About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BusinessProcesses-PT-03
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 1240202.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TFTFTFTTTFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200018.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-03, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200018
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748544947936
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 311 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Transformed 274 places.
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Transformed 237 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:55:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 274 places and 237 transitions and 632 arcs in 525 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Support contains 113 out of 273 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 236/236 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 271 transition count 236
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 251 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 251 transition count 216
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 245 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 245 transition count 210
Applied a total of 54 rules in 96 ms. Remains 245 /273 variables (removed 28) and now considering 210/236 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-29 18:55:51] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 539 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:55:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 685 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1285 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 209 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:55:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 194 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 225 ms of which 143 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 151 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 205 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 197 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 209 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 195 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 173 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 170 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 148 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 147 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 210/455 variables, 245/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 162 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 158 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 147 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(timeout
s136 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 455/455 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 30047 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 83/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 189 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 138 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 14/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 163 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 9/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 9/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 210/455 variables, 245/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 209/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 138 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 140 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 141 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 126 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 455/455 variables, and 632 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60196ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60218ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/273 places, 210/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61628 ms. Remains : 245/273 places, 210/236 transitions.
Support contains 113 out of 245 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (471 resets) in 2673 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 14/89 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (87 resets) in 332 ms. (120 steps per ms) remains 11/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (85 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (89 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 8/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (89 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (82 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (95 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (106 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (118 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (94 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (92 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-29 18:56:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 122/142 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 72/214 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 177/391 variables, 214/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 44/435 variables, 17/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 213 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 6/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 17/452 variables, 12/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 3/455 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/455 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 455/455 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved in 2008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 108/114 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 98/212 variables, 24/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 175/387 variables, 212/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 47/434 variables, 18/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 18/452 variables, 13/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 3/455 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/455 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 455/455 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved in 788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/7 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2810ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 123 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 8 ms.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 245 places (down from 99) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 237 stabilizing places and 199 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 490 edges and 245 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.30 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 215 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 215 transition count 179
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 205 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 205 transition count 169
Applied a total of 81 rules in 79 ms. Remains 205 /245 variables (removed 40) and now considering 169/210 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 205 cols
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 669 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 932 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 10/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 12/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 43/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 168/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 10/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 5/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/245 places, 169/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61107 ms. Remains : 205/245 places, 169/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13958680356685246013.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15392761414589400799.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13958680356685246013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15392761414589400799.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06734e+13,0.813622,21924,2,11515,5,53594,6,0,989,88203,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(((p142==1) + (EX((p202==0)) * E((p216==1) U (p14!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((p142==1) + (EX((p202==0)) * E((p216==1) U (p14!=1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t20, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t67, t70, t72, t75...404
(forward)formula 0,0,26.5157,614708,1,0,460,2.56008e+06,371,218,5900,2.78274e+06,458
