Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813100002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100002
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748541709257

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 158 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Transformed 200 places.
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Transformed 178 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 200 places and 178 transitions and 487 arcs in 402 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 31 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 93 out of 199 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 199/199 places, 177/177 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 197 transition count 177
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 185 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 185 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 185 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 184 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 184 transition count 163
Applied a total of 29 rules in 101 ms. Remains 184 /199 variables (removed 15) and now considering 163/177 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 184 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 539 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 429 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1048 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 188 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 173 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 189 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 174 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 172 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 162 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 188 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 154 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 159 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 162 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 160 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 148 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 141 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 116 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 163 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 159 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 147 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 146 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 161 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 176 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 149 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 158 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 164 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 166 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 161 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 115 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 149 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 116 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 121 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 164 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 177 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 173 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 176 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 173 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 154 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 152 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30243ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30279ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 183 transition count 159
Applied a total of 1 rules in 13 ms. Remains 183 /184 variables (removed 1) and now considering 159/159 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 183 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 317 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 463 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31952 ms. Remains : 183/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 183 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 66 to 65
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (460 resets) in 2542 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 6/65 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (97 resets) in 269 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (94 resets) in 283 ms. (140 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (95 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (97 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (96 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (90 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 134/150 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/342 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved in 535 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 550ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 183 places (down from 82) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 154 stabilizing places and 131 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 351 edges and 183 vertex of which 182 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 351 edges and 183 vertex of which 182 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 180 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 155 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 152 transition count 129
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 152 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 112 transition count 95
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 90 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 90 transition count 73
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 90 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 88 transition count 71
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 56 transition count 41
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 56 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 55 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 54 transition count 39
Applied a total of 244 rules in 81 ms. Remains 54 /183 variables (removed 129) and now considering 39/159 (removed 120) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 54 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [0, 1, 7, 8, 9]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/183 places, 39/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 49/183 places, 39/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13714206369275038841.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10734726629969274627.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13714206369275038841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10734726629969274627.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2322,0.039928,4372,2,466,5,2498,6,0,236,2302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p32==1)||(p193==0))||((p173==1)&&(p116==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p32==1)||(p193==0))||((p173==1)&&(p116==1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/0/18
(forward)formula 0,0,0.088163,6036,1,0,9,11556,19,3,1209,5497,8
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 156 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 156 transition count 133
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 79 rules in 14 ms. Remains 143 /183 variables (removed 40) and now considering 120/159 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 13/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 6/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 22491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 27/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 4/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 52545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52547ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/183 places, 120/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52879 ms. Remains : 143/183 places, 120/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14590127028599660707.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16987596006140750151.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14590127028599660707.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16987596006140750151.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.851748,27552,2,14993,5,88735,6,0,693,119299,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG((((p15==0)||(p99==0))||(p159==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((((p15==0)||(p99==0))||(p159==0))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,1.38771,29856,1,0,9,89944,10,2,1385,121347,4
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 157 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 157 transition count 134
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 75 rules in 17 ms. Remains 145 /183 variables (removed 38) and now considering 122/159 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 248 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 531 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 11/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 7/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 6/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 28443 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 26/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 121/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 7/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 6/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 58475ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58477ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/183 places, 122/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59025 ms. Remains : 145/183 places, 122/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10932103662721523427.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5426717237461498328.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10932103662721523427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5426717237461498328.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30044e+10,1.21114,28168,2,15368,5,91386,6,0,703,122784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(EX(EF((p32==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U (p32==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...305
