Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813200017.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200017
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748544659242

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 211 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Transformed 274 places.
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Transformed 237 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:51:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 274 places and 237 transitions and 632 arcs in 460 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 34 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 12 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 95 out of 273 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 236/236 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 271 transition count 236
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 248 transition count 213
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 241 transition count 206
Applied a total of 62 rules in 135 ms. Remains 241 /273 variables (removed 32) and now considering 206/236 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 206 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-29 18:51:03] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 603 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 695 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 205 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:51:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 202 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 176 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 175 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 140 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 145 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 232 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 226 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 209 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 184 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 186 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 199 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 196 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 171 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 171 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 172 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 147 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 176 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 18/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 206/447 variables, 241/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 163 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30245ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30271ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/273 places, 206/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31820 ms. Remains : 241/273 places, 206/236 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 241 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:51:35] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 241 places (down from 95) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (480 resets) in 3109 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 22/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2025-05-29 18:51:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 180/225 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 195/420 variables, 225/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/445 variables, 15/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/447 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/447 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/447 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved in 1841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 181/223 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 155 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 7/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 193/416 variables, 223/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 15/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 201 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 200 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 210 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 180 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 7012ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 42 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 486 edges and 241 vertex of which 240 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 240 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 215 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 209 transition count 173
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 209 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 173 transition count 142
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 162 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 162 transition count 131
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 116 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 116 transition count 84
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 116 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 116 transition count 83
Applied a total of 248 rules in 101 ms. Remains 116 /241 variables (removed 125) and now considering 83/206 (removed 123) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 116/241 places, 83/206 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1008 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 5/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 614 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 184 ms. (216 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/104 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/115 variables, 7/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 83/198 variables, 115/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/199 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 185 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 90/104 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 11/115 variables, 7/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 4/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 83/198 variables, 115/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 4/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/199 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 176 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 2262 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2466ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 41 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=20 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 60 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
Computed a total of 234 stabilizing places and 196 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 486 edges and 241 vertex of which 240 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.12 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 215 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 215 transition count 179
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 206 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 206 transition count 170
Applied a total of 71 rules in 28 ms. Remains 206 /241 variables (removed 35) and now considering 170/206 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 457 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 665 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:51:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 153 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 170 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 169 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 136 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 162 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 126 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 138 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 139 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 132 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 136 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 4/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/376 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 63/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 169/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 139 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 143 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 133 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 132 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 133 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 376/376 variables, and 543 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 127/127 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60091ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60787 ms. Remains : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11765892425726411103.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7774228939496190623.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11765892425726411103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7774228939496190623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.58845e+12,1.23457,27380,2,12132,5,61502,6,0,994,123518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(A(((p266==0)||(p121==1)) U E((p141==1) U (p188==0))) U AX(((p75==0)||(p194==1)))))) * EG(A(((E((p102==1) U (p115==1)) * ((p180==0...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((p75==0)||(p194==1)))))) U (!(!((E(!(E((p141==1) U (p188==0))) U (!(((p2...643
