413353.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3290970904192413353.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14064657068604658765.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16718057909679496659.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14064657068604658765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16718057909679496659.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41012e+17,0.602815,18968,3918,35,23999,415,521,54791,42,961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((i6.i1.u55.p166==0)||(i18.u75.p283==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((i6.i1.u55.p166==0)||(i18.u75.p283==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t150, t159, t198, t200, t201, t202, t205, t211, i0.u73.t34, i0.u74.t31, i1.t100, i1.u37.t107,...837
(forward)formula 0,0,6.91042,177048,1,0,340898,415,2733,532776,169,961,847715
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 167 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 43 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 43 transitions
Performed 43 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 43
Iterating post reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 299 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 256 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 255 transition count 206
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 255 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 188 transition count 151
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 162 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 162 transition count 125
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 88 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 87 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 86 transition count 53
Applied a total of 411 rules in 43 ms. Remains 86 /306 variables (removed 220) and now considering 53/258 (removed 205) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned [84]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 159 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/306 places, 53/258 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 85 /85 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 207 ms. Remains : 85/306 places, 53/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11302273312119848315.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15307753745766416295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11302273312119848315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15307753745766416295.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,248,0.049764,4804,2,544,5,2523,6,0,391,2835,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EG((p255==1)) + (p111==1)) + ((p125==0)&&(p13==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EG((p255==1)) + (p111==1)) + ((p125==0)&&(p13==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t15, t22, t24, t30, t32, t33, t34, t52, Intersection with reachable at each step ena...208
(forward)formula 0,0,0.223997,8644,1,0,110,18132,134,66,2572,15539,147
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 281 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 281 transition count 233
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 271 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 271 transition count 223
Applied a total of 70 rules in 67 ms. Remains 271 /306 variables (removed 35) and now considering 223/258 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 271 cols
[2025-05-29 19:40:44] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 292 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:40:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1045 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1340 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:40:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 181 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 187 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 173 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 178 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 167 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 180 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 179 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 223/494 variables, 271/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 144 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 174 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 7/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 494/494 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 32/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 178 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 177 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 178 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 174 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 167 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 166 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 11/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/494 variables, 271/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 222/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 14/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 494/494 variables, and 606 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/306 places, 223/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61477 ms. Remains : 271/306 places, 223/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality957600249942071026.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17814646225738689671.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality957600249942071026.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17814646225738689671.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41135e+17,4.71528,110900,2,46951,5,268737,6,0,1307,619549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3141832006454348257.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3141832006454348257.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3141832006454348257.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3141832006454348257.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3141832006454348257.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4364870164312422182.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5271198039173351503.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4364870164312422182.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5271198039173351503.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41135e+17,1.89454,48392,7814,32,57906,345,564,176964,42,971,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(!(EF((i15.i0.u11.p27!=1))) U EF(((i2.u23.p70==1)&&((i10.i1.u77.p328==1)||((i13.u48.p146==1)&&((i10.i1.u77.p283==0)||(i12.i0.u83.p317...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U ((i2.u23.p70==1)&&((i10.i1.u77.p328==1)||((i13.u48.p146==1)&&((i10.i1.u77.p283==0)...491
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t152, t156, t161, t201, t204, t205, t208, t214, i0.u71.t39, i0.u72.t36, i0.u73.t33, i1.u25.t1...956
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 279 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 279 transition count 231
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 269 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 269 transition count 221
Applied a total of 74 rules in 16 ms. Remains 269 /306 variables (removed 37) and now considering 221/258 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 269 cols
