Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r021-smll-174853770000004.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BlocksWorld-PT-01, examination is Liveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r021-smll-174853770000004
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME Liveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748541694814

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=Liveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=BlocksWorld-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
Liveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, Liveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 172 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Transformed 109 places.
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Transformed 181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [pred_on_table_0, pred_arm_empty_0, pred_on_table_1, pred_on_table_2, pred_on_table_3, pred_on_table_4, pred_on_table_5, pred_on_table_6, pred_on_table_7, pred_on_table_8]
[2025-05-29 18:01:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 109 places and 181 transitions and 896 arcs in 399 ms.
Discarding 9 transitions out of 181. Remains 172
Built sparse matrix representations for Structural reductions in 14 ms.17954KB memory used
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 181/181 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 62 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 181/181 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 109/109 places, 181/181 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 181/181 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 45 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 181/181 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:38] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 390 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:01:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 349 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 813 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:01:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 210 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/290 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved in 22298 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/109 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 7/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 161/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 16/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 289/290 variables, and 381 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/179 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 53159ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 53181ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 1 : 109/109 places, 163/181 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 481 edges and 109 vertex of which 100 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 31 ms. Remains 100 /109 variables (removed 9) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 2 : 100/109 places, 163/181 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 2 iterations and 54384 ms. Remains : 100/109 places, 163/181 transitions.
Random walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 7157 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=174 )
Random directed walk for 1250001 steps, including 0 resets, run took 4589 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=272 )
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 19 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 160 ms returned sat
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 19 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 160 ms returned sat
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 1 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 173 ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 181/181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 181/181 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 318 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 537 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:02:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/290 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved in 18630 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/109 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 7/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 161/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 16/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 48933ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 48936ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
FORMULA Liveness FALSE TECHNIQUES QUASILIVENESS_TEST
Total runtime 117089 ms.

BK_STOP 1748541814596

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ Liveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BlocksWorld-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="Liveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BlocksWorld-PT-01, examination is Liveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r021-smll-174853770000004"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BlocksWorld-PT-01.tgz
mv BlocksWorld-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "Liveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "Liveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' Liveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME Liveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;