Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813100009.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-02, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100009
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748543018611

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:23:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:23:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 167 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Transformed 262 places.
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Transformed 219 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 262 places and 219 transitions and 576 arcs in 386 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 40 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 15 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 86 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 204/204 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 204
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 222 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 222 transition count 185
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 218 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 218 transition count 181
Applied a total of 50 rules in 76 ms. Remains 218 /245 variables (removed 27) and now considering 181/204 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 218 cols
[2025-05-29 18:23:41] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 528 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:23:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 654 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1393 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/218 variables, 27/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 170 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 166 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 148 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 181/399 variables, 218/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 399/399 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/218 variables, 27/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 46/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 181/399 variables, 218/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 180/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 9/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 3/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 399/399 variables, and 497 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60201ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60234ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/245 places, 181/204 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61759 ms. Remains : 218/245 places, 181/204 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:24:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:24:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 218 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (547 resets) in 2860 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 11/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (89 resets) in 342 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (99 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (100 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (102 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (106 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (102 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (100 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (101 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (102 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (98 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (101 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
[2025-05-29 18:24:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 76/94 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 68/162 variables, 16/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/191 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 153/344 variables, 191/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/344 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 36/380 variables, 15/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 15/395 variables, 10/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 4/399 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/399 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 399/399 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 1413 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 76/94 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/162 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 29/191 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 153/344 variables, 191/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/344 variables, 3/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/344 variables, 10/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/344 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/344 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/380 variables, 15/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 15/395 variables, 10/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 395/399 variables, and 287 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 216/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/10 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 6439ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 14 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 101 edges and 218 vertex of which 6 / 218 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 410 edges and 213 vertex of which 205 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 205 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 178 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 174 transition count 136
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 174 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 133 transition count 102
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 122 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 122 transition count 91
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 75 transition count 46
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 75 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 74 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 73 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 72 transition count 44
Applied a total of 257 rules in 108 ms. Remains 72 /218 variables (removed 146) and now considering 44/181 (removed 137) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 72/218 places, 44/181 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1165 resets) in 957 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 2/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (359 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 968 steps (4 resets) in 8 ms. (107 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 218 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 211 stabilizing places and 172 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 417 edges and 218 vertex of which 210 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 197 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 197 transition count 162
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 189 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 189 transition count 154
Applied a total of 56 rules in 25 ms. Remains 189 /218 variables (removed 29) and now considering 154/181 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 189 cols
