Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853730000778.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is BART-COL-010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853730000778
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 608K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 189K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748666728231

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BART-COL-010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 04:45:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 04:45:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 04:45:29] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-05-31 04:45:29] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 678 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Detected 3 constant HL places corresponding to 10373 PT places.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Imported 4 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 12833 PT places and 1.407229512E10 transition bindings in 60 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 4 places and 7 transitions 26 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:45:30] [INFO ] Skeletonized 1 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 15 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
All 16 properties of the HLPN use transition enablings in a way that makes the skeleton too coarse.
Domain [distance(41), speed(6), distance(41)] of place NewDistTable breaks symmetries in sort distance
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :trainid
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :trainid domain size was 10
Arc [1:1*[(MOD (ADD $tsp 1) 6), $ds2]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort speed
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 10619 places and 323 transitions 601 arcs in 1187 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 10215 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 10487 places and 121 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 7299 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6305 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13651ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13665ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13999 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 20 to 15
RANDOM walk for 40010 steps (8 resets) in 286 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 1/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 249 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/334 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 14 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 132 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Applied a total of 46 rules in 15 ms. Remains 109 /132 variables (removed 23) and now considering 179/202 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 179/288 variables, 109/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/288 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 288/288 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 5002 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 179/288 variables, 109/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 143/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/288 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 288/288 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 4624 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9638ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9639ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/132 places, 179/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9754 ms. Remains : 109/132 places, 179/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17259484771145298558.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1688567136707241621.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17259484771145298558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1688567136707241621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.7455e+13,0.253722,11900,2,1190,5,50698,6,0,618,41102,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((!(E(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainSt...2000
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((!(E(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainSt...2063
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9906603153261169722.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9906603153261169722.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9906603153261169722.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9906603153261169722.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9906603153261169722.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 23 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5630858254108632366.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2343741344109079054.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5630858254108632366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2343741344109079054.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.7455e+13,4.12265,109756,376,166,152670,22032,390,621203,101,118920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((!(E(((((((((i4.i0.u19.TrainState_61>=1)||(i5.i1.u40.TrainState_191>=1))||((i4.i1.u4.TrainState_63>=1)||(i4.i2.u35.TrainState_18...2762
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((!(E(((((((((i4.i0.u19.TrainState_61>=1)||(i5.i1.u40.TrainState_191>=1))||((i4.i1.u...2825
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:46:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12705ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12706ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12823 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2922029197697960711.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10361630119026040216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2922029197697960711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10361630119026040216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.278403,13112,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((TrainState_0>=1) U A((E((TrainState_42>=1) U ((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)...5816
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((((((((TrainState_42>=1)||(TrainState_61>=1))||((TrainState_65>=1)||(Trai...29680
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 178/0/24
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 200/0/2
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18164640460053329490.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18164640460053329490.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18164640460053329490.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18164640460053329490.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18164640460053329490.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 55 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4852307978592928512.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7702052793922232508.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4852307978592928512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7702052793922232508.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,4.27908,105736,475,133,150446,25522,441,516976,88,142400,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i0.i0.u2.TrainState_0>=1) U A((E((i0.i1.u0.TrainState_42>=1) U ((((((((i6.i2.u14.TrainState_61>=1)||(i7.i2.u41.TrainState_191>=1))||((...8269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((((((((i0.i1.u0.TrainState_42>=1)||(i6.i2.u14.TrainState_61>=1))||((i6.i1...42127
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6794 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12933ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12934ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13047 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9565701657649577111.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16525259671406261621.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9565701657649577111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16525259671406261621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.266646,13112,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(!(E(A((TrainState_42>=1) U (((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainSta...2027
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(E(!((E(!((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=...2507
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 165/0/37
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 178/187/24