(forward)formula 0,0,28.7239,611112,1,0,338,2.8311e+06,271,161,4181,2.68385e+06,352
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 163 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 163 transition count 140
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 153 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 153 transition count 130
Applied a total of 59 rules in 10 ms. Remains 153 /183 variables (removed 30) and now considering 130/159 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 247 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 129 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 16/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 130/283 variables, 153/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 283/283 variables, and 255 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved in 28652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 69/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 14/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 130/283 variables, 153/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 129/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 6/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 4/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 2/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 58684ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58687ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/183 places, 130/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59087 ms. Remains : 153/183 places, 130/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12470066236330201804.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1010684202724496210.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12470066236330201804.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1010684202724496210.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.33837e+10,1.43252,37556,2,18318,5,119273,6,0,743,179884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p56==1) U (AG(!(AX((p158==1)))) + ((p66==1)&&(p189==1)))) * AX((((((AF((p63==1)) + EG((p88==1))) * AX((p172==0))) + !(A((p83==1) U ((...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E((p56==1) U (!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EX(!((p158==1)))))))) + ((p66==1)&&(p189==1))))))] = FALSE * ([FwdG((...894
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t6, t15, t26, t29, t33, t34, t37, t38, t40, t43, t47, t48, t50, t53, t58, t61, t6...332
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12337987412504893349.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12337987412504893349.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12337987412504893349.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12337987412504893349.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12337987412504893349.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11812952748964921826.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12684965684069174418.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11812952748964921826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12684965684069174418.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.33837e+10,0.156663,9156,1228,32,10870,544,395,13356,55,1130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((i1.u18.p56==1) U (AG(!(AX((i14.u45.p158==1)))) + ((i15.u22.p66==1)&&(i15.u53.p189==1)))) * AX((((((AF((i7.u21.p63==1)) + EG((i11.u29....450
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E((i1.u18.p56==1) U (!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EX(!((i14.u45.p158==1)))))))) + ((i15.u22.p66==1)&&(i15.u53.p1...1249
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t71, t79, t83, i0.u42.t29, i0.u44.t26, i1.u17.t74, i2.t75, i2.u13.t82, i2.u15.t78, i3.t92, i3...540
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,12.0319,296644,1,0,573054,566,2535,777470,275,1130,683452
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 99 edges and 183 vertex of which 6 / 183 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 345 edges and 178 vertex of which 177 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 176 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 146 transition count 121
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 146 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 115 transition count 95
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 93 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 93 transition count 73
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 93 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 91 transition count 71
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 61 transition count 43
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 60 transition count 42
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 60 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 59 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 58 transition count 41
Applied a total of 231 rules in 39 ms. Remains 58 /183 variables (removed 125) and now considering 41/159 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 58 cols
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [0, 1, 8, 9]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/183 places, 41/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 109 ms. Remains : 54/183 places, 41/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14297622400759022501.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability984208546853608666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14297622400759022501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability984208546853608666.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,22152,0.023855,4572,2,657,5,3518,6,0,256,2663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((E((((p54==1)&&(p134==1))&&(p179==1)) U E((p40!=1) U E((p137==1) U (p153==1)))) * (p132==0)) * (((p62==0)||(p124==0))||(p185==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p62==0)||(p124==0))||(p185==0))) * (p132==0)),(((p54==1)&&(p134==1))&&(p...208
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 36/8/5
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.053423,5340,1,0,14,7068,31,3,589,5862,12
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 159 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 159 transition count 136
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 149 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 149 transition count 126
Applied a total of 67 rules in 7 ms. Remains 149 /183 variables (removed 34) and now considering 126/159 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 149 cols
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:06:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 265 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 393 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 11/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 11/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 3/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/275 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 3/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/275 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/275 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 65/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 125/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 2/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 275/275 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/183 places, 126/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60446 ms. Remains : 149/183 places, 126/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2699942287588226293.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7593409919109261606.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2699942287588226293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7593409919109261606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52477e+10,0.931093,30620,2,16016,5,98051,6,0,723,135080,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AX((EG(E((p170==1) U (p182==1))) + AF(AX((p176==1))))) U AF(!(EF((p36==1))))) + (AF(EX(EX((((p74==0)||(p103==0))||(p193==0))))) * EX((...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((Init * !(E(!(EX(!((EG(E((p170==1) U (p182==1))) + !(EG(!(!(EX(!((p176==1))))))))))) U !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U ...425