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:24:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 387 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 587 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 153 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 16/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 154/343 variables, 189/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 6/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 20860 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 189/189 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 34/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 154/343 variables, 189/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 153/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 5/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 189/189 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 50909ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50913ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/218 places, 154/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51527 ms. Remains : 189/218 places, 154/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality512319638776918190.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15599070928840459185.ctl : 20 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality512319638776918190.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15599070928840459185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.528783,15888,2,13069,5,40912,6,0,910,37271,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((p199==0)||(p189==1)) U AG(EX(((p65==0)||(p154==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p65==0)||(p154==1))))))) U (!(((p199==0)||(p189==1))) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t20, t25, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t53, t56, t65, t68, t71, t73, t76,...339
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6482414024289192376.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6482414024289192376.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6482414024289192376.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6482414024289192376.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6482414024289192376.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality817963470054964542.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17130312975426656179.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality817963470054964542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17130312975426656179.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.19069,7616,1045,51,7589,418,406,9374,50,1153,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((i15.u53.p199==0)||(i10.u51.p189==1)) U AG(EX(((i2.u21.p65==0)||(i14.i1.u44.p154==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i2.u21.p65==0)||(i14.i1.u44.p154==1))))))) U (!(((i15.u53.p199==0)||(i10.u51...315
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t93, t103, t109, i0.u27.t80, i1.u25.t84, i2.u21.t92, i2.u49.t38, i3.t113, i3.u6.t119, i3.u8.t...575
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,5.55315,136640,1,0,253981,1632,2538,536782,239,10525,338378
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 203 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 203 transition count 168
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 197 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 197 transition count 162
Applied a total of 40 rules in 15 ms. Remains 197 /218 variables (removed 21) and now considering 162/181 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 197 cols
[2025-05-29 18:26:20] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:26:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 482 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 721 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 28/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 3/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 162/359 variables, 197/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 7/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/359 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 28/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 41/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 162/359 variables, 197/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 161/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 3/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 1/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 1/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/359 variables, and 441 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/218 places, 162/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60799 ms. Remains : 197/218 places, 162/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7861273537059722922.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3308482338114723790.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7861273537059722922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3308482338114723790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53279e+12,0.450149,16936,2,14191,5,43410,6,0,950,38637,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p110==0)||(p248==1)) U (AG((!(((p245!=1)&&(((p259==1)||(p176==0))||(p194==1)))) + (((AF(((p218==0)||(p29==1))) * ((p155==0)||(p252==1...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(((p245!=1)&&(((p259==1)||(p176==0))||(p194==1)))) + (((!(EG(!(((p218==0)||(p29...966
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t8, t20, t23, t28, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t48, t49, t51, t54, t58, t59, t61, t71, t72, ...366
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11474451909866127222.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11474451909866127222.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11474451909866127222.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11474451909866127222.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11474451909866127222.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15456856711499927392.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2191962697032085515.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15456856711499927392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2191962697032085515.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53279e+12,0.186076,7044,1107,41,6454,618,447,6262,54,1311,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i13.u37.p110==0)||(i1.u68.p248==1)) U (AG((!(((i16.u67.p245!=1)&&(((i6.u63.p259==1)||(i12.u53.p176==0))||(i11.u56.p194==1)))) + (((AF...447
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(((i16.u67.p245!=1)&&(((i6.u63.p259==1)||(i12.u53.p176==0))||(i11.u56.p194==1))...1386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t103, t115, t121, i0.u28.t86, i0.u52.t44, i1.u22.t98, i1.u26.t90, i2.u5.t127, i3.u7.t124, i4....613
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,5.31288,144132,1,0,298669,1156,2899,454700,311,6117,457215
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 199 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 199 transition count 164
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 190 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 190 transition count 155
Applied a total of 54 rules in 11 ms. Remains 190 /218 variables (removed 28) and now considering 155/181 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 190 cols
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:27:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 454 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 630 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 155/345 variables, 190/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/345 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 345/345 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 40/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 9/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 155/345 variables, 190/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 154/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 3/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60060ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/218 places, 155/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60705 ms. Remains : 190/218 places, 155/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2046017522676426551.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15583055899479496435.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2046017522676426551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15583055899479496435.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.641793,16340,2,13437,5,41625,6,0,915,37953,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AG(E((p130==1) U (p16==0))) + (p42==0)) + (p13==1))) * AF(EX(EF((((p167==1)||(p96==1))||(p66==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(E((p130==1) U (p16==0))))) + (p42==0)) + (p13==1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(EX(E...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t19, t24, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t44, t45, t47, t50, t53, t56, t65, t69, t70, t72, t74,...344