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4029317591574134336.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4029317591574134336.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4029317591574134336.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4029317591574134336.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4029317591574134336.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2326810144610994312.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17035724022683985482.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2326810144610994312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17035724022683985482.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,6.08711,135248,453,210,180846,19037,423,819899,127,83513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(!(E(A((i2.u0.TrainState_42>=1) U (((((i3.i1.u28.TrainState_131>=1)||(i6.i0.u27.TrainState_130>=1))||((i6.i0.u27.TrainState_175>=1)...2716
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(E(!((E(!((((((i3.i1.u28.TrainState_131>=1)||(i6.i0.u27.TrainState_130>=1))||((i6.i0.u27.TrainSt...3352
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 44 edges and 132 vertex of which 6 / 132 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 117 transition count 187
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 117 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 115 transition count 185
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 110 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 110 transition count 180
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 107 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 107 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 104 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 104 transition count 174
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 101 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 101 transition count 171
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 99 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 99 transition count 169
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 97 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 97 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 96 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 96 transition count 166
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 89 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 89 transition count 158
Applied a total of 78 rules in 40 ms. Remains 89 /132 variables (removed 43) and now considering 158/202 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/246 variables, 89/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/247 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 3417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/246 variables, 89/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 122/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/247 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 3167 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6593ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6593ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/132 places, 158/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6726 ms. Remains : 89/132 places, 158/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12613348853615845454.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12157945612820010715.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12613348853615845454.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12157945612820010715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40056e+13,0.753065,24312,2,970,5,119979,6,0,516,117268,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_57<1)&&(TrainState_110<1))&&((Tr...1911
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState...1954
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/13572/157
(forward)formula 0,1,1.09541,24440,1,0,5,119979,19,0,3685,117268,8
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 132 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 131 transition count 201
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 197
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 127 /132 variables (removed 5) and now considering 197/202 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 161/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 5976 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12260ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12260ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12380 ms. Remains : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6558512723935617838.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18060535309484399111.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6558512723935617838.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18060535309484399111.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.25068e+14,0.20929,10648,2,1388,5,43669,6,0,708,30048,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_57<1)&&(TrainState_110<1))&...3458
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))...3522
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.99583,57836,1,0,6,302765,15,0,4282,199147,5
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-31 04:49:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:49:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6898 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6047 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12956ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12957ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13055 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2340781132769796733.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10595773167048426303.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2340781132769796733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10595773167048426303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.284034,13112,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((TrainState_42>=1) + AF(((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_1...6314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((TrainState_42>=1) + !(EG(!(((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_1...12145
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 165/0/37
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 141/0/61
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,19.5341,450912,1,0,14,2.65906e+06,39,7,5363,2.14058e+06,21
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 132 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 131 transition count 201
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 197
Applied a total of 10 rules in 14 ms. Remains 127 /132 variables (removed 5) and now considering 197/202 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6406 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 161/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12479ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12480ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12594 ms. Remains : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7922284222281575920.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5416835389751938866.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7922284222281575920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5416835389751938866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.25068e+14,0.214314,10776,2,1388,5,43669,6,0,708,30048,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E((E(EG((TrainState_0>=1)) U (((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainS...5102
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((E(EG((TrainState_0>=1)) U (((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainStat...5154
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,3.70973,98264,1,0,38,507034,26,28,4170,440905,34
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 129 /132 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-31 04:50:34] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:50:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 6559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 6087 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12654ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12657ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12761 ms. Remains : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15915222097095086493.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17768936769767447870.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15915222097095086493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17768936769767447870.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94361e+14,0.306654,13604,2,1410,5,62263,6,0,718,42252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((AX(((TrainState_0>=1)||((TrainState_0>=1)&&((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=...1612
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(EX(!(((TrainState_0>=1)||((TrainState_0>=1)&&((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))|...1663
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.8941,242352,1,0,12,1.37684e+06,23,4,4414,1.26861e+06,8