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 213 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 213 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 213 transition count 177
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 202 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 202 transition count 166
Applied a total of 87 rules in 39 ms. Remains 202 /245 variables (removed 43) and now considering 166/210 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 202 cols
[2025-05-29 18:58:25] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:58:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 638 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 835 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 18/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 11/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 9/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/368 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 368/368 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 41/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 4/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 165/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 13/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 5/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 368/368 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/245 places, 166/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60949 ms. Remains : 202/245 places, 166/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8600208872580977375.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11381546371029096708.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8600208872580977375.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11381546371029096708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.38735e+12,0.86355,20580,2,11047,5,49659,6,0,974,80406,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((p219==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (p219==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,1.0283,20836,1,0,7,49659,8,1,1673,80406,2
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 213 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 213 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 213 transition count 177
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 202 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 202 transition count 166
Applied a total of 87 rules in 27 ms. Remains 202 /245 variables (removed 43) and now considering 166/210 (removed 44) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:59:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 629 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 813 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 18/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 11/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 216 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 9/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 368/368 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 38/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 165/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 16/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 10/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 368/368 variables, and 481 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/245 places, 166/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60902 ms. Remains : 202/245 places, 166/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9458651218729690980.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17756107293484535441.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9458651218729690980.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17756107293484535441.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.38735e+12,0.750018,20580,2,11047,5,49659,6,0,974,80406,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(AX((p92==0))) * (p93==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p93==1))) * !(EX(!((p92==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t67, t69, t72, t75...398
(forward)formula 0,1,7.78926,182132,1,0,369,615544,350,171,5624,501137,341
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 218 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 218 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 218 transition count 182
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 210 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 210 transition count 174
Applied a total of 71 rules in 22 ms. Remains 210 /245 variables (removed 35) and now considering 174/210 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 210 cols
[2025-05-29 19:00:36] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:00:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 494 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 624 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 173 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 144 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 174/384 variables, 210/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 7/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 48/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 174/384 variables, 210/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 173/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 12/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 8/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/384 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/245 places, 174/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60704 ms. Remains : 210/245 places, 174/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16713356242088199246.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13499965262343457355.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16713356242088199246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13499965262343457355.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.4771e+12,0.801071,21884,2,11721,5,52789,6,0,1014,85667,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(EF((p255==1))) * EF(((!(A((p126==1) U (p263==1))) + EF((((p43==0)||(p169==0))||(p273==0)))) + !(A(((p26==1)||(p34==1)) U ((p270==1)|...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U (p255==1)))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((p263==1)) U (!((p126==1)) * !(...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t24, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t59, t60, t62, t65, t68, t71, ...418
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16212754021210265027.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16212754021210265027.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16212754021210265027.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16212754021210265027.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16212754021210265027.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5842084022250057092.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11573649294629439317.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5842084022250057092.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11573649294629439317.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.4771e+12,0.295179,9152,1404,26,10421,365,462,14574,38,847,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(EF((i18.u70.p255==1))) * EF(((!(A((i14.i1.u42.p126==1) U (i18.u73.p263==1))) + EF((((i11.i0.u15.p43==0)||(i11.i1.u53.p169==0))||(i18...515
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U (i18.u70.p255==1)))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((i18.u73.p263==1)) U (!...806
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t88, t104, t112, t120, t125, t164, t166, t170, i0.u57.t34, i0.u58.t31, i1.i0.t84, i1.i0.u27.t...735
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,1,23.0758,513088,1,0,831989,365,3160,1.52703e+06,195,1087,921378
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 215 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 215 transition count 179
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 206 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 206 transition count 170