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph153484958699737376.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph153484958699737376.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph153484958699737376.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph153484958699737376.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph153484958699737376.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6837766396441557374.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17713654083219656094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6837766396441557374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17713654083219656094.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.114812,7260,1197,35,6268,263,408,8066,47,569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AG(E((i14.u40.p130==1) U (i2.u6.p16==0))) + (i5.u12.p42==0)) + (i2.u6.p13==1))) * AF(EX(EF((((i15.u49.p167==1)||(i0.i1.u31.p96==1))...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(E((i14.u40.p130==1) U (i2.u6.p16==0))))) + (i5.u12.p42==0)) + (i2.u6.p13==1)))))] ...262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t94, t98, t110, t114, i0.i0.u28.t81, i0.i1.u30.t77, i1.u24.t89, i2.u6.t120, i3.u8.t117, i3.u4...573
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,1,14.241,305248,1,0,572641,1088,2768,897956,260,7681,642568
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 197 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 197 transition count 162
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 188 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 188 transition count 153
Applied a total of 58 rules in 11 ms. Remains 188 /218 variables (removed 30) and now considering 153/181 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 188 cols
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 328 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 521 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 17/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 6/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 6/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 153/341 variables, 188/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
(t126 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 0.0)
(t1 0.0)
(t2 0.0)
(t3 1.0)
(t4 3.0)
(t5 0.0)
(t6 0.0)
(t7 0.0)
(t8 0.0)
(t9 1.0)
(t10 1.0)
(t11 1.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 0.0)
(t19 0.0)
(t20 0.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 0.0)
(t23 0.0)
(t24 2.0)
(t25 0.0)
(t26 1.0)
(t27 1.0)
(t28 1.0)
(t29 1.0)
(t30 1.0)
(t31 1.0)
(t32 1.0)
(t33 1.0)
(t34 1.0)
(t35 0.0)
(t36 1.0)
(t37 1.0)
(t38 0.0)
(t39 1.0)
(t40 1.0)
(t41 0.0)
(t42 1.0)
(t43 1.0)
(t44 0.0)
(t45 1.0)
(t46 1.0)
(t47 0.0)
(t48 1.0)
(t49 1.0)
(t50 0.0)
(t51 1.0)
(t52 1.0)
(t53 0.0)
(t54 1.0)
(t55 1.0)
(t56 0.0)
(t57 1.0)
(t58 1.0)
(t59 0.0)
(t60 1.0)
(t61 0.0)
(t62 0.0)
(t63 1.0)
(t64 1.0)
(t65 1.0)
(t66 1.0)
(t67 1.0)
(t68 0.0)
(t69 0.0)
(t70 0.0)
(t71 1.0)
(t72 0.0)
(t73 1.0)
(t74 0.0)
(t75 0.0)
(t76 1.0)
(t77 0.0)
(t78 0.0)
(t79 0.0)
(t80 1.0)
(t81 0.0)
(t82 0.0)
(t83 0.0)
(t84 1.0)
(t85 0.0)
(t86 0.0)
(t87 0.0)
(t88 1.0)
(t89 0.0)
(t90 0.0)
(t91 0.0)
(t92 1.0)
(t93 1.0)
(t94 1.0)
(t95 1.0)
(t96 1.0)
(t97 0.0)
(t98 0.0)
(t99 0.0)
(t100 0.0)
(t101 0.0)
(t102 1.0)
(t103 1.0)
(t104 0.0)
(t105 0.0)
(t106 0.0)
(t107 0.0)
(t108 1.0)
(t109 0.0)
(t110 0.0)
(t111 0.0)
(t112 1.0)
(t113 0.0)
(t114 0.0)
(t115 0.0)
(t116 0.0)
(t117 0.0)
(t118 0.0)
(t119 0.0)
(t120 0.0)
(t121 0.0)
(t122 1.0)
(t123 0.0)
(t124 0.0)
(t125 1.0)
(t126 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 43/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 153/341 variables, 188/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 152/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 5/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 5/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/218 places, 153/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60597 ms. Remains : 188/218 places, 153/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14370246894021014393.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9710966596947250842.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14370246894021014393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9710966596947250842.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.652276,15860,2,13010,5,40610,6,0,905,37181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AX((p5==0)) + (p166==0)) + E(((p58==0)||(p50==1)) U (p188==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((p58==0)||(p50==1)) U (p188==0)))) * !((p166==0)))) * !((p5==0)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t19, t24, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t64, t67, t70, t72, t75, t79,...334
(forward)formula 0,1,8.03475,214648,1,0,364,732269,330,176,5161,638374,350
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 200 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 200 transition count 165
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 194 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 194 transition count 159
Applied a total of 46 rules in 10 ms. Remains 194 /218 variables (removed 24) and now considering 159/181 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 194 cols
[2025-05-29 18:30:50] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:30:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 456 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 770 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:30:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 28/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 145 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 159/353 variables, 194/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/353 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 353/353 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 26200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 194/194 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 28/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 32/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 159/353 variables, 194/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 158/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 7/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 5/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/353 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 194/194 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 56238ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56239ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/218 places, 159/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57020 ms. Remains : 194/218 places, 159/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12523676310649280631.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2394430162832016166.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12523676310649280631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2394430162832016166.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.22122e+12,0.622353,16656,2,13650,5,41842,6,0,934,38196,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(TRUE)) * AF(((EF((((p231==0)||(p125==1))&&((p234==0)||(p12==1)))) + AF(((p25==0)||(p135==1)))) + ((p233==0)&&(p3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (((p231==0)||(p125==1))&&((p234==0)||(p12==...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t11, t21, t26, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t51, t54, t57, t67, t68, t70, t74, t75,...363
(forward)formula 0,0,11.0139,274568,1,0,559,991662,352,253,5519,885027,593
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 116 edges and 218 vertex of which 6 / 218 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 411 edges and 213 vertex of which 205 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 204 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 169 transition count 133
Performed 37 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 37 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 169 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 125 transition count 96
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 108 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 108 transition count 79
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 61 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 60 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 59 transition count 33
Applied a total of 281 rules in 36 ms. Remains 59 /218 variables (removed 159) and now considering 33/181 (removed 148) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 59 cols
