Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r030-smll-174853813100001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100001
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748541709278

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 156 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Transformed 200 places.
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Transformed 178 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 200 places and 178 transitions and 487 arcs in 410 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 36 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 86 out of 199 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 199/199 places, 177/177 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 183 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 183 transition count 161
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 177 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 177 transition count 155
Applied a total of 44 rules in 83 ms. Remains 177 /199 variables (removed 22) and now considering 155/177 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 177 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 497 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 424 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 994 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/177 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 202 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 148 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 163 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 193 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 170 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 180 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 167 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 140 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 151 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 158 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 177 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 151 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 220 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 132 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 163 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 158 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 164 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 164 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 127 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 207 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 151 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 150 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 154 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 156 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 131 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 154 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 152 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 155 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 171 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 168 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30233ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30257ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 177/199 places, 151/177 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 176 transition count 151
Applied a total of 1 rules in 19 ms. Remains 176 /177 variables (removed 1) and now considering 151/151 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 176 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 298 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 452 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 176/199 places, 151/177 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31857 ms. Remains : 176/199 places, 151/177 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 176 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 176 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (465 resets) in 1435 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 1/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 24733 steps (62 resets) in 164 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
Computed a total of 146 stabilizing places and 121 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 343 edges and 176 vertex of which 173 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 100 edges and 176 vertex of which 8 / 176 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 334 edges and 169 vertex of which 166 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 164 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 136 transition count 112
Performed 30 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 30 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 136 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 100 transition count 82
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 82 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 82 transition count 64
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 82 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 81 transition count 63
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 54 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 53 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 52 transition count 37
Applied a total of 216 rules in 80 ms. Remains 52 /176 variables (removed 124) and now considering 37/151 (removed 114) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned [23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/176 places, 37/151 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 40 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 39 transition count 31
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 39 transition count 31
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 35 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 34 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 34 transition count 28
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 33 transition count 27
Applied a total of 22 rules in 18 ms. Remains 33 /45 variables (removed 12) and now considering 27/37 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 33 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned [1, 2, 6, 9]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/176 places, 27/151 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 459 ms. Remains : 29/176 places, 27/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 334 steps (32 resets) in 9 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12244679274559517456.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4983570488412507871.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12244679274559517456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4983570488412507871.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 174 transition count 151
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 155 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 155 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 155 transition count 131
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 59 rules in 18 ms. Remains 146 /176 variables (removed 30) and now considering 122/151 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 256 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 19/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 16/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/268 variables, 146/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 5/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/268 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 268/268 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 21518 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 19/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 26/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/268 variables, 146/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 121/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 9/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/268 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 51586ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51590ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/176 places, 122/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52018 ms. Remains : 146/176 places, 122/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16859006755547705811.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4238329985446438613.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16859006755547705811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4238329985446438613.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24823e+10,0.8215,27716,2,15543,5,92093,6,0,704,121814,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((p93==0) + ((p159==0) * E((p181==1) U ((p29==0)||(p26==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((p93==0) + ((p159==0) * E((p181==1) U ((p29==0)||(p26==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t8, t23, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t52, t55, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, t70, ...311
(forward)formula 0,0,8.80554,214476,1,0,272,837738,266,127,3946,886875,261
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 173 transition count 151