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6861 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6079 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12953ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12953ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13065 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13292345565460806267.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14403645172759235050.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13292345565460806267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14403645172759235050.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.285214,13124,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((!(EG((TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_5...2185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((!(EG((TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(T...2237
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph651982159856892080.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph651982159856892080.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph651982159856892080.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph651982159856892080.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph651982159856892080.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15813150657025548679.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:51:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7155499426801847226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15813150657025548679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7155499426801847226.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,4.01093,91552,398,210,133768,21369,432,461190,123,93584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((!(EG((i2.u3.TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((i2.u3.TrainState_61<1)&&(i2.u4.TrainState_65<1))&&((i2.u3.TrainState_53<1)&&(i3.i0.u8.Tra...3073
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((!(EG((i2.u3.TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((i2.u3.TrainState_61<1)&&(i2.u4.TrainState_65<1))&&((i2...3125
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:52:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 7095 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6364 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13469ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13588 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3320431459772251294.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16051145243303206358.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3320431459772251294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16051145243303206358.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.292731,13108,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainState_195>=1...3923
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(T...7898
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,7.11606,182568,1,0,6,1.1139e+06,25,1,4558,663684,8
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:52:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6791 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13071ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13171 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10365599326716269777.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1563675514834850003.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10365599326716269777.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1563675514834850003.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.295121,13100,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(EG(!(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_57<1)&&(TrainState_110<1)...5765
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,EG(!(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((Tra...5847
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 34/0/168
(forward)formula 0,0,6.33252,162100,1,0,15,834684,36,5,4874,727643,18
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:52:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:52:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 7123 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13581ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13582ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13689 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15040151281264694237.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10030378005079720814.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15040151281264694237.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10030378005079720814.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.296712,13072,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainState_177>=...9563
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(...22425
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3023592770963736235.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3023592770963736235.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3023592770963736235.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3023592770963736235.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3023592770963736235.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2619509646591036324.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:53:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12218845675853698793.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2619509646591036324.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12218845675853698793.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,26.6484,396248,486,199,572776,26308,386,1.9799e+06,119,130114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((((((i0.u13.TrainState_131>=1)||(i0.u46.TrainState_130>=1))||((i0.u46.TrainState_175>=1)||(i2.i0.i1.u36.TrainState_178>=1)))||(((i4....12621
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((((((i0.u13.TrainState_131>=1)||(i0.u46.TrainState_130>=1))||((i0.u46.TrainState_175>=1)||(i2...29577
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 90 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 90 transition count 160
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 90 /132 variables (removed 42) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-31 04:54:05] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 3681 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 124/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 3446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7238 ms. Remains : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability782155592510268637.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6376047434108943032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability782155592510268637.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6376047434108943032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.55793e+13,0.203389,10096,2,981,5,39107,6,0,523,33611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(!(E(EG((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainSta...654
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),EG((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)...702
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,9.32116,201620,1,0,175,1.06328e+06,23,114,2896,1.28363e+06,176
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 132 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 131 transition count 201
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 197
Applied a total of 10 rules in 6 ms. Remains 127 /132 variables (removed 5) and now considering 197/202 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6693 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 197/324 variables, 127/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 161/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6196 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12898ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12898ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13006 ms. Remains : 127/132 places, 197/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13580018653915626720.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12846319856633798195.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13580018653915626720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12846319856633798195.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.25068e+14,0.215404,10640,2,1388,5,43669,6,0,708,30048,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((TrainState_0>=1)) * EG((((!(E(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_...7389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U (TrainState_0>=1))),(((!(E(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<...7450
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/13659/158
(forward)formula 0,1,2.86147,75748,1,0,13,400912,34,7,5579,302761,19
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-31 04:54:38] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:54:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6906 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13295ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13295ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13400 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15442169160894329250.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3961894385309581329.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15442169160894329250.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3961894385309581329.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.29657,13104,2,1443,5,59658,6,0,733,37980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((E((EX(((TrainState_0>=1)&&(((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_...5665