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/218 places, 33/181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 33/33 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 58/218 places, 33/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16455242990242222046.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17289719616690359000.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16455242990242222046.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17289719616690359000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,221,0.026171,4192,2,393,5,1504,6,0,263,1106,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF((p66==1))) + AG((p54==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p66==1))))))),TRUE) * !((p54==0)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t12, t16, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...178
(forward)formula 0,0,0.133419,6496,1,0,68,10588,89,43,1646,7551,91
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 116 edges and 218 vertex of which 6 / 218 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 411 edges and 213 vertex of which 205 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 204 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 169 transition count 133
Performed 37 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 37 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 169 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 124 transition count 96
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 108 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 108 transition count 80
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 62 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 61 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 60 transition count 35
Applied a total of 278 rules in 39 ms. Remains 60 /218 variables (removed 158) and now considering 35/181 (removed 146) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned [18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 290 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/218 places, 35/181 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 47 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 41 transition count 29
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 37 transition count 27
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 35 transition count 25
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 35 /47 variables (removed 12) and now considering 25/35 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 35 cols
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned [2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 25/218 places, 25/181 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 23 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 23 transition count 23
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 23 transition count 22
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 23 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 22 transition count 21
Applied a total of 7 rules in 9 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 21/25 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 22/218 places, 21/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 599 ms. Remains : 22/218 places, 21/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality408596812052361382.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1833303264794642713.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality408596812052361382.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1833303264794642713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,160,0.006266,3844,2,133,5,463,6,0,105,351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p5==0)||(p165==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p5==0)||(p165==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t4, t11, t19, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,1,0.018871,4356,1,0,48,2822,62,24,598,2368,54
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 198 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 198 transition count 163
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 189 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 189 transition count 154
Applied a total of 56 rules in 16 ms. Remains 189 /218 variables (removed 29) and now considering 154/181 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 189 cols
[2025-05-29 18:32:00] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 402 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 586 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 153 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 4/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 154/343 variables, 189/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 3/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 5/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 189/189 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 44/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 154/343 variables, 189/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 153/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 4/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 189/189 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/218 places, 154/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60649 ms. Remains : 189/218 places, 154/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7884713290089546435.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4112782966113528439.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7884713290089546435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4112782966113528439.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.638048,16064,2,13089,5,40988,6,0,910,38094,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((p217==0)||(p144==1)) U !(EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((p217==0)||(p144==1)) U !(EX(TRUE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t16, t20, t25, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t53, t56, t65, t68, t71, t73, t76,...339
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13884636045438699724.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13884636045438699724.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13884636045438699724.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13884636045438699724.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13884636045438699724.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4688626933106840537.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality185046942793674809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4688626933106840537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality185046942793674809.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.158522,8392,1391,44,9093,472,411,11293,48,1226,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((i17.u54.p217==0)||(i14.u43.p144==1)) U !(EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((i17.u54.p217==0)||(i14.u43.p144==1)) U !(EX(TRUE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t93, t97, t109, t113, i0.u22.t92, i0.u28.t80, i1.u24.t88, i2.u6.t119, i3.u8.t116, i4.u10.t112...565
(forward)formula 0,0,6.9529,221256,1,0,390408,472,2235,730125,218,1646,559539
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 197 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 197 transition count 162
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 188 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 188 transition count 153
Applied a total of 58 rules in 10 ms. Remains 188 /218 variables (removed 30) and now considering 153/181 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 188 cols
[2025-05-29 18:33:37] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:33:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 427 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 539 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:33:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 17/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 6/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 6/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 153/341 variables, 188/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 0.0)
(t1 0.0)
(t2 0.0)
(t3 1.0)
(t4 3.0)
(t5 0.0)
(t6 0.0)
(t7 0.0)
(t8 0.0)
(t9 1.0)
(t10 1.0)
(t11 1.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 0.0)
(t19 0.0)
(t20 0.0)