[2025-05-29 19:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 220 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:42:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 185 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 183 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 169 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 176 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 170 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 184 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 179 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 3/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 171 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 182 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 269/490 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 0/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 29/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 221/490 variables, 269/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 220/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 12/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 490/490 variables, and 591 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61378 ms. Remains : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 221 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11926685275503729631.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:43:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4450108319038870638.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11926685275503729631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4450108319038870638.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.68598e+17,5.16279,101012,2,41846,5,241607,6,0,1297,567995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7116889623950019874.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7116889623950019874.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7116889623950019874.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7116889623950019874.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7116889623950019874.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8746209358942465869.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8743448533757947211.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8746209358942465869.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8743448533757947211.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.68598e+17,0.562405,18488,2124,26,24698,377,527,57697,35,834,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(EF(EG(((i17.u75.p276!=0)&&(i16.u51.p156!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U EG(((i17.u75.p276!=0)&&(i16.u51.p156!=1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t101, t151, t155, t199, t201, t203, t206, t212, i0.u72.t32, i1.u38.t104, i1.u42.t97, i1.u62.t...834
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,1,6.037,132920,1,0,225437,377,3115,558002,173,834,364358
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 168 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 299 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 257 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 256 transition count 207
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 256 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 131 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 184 transition count 148
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 157 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 157 transition count 121
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 85 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 84 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 83 transition count 50
Applied a total of 417 rules in 44 ms. Remains 83 /306 variables (removed 223) and now considering 50/258 (removed 208) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 83 cols
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/306 places, 50/258 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 82 /82 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 82/306 places, 50/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15010608446989579806.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7500897917906220050.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15010608446989579806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7500897917906220050.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,214,0.048595,4784,2,605,5,2696,6,0,377,2517,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(!(A(AF(((p292==0)||(p123==1))) U (p115!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p115!=1)) U (!(!(EG(!(((p292==0)||(p123==1)))))) * !((p115!=1)))) + EG(...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t18, t19, t21, t31, t49, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,1,0.198736,9008,1,0,107,19144,133,73,2537,17586,165
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 280 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 280 transition count 232
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 269 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 269 transition count 221
Applied a total of 74 rules in 26 ms. Remains 269 /306 variables (removed 37) and now considering 221/258 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 269 cols
[2025-05-29 19:44:24] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:44:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 939 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 220 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:44:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 169 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 166 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 179 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 169 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 221/490 variables, 269/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 186 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 11/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 490/490 variables, and 367 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 43/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 194 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 173 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 171 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 182 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 166 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 9/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 221/490 variables, 269/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 220/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 149 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 214 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 156 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 490/490 variables, and 622 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61264 ms. Remains : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 221 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18034252600107506234.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2095700148737068132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18034252600107506234.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2095700148737068132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4652e+17,5.04932,95944,2,40583,5,234485,6,0,1297,523146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8830317082167259808.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8830317082167259808.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8830317082167259808.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8830317082167259808.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8830317082167259808.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10268325852997273565.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16314565688024607684.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10268325852997273565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16314565688024607684.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4652e+17,0.646929,19880,3689,24,24832,455,503,55282,38,981,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(!(E(AX(((i5.i2.u52.p157==0)||(i16.u63.p205==1))) U EG((i7.i0.u84.p320==1))))) * EX((((i4.u8.p20==1)||(i2.u90.p351==0))||(i3.u86.p3...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY(Init) * EG(!(E(!(EX(!(((i5.i2.u52.p157==0)||(i16.u63.p205==1))))) U EG((i7.i0.u84.p320==1))))))) * (((i...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t101, t155, t160, t199, t201, t202, t203, t206, t212, i0.u38.t104, i0.u40.t100, i1.u34.t112, ...844
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 169 edges and 306 vertex of which 6 / 306 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 632 edges and 301 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 299 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 254 transition count 205
