About the Execution of 2024-gold for AutoFlight-PT-05b
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
15695.250 | 12887.00 | 25437.00 | 94.80 | F | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r014-tall-174853743800323.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool gold2024
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r014-tall-174853743800323
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME StableMarking
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748549369166
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2024
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Transformed 482 places.
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Transformed 480 transitions.
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 20:09:30] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 482 places and 480 transitions and 1120 arcs in 182 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 286 places are NOT stable. Took 15 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (163 resets) in 2055 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 86/196 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 86/86 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 480 rows 482 cols
[2025-05-29 20:09:31] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 22 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 86/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 205/291 variables, 12/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 205/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 185/476 variables, 21/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 185/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 6/482 variables, 1/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 6/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 480/962 variables, 482/998 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/962 variables, 0/998 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 962/962 variables, and 998 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 5046 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 482/482 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 482/482 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 86/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 205/291 variables, 12/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 205/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 166 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 11/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 185/476 variables, 21/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 185/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2025-05-29 20:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/526 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/526 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 6/482 variables, 1/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 6/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2025-05-29 20:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-29 20:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10148ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 86 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 480/480 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 156 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 156 transitions
Performed 156 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 156
Iterating post reduction 0 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 482 transition count 324
Reduce places removed 156 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 22 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 22 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 188 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 326 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 316 transition count 292
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 316 transition count 243
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 267 transition count 243
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 474 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 245 transition count 221
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 245 transition count 209
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 233 transition count 209
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 184 transition count 160
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 184 transition count 157
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 184 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 164 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 662 place count 163 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 681 place count 151 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 144 transition count 129
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 144 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 712 place count 132 transition count 117
Applied a total of 712 rules in 93 ms. Remains 132 /482 variables (removed 350) and now considering 117/480 (removed 363) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 103 ms. Remains : 132/482 places, 117/480 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 788 steps (0 resets) in 42 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 0/86 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 197 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 11645 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1748549382053
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="gold2024"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool gold2024"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r014-tall-174853743800323"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;