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 152 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 152 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 152 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 64 rules in 12 ms. Remains 143 /176 variables (removed 33) and now considering 120/151 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 252 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 409 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 14/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 6/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 7/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 17824 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 30/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 47868ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47870ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/176 places, 120/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48293 ms. Remains : 143/176 places, 120/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17031552150872970698.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11826584771400960879.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17031552150872970698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11826584771400960879.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.851562,26796,2,14564,5,87722,6,0,693,117611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.857208,26796,1,0,6,87722,7,1,844,117611,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 99 edges and 176 vertex of which 7 / 176 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 336 edges and 170 vertex of which 167 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 165 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 137 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 136 transition count 113
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 136 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 103 transition count 85
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 86 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 86 transition count 68
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 86 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 85 transition count 67
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 53 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 52 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 51 transition count 36
Applied a total of 221 rules in 23 ms. Remains 51 /176 variables (removed 125) and now considering 36/151 (removed 115) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [0, 1, 5, 6, 7, 9]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 104 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/176 places, 36/151 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 36/36 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 45/176 places, 36/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8537353808650735675.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1033772429449923625.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8537353808650735675.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1033772429449923625.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1710,0.016792,4200,2,361,5,2182,6,0,216,1593,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(!(E(EG(((p189==0)||(p116==1))) U EG(((p142==0)||(p118==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(E(EG(((p189==0)||(p116==1))) U EG(((p142==0)||(p118==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t14, t17, t20, t22, t23, t28, t32, t33, Intersection with reachable at each step enable...204
(forward)formula 0,0,0.220706,11624,1,0,225,44450,106,115,1378,47607,278
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 101 edges and 176 vertex of which 8 / 176 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 334 edges and 169 vertex of which 167 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 165 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 137 transition count 112
Performed 30 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 30 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 137 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 83 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 83 transition count 64
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 83 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 82 transition count 63
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 54 transition count 35
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 54 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 53 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 52 transition count 34
Applied a total of 222 rules in 23 ms. Remains 52 /176 variables (removed 124) and now considering 34/151 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [0, 7, 8, 9, 48, 50]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/176 places, 34/151 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 34/34 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 46/176 places, 34/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9091588550212385898.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13779903655002165588.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9091588550212385898.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13779903655002165588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1182,0.033437,4348,2,398,5,2725,6,0,215,1686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((!(A(((p18==0)||(p123==1)) U ((p93==0)||(p59==1)))) + AF((p118==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(((p93==0)||(p59==1))) U (!(((p18==0)||(p123==1))) * !(((p93==0)||(p59==1))))) ...224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t12, t15, t18, t19, t28, t29, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroy...193
(forward)formula 0,0,0.301913,10108,1,0,195,37649,109,111,1397,31665,253
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 101 edges and 176 vertex of which 8 / 176 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 334 edges and 169 vertex of which 166 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 164 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 136 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 135 transition count 111
Performed 30 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 30 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 135 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 99 transition count 81
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 83 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 83 transition count 65
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 83 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 82 transition count 64
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 50 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 49 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 48 transition count 33
Applied a total of 224 rules in 37 ms. Remains 48 /176 variables (removed 128) and now considering 33/151 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 48 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [0, 1, 5, 6, 7]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/176 places, 33/151 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 33/33 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 113 ms. Remains : 43/176 places, 33/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 857 steps (96 resets) in 11 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1623856177473573232.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18328246531301725919.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1623856177473573232.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18328246531301725919.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18328246531301725919.prop.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 173 transition count 151
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 155 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 155 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 155 transition count 132
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 149 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 149 transition count 126
Applied a total of 52 rules in 13 ms. Remains 149 /176 variables (removed 27) and now considering 126/151 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 149 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 292 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 420 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 9/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 6/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/275 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/275 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 23875 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 42/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 125/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 16/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 3/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 3/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 53915ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53918ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/176 places, 126/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54351 ms. Remains : 149/176 places, 126/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10539028012683900719.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1421889791761421654.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10539028012683900719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1421889791761421654.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49178e+10,1.21837,33176,2,18621,5,107576,6,0,723,150526,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((AX(AF(((p37==0)||(p38==1)))) + E((p111!=1) U AX(((p21==0)||(p144==1))))) + (AG(((p86==0)||(p100==1))) * !(((p166==0)&&(p185==1))))...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p37==0)||(p38==1)))))))) + E((p111!=1) U !(EX(!(((p21==0)||(p144==1)))...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t11, t17, t24, t27, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t49, t50, t54, t57, t60, t64, t65, ...320