Applied a total of 79 rules in 12 ms. Remains 206 /245 variables (removed 39) and now considering 170/210 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-29 19:02:31] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:02:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 432 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 573 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:02:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 7/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/376 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 35/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 169/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 12/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 9/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60043ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/245 places, 170/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60631 ms. Remains : 206/245 places, 170/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17755372130365834766.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4703045383883274001.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17755372130365834766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4703045383883274001.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.41505e+12,0.746945,21412,2,11536,5,51678,6,0,994,85063,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p236==1) U E((AF((EF((p126==1)) * (p33!=1))) * !(EX(((p12==1)||(p239==1))))) U AF(AG((((p25==1)&&(p120==1))&&(p218==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(p236==1)),(!(EG(!((E(TRUE U (p126==1)) * (p33!=1))))) * !(EX(((p12==1)||(p239==1)))))) * !(EG(...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t12, t21, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t67, t71, t72...415
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6169829723399318251.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6169829723399318251.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6169829723399318251.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6169829723399318251.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6169829723399318251.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:04:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:04:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:04:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:04:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17927325301819702943.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14233270465938421403.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17927325301819702943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14233270465938421403.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.41505e+12,0.187616,7176,1002,30,6288,473,413,8409,45,1238,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((i19.u58.p236==1) U E((AF((EF((i18.u43.p126==1)) * (i5.u12.p33!=1))) * !(EX(((i7.u5.p12==1)||(i19.u65.p239==1))))) U AF(AG((((i4.u10.p2...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(i19.u58.p236==1)),(!(EG(!((E(TRUE U (i18.u43.p126==1)) * (i5.u12.p33!=1))))) * !(EX(((i7.u5.p1...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t80, t84, t100, t104, t116, t160, t162, t163, t166, u7.t127, i0.i0.u29.t83, i0.i0.u33.t76, i0...688
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,5.01227,121096,1,0,252086,473,2754,356481,213,1238,352029
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 224 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 224 transition count 189
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 218 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 218 transition count 183
Applied a total of 54 rules in 10 ms. Remains 218 /245 variables (removed 27) and now considering 183/210 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 218 cols
[2025-05-29 19:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:04:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 606 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 788 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 11/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 183/401 variables, 218/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 137 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 133 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 11/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 401/401 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 46/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/401 variables, 218/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 182/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 20/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 7/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 401/401 variables, and 523 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/245 places, 183/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60850 ms. Remains : 218/245 places, 183/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5573865951027988665.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1745724188735246324.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5573865951027988665.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1745724188735246324.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21923e+13,1.1955,28476,2,15217,5,64185,6,0,1055,122857,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(E((((AF((p133==1)) + (p225!=1)) + (((p35==1)&&(p145==1))&&((p226==1)&&(p246==1)))) * EG(EX((p246==1)))) U (EF(((p136==1)&&(p77==1))) ...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((((!(EG(!((p133==1)))) + (p225!=1)) + (((p35==1)&&(p145==1))&&((p226==1)&&(p246==1)))) ...760
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t10, t14, t16, t20, t23, t26, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t64, ...461
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph641891675223924635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph641891675223924635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph641891675223924635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph641891675223924635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph641891675223924635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10166445208823290139.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16863950432569061993.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10166445208823290139.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16863950432569061993.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21923e+13,0.206044,9244,1381,48,9894,683,478,16310,51,1959,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(E((((AF((i14.u42.p133==1)) + (i15.u60.p225!=1)) + (((i2.u9.p35==1)&&(i11.i2.u46.p145==1))&&((i2.u65.p226==1)&&(i15.u60.p246==1)))) * ...783
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((((!(EG(!((i14.u42.p133==1)))) + (i15.u60.p225!=1)) + (((i2.u9.p35==1)&&(i11.i2.u46.p14...1049
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t92, t112, t121, t129, t134, t173, t176, i0.t96, i0.u23.t103, i0.u25.t99, i1.t116, i1.u13.t12...825
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,17.8317,380316,1,0,661793,814,3220,1.25772e+06,257,1959,817294
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 215 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 215 transition count 179
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 205 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 205 transition count 169
Applied a total of 81 rules in 12 ms. Remains 205 /245 variables (removed 40) and now considering 169/210 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 205 cols
[2025-05-29 19:05:56] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:05:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:05:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 464 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 606 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:05:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 156 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 157 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 129 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 13/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 46/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 149 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 152 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 3/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 168/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 20/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 10/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 502 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/245 places, 169/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60678 ms. Remains : 205/245 places, 169/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14261863852641970313.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6441386408292771412.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14261863852641970313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6441386408292771412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.45312e+12,0.927555,24812,2,11918,5,58203,6,0,989,106189,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p141==1) * (EX((p178==1)) + AG((p256==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p141==1))) * (p178==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p141==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p2...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t19, t26, t29, t32, t36, t37, t39, t42, t45, t48, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t64, t67, t70,...413