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t25, t29, t30, t32, t35, t38, t42, t43, t45, t48, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t64, t67, t70...420
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9470068694113696860.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9470068694113696860.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9470068694113696860.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9470068694113696860.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9470068694113696860.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 119 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7764686404433330033.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4230199773481361714.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7764686404433330033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4230199773481361714.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.58845e+12,0.36124,11136,1718,24,10923,329,464,28194,38,661,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(A(((i0.u72.p266==0)||(i14.u40.p121==1)) U E((i15.u46.p141==1) U (i17.i1.u57.p188==0))) U AX(((i8.u24.p75==0)||(i17.i0.u59.p194==1...377
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((i8.u24.p75==0)||(i17.i0.u59.p194==1)))))) U (!(!((E(!(E((i15.u46.p141==...925
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t84, t100, t108, t116, t160, t162, t163, t166, i0.t80, i0.u27.t87, i0.u29.t83, i1.u25.t91, i2...714
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,1,13.7079,322304,1,0,561174,329,3255,963877,213,816,754398
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 211 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 211 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 211 transition count 175
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 202 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 202 transition count 166
Applied a total of 79 rules in 16 ms. Remains 202 /241 variables (removed 39) and now considering 166/206 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 202 cols
[2025-05-29 18:53:32] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:53:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 651 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 855 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 18/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 11/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 161 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 9/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 368/368 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 38/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/368 variables, 202/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 165/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 16/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 10/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 1)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 1)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 1)
(s39 1)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 1)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 1)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 1)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 1)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 1)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 1)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 1)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 1)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 1)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 368/368 variables, and 481 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60071ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60075ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/241 places, 166/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60947 ms. Remains : 202/241 places, 166/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15630198732593170746.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10330758629341027060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15630198732593170746.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10330758629341027060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.38735e+12,0.852719,20580,2,11047,5,49659,6,0,974,80406,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(E(EX((p75==0)) U AG((p86==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(EX((p75==0)) U !(E(TRUE U !((p86==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t67, t69, t72, t75...398
(forward)formula 0,0,10.117,200620,1,0,373,716696,362,174,6111,720009,354
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 208 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 208 transition count 172
Applied a total of 67 rules in 21 ms. Remains 208 /241 variables (removed 33) and now considering 172/206 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-29 18:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 312 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 530 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 853 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 171 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:54:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 172/380 variables, 208/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 145 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 8/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 7/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 40/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 136 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 8/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 172/380 variables, 208/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 171/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 16/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 8/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/380 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60094ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/241 places, 172/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60974 ms. Remains : 208/241 places, 172/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 172 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2075336540832072360.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:55:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5010834208388737247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2075336540832072360.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5010834208388737247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57056e+12,0.688923,21352,2,11763,5,51314,6,0,1004,83606,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((AF(((p87==0)&&(p248==1))) * (p29==0)) * (p131==1))) + (p94==0)) + EX(((p251==0)&&(p254==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((p251==0)&&(p254==1))))) * !((p94==0))) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!(((p87==0)&&(p248==1)))...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t10, t21, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t64, t68, t69, t71,...414
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15614293114899107407.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15614293114899107407.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15614293114899107407.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15614293114899107407.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15614293114899107407.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8783698707264545545.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9451136320616494636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8783698707264545545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9451136320616494636.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57056e+12,0.367775,10868,1784,28,12514,477,436,20302,45,1262,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((AF(((i9.u29.p87==0)&&(i16.u58.p248==1))) * (i5.i0.u11.p29==0)) * (i14.u43.p131==1))) + (i8.i1.u32.p94==0)) + EX(((i16.u67.p251=...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((i16.u67.p251==0)&&(i6.u68.p254==1))))) * !((i8.i1.u32.p94==0))) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t80, t84, t104, t123, t162, t168, i1.u26.t91, i2.t100, i2.u18.t107, i2.u20.t103, i3.t108, i3....717
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,19.8525,492020,1,0,916323,477,2887,1.39638e+06,213,1262,1062173