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 254 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 184 transition count 148
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 159 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 159 transition count 123
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 84 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 83 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 82 transition count 49
Applied a total of 419 rules in 84 ms. Remains 82 /306 variables (removed 224) and now considering 49/258 (removed 209) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 82 cols
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 261 ms returned [71]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 264 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/306 places, 49/258 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 49/49 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 364 ms. Remains : 81/306 places, 49/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9904843780080351229.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7187715505824531297.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9904843780080351229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7187715505824531297.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,67,0.089866,4384,2,292,5,1915,6,0,373,1905,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((p308==0)&&(p63==1))&&(p158==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p308==0)&&(p63==1))&&(p158==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t48, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,0,0.193412,6432,1,0,60,7832,118,48,2369,4831,106
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 279 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 279 transition count 231
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 269 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 269 transition count 221
Applied a total of 74 rules in 13 ms. Remains 269 /306 variables (removed 37) and now considering 221/258 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 269 cols
[2025-05-29 19:46:27] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:46:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 911 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1098 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 220 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:46:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 328 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 278 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 159 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 257 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 170 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 177 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 243 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 222 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 219 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 10/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 221/490 variables, 269/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 331 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 198 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 4/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 490/490 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 34/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 221/490 variables, 269/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 220/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 153 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 152 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 20/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 490/490 variables, and 600 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 220 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61172 ms. Remains : 269/306 places, 221/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 221 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15992346048788701361.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10586840828379010992.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15992346048788701361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10586840828379010992.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46534e+17,5.69464,118544,2,52607,5,282679,6,0,1297,655638,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11754809192745365994.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11754809192745365994.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11754809192745365994.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11754809192745365994.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11754809192745365994.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5525187409832796437.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 19:47:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3129025925200308407.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5525187409832796437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3129025925200308407.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46534e+17,0.447377,13608,2117,29,16403,386,553,37789,41,866,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(EX(((i2.u28.p94==0)||(i14.u57.p189==1)))) * EX(AX(AF((i12.i2.u67.p232==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * !(EX(((i2.u28.p94==0)||(i14.u57.p189==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t151, t201, t203, t206, t212, i0.u34.t111, i0.u71.t36, i0.u72.t33, i1.t100, i1.u36.t107, i1.u...882
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,3.52626,90664,1,0,170865,386,3343,341649,194,866,346109
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 282 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 282 transition count 234
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 274 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 274 transition count 226
Applied a total of 64 rules in 57 ms. Remains 274 /306 variables (removed 32) and now considering 226/258 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 274 cols
[2025-05-29 19:48:02] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 2270 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:48:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 880 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:48:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/274 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 222 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 153 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 294 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 286 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 254 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 160 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 135 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 209 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 138 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 13/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/500 variables, 274/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 3/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 1.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 1.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 1.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 500/500 variables, and 366 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/274 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 37/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 168 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/500 variables, 274/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 225/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 20/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 500/500 variables, and 613 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 274/306 places, 226/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63279 ms. Remains : 274/306 places, 226/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7600767006136351470.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11392467876848141206.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7600767006136351470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11392467876848141206.