(forward)formula 0,0,9.64385,211580,1,0,379,711310,362,175,5798,625838,354
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 143 edges and 245 vertex of which 8 / 245 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 5 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 481 edges and 238 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 236 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 195 transition count 158
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 195 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 144 transition count 117
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 115 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 115 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 115 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 113 transition count 86
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 64 transition count 39
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 63 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 62 transition count 37
Applied a total of 337 rules in 68 ms. Remains 62 /245 variables (removed 183) and now considering 37/210 (removed 173) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-29 19:07:06] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:07:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/245 places, 37/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 33 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 26 transition count 30
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 24 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 24 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 24 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 23 transition count 27
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 22 transition count 26
Applied a total of 22 rules in 5 ms. Remains 22 /33 variables (removed 11) and now considering 26/37 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/245 places, 26/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 409 ms. Remains : 22/245 places, 26/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18403645882293865746.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4174120439022911609.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18403645882293865746.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4174120439022911609.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49,0.011454,3908,2,53,5,439,6,0,112,369,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p95==1)||(p128==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p95==1)||(p128==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inters...176
(forward)formula 0,0,0.026186,4164,1,0,49,2084,72,30,636,1582,64
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 218 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 218 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 218 transition count 182
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 209 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 209 transition count 173
Applied a total of 73 rules in 11 ms. Remains 209 /245 variables (removed 36) and now considering 173/210 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 209 cols
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 391 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 568 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 146 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 155 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 150 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 133 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 173/382 variables, 209/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 8/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 382/382 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 57/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 123 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 173/382 variables, 209/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 172/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 12/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 12/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 382/382 variables, and 509 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/245 places, 173/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60630 ms. Remains : 209/245 places, 173/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13144183264956002600.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5774882368099726866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13144183264956002600.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5774882368099726866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.42669e+12,1.08095,26856,2,12146,5,60870,6,0,1009,119225,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p235!=1) * AF(EX((p121==1)))) + ((p138==1) * ((EF((p196==1)) + (p104==1)) + (p227!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p235!=1) * !(EG(!(EX((p121==1)))))) + ((p138==1) * ((E(TRUE U (p196==1)) + (p104==1)) + (p227!=1))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t14, t16, t22, t30, t31, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t51, t54, t57, t60, t64, t65, t67...425
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9182545770848144108.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9182545770848144108.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9182545770848144108.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9182545770848144108.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9182545770848144108.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3198457429227359474.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 19:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14093852183191616030.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3198457429227359474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14093852183191616030.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.42669e+12,0.55474,14864,2904,24,19394,284,453,33003,38,520,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i18.u67.p235!=1) * AF(EX((i10.i1.u41.p121==1)))) + ((i17.u47.p138==1) * ((EF((i11.i1.u58.p196==1)) + (i12.u35.p104==1)) + (i19.i1.u...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i18.u67.p235!=1) * !(EG(!(EX((i10.i1.u41.p121==1)))))) + ((i17.u47.p138==1) * ((E(TRUE U (i11.i1.u...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t87, t103, t111, t119, t124, t165, t166, t169, i0.t83, i0.u27.t90, i0.u29.t86, i0.u33.t79, i1...736
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 143 edges and 245 vertex of which 8 / 245 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 481 edges and 238 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 236 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 194 transition count 157
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 194 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 145 transition count 117
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 116 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 116 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 116 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 114 transition count 86
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 66 transition count 39
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 65 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 64 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 63 transition count 37
Applied a total of 336 rules in 44 ms. Remains 63 /245 variables (removed 182) and now considering 37/210 (removed 173) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [51, 52]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/245 places, 37/210 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 37/37 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 61/245 places, 37/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8767126264081727102.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7719550707909099116.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8767126264081727102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7719550707909099116.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,51,0.018662,4232,2,205,5,1252,6,0,281,1083,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p32==1)||(p26==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p32==1)||(p26==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.039027,4744,1,0,8,3682,19,2,1440,1410,8