(t21 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 43/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 153/341 variables, 188/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 152/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 5/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 5/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/218 places, 153/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60595 ms. Remains : 188/218 places, 153/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17153096687652715011.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:34:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11994904941350374379.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17153096687652715011.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11994904941350374379.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.60104,15800,2,13010,5,40610,6,0,905,37181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EX(TRUE) U EX((p153==0))) * AG(!(A(((p128==0)||(p53==1)) U (p46==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(EX(TRUE) U EX((p153==0)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((p46==1))))) * !(E(!((p46==1)) ...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t19, t24, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t64, t67, t70, t72, t75, t79,...334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11196798523248456040.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11196798523248456040.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11196798523248456040.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11196798523248456040.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11196798523248456040.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5873778605858730043.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18095780051318661548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5873778605858730043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18095780051318661548.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46025e+12,0.147209,8120,1095,51,8301,634,382,10962,53,1339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EX(TRUE) U EX((i13.u44.p153==0))) * AG(!(A(((i14.u39.p128==0)||(i7.u18.p53==1)) U (i7.u15.p46==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(EX(TRUE) U EX((i13.u44.p153==0)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((i7.u15.p46==1))))) * !...254
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t96, t102, t112, i0.u25.t83, i1.u21.t91, i2.t92, i2.u19.t95, i3.t108, i3.u10.t111, i4.u6.t118...550
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,5.9353,133944,1,0,259437,1619,2479,430501,287,8667,359842
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 181/181 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 216 transition count 181
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 201 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 201 transition count 166
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 194 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 194 transition count 159
Applied a total of 46 rules in 10 ms. Remains 194 /218 variables (removed 24) and now considering 159/181 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 194 cols
[2025-05-29 18:35:14] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:35:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 282 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 409 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:35:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 16/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 5/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 159/353 variables, 194/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 3/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/353 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 353/353 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 28443 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 194/194 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 34/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 159/353 variables, 194/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 158/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/353 variables, and 435 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 194/194 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58480ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58481ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/218 places, 159/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58900 ms. Remains : 194/218 places, 159/181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6122006569515105662.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10132720537902932546.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6122006569515105662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10132720537902932546.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49801e+12,0.511357,16520,2,13304,5,42228,6,0,935,39032,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF((p255==1)) + A((EG((p206==0)) + (p40==0)) U (AF(!(((p0==0)||(p42==1)))) * EF((p226==1))))) U EX(A((!(AF((p174==1))) * (((p212==1)&&...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U (p255==1)) + !((E(!((!(EG(!(!(((p0==0)||(p42==1)))))) * E(TRUE U (p226==1)))) U (!((EG...600
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t10, t17, t21, t24, t30, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t49, t52, t55, t58, t61, t70, t73, ...355
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8864694222892653352.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8864694222892653352.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8864694222892653352.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8864694222892653352.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8864694222892653352.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3471005270445286045.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1083280226901334715.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3471005270445286045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1083280226901334715.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49801e+12,0.328281,9820,1576,46,11648,389,419,15011,54,1050,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF((i16.u59.p255==1)) + A((EG((i16.u55.p206==0)) + (i5.u12.p40==0)) U (AF(!(((i10.u0.p0==0)||(i5.u11.p42==1)))) * EF((i16.u59.p226==1)...381
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U (i16.u59.p255==1)) + !((E(!((!(EG(!(!(((i10.u0.p0==0)||(i5.u11.p42==1)))))) * E(TRUE U...808
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t102, t108, t114, i0.u50.t40, i1.u22.t93, i1.u24.t89, i2.t98, i2.u18.t101, i2.u20.t97, i3.t11...604
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14062041662125844338.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14062041662125844338.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14062041662125844338.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14062041662125844338.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14062041662125844338.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9298202118062486458.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:37:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality366824099320415668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9298202118062486458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality366824099320415668.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.80487e+12,0.180725,9964,1526,54,12495,590,522,17144,57,2124,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF((i17.i1.u73.p255==1)) + A((EG((i17.i0.u67.p206==0)) + (i6.i1.u16.p40==0)) U (AF(!(((i0.u0.p0==0)||(i6.i0.u14.p42==1)))) * EF((i17.i...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U (i17.i1.u73.p255==1)) + !((E(!((!(EG(!(!(((i0.u0.p0==0)||(i6.i0.u14.p42==1)))))) * E(T...845
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t116, t120, t132, t138, i0.u62.t47, i0.u63.t44, i1.u30.t103, i2.u22.t119, i2.u24.t115, i3.u6....807
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,1,19.6093,516204,1,0,1.10957e+06,604,3459,1.33764e+06,276,2124,1505586
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 832727 ms.

BK_STOP 1748543853698

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-02, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100009"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-02.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;