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E((EX(((TrainState_0>=1)&&(((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(T...5716
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10134586979849585842.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10134586979849585842.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10134586979849585842.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10134586979849585842.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10134586979849585842.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16688192151573136743.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4653739489914325929.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16688192151573136743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4653739489914325929.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,10.809,224024,541,199,293267,33893,403,1.46199e+06,121,163992,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((E((EX(((u2.TrainState_0>=1)&&(((((i6.u14.TrainState_131>=1)||(i5.u45.TrainState_130>=1))||((i5.u45.TrainState_175>=1)||(i2.u30.Train...7399
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E((EX(((u2.TrainState_0>=1)&&(((((i6.u14.TrainState_131>=1)||(i5.u45.TrainState_130>=1))||((i5.u4...7450
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 100 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 170
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 73 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 73 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 69 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 69 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 66 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 63 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 63 transition count 133
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 60 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 60 transition count 130
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 57 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 57 transition count 127
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 54 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 52 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 52 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 50 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 50 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 49 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 49 transition count 119
Applied a total of 166 rules in 21 ms. Remains 49 /132 variables (removed 83) and now considering 119/202 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 04:55:51] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 04:55:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:55:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1536 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1505 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3135 ms. Remains : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11193578859034295035.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5571802189332451968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11193578859034295035.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5571802189332451968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.21795e+10,0.060602,5852,2,530,5,14447,6,0,318,10909,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((TrainState_42<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((TrainState_42<1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.204162,9692,1,0,9,36615,10,2,1658,23024,5
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4421203365743407168.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4421203365743407168.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4421203365743407168.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4421203365743407168.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4421203365743407168.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7812834261927788092.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 04:55:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10972501462537598080.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7812834261927788092.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10972501462537598080.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,4.70827,108720,431,210,159889,20582,413,487275,125,95406,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((!(E(((((((((i2.u7.TrainState_61>=1)||(i7.i1.u50.TrainState_191>=1))||((i2.u7.TrainState_63>=1)||(i9.i1.u49.TrainState_189>=1)))...2730
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((!(E(((((((((i2.u7.TrainState_61>=1)||(i7.i1.u50.TrainState_191>=1))||((i2.u7.Train...2793
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 140 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9605261576945316194.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17584284089055178975.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9605261576945316194.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17584284089055178975.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.30152,17184,1454,12,26746,337,473,16084,5,279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((!(E(((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.TrainState_61>=1)||(trainidspeeddistance191.TrainState_191>=1))||((trainidspeeddistance63.Tr...4063
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((!(E(((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.TrainState_61>=1)||(trainidspeeddistance191.Tra...4126
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
(forward)formula 0,0,122.685,2200936,1,0,3.78568e+06,1045,2664,5.40786e+06,25,4075,3596404
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((trainidspeeddistance0.TrainState_0>=1) U A((E((trainidspeeddistance42.TrainState_42>=1) U ((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.TrainState_61...11847
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((((((((trainidspeeddistance42.TrainState_42>=1)||(trainidspeeddistance61....60281
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
(forward)formula 1,0,265.755,2891592,1,0,6.51398e+06,1045,2668,1.11983e+07,25,4075,3398071
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((EG(!(E(A((trainidspeeddistance42.TrainState_42>=1) U (((((trainidspeeddistance131.TrainState_131>=1)||(trainidspeeddistance130.TrainS...4112
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(E(!((E(!((((((trainidspeeddistance131.TrainState_131>=1)||(trainidspeeddistance130.TrainState_1...4035
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-05-31 05:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-31 05:26:14] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2025-05-31 05:26:14] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-31 05:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14540376033144032658.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 05:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1332441207586793599.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14540376033144032658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1332441207586793599.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1745e+14,0.492322,17488,2,1443,5,70656,6,0,733,76114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(!(E(A((TrainState_42>=1) U (((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainSta...2027
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(E(!((E(!((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=...2507
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 165/0/37
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 178/187/24
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1052.02,14099516,1,0,55,7.90479e+07,11,33,3281,7.00454e+07,0
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(((!(EG((TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(TrainState_118<1)))&&(((TrainState_5...2185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((!(EG((TrainState_0<1))) * !(((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_65<1))&&((TrainState_53<1)&&(T...2237
(forward)formula 1,0,1111.69,14099900,1,0,55,7.90479e+07,23,33,3411,7.00454e+07,2
FORMULA BART-COL-010-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(!((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainState_177>=...9563
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(...22425
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BART-COL-010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BART-COL-010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853730000778"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BART-COL-010.tgz
mv BART-COL-010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;