(forward)formula 0,1,18.5204,440516,1,0,470,1.92513e+06,291,214,4303,2.29506e+06,502
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 98 edges and 176 vertex of which 8 / 176 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 334 edges and 169 vertex of which 168 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 167 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 141 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 139 transition count 114
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 139 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 109 transition count 87
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 92 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 92 transition count 70
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 92 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 91 transition count 69
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 59 transition count 39
Applied a total of 213 rules in 24 ms. Remains 59 /176 variables (removed 117) and now considering 39/151 (removed 112) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 59 cols
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned [2, 3, 7, 10, 13, 14, 18, 47, 48]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/176 places, 39/151 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 50/176 places, 39/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12067143400681308915.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13261802234642835185.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12067143400681308915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13261802234642835185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3846,0.04727,4668,2,738,5,4266,6,0,237,3518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p106==1) U EF((E((p79==1) U (p48==1)) * (EF(((p44==0)||(p179==1))) + AF((p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (E((p79==1) U (p48==1)) * (E(TRUE U ((p44==0)||(p179==1))) + !(EG(!((p1==1))))))))))) ...380
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t20, t23, t24, t25, t30, t34, t35, t37, Intersection with reachable at each step e...210
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.924977,24852,1,0,346,137166,119,196,1572,117645,392
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 173 transition count 151
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 154 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 154 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 154 transition count 131
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 147 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 147 transition count 124
Applied a total of 56 rules in 11 ms. Remains 147 /176 variables (removed 29) and now considering 124/151 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 147 cols
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 417 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 20348 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 43/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 123/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 9/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 50382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50383ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/176 places, 124/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50813 ms. Remains : 147/176 places, 124/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4268889077002621199.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3965223289984210596.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4268889077002621199.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3965223289984210596.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35292e+10,1.33869,30544,2,16758,5,97780,6,0,713,132626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((p27==0)&&((p112==1)||((p10==0)&&(p62==1))))) + E((AF((p37==0)) + A((((p81==1)||(p39==0)) + AF((p1==1))) U !(AF((p184==0))))) U AX(A...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E((!(EG(!((p37==0)))) + !((E(!(!(!(EG(!((p184==0)))))) U (!((((p81==1)||(p39==0)) + !(EG(!((p1=...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t5, t23, t26, t29, t32, t35, t39, t40, t43, t44, t46, t49, t54, t57, t60, t64, t65, t...308
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3329415704062974250.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3329415704062974250.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3329415704062974250.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3329415704062974250.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3329415704062974250.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15643083382401597307.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17495044941485528406.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15643083382401597307.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17495044941485528406.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35292e+10,0.438211,12284,1531,26,17464,320,371,23170,48,675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((i3.u9.p27==0)&&((i11.i1.u35.p112==1)||((i1.u4.p10==0)&&(i6.i1.u50.p62==1))))) + E((AF((i3.u8.p37==0)) + A((((i7.i0.u25.p81==1)||(i4...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E((!(EG(!((i3.u8.p37==0)))) + !((E(!(!(!(EG(!((i13.u42.p184==0)))))) U (!((((i7.i0.u25.p81==1)|...430
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t73, t77, t86, i0.t69, i0.t65, i0.u14.t72, i0.u16.t68, i1.u4.t92, i2.u6.t89, i3.t79, i3.u11.t...502
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,27.7621,705776,1,0,1.43199e+06,341,2316,1.87952e+06,241,839,1534969
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 173 transition count 151
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 153 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 153 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 153 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 62 rules in 7 ms. Remains 144 /176 variables (removed 32) and now considering 121/151 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2025-05-29 18:07:21] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:07:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 250 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 397 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 16/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 26000 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 38/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 120/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 56028ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56029ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/176 places, 121/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56435 ms. Remains : 144/176 places, 121/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17062280228055533923.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4112498448370039146.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17062280228055533923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4112498448370039146.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25161e+10,1.22794,29340,2,15328,5,95250,6,0,698,135256,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(EX((p120==0))) + AX(AF(((p5==0)&&(p3==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY((EY(Init) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p120==0)))))))),!(((p5==0)&&(p3==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t35, t36, t38, t41, t44, t47, t52, t55, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, ...306
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 117/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,24.938,571092,1,0,334,2.68657e+06,274,160,4357,2.6944e+06,348
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 151/151 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 173 transition count 151
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 152 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 152 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 152 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 64 rules in 6 ms. Remains 143 /176 variables (removed 33) and now considering 120/151 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2025-05-29 18:08:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:08:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 197 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 296 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 14/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 6/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 7/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 15634 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 30/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 45665ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45666ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/176 places, 120/151 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45968 ms. Remains : 143/176 places, 120/151 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4493538766800855959.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17764621453809849794.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4493538766800855959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17764621453809849794.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,1.03742,26700,2,14564,5,87722,6,0,693,117611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,1.04295,26700,1,0,6,87722,7,1,844,117611,1
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 458039 ms.

BK_STOP 1748542170116

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r030-smll-174853813100001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-01.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;