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 138 edges and 241 vertex of which 7 / 241 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 478 edges and 235 vertex of which 234 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 233 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 192 transition count 155
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 192 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 145 transition count 116
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 118 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 118 transition count 89
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 118 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 117 transition count 88
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 67 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 66 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 65 transition count 38
Applied a total of 327 rules in 42 ms. Remains 65 /241 variables (removed 176) and now considering 38/206 (removed 168) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-29 18:56:34] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned [3, 8, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/241 places, 38/206 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 38/38 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 62/241 places, 38/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 70 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15941919443492755703.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12138964061296738395.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15941919443492755703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12138964061296738395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65,0.034622,4228,2,255,5,1332,6,0,286,1126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!(((p266==0)||(p249==1))) U EF(!(((p228==0)||(p148==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p228==0)||(p148==1))))) U (!(!(((p266==0)||(p249==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p228==0)...230
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t18, t35, t36, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...186
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.138905,5892,1,0,119,9260,110,99,1862,8682,161
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 220 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 220 transition count 185
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 215 transition count 180
Applied a total of 52 rules in 19 ms. Remains 215 /241 variables (removed 26) and now considering 180/206 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 215 cols
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:56:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 550 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 702 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 122 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 167 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 162 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 166 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 148 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 159 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 139 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 180/395 variables, 215/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 8/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 395/395 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 56/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 180/395 variables, 215/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 179/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 14/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60112ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60116ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/241 places, 180/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60839 ms. Remains : 215/241 places, 180/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11381662408039229423.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4389334178964412267.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11381662408039229423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4389334178964412267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18131e+13,1.66231,36076,2,18021,5,80821,6,0,1040,174602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((p150==0)||(p212==1))) * ((AG(EF(((p210==0)&&(p59==1)))) + AG(((p154==0)&&(p43==1)))) + AX((((((AG(((p194==0)&&(p184==1))) + (p215==...303
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((p150==0)||(p212==1)))))] = FALSE * ((([(FwdU(((EY((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p210==0)&&...785
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t24, t34, t35, t37, t40, t44, t45, t47, t50, t53, t56, t59, t62,...452
(forward)formula 0,0,21.7206,421440,1,0,507,1.49381e+06,385,239,6068,1.64179e+06,503
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 215 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 215 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 215 transition count 179
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 207 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 207 transition count 171
Applied a total of 69 rules in 15 ms. Remains 207 /241 variables (removed 34) and now considering 171/206 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:57:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 630 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 792 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 170 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:57:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 171/378 variables, 207/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 14/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30037ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/241 places, 171/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30846 ms. Remains : 207/241 places, 171/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 171 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11018552878273761007.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality122181133879241559.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11018552878273761007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality122181133879241559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.47671e+12,1.27582,28764,2,12430,5,65167,6,0,999,132266,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((p151==0)||(p192==1)) U (!((EX((p183==1)) + AG(((p209==0)||(p49==1))))) + !(E((((p188==0)||(p127==1))||((p11==0)||(p88==1))) U AF((p...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,((p151==0)||(p192==1))) * !(EX((p183==1)))),TRUE) * !(((p209==0)||(p49==1))))] = FALSE * [(Fw...274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t17, t20, t27, t31, t32, t35, t36, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t53, t57, t58, t60, t63, t66...414
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6944901573544057996.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6944901573544057996.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6944901573544057996.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6944901573544057996.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6944901573544057996.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1743652983218659227.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:58:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13366695542048596252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1743652983218659227.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13366695542048596252.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.47671e+12,0.340906,9344,1637,24,8986,336,470,16878,38,723,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((i14.i1.u47.p151==0)||(i16.i0.u59.p192==1)) U (!((EX((i15.u56.p183==1)) + AG(((i18.u62.p209==0)||(i5.u16.p49==1))))) + !(E((((i16.i1...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,((i14.i1.u47.p151==0)||(i16.i0.u59.p192==1))) * !(EX((i15.u56.p183==1)))),TRUE) * !(((i18.u62...383
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t81, t105, t117, t161, t163, i0.t85, i0.u25.t92, i0.u27.t88, i1.t101, i1.u19.t104, i2.t122, i...738
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,0,15.2176,316032,1,0,512849,431,3387,862237,213,968,678538
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 241 vertex of which 7 / 241 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 478 edges and 235 vertex of which 234 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 233 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 196 transition count 159
Performed 43 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 43 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 196 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 143 transition count 116
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 200 place count 115 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 115 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 115 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 112 transition count 86