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t10, t13, t19, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t55, t58, t61, t65, t66, ...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph934597226964115260.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph934597226964115260.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph934597226964115260.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph934597226964115260.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph934597226964115260.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability119497696196461853.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5377786554650415827.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability119497696196461853.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5377786554650415827.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52477e+10,0.316381,12932,1886,23,19140,303,385,21799,43,794,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AX((EG(E((i10.u44.p170==1) U (i5.i1.u49.p182==1))) + AF(AX((i4.u46.p176==1))))) U AF(!(EF((i2.i1.u11.p36==1))))) + (AF(EX(EX((((i6.i1....273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((Init * !(E(!(EX(!((EG(E((i10.u44.p170==1) U (i5.i1.u49.p182==1))) + !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i4.u46.p176==1)))))))...537
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t66, t70, t78, t88, t116, u32.t47, i0.u37.t32, i0.u38.t29, i0.u39.t26, i1.t74, i1.u4.t94, i1....493
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,0,8.52374,201732,1,0,406469,303,2466,490906,222,794,580572
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 157 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 157 transition count 134
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 77 rules in 6 ms. Remains 144 /183 variables (removed 39) and now considering 121/159 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2025-05-29 18:08:11] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:08:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 8/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 3/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 217 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 25674 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 43/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 120/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 4/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 55701ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55702ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/183 places, 121/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56005 ms. Remains : 144/183 places, 121/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability598279125604119558.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11032049836409328605.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability598279125604119558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11032049836409328605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,1.04129,28156,2,15755,5,91594,6,0,698,122675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(AG(EF((p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p12==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...311
(forward)formula 0,1,9.08551,226080,1,0,261,815537,263,121,3981,773418,255
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 156 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 156 transition count 133
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 79 rules in 7 ms. Remains 143 /183 variables (removed 40) and now considering 120/159 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2025-05-29 18:09:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 235 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 400 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 13/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 6/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 18566 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 27/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 4/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 48595ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48596ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/183 places, 120/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49003 ms. Remains : 143/183 places, 120/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10256842020597582795.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12307495956612987403.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10256842020597582795.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12307495956612987403.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.953812,27484,2,14993,5,88735,6,0,693,119299,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(AF((p41==0))) * AX(((p34==1)&&(p150==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((p41==0)))))))) * !(EX(!(((p34==1)&&(p150==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...301
(forward)formula 0,1,18.179,440224,1,0,446,2.18538e+06,265,199,3990,2.17774e+06,479
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 158 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 158 transition count 135
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 148 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 148 transition count 125
Applied a total of 69 rules in 6 ms. Remains 148 /183 variables (removed 35) and now considering 125/159 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 148 cols
[2025-05-29 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 239 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 12/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 125/273 variables, 148/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 11/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 273/273 variables, and 243 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 62/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 125/273 variables, 148/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 124/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 3/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 5/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 4/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 273/273 variables, and 376 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/183 places, 125/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 148/183 places, 125/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4101422765993219533.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1043902871587692000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4101422765993219533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1043902871587692000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38392e+10,1.30023,31620,2,16313,5,101893,6,0,718,140482,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EF((p95==1)) + EG((p147==1))) + (AG((p82==1)) + A(EF((((p57==1)&&(p133==1))&&(p193==1))) U EX((p33==1))))) + ((p161==1)||(((p48==1)...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(TRUE U (p95==1)) + EG((p147==1))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((p82==1)))) + !((E(!(EX((p33==1))) U (!(E(TRUE...302
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t13, t19, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t55, t58, t61, t65, t66, t69, ...315
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7109659616865620509.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7109659616865620509.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7109659616865620509.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7109659616865620509.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7109659616865620509.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12337448451433472238.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11092849760049360656.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12337448451433472238.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11092849760049360656.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38392e+10,0.150284,8192,1068,24,9480,260,350,9901,40,522,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EF((i10.u30.p95==1)) + EG((i12.u41.p147==1))) + (AG((i0.u26.p82==1)) + A(EF((((i6.i1.u19.p57==1)&&(i0.u38.p133==1))&&(i12.u40.p193=...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(TRUE U (i10.u30.p95==1)) + EG((i12.u41.p147==1))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((i0.u26.p82==1)))) + !((E(!(EX...400
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t66, t70, t78, t87, t116, i0.u38.t29, i0.u39.t26, i1.u14.t73, i1.u33.t44, i2.u4.t93, i2.u34.t...485
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,16.1405,381040,1,0,832535,266,2309,933161,201,734,1131070
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 162 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 162 transition count 139
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 152 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 152 transition count 129
Applied a total of 61 rules in 5 ms. Remains 152 /183 variables (removed 31) and now considering 129/159 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 152 cols