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48527e+17,5.77038,120480,2,48852,5,286772,6,0,1322,672502,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16078287672766411420.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16078287672766411420.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16078287672766411420.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16078287672766411420.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16078287672766411420.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 68 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12685791194662504171.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:49:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3875723679375670671.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12685791194662504171.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3875723679375670671.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48527e+17,1.04902,24468,4257,34,35455,474,595,70398,45,1160,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(EX((i16.u77.p309==1)) U (E(((i14.i2.u67.p230==0)||(i1.u92.p352==1)) U (i5.i0.u11.p28==1)) * ((i4.u83.p299==0)||(i17.i1.u82.p293==1)...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((E(((i14.i2.u67.p230==0)||(i1.u92.p352==1)) U (i5.i0.u11.p28==1)) * ((i4.u83.p299==0)||(i17.i...610
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t158, t163, t204, t207, t208, t211, i0.i0.t104, i0.i0.u35.t115, i0.i0.u37.t111, i0.i0.u39.t10...920
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 283 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 283 transition count 235
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 274 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 274 transition count 226
Applied a total of 64 rules in 17 ms. Remains 274 /306 variables (removed 32) and now considering 226/258 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 274 cols
[2025-05-29 19:50:05] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:50:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 675 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 855 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:50:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/274 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 171 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 12/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 171 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 9/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 181 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 226/500 variables, 274/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 500/500 variables, and 374 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/274 variables, 55/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 45/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 226/500 variables, 274/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 225/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 208 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 155 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 19/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 500/500 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 274/274 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 274/306 places, 226/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60937 ms. Remains : 274/306 places, 226/258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5163016104588591698.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality998449507154190890.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5163016104588591698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality998449507154190890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47793e+17,5.45736,124632,2,54359,5,297306,6,0,1322,694735,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13677304994347618545.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13677304994347618545.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13677304994347618545.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13677304994347618545.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13677304994347618545.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2794353390838360146.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:51:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3307822001065066321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2794353390838360146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3307822001065066321.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47793e+17,0.300738,12112,2009,36,13996,453,530,26217,48,1135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((E(EX((((i20.u70.p245==0)||(u36.p113==1))||((i21.u76.p362==0)||(i15.u69.p238==1)))) U ((i4.u14.p41==0)||(i21.u87.p335==1))) + (i14.u4...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(Init),EX((((i20.u70.p245==0)||(u36.p113==1))||((i21.u76.p362==0)||(i15.u69.p238==1))))) * ((i4.u14.p...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t103, t160, t165, t204, t206, t207, t208, t211, t217, i0.i0.u75.t33, i0.i1.u35.t114, i0.i1.u3...886
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:52:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6579372727863778677.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6579372727863778677.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6579372727863778677.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6579372727863778677.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6579372727863778677.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6106659303549389431.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:52:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6631990422056460002.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6106659303549389431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6631990422056460002.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.92239e+17,0.328003,12360,1785,45,15123,833,725,27404,58,3188,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(!(EF((i3.i0.u9.p27!=1))) U EF(((i14.u22.p70==1)&&((i15.i0.u85.p328==1)||((i7.u51.p146==1)&&((i15.i0.u85.p283==0)||(i17.i1.u98.p317==...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U ((i14.u22.p70==1)&&((i15.i0.u85.p328==1)||((i7.u51.p146==1)&&((i15.i0.u85.p283==0)...489
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t185, t195, t243, i0.u33.t149, i0.u35.t145, i0.u37.t141, i1.u16.t183, i1.u17.t182, i1.u18.t17...1278
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,1,49.9982,768772,1,0,1.17732e+06,833,4759,2.18358e+06,265,3188,1137912
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((EG(!(E(AX(((i3.i1.u55.p157==0)||(i10.u66.p205==1))) U EG((i17.i1.u97.p320==1))))) * EX((((i2.u7.p20==1)||(i0.u107.p351==0))||(i13.i0....172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY(Init) * EG(!(E(!(EX(!(((i3.i1.u55.p157==0)||(i10.u66.p205==1))))) U EG((i17.i1.u97.p320==1))))))) * (((...223
(forward)formula 1,1,77.3007,1153412,1,0,1.72037e+06,833,4796,3.27525e+06,267,3188,1638659
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((A(EX((i15.i1.u95.p309==1)) U (E(((i12.i1.u73.p230==0)||(i0.u107.p352==1)) U (i3.i0.u10.p28==1)) * ((i8.i0.u93.p299==0)||(i16.u92.p293...328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((E(((i12.i1.u73.p230==0)||(i0.u107.p352==1)) U (i3.i0.u10.p28==1)) * ((i8.i0.u93.p299==0)||(i...626
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 2,1,152.29,2136292,1,0,2.991e+06,833,4893,5.70365e+06,268,3188,2656159
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(((E(EX((((i6.i1.u79.p245==0)||(i5.i2.u38.p113==1))||((i15.i0.u85.p362==0)||(i13.i2.u76.p238==1)))) U ((i8.i0.u14.p41==0)||(i15.i1.u103...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(Init),EX((((i6.i1.u79.p245==0)||(i5.i2.u38.p113==1))||((i15.i0.u85.p362==0)||(i13.i2.u76.p238==1))))...307
(forward)formula 3,1,188.963,2200056,1,0,3.15147e+06,833,1457,5.88e+06,114,3188,835956
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1139853 ms.

BK_STOP 1748548516818

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200033"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-05.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;