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 68 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 67 transition count 42
Applied a total of 321 rules in 25 ms. Remains 67 /241 variables (removed 174) and now considering 42/206 (removed 164) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 67 cols
[2025-05-29 18:59:14] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:59:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/241 places, 42/206 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 41 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 37 transition count 38
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 35 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 35 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 35 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 34 transition count 35
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 34 /41 variables (removed 7) and now considering 35/42 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 34 cols
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 34/241 places, 35/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 357 ms. Remains : 34/241 places, 35/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17995264694865641321.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7385346292933800424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17995264694865641321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7385346292933800424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,297,0.021205,3936,2,146,5,747,6,0,168,566,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p83==0) U AG((EF((AF((p134==1)) * EG(((p247==0)||(p95==1))))) * (p116==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p83==0)) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (!(EG(!((p134==1)))) * EG(((p247==0)||(p95==1))))) * (p116==1))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t5, t7, t23, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/in...180
(forward)formula 0,0,0.116425,6496,1,0,198,15079,103,115,1009,16380,259
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 138 edges and 241 vertex of which 7 / 241 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 478 edges and 235 vertex of which 234 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 233 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 193 transition count 156
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 193 transition count 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 143 transition count 115
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 200 place count 116 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 116 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 116 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 113 transition count 86
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 65 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 64 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 63 transition count 38
Applied a total of 329 rules in 34 ms. Remains 63 /241 variables (removed 178) and now considering 38/206 (removed 168) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/241 places, 38/206 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 38/38 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 112 ms. Remains : 62/241 places, 38/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10432566751043831096.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2541224334040730376.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10432566751043831096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2541224334040730376.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52,0.019951,4104,2,228,5,1325,6,0,286,1146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG(EF((p219==0))) * (p225==0)) * (p235==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p235==1)) * (p225==0)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p219==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t37, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inters...176
(forward)formula 0,1,0.065546,5512,1,0,55,4884,98,40,1794,3534,87
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 206 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 206 transition count 170
Applied a total of 71 rules in 26 ms. Remains 206 /241 variables (removed 35) and now considering 170/206 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 256 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:59:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 475 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 745 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:59:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 141 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 128 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 10/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 2/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/376 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 42/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 142 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 147 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 169/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 7/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 7/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 376/376 variables, and 486 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60829 ms. Remains : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3257735630882853833.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11614286836043334.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3257735630882853833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11614286836043334.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.55834e+12,0.955892,22956,2,11742,5,53606,6,0,994,94162,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((!(A(!(((p210==1)||(p148==1))) U ((p159==0)||(p177==1)))) + AX(FALSE)) + (AF(((p138==0)||(p219==1))) * (((p146==0)&&(p125==1))||((p79...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p159==0)||(p177==1)))) * (!(!(((p210==1)||(p148==1)))) * !(((p159==0)||(p177==1)))...397
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 166/4/4
(forward)formula 0,1,6.37113,135412,1,0,10,488813,23,3,4862,179285,9
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 211 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 211 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 211 transition count 175
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 203 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 203 transition count 167
Applied a total of 77 rules in 11 ms. Remains 203 /241 variables (removed 38) and now considering 167/206 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 203 cols
[2025-05-29 19:00:22] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:00:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 409 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 543 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:00:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 19/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 167/370 variables, 203/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 9/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 163 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 3/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 5/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/370 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 203/203 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 39/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 167/370 variables, 203/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 166/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 4/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60039ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/241 places, 167/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60594 ms. Remains : 203/241 places, 167/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 167 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11311865055996164244.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4310244179546034382.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11311865055996164244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4310244179546034382.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.42e+12,0.769911,20600,2,11160,5,49779,6,0,979,80035,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX((p252==0)) + EX(((p170==0)&&(p254==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * (p252==0))] != FALSE + [(EY(EY(Init)) * ((p170==0)&&(p254==1)))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,1,0.785426,20856,1,0,9,49779,8,1,1193,80035,3
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 206 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 206 transition count 170