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 217 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 217 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 217 transition count 181
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 208 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 208 transition count 172
Applied a total of 75 rules in 16 ms. Remains 208 /245 variables (removed 37) and now considering 172/210 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 349 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 458 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 171 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:09:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 172/380 variables, 208/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 4/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 45/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 172/380 variables, 208/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 171/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 7/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/380 variables, and 496 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/245 places, 172/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60519 ms. Remains : 208/245 places, 172/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 172 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9382297867570941571.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3903088832626955502.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9382297867570941571.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3903088832626955502.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08201e+13,1.05446,25832,2,12497,5,60332,6,0,1004,111254,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AF(EX(!(A((p171==1) U (p75==1))))) U ((EX(EF((((p62==1)&&(p150==1))&&((p249==1)&&(p114==1))))) * EX(AG((p173==1)))) * (p32==1))) * A((...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(!(EG(!(EX(!(!((E(!((p75==1)) U (!((p171==1)) * !((p75==1)))) + EG(!((p75==1)))))))))) U ((EX(E(TRUE...631
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t18, t21, t28, t31, t34, t37, t41, t42, t45, t46, t48, t51, t54, t57, t60, t63, t66, t69...415
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph28708966041564698.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph28708966041564698.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph28708966041564698.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph28708966041564698.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph28708966041564698.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:10:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:10:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13532215142477034843.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:10:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8230789879083369037.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13532215142477034843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8230789879083369037.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08201e+13,0.332813,13048,1649,27,15261,370,459,32773,41,1131,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AF(EX(!(A((i15.i1.u49.p171==1) U (i15.i1.u23.p75==1))))) U ((EX(EF((((i2.u19.p62==1)&&(i12.u45.p150==1))&&((i2.u67.p249==1)&&(i14.u38....317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(!(EG(!(EX(!(!((E(!((i15.i1.u23.p75==1)) U (!((i15.i1.u49.p171==1)) * !((i15.i1.u23.p75==1)))) + EG(...870
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t101, t105, t117, t123, t162, t168, i0.i0.u32.t77, i0.i1.t10, i0.i1.u57.t18, i0.i1.u59.t...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 203 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 203 transition count 167
Applied a total of 85 rules in 16 ms. Remains 203 /245 variables (removed 42) and now considering 167/210 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 203 cols
[2025-05-29 19:11:09] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 378 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 547 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 167/370 variables, 203/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 147 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 18/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/370 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 203/203 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 41/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 3/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 143 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 167/370 variables, 203/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 166/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 20/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 12/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/370 variables, and 494 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 203/203 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/245 places, 167/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60613 ms. Remains : 203/245 places, 167/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 167 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5045894859044249833.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2455941158535259043.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5045894859044249833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2455941158535259043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.61484e+12,0.816875,20980,2,11199,5,50386,6,0,979,82457,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AG(!(E((p156==1) U (p273==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(E((p156==1) U (p273==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t50, t51, t53, t56, t59, t62, t65, t68, t70, t73...398
(forward)formula 0,1,10.4942,243832,1,0,439,930224,359,208,5848,956696,421
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 143 edges and 245 vertex of which 8 / 245 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 481 edges and 238 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 236 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 194 transition count 157
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 194 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 143 transition count 116
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 114 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 114 transition count 87
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 114 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 112 transition count 85
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 65 transition count 40
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 64 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 63 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 62 transition count 38
Applied a total of 336 rules in 50 ms. Remains 62 /245 variables (removed 183) and now considering 38/210 (removed 172) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 215 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 45]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 340 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/245 places, 38/210 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 48 transition count 37
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 48 /49 variables (removed 1) and now considering 37/38 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 48 cols
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/245 places, 37/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 649 ms. Remains : 48/245 places, 37/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4872538288322931299.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17529300779331572155.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4872538288322931299.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17529300779331572155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58,0.015165,4148,2,274,5,1135,6,0,228,995,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(EF((p187==1))) + (p247==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p247==1))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p187==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t20, t35, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/i...181
