Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r016-smll-174853764200001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BlocksWorld-PT-01, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r016-smll-174853764200001
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2024-15
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748541555968

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BlocksWorld-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 17:59:18] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 17:59:18] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 156 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Transformed 109 places.
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Transformed 181 transitions.
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [pred_on_table_0, pred_arm_empty_0, pred_on_table_1, pred_on_table_2, pred_on_table_3, pred_on_table_4, pred_on_table_5, pred_on_table_6, pred_on_table_7, pred_on_table_8]
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 109 places and 181 transitions and 896 arcs in 374 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 34 ms.
Support contains 92 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 181/181 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 181/181 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 29 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 418 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 17:59:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 17:59:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 396 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 883 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 17:59:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 17:59:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 165 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/290 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved in 21005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/109 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 7/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 180/289 variables, 109/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 14/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 161/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 16/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 289/290 variables, and 385 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/179 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51840ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 51868ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/109 places, 163/181 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 52827 ms. Remains : 109/109 places, 163/181 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 100 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:12] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 100 places (down from 81) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 3544 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 16/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/99 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved in 232 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 88/263 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 0 unsolved in 45 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 303ms problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 16 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 100 places (down from 64) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 33 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:00:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 320 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 487 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:00:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13375 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43640ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43645ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44188 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4166368980127322761.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16165713753029767141.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4166368980127322761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16165713753029767141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9409950487906167692.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9409950487906167692.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9409950487906167692.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9409950487906167692.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9409950487906167692.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 226 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6509493923716017064.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4636318737753970572.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6509493923716017064.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4636318737753970572.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 401 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 626 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:02:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13716 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 44009ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44013ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44651 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13197523390832818542.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2812215879838062087.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13197523390832818542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2812215879838062087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10811929789044991829.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10811929789044991829.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10811929789044991829.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10811929789044991829.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10811929789044991829.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 234 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16133054871022400935.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14289335766215673170.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16133054871022400935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14289335766215673170.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:03:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:03:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 319 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 505 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:03:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43741ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44252 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11636610300904735630.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17711591697810108640.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11636610300904735630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17711591697810108640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2407431869756192888.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2407431869756192888.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2407431869756192888.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2407431869756192888.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2407431869756192888.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 122 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11424809043357018431.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11377836011080623457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11424809043357018431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11377836011080623457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 354 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 512 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:05:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43691ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43692ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44215 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8539292111722350664.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6118953749651318276.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8539292111722350664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6118953749651318276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12844231731463075761.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12844231731463075761.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12844231731463075761.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12844231731463075761.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12844231731463075761.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 242 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6188582793850414280.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7306115696141019815.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6188582793850414280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7306115696141019815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 533 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:07:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13625 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43839ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43841ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44385 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11500178456982437770.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:07:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7650626579158936395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11500178456982437770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7650626579158936395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph146622499195611455.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph146622499195611455.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph146622499195611455.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph146622499195611455.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph146622499195611455.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 238 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7429057885048061075.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6619745441696263187.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7429057885048061075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6619745441696263187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:08:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:08:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 266 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 443 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:08:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13784 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43980ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43981ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44430 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10553244970734753599.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14264690955692525130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10553244970734753599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14264690955692525130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14128487284874297916.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14128487284874297916.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14128487284874297916.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14128487284874297916.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14128487284874297916.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 242 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14510327815669882070.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3260479927540761958.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14510327815669882070.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3260479927540761958.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 276 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 483 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:10:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 13684 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43876ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43880ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44404 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
RANDOM walk for 3014 steps (0 resets) in 34 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18141405600558746371.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2128021988325998791.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18141405600558746371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2128021988325998791.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 393 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:11:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 10023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40216ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40650 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6769271770190621286.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality60172806416315626.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6769271770190621286.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality60172806416315626.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3228109786026538765.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3228109786026538765.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3228109786026538765.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3228109786026538765.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3228109786026538765.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 234 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9365796268452041676.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9543494724391095115.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9365796268452041676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9543494724391095115.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 308 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 456 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 11064 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41216ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41692 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15802496145573543085.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11222311685778042968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15802496145573543085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11222311685778042968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11322172945765973911.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11322172945765973911.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11322172945765973911.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11322172945765973911.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11322172945765973911.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 234 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4594661165153854506.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4227616467900190262.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4594661165153854506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4227616467900190262.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:14:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:14:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 288 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 407 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:14:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 10676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40834ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40835ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41246 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7652997092766634049.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4938474789173043881.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7652997092766634049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4938474789173043881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1666821815472324286.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1666821815472324286.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1666821815472324286.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1666821815472324286.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1666821815472324286.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 274 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 70 labels/synchronizations in 23 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2825108290992164217.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5881148618687962836.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2825108290992164217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5881148618687962836.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:16:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 11787 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41932ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41933ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42325 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality699296613090645676.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3178518043478618026.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality699296613090645676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3178518043478618026.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3412470674417891706.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3412470674417891706.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3412470674417891706.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3412470674417891706.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3412470674417891706.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 234 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2672826943058494269.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7102070062068427198.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2672826943058494269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7102070062068427198.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 313 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 10623 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/100 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/262 variables, 100/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 161/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/263 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40771ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40772ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41103 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17670399217437649842.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15008435850781475578.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17670399217437649842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15008435850781475578.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8168816671099925027.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8168816671099925027.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8168816671099925027.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8168816671099925027.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8168816671099925027.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 242 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8180613134467083428.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10109053504912023277.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8180613134467083428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10109053504912023277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2445907795147674800.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2445907795147674800.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2445907795147674800.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2445907795147674800.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2445907795147674800.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 296 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17520529089719299703.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5902444205946869650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17520529089719299703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5902444205946869650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.14573e+06,654.642,9986144,2,885570,5,3.31647e+07,6,0,614,2.62393e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((E(((gu12.pred_clear_1<=1)&&(!((gu9.pred_on_37<=gu9.pred_holding_8)||(gu14.pred_on_12<=gu14.pred_on_57)))) U (gi0.gu0.pred_holding_6>...291
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((gu14.pred_on_57>=1)||(gu6.pred_on_table_7<=gu6.pred_on_34))) * E(((gu12.pred_clear_1<=1)...450
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/71/48
(forward)formula 0,1,949.329,10385572,1,0,21,4.35198e+07,38,9,3727,2.62393e+07,19
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:46:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2025-05-29 18:46:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:46:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:46:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 430 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 669 ms
[2025-05-29 18:46:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 48 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:46:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14026651438397772512.gal : 123 ms
[2025-05-29 18:46:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1695156326052032206.ctl : 39 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14026651438397772512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1695156326052032206.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.14573e+06,175.888,2369284,2,320418,5,4.86051e+06,6,0,566,6.04729e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,447.751,4535060,1,0,5,1.38453e+07,11,1,1928,7.98688e+06,3
FORMULA BlocksWorld-PT-01-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((gu1.pred_on_17<=gmissing.pred_on_table_5) * AF((AF((gu7.pred_on_64>gu7.pred_on_46)) * (gu15.pred_clear_4<=gu8.pred_holding_3)))) U ((...496
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,((gu1.pred_on_17<=gmissing.pred_on_table_5) * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((gu7.pred_on_64>gu7.pred_on_46)...1107
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 161/0/2

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BlocksWorld-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BlocksWorld-PT-01, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r016-smll-174853764200001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BlocksWorld-PT-01.tgz
mv BlocksWorld-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;