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 259 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 412 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 128 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 17/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 6/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 129/281 variables, 152/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 4/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/281 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 281/281 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 26245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 56/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 17/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 129/281 variables, 152/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 128/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 4/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 3/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 281/281 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 56275ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 128 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56276ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/183 places, 129/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56695 ms. Remains : 152/183 places, 129/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 129 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7031733210739313899.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9220396720916897203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7031733210739313899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9220396720916897203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4875e+10,1.41383,33456,2,17797,5,106251,6,0,738,151660,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((!(E((p21!=1) U AX((p165==1)))) + AF((p141==1))) + (AG((EX((p166==1)) * A((p55==1) U (p115==1)))) + A(AX((p167==1)) U EF((p7==1)))))...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(E((p21!=1) U !(EX(!((p165==1)))))) + !(EG(!((p141==1))))))) * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE ...1003
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t12, t14, t27, t30, t33, t36, t40, t41, t44, t45, t47, t50, t53, t58, t61, t64, t...323
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6273903650030577078.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6273903650030577078.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6273903650030577078.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6273903650030577078.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6273903650030577078.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10852760842841691117.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7729331779387335163.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10852760842841691117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7729331779387335163.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4875e+10,0.136721,7824,900,34,8236,474,376,10154,53,1217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((!(E((u7.p21!=1) U AX((i13.u46.p165==1)))) + AF((i13.u46.p141==1))) + (AG((EX((i13.u46.p166==1)) * A((i6.u17.p55==1) U (i11.u34.p115...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(E((u7.p21!=1) U !(EX(!((i13.u46.p165==1)))))) + !(EG(!((i13.u46.p141==1)))))))...1244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t69, t73, t77, t81, i0.u25.t58, i1.u14.t76, i2.u12.t80, i2.u38.t36, i4.t91, i4.u4.t97, i4.u6....512
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,15.6145,407032,1,0,790960,656,2886,1.03534e+06,292,1833,958682
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 157 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 157 transition count 134
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 77 rules in 6 ms. Remains 144 /183 variables (removed 39) and now considering 121/159 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2025-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 188 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 296 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 11/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 6/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 24899 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 52/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 120/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 3/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 54924ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54925ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/183 places, 121/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55229 ms. Remains : 144/183 places, 121/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7157194603301099492.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6035351347371029544.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7157194603301099492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6035351347371029544.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26039e+10,0.91906,28212,2,15076,5,90868,6,0,698,123385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!(EF(((p3==1)&&(p90==1)))) * A((p96==1) U !((((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1))))) U AF(EG(!(AX((p80==1)))))) + E(EF(!(E((p82==1) U (p...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((p3==1)&&(p90==1)))) * !((E(!(!((((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1)))) U (!((p96==1)) * ...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t13, t23, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t52, t55, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, ...306
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9485862702133632377.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9485862702133632377.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9485862702133632377.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9485862702133632377.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9485862702133632377.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9502499873579279396.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17764821451947593777.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9502499873579279396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17764821451947593777.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26039e+10,0.137978,7892,903,27,8695,348,377,10572,44,692,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!(EF(((i0.i1.u1.p3==1)&&(i10.u29.p90==1)))) * A((i2.u31.p96==1) U !((((i0.i1.u17.p51==1)&&(i0.i0.u39.p138==1))&&(i12.u40.p193==1)))))...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((i0.i1.u1.p3==1)&&(i10.u29.p90==1)))) * !((E(!(!((((i0.i1.u17.p51==1)&&(i0.i0.u39.p138...517
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t63, t71, t75, t111, t112, u33.t41, i0.i0.u39.t23, i0.i1.u17.t66, i0.i1.u26.t52, i1.t67, i1.u...471
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.09435,134868,1,0,300244,348,2415,321056,225,780,380288
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 157 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 157 transition count 134
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 75 rules in 5 ms. Remains 145 /183 variables (removed 38) and now considering 122/159 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2025-05-29 18:15:23] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:15:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 280 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 412 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 13/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 4/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 23178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 23/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 121/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 8/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 53205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53206ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/183 places, 122/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53623 ms. Remains : 145/183 places, 122/159 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1780269580661811502.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12996795959234017369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1780269580661811502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12996795959234017369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28679e+10,1.01834,27464,2,15096,5,88758,6,0,703,118163,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(A(A(((p116==1)||(p167==1)) U (((p106==1)&&(p69==1))&&(p72==1))) U EF((p67==1))) U AX((p196==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((p196==1)))))) * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (p67==1))) U (!(!((E(!((((p106==1)&&(p69==1))&&(p72...410
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t12, t24, t27, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t53, t56, t59, t63, t64, t67, t68, ...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6248482439883441145.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6248482439883441145.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6248482439883441145.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6248482439883441145.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6248482439883441145.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4443151845272600785.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10889067252561123178.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4443151845272600785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10889067252561123178.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28679e+10,0.148697,8192,1042,26,10163,328,374,8660,45,670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(A(A(((i10.u36.p116==1)||(i11.u45.p167==1)) U (((i13.u34.p106==1)&&(i8.i0.u22.p69==1))&&(i8.i0.u23.p72==1))) U EF((i8.i1.u21.p67==1)))...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((i11.u51.p196==1)))))) * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (i8.i1.u21.p67==1))) U (!(!((E(!((((i13.u34...564
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t64, t72, t76, t84, t113, i0.i0.u26.t53, i0.i1.u39.t27, i0.i1.u40.t24, i1.t68, i1.u13.t75, i1...464
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,14.3419,398360,1,0,988693,474,2461,824878,242,1250,1194057
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 909944 ms.

BK_STOP 1748542622021

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-01.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;