(forward)formula 0,0,0.047512,5428,1,0,60,4534,97,43,1528,3350,89
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 217 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 217 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 217 transition count 181
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 207 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 207 transition count 171
Applied a total of 77 rules in 14 ms. Remains 207 /245 variables (removed 38) and now considering 171/210 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 437 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 617 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 170 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:12:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 147 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 138 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 171/378 variables, 207/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 8/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/378 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 170/170 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 39/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 171/378 variables, 207/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 170/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 7/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 7/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 378/378 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 170/170 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/245 places, 171/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60689 ms. Remains : 207/245 places, 171/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 171 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11164550106952109416.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17813936210779804967.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11164550106952109416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17813936210779804967.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57673e+12,0.856389,22228,2,11933,5,52963,6,0,999,89452,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(AF(((AX((p137==1)) * (p83==1)) * EX((p102==1))))) + AF(((EG((p252==1)) * AF((p167==1))) * ((p12==1)&&(p177==1))))) + (EF(AG((p75==1...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p127==1))))) + (p32==1)) U (E((p127==1) U ((p12==1)||(p18==1))) * E...776
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t13, t21, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t59, t60, t62, t65, t68, t71,...408
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3138964970957700363.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3138964970957700363.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3138964970957700363.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3138964970957700363.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3138964970957700363.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13106996519910458313.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:13:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability370832118983131069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13106996519910458313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability370832118983131069.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57673e+12,0.186166,9116,1621,33,8771,375,442,15570,47,928,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(AF(((AX((i10.u45.p137==1)) * (i0.i0.u27.p83==1)) * EX((i0.i1.u34.p102==1))))) + AF(((EG((i14.u58.p252==1)) * AF((i9.u52.p167==1))) ...473
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i11.u43.p127==1))))) + (i15.u10.p32==1)) U (E((i11.u43.p127==1) U (...1088
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t80, t84, t104, t116, t161, t167, i0.i0.u27.t87, i0.i1.u56.t31, i0.i1.u57.t28, i1.u21.t99, i1...715
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,23.8942,465692,1,0,820162,482,3190,1.39332e+06,233,928,970856
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 204 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 204 transition count 168
Applied a total of 83 rules in 9 ms. Remains 204 /245 variables (removed 41) and now considering 168/210 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 204 cols
[2025-05-29 19:14:15] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:14:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 527 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:14:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 168/372 variables, 204/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 16/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 372/372 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 45/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 9/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 168/372 variables, 204/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 167/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 6/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60041ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/245 places, 168/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60579 ms. Remains : 204/245 places, 168/210 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14722830298030381196.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7677789970555929420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14722830298030381196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7677789970555929420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.64591e+12,0.641295,22020,2,12613,5,53619,6,0,984,87156,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p51==1) + (AG(EX((p68==0))) * (((p62==0)||(p185==0))||(p249==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p51==1) + (!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p68==0))))) * (((p62==0)||(p185==0))||(p249==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t67, t69, t72, t75...404
(forward)formula 0,0,24.226,592544,1,0,473,2.40619e+06,365,223,5888,2.57448e+06,473
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2025-05-29 19:15:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 19:15:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3757715272417386561.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3757715272417386561.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3757715272417386561.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3757715272417386561.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3757715272417386561.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12208720107232285279.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 19:15:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5936870671786031923.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12208720107232285279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5936870671786031923.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3753e+13,0.39172,13576,2152,55,18145,1039,599,31595,58,3648,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i17.u80.p235!=1) * AF(EX((i9.u41.p121==1)))) + ((i12.u50.p138==1) * ((EF((i1.i1.u67.p196==1)) + (i0.u35.p104==1)) + (i5.i1.u77.p227...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i17.u80.p235!=1) * !(EG(!(EX((i9.u41.p121==1)))))) + ((i12.u50.p138==1) * ((E(TRUE U (i1.i1.u67.p1...218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t120, t136, t140, t146, t155, i0.u65.t60, i0.u66.t57, i1.i0.t116, i1.i0.u28.t123, i1.i0.u30.t...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,22.2079,437128,1,0,751542,1039,3714,1.30473e+06,296,3648,996776
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (E(AF(EX(!(A((i15.i0.u59.p171==1) U (i15.i1.u25.p75==1))))) U ((EX(EF((((i3.u21.p62==1)&&(i8.i2.u53.p150==1))&&((i3.u85.p249==1)&&(i8.i0....328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(!(EG(!(EX(!(!((E(!((i15.i1.u25.p75==1)) U (!((i15.i0.u59.p171==1)) * !((i15.i1.u25.p75==1)))) + EG(...867
(forward)formula 1,0,46.7749,924844,1,0,1.59401e+06,1039,3897,2.54966e+06,300,3648,2056115
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Total runtime 1237825 ms.
BK_STOP 1748546188138
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-03, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200018"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-03.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;