Applied a total of 71 rules in 11 ms. Remains 206 /241 variables (removed 35) and now considering 170/206 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-29 19:01:24] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 507 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 672 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 140 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 12/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/376 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 50/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/376 variables, 206/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 169/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 9/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 133 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 13/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 7/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60032ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60032ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60716 ms. Remains : 206/241 places, 170/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3572995777825598119.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8336854275802172513.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3572995777825598119.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8336854275802172513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.48109e+12,0.961492,27564,2,14742,5,66947,6,0,994,119748,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p48==1) + ((E((p258!=0) U (((p92==1)&&(p178==1))||(p236==0))) + AG(EX((p33==1)))) * (AF(((p260==0)&&(p249==1))) + (p59==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p48==1))) * !(E((p258!=0) U (((p92==1)&&(p178==1))||(p236==0))))),TRUE) * !(EX((p...266
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 165/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,6.93532,159920,1,0,15,596251,24,8,4865,268587,11
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 205 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 205 transition count 169
Applied a total of 73 rules in 9 ms. Remains 205 /241 variables (removed 36) and now considering 169/206 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 205 cols
[2025-05-29 19:02:32] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:02:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 375 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 533 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:02:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 143 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 140 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 136 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 16/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 63/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 168/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 6/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 8/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 502 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/241 places, 169/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60588 ms. Remains : 205/241 places, 169/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8448327487700948076.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17629239802831440824.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8448327487700948076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17629239802831440824.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.73874e+12,0.821781,22928,2,11745,5,54535,6,0,989,93101,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p148==1) + AX(((AX((p152==1)) + AX((p168==0))) * ((p257==1) + EG(((p173==0)&&(p258==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p148==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((!(EX(!((p152==1)))) + !(EX(!((p168==0))...217
(forward)formula 0,1,0.825682,23184,1,0,7,54535,8,1,992,93101,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 214 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 214 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 214 transition count 178
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 205 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 205 transition count 169
Applied a total of 73 rules in 8 ms. Remains 205 /241 variables (removed 36) and now considering 169/206 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 205 cols
[2025-05-29 19:03:33] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 19:03:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 440 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 577 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:03:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 8/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/374 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 27878 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 41/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 34/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 157 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 148 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 13/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/374 variables, 205/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 168/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 20/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 14/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 374/374 variables, and 500 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57912ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57912ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/241 places, 169/206 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58499 ms. Remains : 205/241 places, 169/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6503643235233092069.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18076338515601362501.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6503643235233092069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18076338515601362501.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.6466e+12,0.800095,22544,2,12854,5,54614,6,0,989,89936,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((p84==1) + EF(AG((p52==0)))) * (((p219==0)||(p14==1))||((p234==0)&&((p133==0)||(p182==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !((p84==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p52==0)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((((p219==0)||(p14...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t19, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t53, t56, t59, t63, t64, t66, t69, t71...415
(forward)formula 0,1,11.4367,291492,1,0,426,961019,362,200,5819,956307,413
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 206/206 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 137 edges and 241 vertex of which 7 / 241 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 478 edges and 235 vertex of which 234 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 233 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 195 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 193 transition count 156
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 193 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 147 transition count 117
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 119 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 119 transition count 89
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 119 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 116 transition count 87
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 68 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 67 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 66 transition count 39
Applied a total of 325 rules in 27 ms. Remains 66 /241 variables (removed 175) and now considering 39/206 (removed 167) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [7, 53, 59]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/241 places, 39/206 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 187 ms. Remains : 63/241 places, 39/206 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6487323066017924172.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12103042985193808600.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6487323066017924172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12103042985193808600.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,53,0.017129,4116,2,227,5,1223,6,0,291,1044,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG(!(A(((p75==0)||(p237==1)) U ((p42==0)||(p271==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(((p42==0)||(p271==1))) U (!(((p75==0)||(p237==1))) * !(((p42==0)||(p...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t38, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,0,0.056995,5396,1,0,53,4785,113,42,1872,3514,96
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 19:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 821605 ms.

BK_STOP 1748545483980

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813200017"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-03.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;